Got it yesterday, well ventilated case (11 fans), running FurMark stable over 1 hour.
Mostly stays on 2085 core, with very rare dips to 2070.
 

 
 
 

Great results. Can’t wait for the kpe. 😁

tayback longleg
Cuz I think this FTW3 3090 is probably 100+ more watts of heat to dissipate...

In the new GeForce Experience's performance overlay, it shows the card draws about 380W. These are my current settings, btw (didn't bother with memory overclock so far):

 
 

Did you buy fire extinguisher? Jk nice oc!

SWEET!

how did you get the card? I don't see any in stock. Nice OC btw.

Hmmm very cool.  Seems like the card can clock well as long as you keep it off the power limit, with a lighter load.  I have little experience with furmark so take my comments with a grain of salt:
 
- The FPS seems low, when I run it on my 2080 Ti at 2560x1920 8x MSAA, 2130mhz @ 1.068v, I'm pulling about 300-310w and getting about 82-86 FPS.  Edge of stability. Am I somehow running easier settings to get a higher FPS?
 
- When I run 0x MSAA 2560x1920 my power draw goes to max, clocks are about 1845mhz and 290 FPS.  Also edge of stability.  I would consider this a much heavier load since it's riding the power limit and not clocking high.  What kind of behavior does the 3090 exhibit with 0x MSAA?
 
- When I run a P1080 setting bench, my score is a couple percent behind the one P1080 3090 score up on the score page right now, like 15.9k vs 15.6k.  About 1920mhz and on the power limit.  Does anyone have any stronger 3090 scores?
 
Thoughts?

The benches look great.  Seems like it really loads up the card.  About 20% ahead of my card is typical for a 1080p bench, but cpu could be a factor.
 
I think you might be cpu bottlenecked if the 0x MSAA 2560x1920 is only getting up to 100 fps, but who knows.
 

Furmark was originally written and designed to maximise the use of the ALU's inside of the GPU cores. Its specifically written to maximise the workload done with as few stalls as possible. As such its one of the few programs that actually really fills the GPUs pipeline of work up and keeps the ALUs running full time for almost every cycle. As a result its usage of the GPU is much higher than the average program that can not utilise the ALUs fully as they take branches (slow) or do calculations not designed around maximising the hardware usage.
 
The companies called it a power hog but they initially complained about it because it had the ability to actually break their hardware. Neither Nvidia nor AMD had designed their cards to throttle and protect themselves against an efficient GPU program like furmark's and as a result the hardware could be damaged. They both put in a software solution. Nowadays they continue to claim its just a power virus, but the reality is its one of the most efficient uses of a GPU you will find and this just means that if you push to the theoretical throughput of the GPU it will actually throttle because its not capable of sustaining that level of performance.

stkiller
Got it yesterday, well ventilated case (11 fans), running FurMark stable over 1 hour.
Mostly stays on 2085 core, with very rare dips to 2070.
 

 
 
 

What fan speeds was it running during the test?

jayrwar
What fan speeds was it running during the test?

Case fans - around 1500 RPM, GPU's fans - around 60%.
 

enewt
How long did it take you to pull those numbers?  Nice work.

I did "VG Curve Tuner" scan, it recommended +110 core, and maybe 30 minutes afterwards?
 
What's a bit sad is that RDR2 doesn't seem to want to work with those frequencies... And in the evening, when the room is heated up, GPU starts to throttle down to 1920-1950. Will put a water block on it when they become available.

This gives me hope for some nice OC with this card if I am able to secure one. Comparing all these results is helping me lean more towards FTW3 Ultra 3090 :)

I am not sure if I did anything incorrect, but seems like these configurations are pretty reproducible.
I am getting 2.1G on air but with a open-frame chassis. 
 
 

Impressive.  Mine won't OC above +125 GPU and + 800 memory without crashing in Port Royal.  Once it hits about 2100mhz it crashes ever single time.  It's odd because I'm only the 13k's for a score while others are well into 14k's but much closer in Time Spy Extreme with similar configs.

Nobody in 2020:
 
Nvidia in 2020:  Hey guys here's a gpu that runs Furmark really well

ehabash1
These Evga cards seem to be doing really well.
Looking at Jays2cents port Royal Score 15,148
 
10900k with ram at 3600MHz
Core clock 2,130 MHz w/ average temp @ 51 C
 
Very reasonable hardware to achieve this number. Looks like the 3090 is a true upgrade over 2080ti. ~50%

Lol, no way that's just a normal card on air with an OC.