kaninjaIn other "news"
BF3PROIf this is true which it probably is not because I know for a fact there would be tons of officers dead on the ground and basically a warzone but if it is the WAR HAS BEGUN. It's true I edited this to say I have verified... those in Connecticut care more about other things than their rights.. Go to my home state of West Virginia and try this... bodies will be everywhere...
rcoev6BF3PROIf this is true which it probably is not because I know for a fact there would be tons of officers dead on the ground and basically a warzone but if it is the WAR HAS BEGUN. It's true I edited this to say I have verified... those in Connecticut care more about other things than their rights.. Go to my home state of West Virginia and try this... bodies will be everywhere... Makes me laugh. In our society today it would be a very short war. A shooting battle in our streets against the government is not going to be like COD or BF4, I enjoy those games but take it from someone who has seen combat it is not something you ever want to experience especially when your family is there standing next to you. #1 Our enemy is not stupid, you should not under estimate them. Why would they come to your home for confiscation? If you are an offender on their list they could just as easily pick you up at work or enroute, then march you to either your home to get what they want or to jail. The state and federal government has way too many ways to make your life very difficult without knocking on your door to take your gun. #2 Most who have the assault weapons they are looking for simply have too much too loose to fight what would be a very short fight. The "man" knocks on your door while you and the family are eating dinner, are you going to start a gun battle with them with your family in the background? #3 I am very well armed and received excellent training during my time in the Army and have kept up by taking tactical shooting classes at least twice a year along with quite a bit of shooting. But I know what my chances of walking away from a shooting confrontation with a prepared LE force serving a warrant to what they would assume to be a dangerous target = zero. Now give me time to prepare and a heads up of when they are coming, much better chances but that is not going to happen. Our only chance to stop this movement is the peaceful revolution we have during every election cycle. Way too many internet tough guys out there talking about being a patriot and taking on the government in a shooting battle, absolutely crazy.
candle_86thank god I live and Texas, and thank god Texas declared itself a sovereign state.
TweakedRegardless of whether CT is going door to door or not, I'm glad to live in a state that fully supports the second amendment and to live in a county where the Sheriff has already stated publicly that he will not enforce any law passed by congress that violates the second amendment.
Halo_003Where exactly do they define what they consider a 'long gun' to be? That description could be anything at least with how they're talking about it. With that, where do you draw the line? A .44 scoped can be a lot more accurate at range than some rifles, so I'm curious what all would be 'offending'. Second, no offense intended but you can't trust the word coming from public officials like that. Finally @ clo007, that bald dude at the end of the video is a bleeding image of Hitman.
wrinvertConn has a new law that starts the 4/1 that all gun transfers will need a state bg check. The law already passed required reg of all greater then 10rd mags and labeled assault rifles.