EVGA

So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards?

Page: << < ..678910.. > >> Showing page 7 of 19
Author
Samsander
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 113
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2015/05/21 06:09:28
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/22 09:37:33 (permalink)
NDiamond
just a quick update after using the beta bios.   Ive been playing elite dangerous in full screen mode, window mode, and 2560x1440 dsr mode, this is with air cooling.
 
window mode, with everything maxed except for bloom and supersampling, and my temp is being consistant in 40 to 50c - no crashes
 
full screen, same settings, 1 crash, had to task manager to return to desktop.  50c temp
 
dsr 2560x1440 - same settings, no crashes, but temps pushing mid 60c
 
so far, other than the 1 crash, mostly stable.
 


That BETA BIOS is just a downclock. And not a very effective one. It will crash less but still will crash because the downclock is a minor one.
It's not the BIOS we were hoping for.

I really hope this is not a design fault and the real BIOS fix will come soon that does not involve a more expensive FTW card to be downclocked to almost reference level.
Red46
New Member
  • Total Posts : 61
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2014/02/04 10:23:55
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/22 09:45:38 (permalink)
Today I got my second 980FTW from RMA and I must be really in bad luck with video cards, as this one behaves exactly like the one I sent in, black screen in games and 3dmark unless I use DRS or downclock it.
Samsander
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 113
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2015/05/21 06:09:28
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/22 10:37:56 (permalink)
Red46
Today I got my second 980FTW from RMA and I must be really in bad luck with video cards, as this one behaves exactly like the one I sent in, black screen in games and 3dmark unless I use DRS or downclock it.


I think we already confirmed this time after time that the FTW's are fubared.
We can only wait and see if EVGA can save the situation with a BIOS fix.
Vlada011
Omnipotent Enthusiast
  • Total Posts : 10257
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/03/25 00:14:05
  • Location: Belgrade-Serbia
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 11
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/22 10:49:33 (permalink)
Red46
Today I got my second 980FTW from RMA and I must be really in bad luck with video cards, as this one behaves exactly like the one I sent in, black screen in games and 3dmark unless I use DRS or downclock it.




You should done that and before, but now with second unstable card is really time...
If you recognize problematic series than ask other card, if they don't want to do that than find someone to drop clock on reference speed with BIOS and sell for GTX970 price and change manufacturer of graphic card. Series is recognized as problematic... It's not normal to someone say all of cards not work, but FTW series have more unstable models than others... Today many fault hardware are in shops and with all other series is risk, no reason to constant search for stable model in most problematic series. SC, Hybrid, SC ACX 2.0, Classified, all of them mostly contain stable cards. With FTW that is not case. 

i7-5820K 4.5GHz/RVE10-EK Monoblock/Dominator Platinum 2666/ASUS GTX1080Ti Poseidon/SBZxR /Samsung 970 EVO PLus 1TB/850 EVO 1TB /EVGA 1200P2/Lian Li PC-O11WXC/EK XRES D5 Revo 100 Glass/Coolstream PE360-Noctua NF-A12x25 PWM x3
http://www.evga.com
http://www.intel.com
http://www.nvidia.com
https://watercool.de
http://www.lian-li.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHMun5xiRe0
 
https://xdevs.com/guide/2080ti_kpe/#intro
https://www.evga.com/articles/01386/evga-sr-3-dark/
 
 
 

 
 
n3xuz
New Member
  • Total Posts : 64
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/04/24 14:51:24
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/22 10:50:37 (permalink)
well for funs tryed out to play on my 1080p monitor with the same overclock i achived on my 1440p monitor that i been playing on for a weeks w/o crashing, 10 minutes into a csgo game driver crash .... with 347.88 hopefully the new driver that is out has some changes but funny aswell i lost about 80fps in csgo, 1440p 300fps constant while 1080p was doing 220fps with the same setting only changed resolution im guessing gpu usage throttleing?
 
im sitting with the 980 Hydro Copper (having the same issues as the FTW cards, sent in already 2 cards for RMA)

[CPU: Intel i7-4790k @ 4.8GHz]
[MB: Asus Formula VII Hero ROG]
[GFX: EVGA Gefore GTX 980 Hydro Copper @ 1495/2000]
[RAM: Kingston Fury 1600MHz 16GB]
[Case: Fractal Define R5]
[SSD: 2xIntel 330 120GB Raid 0 + Samsung 850 Pro 1TB]
[Headphones: Beyerdynamic DT880 Pro 250ohm]
[Mic: Blue Snowball]
[DAC/AMP: Asus Xonar Essence One]
Samsander
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 113
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2015/05/21 06:09:28
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/22 11:11:04 (permalink)
n3xuz
well for funs tryed out to play on my 1080p monitor with the same overclock i achived on my 1440p monitor that i been playing on for a weeks w/o crashing, 10 minutes into a csgo game driver crash .... with 347.88 hopefully the new driver that is out has some changes but funny aswell i lost about 80fps in csgo, 1440p 300fps constant while 1080p was doing 220fps with the same setting only changed resolution im guessing gpu usage throttleing?
 
im sitting with the 980 Hydro Copper (having the same issues as the FTW cards, sent in already 2 cards for RMA)


You are crashing to desktop?
n3xuz
New Member
  • Total Posts : 64
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/04/24 14:51:24
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/22 12:56:18 (permalink)
im having dual Monitor setup but both screen goes complete black for a sec then comes back with that the driver crashed and restored so hard to say if its crash to desktop since i always has my desktop on screen 2 but since both screen goes black with driver crash message, think i have had some game to completly shutdown aswell 

[CPU: Intel i7-4790k @ 4.8GHz]
[MB: Asus Formula VII Hero ROG]
[GFX: EVGA Gefore GTX 980 Hydro Copper @ 1495/2000]
[RAM: Kingston Fury 1600MHz 16GB]
[Case: Fractal Define R5]
[SSD: 2xIntel 330 120GB Raid 0 + Samsung 850 Pro 1TB]
[Headphones: Beyerdynamic DT880 Pro 250ohm]
[Mic: Blue Snowball]
[DAC/AMP: Asus Xonar Essence One]
Samsander
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 113
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2015/05/21 06:09:28
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/22 14:16:41 (permalink)
n3xuz
im having dual Monitor setup but both screen goes complete black for a sec then comes back with that the driver crashed and restored so hard to say if its crash to desktop since i always has my desktop on screen 2 but since both screen goes black with driver crash message, think i have had some game to completly shutdown aswell 




This is not the same problem that we have with the FTW. What you have is a driver crash and restore.
What we have with the FTW is a complete system shutdown, even the test leds on the motherboard kick in because everything just restarts.
And it doesn't even recover if you simply restart. A complete power off is needed before you can boot again and get rid of the NO SIGNAL on the monitor.
post edited by Samsander - 2015/06/22 14:21:28
n3xuz
New Member
  • Total Posts : 64
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/04/24 14:51:24
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/22 15:04:54 (permalink)
Samsander
n3xuz
im having dual Monitor setup but both screen goes complete black for a sec then comes back with that the driver crashed and restored so hard to say if its crash to desktop since i always has my desktop on screen 2 but since both screen goes black with driver crash message, think i have had some game to completly shutdown aswell 




This is not the same problem that we have with the FTW. What you have is a driver crash and restore.
What we have with the FTW is a complete system shutdown, even the test leds on the motherboard kick in because everything just restarts.
And it doesn't even recover if you simply restart. A complete power off is needed before you can boot again and get rid of the NO SIGNAL on the monitor.




well then iam having more of crash to desktop while you have a complete powerfailure crash/shutdown

