EVGA

Evga 3090 FTW3 Ultra Port Royal Benchmark

Author
tksteven
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 104
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/06/04 22:12:12
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
2020/12/27 17:44:51 (permalink)
Hi everyone. Finally got the chance to run the Port Royal benchmark and get a sense of what my baseline score would be with the Evga 3090 FTW3 Ultra. My pc, just rebuilt roughly 2 weeks ago, was able to get a score of 12,667 on Port Royal. http://www.3dmark.com/pr/701569
 
Also, just wondering if this score is normal? I haven't ran any benchmarks for quite awhile as I have been away from the pc building/stuff for the past few years. Everything, such as the cpu, ram, and gpu, is stock out of the box setup. The only thing I changed is the Precision X1 fan profile, where I made my own basic custom fan profile. Currently running on Nvidia driver 460.79. Figured I share this with you guys. My pc specs are in my sig below.
post edited by tksteven - 2020/12/27 17:47:36

Corsair Obsidian 900D
Intel i9 9920x @ Stock Speed | Corsair H115i RGB
EVGA X299 Dark | Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 64GB @ Stock Speed
EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra 24GB @ Stock Speed
Samsung 970 Pro 1TB | Samsung 250GB | Maxtor 500GB | WD 1TB | Startech 320 GB | Seagate 5TB 
Corsair HX1050 | Sony Blu-ray | Asus PB287q 28" 4K 3840x2160 | Windows 10 Professional 64-bit
Corsair K95 RGB Platinum | Corsair Glaive RGB | Corsair Virtuoso RGB Wireless | Corsair MM800 RGB Polaris | Corsair Commander Pro | Corsair LL RGB Fans | Corsair ML Pro RGB Fans | Corsair RGB Led Strips
 
3DMark Port Royal: http://www.3dmark.com/pr/715577
 
 
#1

8 Replies Related Threads

    Bee_Dee_3_Dee
    SSC Member
    • Total Posts : 604
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2004/11/20 02:40:52
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 23
    Re: Evga 3090 FTW3 Ultra Port Royal Benchmark 2020/12/27 20:55:49 (permalink)
    https://www.3dmark.com/pr/661685
     
    maybe if not already; u need to select in NVidia Control Panel/3D Settings/Manage 3D/Program Settings Tab/Power Management Mode: "Prefer Maximum Performance" for Port Royal benchmark. NOT the Power Management Mode on the Global Settings Tab... just leave it at "Normal".

    > PSU: Seasonic VERTEX GX-1200
    > Mainboard: EVGA Z690 CLASSIFIED (BIOS v1.03 12/3/2021)
    > CPU: Intel Core i9-12900KF
    > AIO: EVGA CLC 240mm
    > Physical Memory: G.SKILL Trident Z5 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR5 5600
    > Physical Memory Model#: F5-5600U3636C16GX2-TZ5S
    > Monitor: Alienware AW2721D
    > Video Card: GPU : MSI GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM LIQUID X:
    > Case: Cooler Master HAF X (942)
    > DAS: Sabrent DS-SC5B
     
    #2
    tksteven
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 104
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/06/04 22:12:12
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re: Evga 3090 FTW3 Ultra Port Royal Benchmark 2020/12/27 21:10:52 (permalink)
    Ah, I totally forgot about that part haha. Will check Nvidia Control Panel and change the mode to "Prefer Maximum Performance". We'll see how it goes. Thanks for the reminder.

    Corsair Obsidian 900D
    Intel i9 9920x @ Stock Speed | Corsair H115i RGB
    EVGA X299 Dark | Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 64GB @ Stock Speed
    EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra 24GB @ Stock Speed
    Samsung 970 Pro 1TB | Samsung 250GB | Maxtor 500GB | WD 1TB | Startech 320 GB | Seagate 5TB 
    Corsair HX1050 | Sony Blu-ray | Asus PB287q 28" 4K 3840x2160 | Windows 10 Professional 64-bit
    Corsair K95 RGB Platinum | Corsair Glaive RGB | Corsair Virtuoso RGB Wireless | Corsair MM800 RGB Polaris | Corsair Commander Pro | Corsair LL RGB Fans | Corsair ML Pro RGB Fans | Corsair RGB Led Strips
     
