Callsign_Vega

lehpron

Callsign_Vega

So despite turning up the resolution and detail BF3, BL2 and Batman remain CPU-intensive (not using the power of the graphics card), seeing how the CPU was left at stock 3.3GHz, I'm not surprised.  Skyrim is a balance of CPU- and GPU-intensive, while the the three were more GPU-intensive if they scale so well.  It shows that results may vary.  If someone tried WoW, the upcoming SimCity or upcoming Lost Planet 3; they can't refer to that graph without a reference (at least if they knew performance in one game matches another).

cisco0623 
so if EVGA i sellin this when will it be available on the site? tomorrow or a week after?

Considering that EVGA got first dibs on GTX690 and Asus came later, and since the Asus Titan was first to get accidentally published, I'd say EVGA's Titan either shows up in a few weeks or farther.  Thought even crossed my mind EVGA won't sell this at all, even back to default where I doubted it existed all over again.

I've noticed some folks will deny evidence if they don't like a conclusion, people shouldn't deny that we knew a lot more of previous generations by this point in time than of Titan.  But once I suggest a conclusion no one likes, what else is going to happen?  Many don't seem smart enough to simply draw another conclusion from the same evidence.  For instance, if there is just one vendor, then its that vendor that was able to keep everything tightly locked down.

Callsign_Vega 
You guys must not know how graphs work. This graph has all the information you need to determine the differences between the items being compared.

I've noticed the same reaction when I put heavy algebra in my posts or just type a lot, you just have to have faith those you're aiming your post at read it and understood.  For instance I understood, as well as the caveats and conditions.  It simple suggests whatever our performance is with those games if we had the previous champion hardware, then we can project how the challenger hardware could do for us.

gutcheck 
If that 3 way SLI vs quad 690 graph is true, in some games just 2 say SLI is going to be better then a 690 quad setup?  That's just crazy. 

Thus my bet in that other thread about Titan matching GTX690 might have a chance, the extra bandwidth per GPU compensated for lower rendering fill rate.  But that chart only showed a handful of games, some GPU-intensive that benefited from the extra features and others that clearly need the i7-3960X to be overclocked and nothing to do with using Titans.  

Bruno747 
It would not surprise me if its moved to the 19th, Part of me was wondering why they would do it on a Monday when almost all big stuff is launched on a Tuesday in the US. 

Today is President's day in the US, might have something to do with it.