[CPU: Intel i7-4790k @ 4.8GHz]
[MB: Asus Formula VII Hero ROG]
[GFX: EVGA Gefore GTX 980 Hydro Copper @ 1495/2000]
[RAM: Kingston Fury 1600MHz 16GB]
[Case: Fractal Define R5]
[SSD: 2xIntel 330 120GB Raid 0 + Samsung 850 Pro 1TB]
[Headphones: Beyerdynamic DT880 Pro 250ohm]
[Mic: Blue Snowball]
[DAC/AMP: Asus Xonar Essence One]
Vlada011
Omnipotent Enthusiast
  • Total Posts : 10257
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/03/25 00:14:05
  • Location: Belgrade-Serbia
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 11
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/22 15:37:27 (permalink)
Samsander
n3xuz
im having dual Monitor setup but both screen goes complete black for a sec then comes back with that the driver crashed and restored so hard to say if its crash to desktop since i always has my desktop on screen 2 but since both screen goes black with driver crash message, think i have had some game to completly shutdown aswell 




This is not the same problem that we have with the FTW. What you have is a driver crash and restore.
What we have with the FTW is a complete system shutdown, even the test leds on the motherboard kick in because everything just restarts.
And it doesn't even recover if you simply restart. A complete power off is needed before you can boot again and get rid of the NO SIGNAL on the monitor.




That happen and with other unstable cards... not restarts...
Only sometimes lose signal when you uninstall or install driver and than need patience...
And you need to shut down on case button keeping 5sec... than after 2-3 min people enable PC continue with installation drivers.
Not every time. 

i7-5820K 4.5GHz/RVE10-EK Monoblock/Dominator Platinum 2666/ASUS GTX1080Ti Poseidon/SBZxR /Samsung 970 EVO PLus 1TB/850 EVO 1TB /EVGA 1200P2/Lian Li PC-O11WXC/EK XRES D5 Revo 100 Glass/Coolstream PE360-Noctua NF-A12x25 PWM x3
http://www.evga.com
http://www.intel.com
http://www.nvidia.com
https://watercool.de
http://www.lian-li.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHMun5xiRe0
 
https://xdevs.com/guide/2080ti_kpe/#intro
https://www.evga.com/articles/01386/evga-sr-3-dark/
 
 
 

 
 
Samsander
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 113
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2015/05/21 06:09:28
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/22 16:16:20 (permalink)
Vlada011
Samsander
n3xuz
im having dual Monitor setup but both screen goes complete black for a sec then comes back with that the driver crashed and restored so hard to say if its crash to desktop since i always has my desktop on screen 2 but since both screen goes black with driver crash message, think i have had some game to completly shutdown aswell 




This is not the same problem that we have with the FTW. What you have is a driver crash and restore.
What we have with the FTW is a complete system shutdown, even the test leds on the motherboard kick in because everything just restarts.
And it doesn't even recover if you simply restart. A complete power off is needed before you can boot again and get rid of the NO SIGNAL on the monitor.




That happen and with other unstable cards... not restarts...
Only sometimes lose signal when you uninstall or install driver and than need patience...
And you need to shut down on case button keeping 5sec... than after 2-3 min people enable PC continue with installation drivers.
Not every time. 




Why did I read this with Russian accent?
djmorgan
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 107
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2014/11/24 23:04:36
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/22 16:46:25 (permalink)
Hardware or software! those that think it hardware perhaps should read this, software is and does cause needed resets
 
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/847580/geforce-drivers/official-nvidia-353-30-whql-game-ready-display-driver-feedback-thread-released-2015-06-22-/
 
 
David

ASUS P6X58D Premium LGA1366 X58
Intel core I7 950 @3.68GHZ CPU
1 X EVGA GTX 980 FTW
12Gb Corsair TR3X3G1600C8D 1600MHz
Corsair H70 Water cooling
Corsair HX1000W PSU
Intel 240Gb 510 SSD
2 x Seagate ST31000524AS 1Tb @ 7200rpm
Dual 24" 144Hz 2Ms 1920 x 1080 monitors
Windows 7 Pro X64 SP1
wickedwayne
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 120
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2015/05/15 03:13:26
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/22 17:47:18 (permalink)
djmorgan
Hardware or software! those that think it hardware perhaps should read this, software is and does cause needed resets
 
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/847580/geforce-drivers/official-nvidia-353-30-whql-game-ready-display-driver-feedback-thread-released-2015-06-22-/
 
 
David




It's amazing that even with the official responses in this thread you are still adamant about blaming it on a driver issue. It's like you don't even read any comments here.
 
Also, you should probably read what those drivers have fixed in the changelog because you obviously didn't read those too. 
 
They didn't fix anything, literally.
 
 
Vlada011
Omnipotent Enthusiast
  • Total Posts : 10257
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/03/25 00:14:05
  • Location: Belgrade-Serbia
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 11
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/22 18:34:10 (permalink)
Samsander
Vlada011
Samsander
n3xuz
im having dual Monitor setup but both screen goes complete black for a sec then comes back with that the driver crashed and restored so hard to say if its crash to desktop since i always has my desktop on screen 2 but since both screen goes black with driver crash message, think i have had some game to completly shutdown aswell 




This is not the same problem that we have with the FTW. What you have is a driver crash and restore.
What we have with the FTW is a complete system shutdown, even the test leds on the motherboard kick in because everything just restarts.
And it doesn't even recover if you simply restart. A complete power off is needed before you can boot again and get rid of the NO SIGNAL on the monitor.




That happen and with other unstable cards... not restarts...
Only sometimes lose signal when you uninstall or install driver and than need patience...
And you need to shut down on case button keeping 5sec... than after 2-3 min people enable PC continue with installation drivers.
Not every time. 




Why did I read this with Russian accent?
 
 
 




 
You know what is Russian accent, b****?
You recognize accent in fonts, go to hell.

i7-5820K 4.5GHz/RVE10-EK Monoblock/Dominator Platinum 2666/ASUS GTX1080Ti Poseidon/SBZxR /Samsung 970 EVO PLus 1TB/850 EVO 1TB /EVGA 1200P2/Lian Li PC-O11WXC/EK XRES D5 Revo 100 Glass/Coolstream PE360-Noctua NF-A12x25 PWM x3
http://www.evga.com
http://www.intel.com
http://www.nvidia.com
https://watercool.de
http://www.lian-li.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHMun5xiRe0
 
https://xdevs.com/guide/2080ti_kpe/#intro
https://www.evga.com/articles/01386/evga-sr-3-dark/
 
 
 

 
 
Samsander
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 113
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2015/05/21 06:09:28
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/22 22:48:28 (permalink)
Vlada011
Samsander
Vlada011
Samsander
n3xuz
im having dual Monitor setup but both screen goes complete black for a sec then comes back with that the driver crashed and restored so hard to say if its crash to desktop since i always has my desktop on screen 2 but since both screen goes black with driver crash message, think i have had some game to completly shutdown aswell 




This is not the same problem that we have with the FTW. What you have is a driver crash and restore.
What we have with the FTW is a complete system shutdown, even the test leds on the motherboard kick in because everything just restarts.
And it doesn't even recover if you simply restart. A complete power off is needed before you can boot again and get rid of the NO SIGNAL on the monitor.




That happen and with other unstable cards... not restarts...
Only sometimes lose signal when you uninstall or install driver and than need patience...
And you need to shut down on case button keeping 5sec... than after 2-3 min people enable PC continue with installation drivers.
Not every time. 




Why did I read this with Russian accent?
 
 
 




 
You know what is Russian accent, b****?
You recognize accent in fonts, go to hell.