    3DMark Port Royal: http://www.3dmark.com/pr/715577
     
     
    #3
    tksteven
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 104
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/06/04 22:12:12
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re: Evga 3090 FTW3 Ultra Port Royal Benchmark 2020/12/27 21:44:59 (permalink)
    Just did another quick Port Royal benchmark after changing the Nvidia Control Panel power management mode to "prefer maximum performance." Here's the score and it's just a notch higher at 12,731 lol. http://www.3dmark.com/pr/702862
     
    I did have steam, precision x1, core temp, hwinfor64, and chrome with 7 tabs open while running the benchmark.
    post edited by tksteven - 2020/12/28 00:34:47

    Corsair Obsidian 900D
    Intel i9 9920x @ Stock Speed | Corsair H115i RGB
    EVGA X299 Dark | Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 64GB @ Stock Speed
    EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra 24GB @ Stock Speed
    Samsung 970 Pro 1TB | Samsung 250GB | Maxtor 500GB | WD 1TB | Startech 320 GB | Seagate 5TB 
    Corsair HX1050 | Sony Blu-ray | Asus PB287q 28" 4K 3840x2160 | Windows 10 Professional 64-bit
    Corsair K95 RGB Platinum | Corsair Glaive RGB | Corsair Virtuoso RGB Wireless | Corsair MM800 RGB Polaris | Corsair Commander Pro | Corsair LL RGB Fans | Corsair ML Pro RGB Fans | Corsair RGB Led Strips
     
    3DMark Port Royal: http://www.3dmark.com/pr/715577
     
     
    #4
    bavor
    SSC Member
    • Total Posts : 995
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/02/20 21:24:43
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 6
    Re: Evga 3090 FTW3 Ultra Port Royal Benchmark 2020/12/27 23:37:55 (permalink)
    I haven't run it since last month, but this is what I got.
    https://www.3dmark.com/pr/526102
     
    #5
    loudee16
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 84
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2020/07/04 14:41:20
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: Evga 3090 FTW3 Ultra Port Royal Benchmark 2020/12/28 00:29:20 (permalink)
    Bee_Dee_3_Dee
    https://www.3dmark.com/pr/661685
     
    maybe if not already; u need to select in NVidia Control Panel/3D Settings/Manage 3D/Program Settings Tab/Power Management Mode: "Prefer Maximum Performance" for Port Royal benchmark. NOT the Power Management Mode on the Global Settings Tab... just leave it at "Normal".


    i tried to see  if i has these options and when i tried to open nvidia control panel i got a popup saying application is not compatible with installed nvidia driver.. do i have the wrong driver installed??? i am running a 3090 ftw 3  ultra.
     
    i figured it out, i have to open it from right clicking on the desktop
    post edited by loudee16 - 2020/12/28 00:31:24
    #6
    tksteven
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 104
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/06/04 22:12:12
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re: Evga 3090 FTW3 Ultra Port Royal Benchmark 2020/12/28 00:32:48 (permalink)
    bavor
    I haven't run it since last month, but this is what I got.
    https://www.3dmark.com/pr/526102
     



    Nice numbers.
     
    I'll probably play around with the settings or open less other programs and see if anything improves. I'll also try to do some light OC and see how it goes as well.

    Corsair Obsidian 900D
    Intel i9 9920x @ Stock Speed | Corsair H115i RGB
    EVGA X299 Dark | Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 64GB @ Stock Speed
    EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra 24GB @ Stock Speed
    Samsung 970 Pro 1TB | Samsung 250GB | Maxtor 500GB | WD 1TB | Startech 320 GB | Seagate 5TB 
    Corsair HX1050 | Sony Blu-ray | Asus PB287q 28" 4K 3840x2160 | Windows 10 Professional 64-bit
    Corsair K95 RGB Platinum | Corsair Glaive RGB | Corsair Virtuoso RGB Wireless | Corsair MM800 RGB Polaris | Corsair Commander Pro | Corsair LL RGB Fans | Corsair ML Pro RGB Fans | Corsair RGB Led Strips
     
    3DMark Port Royal: http://www.3dmark.com/pr/715577
     
     
    #7
    Bee_Dee_3_Dee
    SSC Member
    • Total Posts : 604
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2004/11/20 02:40:52
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 23
    Re: Evga 3090 FTW3 Ultra Port Royal Benchmark 2020/12/28 14:42:06 (permalink)
    tksteven
    Just did another quick Port Royal benchmark after changing the Nvidia Control Panel power management mode to "prefer maximum performance." Here's the score and it's just a notch higher at 12,731 lol. http://www.3dmark.com/pr/702862
     
    I did have steam, precision x1, core temp, hwinfor64, and chrome with 7 tabs open while running the benchmark.




    i prefer to run precision x1 just once for the latest vBIOS update. Then i never run it again. (Don't let it run when Windows Starts.)
     
    Just Shut down/Unplug PSU/use OC switch on GPU to have a more aggressive Fan Curve. See: following thread: https://forums.evga.com/Physical-OC-Switch-on-GPU-m3122920.aspx
     
    don't run precision x1. The OC switch is perfect. And i LUV the default LED lights. So i don't need LED app to change it. 
     
    And yes, test with Chrome closed, and all others. BUT utilities for monitoring temps are cool (aok no pun). Especially on a second or third monitor. i have no prob with three screens running with most all Benchmarks. Always be safe by being aware of CPU temps, GPU temps and GPU Fan Speeds. here's what i monitor:

    anything else than ^^ IMOHO isn't needed- IF all is well with one's PC and using it for addition diag and info is not necessary. And all those endless things HWiNFO64 can monitor and does by default should be Hidden/Disabled.
     
    u may also be missing:
    A. testing with just "Optimal Defaults" in MB BIOS.
    B. testing with "Optimal Defaults" + "Memory EMP Settings Loaded". (ur system memory running below specs as reported in ur OP, Port Royal Test Link's System Specs? It is slower than my older RAM.)
    C. testing with "Optimal Defaults" + "EMP Settings Loaded" + slight OC here and there.
     
    BUT BE CAREFUL. Start by backing-up current BIOS. (And test reloading it and it successfully working.) Then, try ^^ (A.B. and C.). Because sometimes after several Drives have been added to a system over weeks and months and "Loading Optimal Defaults" it can be hard to get Boot order correct and successfully Booting in Windows. Maybe it's just me with two Operating Systems. idk always be safe.
     
    i never OC anything; so that no matter wat game i run; no matter how old or new it is; i know that OCing is not a factor as far as problem solving a game goes. i play many games. like i've heard Cyberpunk 2077 runs great on 3090 and not so much on low-end laptops and GPUs. So i'll be definitely trying it soon. won't have to change any OC setting. just DL and run it. a friend with over twenty years gaming but less than a 2080-ti says np running Cyberpunk 2077. just some little stuff. and they played it endlessly since it released.
     
    GL
     
     
    post edited by Bee_Dee_3_Dee - 2020/12/28 14:45:59

    Attached Image(s)


    > PSU: Seasonic VERTEX GX-1200
    > Mainboard: EVGA Z690 CLASSIFIED (BIOS v1.03 12/3/2021)
    > CPU: Intel Core i9-12900KF
    > AIO: EVGA CLC 240mm
    > Physical Memory: G.SKILL Trident Z5 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR5 5600
    > Physical Memory Model#: F5-5600U3636C16GX2-TZ5S
    > Monitor: Alienware AW2721D
    > Video Card: GPU : MSI GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM LIQUID X:
    > Case: Cooler Master HAF X (942)
    > DAS: Sabrent DS-SC5B
     
    #8
    tksteven
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 104
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/06/04 22:12:12
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re: Evga 3090 FTW3 Ultra Port Royal Benchmark 2020/12/28 16:02:17 (permalink)
    Bee_Dee_3_Dee
    tksteven
    Just did another quick Port Royal benchmark after changing the Nvidia Control Panel power management mode to "prefer maximum performance." Here's the score and it's just a notch higher at 12,731 lol. http://www.3dmark.com/pr/702862
     
    I did have steam, precision x1, core temp, hwinfor64, and chrome with 7 tabs open while running the benchmark.



    i prefer to run precision x1 just once for the latest vBIOS update. Then i never run it again. (Don't let it run when Windows Starts.)
     
    Just Shut down/Unplug PSU/use OC switch on GPU to have a more aggressive Fan Curve. See: following thread: https://forums.evga.com/Physical-OC-Switch-on-GPU-m3122920.aspx
     
    don't run precision x1. The OC switch is perfect. And i LUV the default LED lights. So i don't need LED app to change it. 
     
    And yes, test with Chrome closed, and all others. BUT utilities for monitoring temps are cool (aok no pun). Especially on a second or third monitor. i have no prob with three screens running with most all Benchmarks. Always be safe by being aware of CPU temps, GPU temps and GPU Fan Speeds. here's what i monitor:

    anything else than ^^ IMOHO isn't needed- IF all is well with one's PC and using it for addition diag and info is not necessary. And all those endless things HWiNFO64 can monitor and does by default should be Hidden/Disabled.
     
    u may also be missing:
    A. testing with just "Optimal Defaults" in MB BIOS.
    B. testing with "Optimal Defaults" + "Memory EMP Settings Loaded". (ur system memory running below specs as reported in ur OP, Port Royal Test Link's System Specs? It is slower than my older RAM.)
    C. testing with "Optimal Defaults" + "EMP Settings Loaded" + slight OC here and there.
     
    BUT BE CAREFUL. Start by backing-up current BIOS. (And test reloading it and it successfully working.) Then, try ^^ (A.B. and C.). Because sometimes after several Drives have been added to a system over weeks and months and "Loading Optimal Defaults" it can be hard to get Boot order correct and successfully Booting in Windows. Maybe it's just me with two Operating Systems. idk always be safe.
     
    i never OC anything; so that no matter wat game i run; no matter how old or new it is; i know that OCing is not a factor as far as problem solving a game goes. i play many games. like i've heard Cyberpunk 2077 runs great on 3090 and not so much on low-end laptops and GPUs. So i'll be definitely trying it soon. won't have to change any OC setting. just DL and run it. a friend with over twenty years gaming but less than a 2080-ti says np running Cyberpunk 2077. just some little stuff. and they played it endlessly since it released.
     
    GL

     
    Thanks, and thanks for the suggestions :) I'll definitely try out those things. 
     
    I guess it's good that I'm not too big on the benchmark stuff, but never hurts to know what my pc can do on the benchmarks. I used to OC my previous Evga X99 Classified system during the 1st year or so. Later I decided to make everything stock and ran it for about 4-5 years. Had a pretty stable X99 system and played several games on it for about 5-6 years. Also had the Evga X58 Classified system and OC'd it as well haha.
     
    So far my current x299 setup has been good and stable (knock on wood of course), built roughly for a little over 2 weeks. For now, I want to keep everything stock and then maybe OC later on. Played Cyberpunk 2077, COD Warzone and COD BOCW, Star Wars Squadron, and Diablo III with this current video card. Fingers crossed, but so far so good. After reading about the issues that a lot of folks are having with the 3090 FTW3 Ultra, I'm a little nervous about it. I still have the Evga 2080Ti FTW3 Ultra from my previous system as a backup, just in case. 
    post edited by tksteven - 2020/12/28 16:05:53

    Corsair Obsidian 900D
    Intel i9 9920x @ Stock Speed | Corsair H115i RGB
    EVGA X299 Dark | Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 64GB @ Stock Speed
    EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra 24GB @ Stock Speed
    Samsung 970 Pro 1TB | Samsung 250GB | Maxtor 500GB | WD 1TB | Startech 320 GB | Seagate 5TB 
    Corsair HX1050 | Sony Blu-ray | Asus PB287q 28" 4K 3840x2160 | Windows 10 Professional 64-bit
    Corsair K95 RGB Platinum | Corsair Glaive RGB | Corsair Virtuoso RGB Wireless | Corsair MM800 RGB Polaris | Corsair Commander Pro | Corsair LL RGB Fans | Corsair ML Pro RGB Fans | Corsair RGB Led Strips
     
    3DMark Port Royal: http://www.3dmark.com/pr/715577
     
     
    #9
    Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile