No real news of one yet as far as I know.

NVidia said it is up to the card manufacturers, so if we bother EVGA enough they will do it most likely.  I'm pretty sure one is probably coming either way.

With all the new games coming out, 3gb of vram isnt enough for us 5760x1080 gamers. I cant even max out bf4 on 1920x1080 because of the vram. Im thinking we need a 780ti w/ 12gb vram.

lmah84

CAxVIPER

lmah84
NVidia said it is up to the card manufacturers, so if we bother EVGA enough they will do it most likely.  I'm pretty sure one is probably coming either way.

Do you have a link to back this up? Last I heard was they weren't allowing them to make cards with 6GB as they wanted that to stay exclusive to the titans. 

https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/632958/the-geforce-lounge/will-gtx780ti-get-a-custom-colling-/

Thanks 
 
EVGA lets make this happen! Classy with 6gb 

Count me in for 4 (Quad-SLI) GTX 780Ti Classified 6 Gb or 12Gb.   Wanting to do 2160p Surround on 50"-65"
 
Titans are useless to me because I will not utilize the compute features.
 
Thank you,
Monnie

Wait for MSI and ASUS to release their non-reference 780 Ti cards.  I expect someone will do 6GB.  I definitely wouldn't buy the 3GB one.

kubi07
Doubt they'll make it 6 gigs since they would lose money on the Titan because everyone would instead be buying the Ti.

 
Disagree,
 
People looking for a compute card and not ready for tesla/quadro eat up titans.
People looking for raw rendering power with no need for compute will eat up 780Ti's with 6 GB+ vram
 
Two different markets that can be satisfied=more revenue
 
Analogy: consumer wants a chevrolet sports car. Corvette(titan) is top tier but they need more cargo area and more than two seats so they look at the camaro. But, instead of getting the SS v-8(780Ti 3Gb) they want more performance so they get the ZL-1 supercharged v-8(Classified 780Ti 6Gb). 
 
Thank you,
Monnie

Zephmeister
An example of EVGA making a custom card in the current series is the 4GB version of the 770. The reference specification only shows it with 2GB, so it is possible EVGA would make a 6GB version. But what would be the price hike for double RAM? $800 for 780 Ti 6GB? $900-$950 for Ti Classy 6GB?

Add $25 for every GB added. That is about the going rate right now for GPU DDR5. So something along the lines for $675 and probably $825

I also agree EVGA should make a 6GB GeForce GTX 780 Ti (at least a Classified Hydro Copper one). And 12GB shouldn't be off the table either. Battlefield 4 uses 5.1GB at 4K. 4K Surround will need 12GB as well as 4K with the 200% resolution scaling set in Battlefield 4.

CAxVIPER
 
Add $25 for every GB added. That is about the going rate right now for GPU DDR5. So something along the lines for $675 and probably $825

You might've had a typo on that, did you mean $775? Because reference Ti is $700. Also the 780 ref -> 780 Classy is a $80 price increase so $855-860 for Ti Classy 6GB?

fantony
3gb vram is not enough for me

Here's is the recent answer from JacobF the product manager specfically on a 6GB 780Ti when a mockup image was discovered....
 
"Should clarify some more, didn't realize that picture actually existed on our server and will be removed, and had to look at some history to find the origin. Actually if you look at the date this image was made way back in July. It was a part that was reserved but never made it to market and there are no plans to ever bring it to market. In fact it never existed in an actual product form."
 post# 24
http://forums.evga.com/tm.aspx?m=2052612#

This is so upsetting to hear that this is Vram capping BF4 in 5760x1080.  Now I see why my FPS was acting up in surround on ultra/high.  Reason why I bought the dam card in the first place was for it not to be Vram capped like the 680 2GB HC was with BF3.  You would think you made the right move for $800 (780 Classy HC) but not the case.  Do I just pay shipping for a ref 780 Ti since I don't need to pay the difference (step-up) or just wait for Maxwell and sell this card w/e I get for it OR give the birdy to Nvidia and move to AMD camp for the screwing around tactic which hurts the consumer while the 2 big e-peens are showing off their guns.