I was joking. But whatever.
It actually makes sense if I google translate it back from English to Russian.
NordicJedi
EVGA Forum Moderator
  • Total Posts : 12570
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2007/07/16 21:05:08
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 77
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/22 23:05:09 (permalink)
Let's take it down a notch, guys.  This is an important thread to many people, so let's please keep it on-topic.

6012mhz on L/N2 
5321mhz on L/N2
5091mhz on air
The Lightsaber
The Emperor Reborn
stalinx20
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 4977
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/01/03 08:56:23
  • Location: U.S., Michigan
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/23 03:20:00 (permalink)
wickedwayne
djmorgan
Hardware or software! those that think it hardware perhaps should read this, software is and does cause needed resets
 
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/847580/geforce-drivers/official-nvidia-353-30-whql-game-ready-display-driver-feedback-thread-released-2015-06-22-/
 
 
David




It's amazing that even with the official responses in this thread you are still adamant about blaming it on a driver issue. It's like you don't even read any comments here.
 
Also, you should probably read what those drivers have fixed in the changelog because you obviously didn't read those too. 
 
They didn't fix anything, literally.
 
 


I can't do anything but shake my head for those that thought that the latest drivers were actually going to fix the FTW. It's not. THis is not a driver issue, and never was a driver issue. Unstable card is unstable card. I'm not sure what it's going to take for the techs to "consider" the theory that the GPU is not getting enough voltage, or that the voltage is throttling (which some users have found out). WHen you have an unstable card, the drivers are going to fail no matter what you put on it. Hense the reason when you have unstable overclocks, your gpu's drivers crash.

As far as the voltage, I'm not even sure if the techs can provide more power to the card. I think it's peaked. If that is the case, your only resolution is down-clocking the card. Sorry. There is no way around it.
 
@ Vlada - Vlada, while I'm fully aware of where you are from, surely it was a misunderstanding when he asked if it was Russian. Simple mistake, we're all human here. Sometimes it's way too easy to take things out of context, especially on forums, I have a couple Serbian friends myself. I totally understand. Hope you have a good day.
post edited by stalinx20 - 2015/06/23 03:32:07

EVGA X79 Dark
2080 Black edition
980
EVGA 1000 gold PSU (Gold)
4820K CPU
16x G-skill
Samsander
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 113
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2015/05/21 06:09:28
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/23 03:33:47 (permalink)
stalinx20
wickedwayne
djmorgan
Hardware or software! those that think it hardware perhaps should read this, software is and does cause needed resets
 
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/847580/geforce-drivers/official-nvidia-353-30-whql-game-ready-display-driver-feedback-thread-released-2015-06-22-/
 
 
David




It's amazing that even with the official responses in this thread you are still adamant about blaming it on a driver issue. It's like you don't even read any comments here.
 
Also, you should probably read what those drivers have fixed in the changelog because you obviously didn't read those too. 
 
They didn't fix anything, literally.
 
 


I can't do anything but shake my head for those that thought that the latest drivers were actually going to fix the FTW. It's not. THis is not a driver issue, and never was a driver issue. Unstable card is unstable card. I'm not sure what it's going to take for the techs to "consider" the theory that the GPU is not getting enough voltage, or that the voltage is throttling (which some users have found out). WHen you have an unstable card, the drivers are going to fail no matter what you put on it. Hense the reason when you have unstable overclocks, your gpu's drivers crash.

As far as the voltage, I'm not even sure if the techs can provide more power to the card. I think it's peaked. If that is the case, your only resolution is down-clocking the card. Sorry. There is no way around it.




The voltage lock is probably not the issue though. Because even at 1.175 & 1.150v the card is stable at 1380Mhz if you run it at a constant 100% power draw. (I tested this by changing the voltages in the BIOS, anything below 1.150v was unstable at 1380Mhz and resulted in application crashing and a driver recovery, NOT a black screen BSOD).
It will crash though when the power draw starts going up high and down to the low draw (with any voltage). The problem is most likely the card not adjusting in time for those drastic power changes.
So 1.2v is more then enough if you ask me. I've seen people running at ~1500Mhz without touching the voltage on non FTW models.
 
Example: http://www.overclock.net/...lub/5070#post_23189477
post edited by Samsander - 2015/06/23 03:51:12
Vlada011
Omnipotent Enthusiast
  • Total Posts : 10257
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/03/25 00:14:05
  • Location: Belgrade-Serbia
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 11
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/23 04:24:00 (permalink)
I'm sorry because I say you something wrong, I didn't know you are joking and I'm allergic on Russia and their government and ideology.

i7-5820K 4.5GHz/RVE10-EK Monoblock/Dominator Platinum 2666/ASUS GTX1080Ti Poseidon/SBZxR /Samsung 970 EVO PLus 1TB/850 EVO 1TB /EVGA 1200P2/Lian Li PC-O11WXC/EK XRES D5 Revo 100 Glass/Coolstream PE360-Noctua NF-A12x25 PWM x3
http://www.evga.com
http://www.intel.com
http://www.nvidia.com
https://watercool.de
http://www.lian-li.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHMun5xiRe0
 
https://xdevs.com/guide/2080ti_kpe/#intro
https://www.evga.com/articles/01386/evga-sr-3-dark/
 
 
 

 
 
stalinx20
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 4977
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/01/03 08:56:23
  • Location: U.S., Michigan
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/23 04:26:17 (permalink)
Samsander
stalinx20
wickedwayne
djmorgan
Hardware or software! those that think it hardware perhaps should read this, software is and does cause needed resets
 
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/847580/geforce-drivers/official-nvidia-353-30-whql-game-ready-display-driver-feedback-thread-released-2015-06-22-/
 
 
David




It's amazing that even with the official responses in this thread you are still adamant about blaming it on a driver issue. It's like you don't even read any comments here.
 
Also, you should probably read what those drivers have fixed in the changelog because you obviously didn't read those too. 
 
They didn't fix anything, literally.
 
 


I can't do anything but shake my head for those that thought that the latest drivers were actually going to fix the FTW. It's not. THis is not a driver issue, and never was a driver issue. Unstable card is unstable card. I'm not sure what it's going to take for the techs to "consider" the theory that the GPU is not getting enough voltage, or that the voltage is throttling (which some users have found out). WHen you have an unstable card, the drivers are going to fail no matter what you put on it. Hense the reason when you have unstable overclocks, your gpu's drivers crash.

As far as the voltage, I'm not even sure if the techs can provide more power to the card. I think it's peaked. If that is the case, your only resolution is down-clocking the card. Sorry. There is no way around it.




The voltage lock is probably not the issue though. Because even at 1.175 & 1.150v the card is stable at 1380Mhz if you run it at a constant 100% power draw. (I tested this by changing the voltages in the BIOS, anything below 1.150v was unstable at 1380Mhz and resulted in application crashing and a driver recovery, NOT a black screen BSOD).
It will crash though when the power draw starts going up high and down to the low draw (with any voltage). The problem is most likely the card not adjusting in time for those drastic power changes.
So 1.2v is more then enough if you ask me. I've seen people running at ~1500Mhz without touching the voltage on non FTW models.
 
Example: http://www.overclock.net/...lub/5070#post_23189477


So, in a sense, it is a voltage issue... in order for the GPU to remain stable, it has to stay at a constant voltage (in your case you modified the bios to make the GPU run at 100% power draw...not sure if that's safe, but I bet you have a much hotter gpu, right? with it being stable, of course) I don't mean to sound specific or trying to be correct here, but, *Anything in which the application crashes, and/or driver recovery (leading up to, but not limited to BSOD) relates to the unit has in fact crashed and has to reset itself in order to acquire stabilization again, Due to the clocks trying to acquire the additional power, in this case the FTW.
 
1.2 for sure might be enough, but that is where the power is pushing "almost"  to Nvidia limitations. So, yes the voltage lock is "one of the reasons" the FTW is not running 100% stable. I'm pretty sure 1.25 is the cutoff point to where they are not allowed to achieve anymore. Needless to say that is probably why their first "BIOS fix" probably showed their attempt to lower the clocks rather than to increase the voltage.
post edited by stalinx20 - 2015/06/23 04:39:49

EVGA X79 Dark
2080 Black edition
980
EVGA 1000 gold PSU (Gold)
4820K CPU
16x G-skill
Ricksterbon
New Member
  • Total Posts : 24
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/01/30 11:23:36
  • Location: JHB, South Africa
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/23 05:00:54 (permalink)
PSU Brand?
Vlada011
Omnipotent Enthusiast
  • Total Posts : 10257
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/03/25 00:14:05
  • Location: Belgrade-Serbia
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 11
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/23 05:15:28 (permalink)
Many unstable cards but not all of them could become stable if someone could change voltage in BIOS for specific mode.
Example in situation when card need to work with full power and instead of 1.162V example to automatic card work on 1.200V.
But in other modes 325MHz, 650MHz, base clock voltage to stay same. I'm not sure is it that possible at all but than some cards could work normal on fabric speed.
But that need to be done in BIOS not with software, because they know to cause crash too and temps of cards will be higher at least 5C and zero possibility for OC.
Someone who understand and work with BIOS and write new BIOS maybe could help... Voltage need to stay same for all phases except for full load, for full load automatic to start with higher voltage than in original BIOS. Because keeping KBoost or some other option is not solution, temps are much higher...
It's enough to change Power Management in NVIDIA Control Panel from Adaptive on Performance and idle temps will be 55C not 35C and card will work always on base clock even in Google Chrome. 
 

i7-5820K 4.5GHz/RVE10-EK Monoblock/Dominator Platinum 2666/ASUS GTX1080Ti Poseidon/SBZxR /Samsung 970 EVO PLus 1TB/850 EVO 1TB /EVGA 1200P2/Lian Li PC-O11WXC/EK XRES D5 Revo 100 Glass/Coolstream PE360-Noctua NF-A12x25 PWM x3
http://www.evga.com
http://www.intel.com
http://www.nvidia.com
https://watercool.de
http://www.lian-li.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHMun5xiRe0
 
https://xdevs.com/guide/2080ti_kpe/#intro
https://www.evga.com/articles/01386/evga-sr-3-dark/
 
 
 

 
 
Samsander
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 113
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2015/05/21 06:09:28
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/23 05:27:49 (permalink)
stalinx20
Samsander
stalinx20
wickedwayne
djmorgan
Hardware or software! those that think it hardware perhaps should read this, software is and does cause needed resets
 
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/847580/geforce-drivers/official-nvidia-353-30-whql-game-ready-display-driver-feedback-thread-released-2015-06-22-/
 
 
David




It's amazing that even with the official responses in this thread you are still adamant about blaming it on a driver issue. It's like you don't even read any comments here.
 
Also, you should probably read what those drivers have fixed in the changelog because you obviously didn't read those too. 
 
They didn't fix anything, literally.
 
 


I can't do anything but shake my head for those that thought that the latest drivers were actually going to fix the FTW. It's not. THis is not a driver issue, and never was a driver issue. Unstable card is unstable card. I'm not sure what it's going to take for the techs to "consider" the theory that the GPU is not getting enough voltage, or that the voltage is throttling (which some users have found out). WHen you have an unstable card, the drivers are going to fail no matter what you put on it. Hense the reason when you have unstable overclocks, your gpu's drivers crash.

As far as the voltage, I'm not even sure if the techs can provide more power to the card. I think it's peaked. If that is the case, your only resolution is down-clocking the card. Sorry. There is no way around it.




The voltage lock is probably not the issue though. Because even at 1.175 & 1.150v the card is stable at 1380Mhz if you run it at a constant 100% power draw. (I tested this by changing the voltages in the BIOS, anything below 1.150v was unstable at 1380Mhz and resulted in application crashing and a driver recovery, NOT a black screen BSOD).
It will crash though when the power draw starts going up high and down to the low draw (with any voltage). The problem is most likely the card not adjusting in time for those drastic power changes.
So 1.2v is more then enough if you ask me. I've seen people running at ~1500Mhz without touching the voltage on non FTW models.
 
Example: http://www.overclock.net/...lub/5070#post_23189477


So, in a sense, it is a voltage issue... in order for the GPU to remain stable, it has to stay at a constant voltage (in your case you modified the bios to make the GPU run at 100% power draw...not sure if that's safe, but I bet you have a much hotter gpu, right? with it being stable, of course) I don't mean to sound specific or trying to be correct here, but, *Anything in which the application crashes, and/or driver recovery (leading up to, but not limited to BSOD) relates to the unit has in fact crashed and has to reset itself in order to acquire stabilization again, Due to the clocks trying to acquire the additional power, in this case the FTW.
 
1.2 for sure might be enough, but that is where the power is pushing "almost"  to Nvidia limitations. So, yes the voltage lock is "one of the reasons" the FTW is not running 100% stable. I'm pretty sure 1.25 is the cutoff point to where they are not allowed to achieve anymore. Needless to say that is probably why their first "BIOS fix" probably showed their attempt to lower the clocks rather than to increase the voltage.




No, you didn't understand me. You can't change the power draw in BIOS to always draw a constant 100%. The power draw of 100% I achieved with the Furmark Benchmark.
All I did in the BIOS is played with the voltages just to see how low can I set the voltage at the stock BOOST clock without the benchmark crashing or the driver recovering.
 
I also tried to set a constant 1.2v in BIOS at all states just to test if it was the voltage fluctuation that is causing all the problems.
This didn't help at all. Even with a constant locked 1.2v the card still crashed with a black screen when the power draw started changing drastically.
stalinx20
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 4977
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/01/03 08:56:23
  • Location: U.S., Michigan
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/23 05:38:43 (permalink)
Samsander
stalinx20
Samsander
stalinx20
wickedwayne
djmorgan
Hardware or software! those that think it hardware perhaps should read this, software is and does cause needed resets
 
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/847580/geforce-drivers/official-nvidia-353-30-whql-game-ready-display-driver-feedback-thread-released-2015-06-22-/
 
 
David




It's amazing that even with the official responses in this thread you are still adamant about blaming it on a driver issue. It's like you don't even read any comments here.
 
Also, you should probably read what those drivers have fixed in the changelog because you obviously didn't read those too. 
 
They didn't fix anything, literally.
 
 


I can't do anything but shake my head for those that thought that the latest drivers were actually going to fix the FTW. It's not. THis is not a driver issue, and never was a driver issue. Unstable card is unstable card. I'm not sure what it's going to take for the techs to "consider" the theory that the GPU is not getting enough voltage, or that the voltage is throttling (which some users have found out). WHen you have an unstable card, the drivers are going to fail no matter what you put on it. Hense the reason when you have unstable overclocks, your gpu's drivers crash.

As far as the voltage, I'm not even sure if the techs can provide more power to the card. I think it's peaked. If that is the case, your only resolution is down-clocking the card. Sorry. There is no way around it.




The voltage lock is probably not the issue though. Because even at 1.175 & 1.150v the card is stable at 1380Mhz if you run it at a constant 100% power draw. (I tested this by changing the voltages in the BIOS, anything below 1.150v was unstable at 1380Mhz and resulted in application crashing and a driver recovery, NOT a black screen BSOD).
It will crash though when the power draw starts going up high and down to the low draw (with any voltage). The problem is most likely the card not adjusting in time for those drastic power changes.
So 1.2v is more then enough if you ask me. I've seen people running at ~1500Mhz without touching the voltage on non FTW models.
 
Example: http://www.overclock.net/...lub/5070#post_23189477


So, in a sense, it is a voltage issue... in order for the GPU to remain stable, it has to stay at a constant voltage (in your case you modified the bios to make the GPU run at 100% power draw...not sure if that's safe, but I bet you have a much hotter gpu, right? with it being stable, of course) I don't mean to sound specific or trying to be correct here, but, *Anything in which the application crashes, and/or driver recovery (leading up to, but not limited to BSOD) relates to the unit has in fact crashed and has to reset itself in order to acquire stabilization again, Due to the clocks trying to acquire the additional power, in this case the FTW.
 
1.2 for sure might be enough, but that is where the power is pushing "almost"  to Nvidia limitations. So, yes the voltage lock is "one of the reasons" the FTW is not running 100% stable. I'm pretty sure 1.25 is the cutoff point to where they are not allowed to achieve anymore. Needless to say that is probably why their first "BIOS fix" probably showed their attempt to lower the clocks rather than to increase the voltage.




No, you didn't understand me. You can't change the power draw in BIOS to always draw a constant 100%. The power draw of 100% I achieved with the Furmark Benchmark.
All I did in the BIOS is played with the voltages just to see how low can I set the voltage at the stock BOOST clock without the benchmark crashing or the driver recovering.
 
I also tried to set a constant 1.2v in BIOS at all states just to test if it was the voltage fluctuation that is causing all the problems.
This didn't help at all. Even with a constant locked 1.2v the card still crashed with a black screen when the power draw started changing drastically.




If that didn't help at all, then the conclusion is that the card just has too high of clocks. I know that's not the answer anyone wants to hear, but the logical thing to do is, again, lower the clocks till you get a stable card until they have a BIOS fix. Not trying to justify the situation, but is a boost of 100mhz really that mind blowing?

EVGA X79 Dark
2080 Black edition
980
EVGA 1000 gold PSU (Gold)
4820K CPU
16x G-skill
Samsander
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 113
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2015/05/21 06:09:28
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/23 06:17:03 (permalink)
stalinx20
Samsander
stalinx20
Samsander
stalinx20
wickedwayne
djmorgan
Hardware or software! those that think it hardware perhaps should read this, software is and does cause needed resets
 
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/847580/geforce-drivers/official-nvidia-353-30-whql-game-ready-display-driver-feedback-thread-released-2015-06-22-/
 
 
David




It's amazing that even with the official responses in this thread you are still adamant about blaming it on a driver issue. It's like you don't even read any comments here.
 
Also, you should probably read what those drivers have fixed in the changelog because you obviously didn't read those too. 
 
They didn't fix anything, literally.
 
 


I can't do anything but shake my head for those that thought that the latest drivers were actually going to fix the FTW. It's not. THis is not a driver issue, and never was a driver issue. Unstable card is unstable card. I'm not sure what it's going to take for the techs to "consider" the theory that the GPU is not getting enough voltage, or that the voltage is throttling (which some users have found out). WHen you have an unstable card, the drivers are going to fail no matter what you put on it. Hense the reason when you have unstable overclocks, your gpu's drivers crash.

As far as the voltage, I'm not even sure if the techs can provide more power to the card. I think it's peaked. If that is the case, your only resolution is down-clocking the card. Sorry. There is no way around it.




The voltage lock is probably not the issue though. Because even at 1.175 & 1.150v the card is stable at 1380Mhz if you run it at a constant 100% power draw. (I tested this by changing the voltages in the BIOS, anything below 1.150v was unstable at 1380Mhz and resulted in application crashing and a driver recovery, NOT a black screen BSOD).
It will crash though when the power draw starts going up high and down to the low draw (with any voltage). The problem is most likely the card not adjusting in time for those drastic power changes.
So 1.2v is more then enough if you ask me. I've seen people running at ~1500Mhz without touching the voltage on non FTW models.
 
Example: http://www.overclock.net/...lub/5070#post_23189477


So, in a sense, it is a voltage issue... in order for the GPU to remain stable, it has to stay at a constant voltage (in your case you modified the bios to make the GPU run at 100% power draw...not sure if that's safe, but I bet you have a much hotter gpu, right? with it being stable, of course) I don't mean to sound specific or trying to be correct here, but, *Anything in which the application crashes, and/or driver recovery (leading up to, but not limited to BSOD) relates to the unit has in fact crashed and has to reset itself in order to acquire stabilization again, Due to the clocks trying to acquire the additional power, in this case the FTW.
 
1.2 for sure might be enough, but that is where the power is pushing "almost"  to Nvidia limitations. So, yes the voltage lock is "one of the reasons" the FTW is not running 100% stable. I'm pretty sure 1.25 is the cutoff point to where they are not allowed to achieve anymore. Needless to say that is probably why their first "BIOS fix" probably showed their attempt to lower the clocks rather than to increase the voltage.




No, you didn't understand me. You can't change the power draw in BIOS to always draw a constant 100%. The power draw of 100% I achieved with the Furmark Benchmark.
All I did in the BIOS is played with the voltages just to see how low can I set the voltage at the stock BOOST clock without the benchmark crashing or the driver recovering.
 
I also tried to set a constant 1.2v in BIOS at all states just to test if it was the voltage fluctuation that is causing all the problems.
This didn't help at all. Even with a constant locked 1.2v the card still crashed with a black screen when the power draw started changing drastically.




If that didn't help at all, then the conclusion is that the card just has too high of clocks. I know that's not the answer anyone wants to hear, but the logical thing to do is, again, lower the clocks till you get a stable card until they have a BIOS fix. Not trying to justify the situation, but is a boost of 100mhz really that mind blowing?




High clock is also not the issue. As already said many times, You can run the FTW at ~1450Mhz with that locked voltage and it will run fine for hours as long as you run a heavy benchmark like Furmark or Kombustor that maxes out the power draw.
 
If the clock was simply to high those benchmarks would crash and burn. But they do not. I did manage to crash Furmark when it came close to 1490Mhz. And that was an app crash with a driver recovery. Not a black screen BSOD.
stalinx20
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 4977
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/01/03 08:56:23
  • Location: U.S., Michigan
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/23 06:34:07 (permalink)
Samsander
stalinx20
Samsander
stalinx20
Samsander
stalinx20
wickedwayne
djmorgan
Hardware or software! those that think it hardware perhaps should read this, software is and does cause needed resets
 
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/847580/geforce-drivers/official-nvidia-353-30-whql-game-ready-display-driver-feedback-thread-released-2015-06-22-/
 
 
David




It's amazing that even with the official responses in this thread you are still adamant about blaming it on a driver issue. It's like you don't even read any comments here.
 
Also, you should probably read what those drivers have fixed in the changelog because you obviously didn't read those too. 
 
They didn't fix anything, literally.
 
 


I can't do anything but shake my head for those that thought that the latest drivers were actually going to fix the FTW. It's not. THis is not a driver issue, and never was a driver issue. Unstable card is unstable card. I'm not sure what it's going to take for the techs to "consider" the theory that the GPU is not getting enough voltage, or that the voltage is throttling (which some users have found out). WHen you have an unstable card, the drivers are going to fail no matter what you put on it. Hense the reason when you have unstable overclocks, your gpu's drivers crash.

As far as the voltage, I'm not even sure if the techs can provide more power to the card. I think it's peaked. If that is the case, your only resolution is down-clocking the card. Sorry. There is no way around it.




