Roy10266
I wish my 1080 SC could do better than 2000 MHz :( When I am able to make it run 2050 MHz though, it doesn't even add a frame to the game I tested with. Anyway, here's scores for 2025 MHz that drops to 2012 and 2000 all the time during games and benchmarks and 5508 memory. So pretty much 2000 MHz.

Time Spy: 7847
Fire Strike Extreme: 11579
Fire Strike: 24475

That I score higher than some people running 2050+ MHz on the core is a nice thing, so I guess the core clock number being higher would only benefit me in bragging rights.. in forum signatures and the like.

Roy10266

Piers123
 
Which CPU do you have?
 
I've found I can either have 500 memory OR higher core. I dropped the memory down to 450 and managed to get an extra 50 MHz from the core

That's just the graphics score, but I have a 6700K. I got +67 on the core and +500 on mem, but I may have to lower it to 400 or 450. Even at 300 memory I can't raise the core much higher. And without raising voltage, it doesn't even make a difference. The core falls back to 2000 MHz, even if it was set to 2037.

Roy10266
I wish my 1080 SC could do better than 2000 MHz :( When I am able to make it run 2050 MHz though, it doesn't even add a frame to the game I tested with. Anyway, here's scores for 2025 MHz that drops to 2012 and 2000 all the time during games and benchmarks and 5508 memory. So pretty much 2000 MHz.

Time Spy: 7847
Fire Strike Extreme: 11579
Fire Strike: 24475

That I score higher than some people running 2050+ MHz on the core is a nice thing, so I guess the core clock number being higher would only benefit me in bragging rights.. in forum signatures and the like.

Salem13

jarablue
No because when I run 3dmark firestrike, I am clicking the kboost icon in PXOC. It is running at max clocks regardless. I don't think max performance would do anything in addition to running it at max from PXOC..would it? I do not have any special hardware either. This is a regular build on a asrock extreme4 z170 board with the latest bios. I can't tweak anything more. Just wondering how my score can be so low in comparison to others. Unless the FBI has monitoring software on my pc killing my fps, there is not much more I can do.

So, you're not willing to try the first setting everyone suggests exploring when faced with a performance issue?

Sajin

Scorpion-X

Sajin

Viper453

Sajin

Viper453
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/14086254?
 
didn't do too well here.
 
after some playing around I think i might been bottle-necking my cpu or something.
 
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/14087366?

Benchmark using a monitor that doesn't have g-sync. You'll see your score go up. 

Well I disabled gsync and got a higher score thanks.
 
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/14108716?

No problem. Disabling g-sync is only half the fix. You need to completely disconnect your g-sync monitor and use a monitor that doesn't have g-sync at all.

What's the deal with this? Is it a know issue? Is a fix in the works? Very strange...and kinda disappointing!

It's been like that for awhile now. I've reported the problem to nvidia along time ago. No fix introduced yet. Benchmarks show a 1-3 fps loss. 1-3 fps loss in games isn't a problem since g-sync makes everything so smooth.

Slamina
1080 ftw hybrid with core +100 (2101mhz) & memory +800 (5805mhz) at 34-37c under load (room is quite chilly at about 64F right now with the AC on).
 

NxtGenCowboy
I think my scores are def lower than most others. 
1080FTW
Power 120%
Temp Target 83C
+100 Core
+500 Mem