Just lower the settings and be done with it. There is no god given right to use the ultra/high setting and BF4 is just a game not worth spending money over.
Keep the HC and buy new when you really need more vram, as in you already play on low settings but need more.
Only option is to get the titan as i dont se AMD 290X as option until they fix the crappy cooler they put on the R9-series.
If you paid 800 another 199 is nothing when you already was willing to put up to mutch for a 780 in nicer dress anyway, absolutely not when titan offer so mutch more of what you have use for.

MonnieRock

gtxjackbauer
This is so upsetting to hear that this is Vram capping BF4 in 5760x1080.  Now I see why my FPS was acting up in surround on ultra/high.  Reason why I bought the dam card in the first place was for it not to be Vram capped like the 680 2GB HC was with BF3.

 
You are a fine example of the result from people spewing out authoritative posts of  "No one needs more than 3 gb of vram" "More than 3GB is stupid" "I have never seen more than 2gb used, 3gb is overkill" etc..... when in fact they have no real world experience  with surround gaming and / or 4k gaming on their own as they sit there with their single 1080p monitor. The same people say you do not need anti-aliasing at high resolution or high resolution texture packs.
 
The one that really makes me laugh is " You do not need Anti-aliasing at 4k."  When they have no idea what is displaying 4k.   Sure at a 20" screen, 4k has 220.29 PPI and the"jaggies" would be so small but, on a 65", 4k has 67.78 PPI which is less than a 24" 1080p monitor that is 91.79 PPI.
 
People do not upgrade to expensive high end products only to reduce settings and / or image quality. They upgrade to to get better
 
 
 
gtxjackbauer, sorry you got the wrong card for your needs buddy.
 
Thank you,
Monnie

Thanks for understanding man.  You'd think for $800 you'd be able to run max no matter what with no Vram cap.  I could've gotten 2 680s 4GB in SLI and perform better.  At the same time what happened to the Nvidia that used to put a little extra on their Products so we wouldn't hit any cap till next generation?  I guess they got bought out or their share holders are bloodsucking money greedy -insert your own word here-.  This really hurts mentally, physically and financially.

tm95ern
Just lower the settings and be done with it. There is no god given right to use the ultra/high setting and BF4 is just a game not worth spending money over.
Keep the HC and buy new when you really need more vram, as in you already play on low settings but need more.
Only option is to get the titan as i dont se AMD 290X as option until they fix the crappy cooler they put on the R9-series.
If you paid 800 another 199 is nothing when you already was willing to put up to mutch for a 780 in nicer dress anyway, absolutely not when titan offer so mutch more of what you have use for.

You sir are wrong in your theory/opinion.  I don't really have an extra $200 lay around.  Maybe some of use who spend big is a once every few years type of deal and not often as others might think.  Found every piece of change in the couch type of deal.  Would you like to pay my difference? :)  I already lost value because of the price cuts.  I'd have to sell it less than $700 now since I bought it for $800 in august.  Also, my OC'd classy outperforms a stock titan but I think comes even with a stock 780 Ti.
 
You think they want to sell you a $800 GPU to play at lower settings?!  You think that's what they aim and strive for?!  They even advertise about surround and multi-monitor use.  Think about it sir before typing out nonsense.
 
Also, the Hydro Copper came with the GPU so that's not going to happen.
 

tm95ern 

LCRava I am going to pretend you did not post this at all. Who the hell would pay $700~$1000 per GPU to lower their settings?!?

Anyone that dont do their reserch has two options, either play at lower settings that is free of charge.
Buy another card and here it would have been the right one to wait for 290X, if not then the adopters fee is in place for titans.
Deliberately or not it is ALWAYS buyers responsibilty tio reserch, reserch and reserch before buying to make sure it is correct, but please keep your head in the sand if you refuse to accept that if you dont do it correct than you have the option to lower settings, there is NO e-pen in playing a game on highets setting on cards that aint suited for it in choosen resolution due to vram shortage.

 
Again, take your own advice and do some research before spewing misinformation to the masses.  You mad the mistake on buying a titan when you don't even use DP.  And your argument about waiting makes no sense.  You don't know what the market was going to be like down the road.  You can't wait or you'll always be waiting. 
 
You're missing the whole point and make no sense.