The voltage lock is probably not the issue though. Because even at 1.175 & 1.150v the card is stable at 1380Mhz if you run it at a constant 100% power draw. (I tested this by changing the voltages in the BIOS, anything below 1.150v was unstable at 1380Mhz and resulted in application crashing and a driver recovery, NOT a black screen BSOD).
It will crash though when the power draw starts going up high and down to the low draw (with any voltage). The problem is most likely the card not adjusting in time for those drastic power changes.
So 1.2v is more then enough if you ask me. I've seen people running at ~1500Mhz without touching the voltage on non FTW models.
 
Example: http://www.overclock.net/...lub/5070#post_23189477


So, in a sense, it is a voltage issue... in order for the GPU to remain stable, it has to stay at a constant voltage (in your case you modified the bios to make the GPU run at 100% power draw...not sure if that's safe, but I bet you have a much hotter gpu, right? with it being stable, of course) I don't mean to sound specific or trying to be correct here, but, *Anything in which the application crashes, and/or driver recovery (leading up to, but not limited to BSOD) relates to the unit has in fact crashed and has to reset itself in order to acquire stabilization again, Due to the clocks trying to acquire the additional power, in this case the FTW.
 
1.2 for sure might be enough, but that is where the power is pushing "almost"  to Nvidia limitations. So, yes the voltage lock is "one of the reasons" the FTW is not running 100% stable. I'm pretty sure 1.25 is the cutoff point to where they are not allowed to achieve anymore. Needless to say that is probably why their first "BIOS fix" probably showed their attempt to lower the clocks rather than to increase the voltage.




No, you didn't understand me. You can't change the power draw in BIOS to always draw a constant 100%. The power draw of 100% I achieved with the Furmark Benchmark.
All I did in the BIOS is played with the voltages just to see how low can I set the voltage at the stock BOOST clock without the benchmark crashing or the driver recovering.
 
I also tried to set a constant 1.2v in BIOS at all states just to test if it was the voltage fluctuation that is causing all the problems.
This didn't help at all. Even with a constant locked 1.2v the card still crashed with a black screen when the power draw started changing drastically.




If that didn't help at all, then the conclusion is that the card just has too high of clocks. I know that's not the answer anyone wants to hear, but the logical thing to do is, again, lower the clocks till you get a stable card until they have a BIOS fix. Not trying to justify the situation, but is a boost of 100mhz really that mind blowing?




High clock is also not the issue. As already said many times, You can run the FTW at ~1450Mhz with that locked voltage and it will run fine for hours as long as you run a heavy benchmark like Furmark or Kombustor that maxes out the power draw.
 
If the clock was simply to high those benchmarks would crash and burn. But they do not. I did manage to crash Furmark when it came close to 1490Mhz. And that was an app crash with a driver recovery. Not a black screen BSOD.


It has to be. The higher your clock, the more power you need. I can run the scenario you guys are having with the FTW with my reference model, and I can make the GPU's drivers crash day in and day out (you understand the point i'm making here.) - - - So, the GPU is not getting sufficient power when it is not under load. Try running Assassin's creed unity maxed settings. Or, even shadows of morder with ultra textures. what happens? Does it still crash?

EVGA X79 Dark
2080 Black edition
980
EVGA 1000 gold PSU (Gold)
4820K CPU
16x G-skill
Samsander
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 113
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2015/05/21 06:09:28
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/23 06:42:56 (permalink)
stalinx20
Samsander
stalinx20
Samsander
stalinx20
Samsander
stalinx20
wickedwayne
djmorgan
Hardware or software! those that think it hardware perhaps should read this, software is and does cause needed resets
 
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/847580/geforce-drivers/official-nvidia-353-30-whql-game-ready-display-driver-feedback-thread-released-2015-06-22-/
 
 
David




It's amazing that even with the official responses in this thread you are still adamant about blaming it on a driver issue. It's like you don't even read any comments here.
 
Also, you should probably read what those drivers have fixed in the changelog because you obviously didn't read those too. 
 
They didn't fix anything, literally.
 
 


I can't do anything but shake my head for those that thought that the latest drivers were actually going to fix the FTW. It's not. THis is not a driver issue, and never was a driver issue. Unstable card is unstable card. I'm not sure what it's going to take for the techs to "consider" the theory that the GPU is not getting enough voltage, or that the voltage is throttling (which some users have found out). WHen you have an unstable card, the drivers are going to fail no matter what you put on it. Hense the reason when you have unstable overclocks, your gpu's drivers crash.

As far as the voltage, I'm not even sure if the techs can provide more power to the card. I think it's peaked. If that is the case, your only resolution is down-clocking the card. Sorry. There is no way around it.




The voltage lock is probably not the issue though. Because even at 1.175 & 1.150v the card is stable at 1380Mhz if you run it at a constant 100% power draw. (I tested this by changing the voltages in the BIOS, anything below 1.150v was unstable at 1380Mhz and resulted in application crashing and a driver recovery, NOT a black screen BSOD).
It will crash though when the power draw starts going up high and down to the low draw (with any voltage). The problem is most likely the card not adjusting in time for those drastic power changes.
So 1.2v is more then enough if you ask me. I've seen people running at ~1500Mhz without touching the voltage on non FTW models.
 
Example: http://www.overclock.net/...lub/5070#post_23189477


So, in a sense, it is a voltage issue... in order for the GPU to remain stable, it has to stay at a constant voltage (in your case you modified the bios to make the GPU run at 100% power draw...not sure if that's safe, but I bet you have a much hotter gpu, right? with it being stable, of course) I don't mean to sound specific or trying to be correct here, but, *Anything in which the application crashes, and/or driver recovery (leading up to, but not limited to BSOD) relates to the unit has in fact crashed and has to reset itself in order to acquire stabilization again, Due to the clocks trying to acquire the additional power, in this case the FTW.
 
1.2 for sure might be enough, but that is where the power is pushing "almost"  to Nvidia limitations. So, yes the voltage lock is "one of the reasons" the FTW is not running 100% stable. I'm pretty sure 1.25 is the cutoff point to where they are not allowed to achieve anymore. Needless to say that is probably why their first "BIOS fix" probably showed their attempt to lower the clocks rather than to increase the voltage.




No, you didn't understand me. You can't change the power draw in BIOS to always draw a constant 100%. The power draw of 100% I achieved with the Furmark Benchmark.
All I did in the BIOS is played with the voltages just to see how low can I set the voltage at the stock BOOST clock without the benchmark crashing or the driver recovering.
 
I also tried to set a constant 1.2v in BIOS at all states just to test if it was the voltage fluctuation that is causing all the problems.
This didn't help at all. Even with a constant locked 1.2v the card still crashed with a black screen when the power draw started changing drastically.




If that didn't help at all, then the conclusion is that the card just has too high of clocks. I know that's not the answer anyone wants to hear, but the logical thing to do is, again, lower the clocks till you get a stable card until they have a BIOS fix. Not trying to justify the situation, but is a boost of 100mhz really that mind blowing?




High clock is also not the issue. As already said many times, You can run the FTW at ~1450Mhz with that locked voltage and it will run fine for hours as long as you run a heavy benchmark like Furmark or Kombustor that maxes out the power draw.
 
If the clock was simply to high those benchmarks would crash and burn. But they do not. I did manage to crash Furmark when it came close to 1490Mhz. And that was an app crash with a driver recovery. Not a black screen BSOD.


It has to be. The higher your clock, the more power you need. I can run the scenario you guys are having with the FTW with my reference model, and I can make the GPU's drivers crash day in and day out (you understand the point i'm making here.) - - - So, the GPU is not getting sufficient power when it is not under load. Try running Assassin's creed unity maxed settings. Or, even shadows of morder with ultra textures. what happens? Does it still crash?




I can tell you for sure that it will crash unless you set everything to Ultra, disable vsync (probably not needed though with 4K DSR) and run at 4K DSR. Keep that power draw high and nothing crashes. Even if you go above the stock 1380Mhz boost clock.
stalinx20
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 4977
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/01/03 08:56:23
  • Location: U.S., Michigan
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/23 06:45:14 (permalink)
Samsander
stalinx20
Samsander
stalinx20
Samsander
stalinx20
Samsander
stalinx20
wickedwayne
djmorgan
Hardware or software! those that think it hardware perhaps should read this, software is and does cause needed resets
 
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/847580/geforce-drivers/official-nvidia-353-30-whql-game-ready-display-driver-feedback-thread-released-2015-06-22-/
 
 
David




It's amazing that even with the official responses in this thread you are still adamant about blaming it on a driver issue. It's like you don't even read any comments here.
 
Also, you should probably read what those drivers have fixed in the changelog because you obviously didn't read those too. 
 
They didn't fix anything, literally.
 
 


I can't do anything but shake my head for those that thought that the latest drivers were actually going to fix the FTW. It's not. THis is not a driver issue, and never was a driver issue. Unstable card is unstable card. I'm not sure what it's going to take for the techs to "consider" the theory that the GPU is not getting enough voltage, or that the voltage is throttling (which some users have found out). WHen you have an unstable card, the drivers are going to fail no matter what you put on it. Hense the reason when you have unstable overclocks, your gpu's drivers crash.

As far as the voltage, I'm not even sure if the techs can provide more power to the card. I think it's peaked. If that is the case, your only resolution is down-clocking the card. Sorry. There is no way around it.




The voltage lock is probably not the issue though. Because even at 1.175 & 1.150v the card is stable at 1380Mhz if you run it at a constant 100% power draw. (I tested this by changing the voltages in the BIOS, anything below 1.150v was unstable at 1380Mhz and resulted in application crashing and a driver recovery, NOT a black screen BSOD).
It will crash though when the power draw starts going up high and down to the low draw (with any voltage). The problem is most likely the card not adjusting in time for those drastic power changes.
So 1.2v is more then enough if you ask me. I've seen people running at ~1500Mhz without touching the voltage on non FTW models.
 
Example: http://www.overclock.net/...lub/5070#post_23189477


So, in a sense, it is a voltage issue... in order for the GPU to remain stable, it has to stay at a constant voltage (in your case you modified the bios to make the GPU run at 100% power draw...not sure if that's safe, but I bet you have a much hotter gpu, right? with it being stable, of course) I don't mean to sound specific or trying to be correct here, but, *Anything in which the application crashes, and/or driver recovery (leading up to, but not limited to BSOD) relates to the unit has in fact crashed and has to reset itself in order to acquire stabilization again, Due to the clocks trying to acquire the additional power, in this case the FTW.
 
1.2 for sure might be enough, but that is where the power is pushing "almost"  to Nvidia limitations. So, yes the voltage lock is "one of the reasons" the FTW is not running 100% stable. I'm pretty sure 1.25 is the cutoff point to where they are not allowed to achieve anymore. Needless to say that is probably why their first "BIOS fix" probably showed their attempt to lower the clocks rather than to increase the voltage.




No, you didn't understand me. You can't change the power draw in BIOS to always draw a constant 100%. The power draw of 100% I achieved with the Furmark Benchmark.
All I did in the BIOS is played with the voltages just to see how low can I set the voltage at the stock BOOST clock without the benchmark crashing or the driver recovering.
 
I also tried to set a constant 1.2v in BIOS at all states just to test if it was the voltage fluctuation that is causing all the problems.
This didn't help at all. Even with a constant locked 1.2v the card still crashed with a black screen when the power draw started changing drastically.




If that didn't help at all, then the conclusion is that the card just has too high of clocks. I know that's not the answer anyone wants to hear, but the logical thing to do is, again, lower the clocks till you get a stable card until they have a BIOS fix. Not trying to justify the situation, but is a boost of 100mhz really that mind blowing?




High clock is also not the issue. As already said many times, You can run the FTW at ~1450Mhz with that locked voltage and it will run fine for hours as long as you run a heavy benchmark like Furmark or Kombustor that maxes out the power draw.
 
If the clock was simply to high those benchmarks would crash and burn. But they do not. I did manage to crash Furmark when it came close to 1490Mhz. And that was an app crash with a driver recovery. Not a black screen BSOD.


It has to be. The higher your clock, the more power you need. I can run the scenario you guys are having with the FTW with my reference model, and I can make the GPU's drivers crash day in and day out (you understand the point i'm making here.) - - - So, the GPU is not getting sufficient power when it is not under load. Try running Assassin's creed unity maxed settings. Or, even shadows of morder with ultra textures. what happens? Does it still crash?




I can tell you for sure that it will crash unless you set everything to Ultra, disable vsync and run at 4K DSR. Keep that power draw high and nothing crashes. Even if you go above the stock 1380Mhz boost clock.


I think the #1 resolution they should consider is having 1 of the power plugs using an 8pin. more power sufficiency and better voltage going to the card.

EVGA X79 Dark
2080 Black edition
980
EVGA 1000 gold PSU (Gold)
4820K CPU
16x G-skill
Samsander
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 113
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2015/05/21 06:09:28
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/23 08:08:52 (permalink)
stalinx20
Samsander
stalinx20
Samsander
stalinx20
Samsander
stalinx20
Samsander
stalinx20
wickedwayne
djmorgan
Hardware or software! those that think it hardware perhaps should read this, software is and does cause needed resets
 
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/847580/geforce-drivers/official-nvidia-353-30-whql-game-ready-display-driver-feedback-thread-released-2015-06-22-/
 
 
David




It's amazing that even with the official responses in this thread you are still adamant about blaming it on a driver issue. It's like you don't even read any comments here.
 
Also, you should probably read what those drivers have fixed in the changelog because you obviously didn't read those too. 
 
They didn't fix anything, literally.
 
 


I can't do anything but shake my head for those that thought that the latest drivers were actually going to fix the FTW. It's not. THis is not a driver issue, and never was a driver issue. Unstable card is unstable card. I'm not sure what it's going to take for the techs to "consider" the theory that the GPU is not getting enough voltage, or that the voltage is throttling (which some users have found out). WHen you have an unstable card, the drivers are going to fail no matter what you put on it. Hense the reason when you have unstable overclocks, your gpu's drivers crash.

As far as the voltage, I'm not even sure if the techs can provide more power to the card. I think it's peaked. If that is the case, your only resolution is down-clocking the card. Sorry. There is no way around it.




The voltage lock is probably not the issue though. Because even at 1.175 & 1.150v the card is stable at 1380Mhz if you run it at a constant 100% power draw. (I tested this by changing the voltages in the BIOS, anything below 1.150v was unstable at 1380Mhz and resulted in application crashing and a driver recovery, NOT a black screen BSOD).
It will crash though when the power draw starts going up high and down to the low draw (with any voltage). The problem is most likely the card not adjusting in time for those drastic power changes.
So 1.2v is more then enough if you ask me. I've seen people running at ~1500Mhz without touching the voltage on non FTW models.
 
Example: http://www.overclock.net/...lub/5070#post_23189477


So, in a sense, it is a voltage issue... in order for the GPU to remain stable, it has to stay at a constant voltage (in your case you modified the bios to make the GPU run at 100% power draw...not sure if that's safe, but I bet you have a much hotter gpu, right? with it being stable, of course) I don't mean to sound specific or trying to be correct here, but, *Anything in which the application crashes, and/or driver recovery (leading up to, but not limited to BSOD) relates to the unit has in fact crashed and has to reset itself in order to acquire stabilization again, Due to the clocks trying to acquire the additional power, in this case the FTW.
 
