It may just be a choke point for the water, but I will see what I can pull off.

Hardwarecanucks removed heatsink during the review. Email them, maybe they have some pics

Theboatswain
Nate,
  I was looking at the lever and put my old 295 in for you camera's battery died but it needs to move about 1/8th inch.

I wasn't referring to how far you bend the tab to insert a graphics card, I meant how far you could bend it away, in the opposite if its intended direction so I can drop the block straight down.
 
In any case it seems that the new board will have the same layout:
http://forums.evga.com/fb.ashx?m=1146167

Yup.  Board looks the same to me.  Blocks should be compatible. 

Figure on this much: Copper > Aluminium
No matter what solution I come up with, it will still be better then the factory solution.

The difference is the Gigabyte motherboard, doesn't have some components in the gap that make the choke point that EVGA's board does.  I have to pull every trick in the book I can to get water to that chip. 

 
 
See the highlighted annoyances:

 
 

It defiantly won't be easy, and not even sure if it can be done, but I will do my best and come up with a solution.

You know nateman_doo, it makes more sense if you could make the CPU and chipset waterblock as all-in-one piece rather than a separate block, IMO.
 
Why? P67 and Z68 are stuck in the same TDP category, both dissipating less than 6.1W of heat even if all ports were used (all SATA, USB, ethernet, audio, PCIe 1.1, etc).  Remember, it is a southbridge and they have traditionally been low-wattage parts anyway.
 
Here's what six Watts of heat is capable, of using Hooke's Law:  It will take 90-minutes to boil 100ml of water, versus 2.5 minutes for an overclocked 6-core to around 4GHz (200W).  Trust me, P67/Z68 doesn't need watercooling any more than an Atom CPU does-- but if you have a market where enough people just want a P67/Z68 waterblock, then go make some money Nate!

BTW, the datasheets from both of those links will show you the dimensions of the chipsets and reference retention holes for coolers of the Intel boards.  EVGA and other vendors might have different screw holes, but the chipsets themselves will be the same size.

nateman_doo

The NF200's and Vregs will benefit most from being under water.

 
So you could easily keep the water up at the nf200 and avoid all the issues of trying to get the water down to the P67 chipset.

Personally, I'd say just do the V-regs and NF200. If you made it, it's just one more reason for me to go full water. 

I am interested in one, keep it up, you do amazing work.
 

looking at the way the bottom heat sink looks. seems like you may be able to stick to barbs on the bottom near the the cmos battery.
 
should get around 3/4 of a inch or so between the graphics cards and the board so would guess thats what you have to work with. i think theres some L type barbs that may work. cant remember what website .
 
could also fit the barbs on each corner of the sink.

thats why i was saying stick the barbs on the corners or sides you got around 3/4 to work with between the cards and the board so would have to be on the sides. i was thinking one opisit one another on each corner.or one next to the cmos battery, and one near the side mounted pata plug or is that the power plug.

heres kind of what i was trying to say could use a L shaped barb to get the tubing to go under the cards then again without being able to hold one of those boards in my hands there may not be enough room in any of those spots i have marked

i plan to if i get the money they cost though to do it right anyways
 
so maby not me but i have seen a few