1.2 for sure might be enough, but that is where the power is pushing "almost"  to Nvidia limitations. So, yes the voltage lock is "one of the reasons" the FTW is not running 100% stable. I'm pretty sure 1.25 is the cutoff point to where they are not allowed to achieve anymore. Needless to say that is probably why their first "BIOS fix" probably showed their attempt to lower the clocks rather than to increase the voltage.




No, you didn't understand me. You can't change the power draw in BIOS to always draw a constant 100%. The power draw of 100% I achieved with the Furmark Benchmark.
All I did in the BIOS is played with the voltages just to see how low can I set the voltage at the stock BOOST clock without the benchmark crashing or the driver recovering.
 
I also tried to set a constant 1.2v in BIOS at all states just to test if it was the voltage fluctuation that is causing all the problems.
This didn't help at all. Even with a constant locked 1.2v the card still crashed with a black screen when the power draw started changing drastically.




If that didn't help at all, then the conclusion is that the card just has too high of clocks. I know that's not the answer anyone wants to hear, but the logical thing to do is, again, lower the clocks till you get a stable card until they have a BIOS fix. Not trying to justify the situation, but is a boost of 100mhz really that mind blowing?




High clock is also not the issue. As already said many times, You can run the FTW at ~1450Mhz with that locked voltage and it will run fine for hours as long as you run a heavy benchmark like Furmark or Kombustor that maxes out the power draw.
 
If the clock was simply to high those benchmarks would crash and burn. But they do not. I did manage to crash Furmark when it came close to 1490Mhz. And that was an app crash with a driver recovery. Not a black screen BSOD.


It has to be. The higher your clock, the more power you need. I can run the scenario you guys are having with the FTW with my reference model, and I can make the GPU's drivers crash day in and day out (you understand the point i'm making here.) - - - So, the GPU is not getting sufficient power when it is not under load. Try running Assassin's creed unity maxed settings. Or, even shadows of morder with ultra textures. what happens? Does it still crash?




I can tell you for sure that it will crash unless you set everything to Ultra, disable vsync and run at 4K DSR. Keep that power draw high and nothing crashes. Even if you go above the stock 1380Mhz boost clock.


I think the #1 resolution they should consider is having 1 of the power plugs using an 8pin. more power sufficiency and better voltage going to the card.




It does use one 8pin and one 6pin.
stalinx20
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 4977
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/01/03 08:56:23
  • Location: U.S., Michigan
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: So GTX 980 FTW are very bad cards? 2015/06/23 08:11:52 (permalink)
Samsander
stalinx20
Samsander
stalinx20
Samsander
stalinx20
Samsander
stalinx20
Samsander
stalinx20
wickedwayne
djmorgan
Hardware or software! those that think it hardware perhaps should read this, software is and does cause needed resets
 
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/847580/geforce-drivers/official-nvidia-353-30-whql-game-ready-display-driver-feedback-thread-released-2015-06-22-/
 
 
David




It's amazing that even with the official responses in this thread you are still adamant about blaming it on a driver issue. It's like you don't even read any comments here.
 
Also, you should probably read what those drivers have fixed in the changelog because you obviously didn't read those too. 
 
They didn't fix anything, literally.
 
 


I can't do anything but shake my head for those that thought that the latest drivers were actually going to fix the FTW. It's not. THis is not a driver issue, and never was a driver issue. Unstable card is unstable card. I'm not sure what it's going to take for the techs to "consider" the theory that the GPU is not getting enough voltage, or that the voltage is throttling (which some users have found out). WHen you have an unstable card, the drivers are going to fail no matter what you put on it. Hense the reason when you have unstable overclocks, your gpu's drivers crash.

As far as the voltage, I'm not even sure if the techs can provide more power to the card. I think it's peaked. If that is the case, your only resolution is down-clocking the card. Sorry. There is no way around it.




The voltage lock is probably not the issue though. Because even at 1.175 & 1.150v the card is stable at 1380Mhz if you run it at a constant 100% power draw. (I tested this by changing the voltages in the BIOS, anything below 1.150v was unstable at 1380Mhz and resulted in application crashing and a driver recovery, NOT a black screen BSOD).
It will crash though when the power draw starts going up high and down to the low draw (with any voltage). The problem is most likely the card not adjusting in time for those drastic power changes.
So 1.2v is more then enough if you ask me. I've seen people running at ~1500Mhz without touching the voltage on non FTW models.
 
Example: http://www.overclock.net/...lub/5070#post_23189477


So, in a sense, it is a voltage issue... in order for the GPU to remain stable, it has to stay at a constant voltage (in your case you modified the bios to make the GPU run at 100% power draw...not sure if that's safe, but I bet you have a much hotter gpu, right? with it being stable, of course) I don't mean to sound specific or trying to be correct here, but, *Anything in which the application crashes, and/or driver recovery (leading up to, but not limited to BSOD) relates to the unit has in fact crashed and has to reset itself in order to acquire stabilization again, Due to the clocks trying to acquire the additional power, in this case the FTW.
 
1.2 for sure might be enough, but that is where the power is pushing "almost"  to Nvidia limitations. So, yes the voltage lock is "one of the reasons" the FTW is not running 100% stable. I'm pretty sure 1.25 is the cutoff point to where they are not allowed to achieve anymore. Needless to say that is probably why their first "BIOS fix" probably showed their attempt to lower the clocks rather than to increase the voltage.




No, you didn't understand me. You can't change the power draw in BIOS to always draw a constant 100%. The power draw of 100% I achieved with the Furmark Benchmark.
All I did in the BIOS is played with the voltages just to see how low can I set the voltage at the stock BOOST clock without the benchmark crashing or the driver recovering.
 
I also tried to set a constant 1.2v in BIOS at all states just to test if it was the voltage fluctuation that is causing all the problems.
This didn't help at all. Even with a constant locked 1.2v the card still crashed with a black screen when the power draw started changing drastically.




If that didn't help at all, then the conclusion is that the card just has too high of clocks. I know that's not the answer anyone wants to hear, but the logical thing to do is, again, lower the clocks till you get a stable card until they have a BIOS fix. Not trying to justify the situation, but is a boost of 100mhz really that mind blowing?




High clock is also not the issue. As already said many times, You can run the FTW at ~1450Mhz with that locked voltage and it will run fine for hours as long as you run a heavy benchmark like Furmark or Kombustor that maxes out the power draw.
 
If the clock was simply to high those benchmarks would crash and burn. But they do not. I did manage to crash Furmark when it came close to 1490Mhz. And that was an app crash with a driver recovery. Not a black screen BSOD.


It has to be. The higher your clock, the more power you need. I can run the scenario you guys are having with the FTW with my reference model, and I can make the GPU's drivers crash day in and day out (you understand the point i'm making here.) - - - So, the GPU is not getting sufficient power when it is not under load. Try running Assassin's creed unity maxed settings. Or, even shadows of morder with ultra textures. what happens? Does it still crash?




I can tell you for sure that it will crash unless you set everything to Ultra, disable vsync and run at 4K DSR. Keep that power draw high and nothing crashes. Even if you go above the stock 1380Mhz boost clock.


I think the #1 resolution they should consider is having 1 of the power plugs using an 8pin. more power sufficiency and better voltage going to the card.




It does use one 8pin and one 6pin.


Then wth....?

EVGA X79 Dark
2080 Black edition
980
EVGA 1000 gold PSU (Gold)
4820K CPU
16x G-skill
Page: << < ..678910.. > >> Showing page 7 of 19
Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile