So far I'm at +120/+1050 with max voltage and power. That translates to averages around 2085 with occasional peaks of 2100 or 2115. This is a 2080Ti XC Gaming on EK block and back-plate.
 
I tried +130/+1100 but that was a no-go, at least when running 3dmark tests, so 120/1050 looks like my max.
 
Once I'm done verifying that and running some more benchmarks, I'm going to undervolt and see what I can hit at 1000mV or the next step down (993?) then run some comparisons. I assume the difference will be negligible and if that's the case I'll do what I did with my 1080Ti and run the under-volted curve as my 24/7.

2080ti FTW3 +100 Core / +850 Mem, can go 120 core tho.

FTW3 SLI +120 core and + 900mem to 3dmark successful
 
24/7 use on +80core and + 500 mem

145mhz core and 800mhz memory on aircooling alone for gaming until I put it on watercooling. Bench at 165mhz core and 1000mhz memory for 3DMark.

+160 on core, +800  on [link=mailto:memory@2160max/7700]memory@2160max/7700[/link] - EVGA ICX  with AIO cooling. 

2080 Ti KPE w EK Supremacy GPU block, +80/2130mhz GPU and +1200 mem 24/7 with core temps under 40c for long gaming sessions. Voltage and power temp slider set to max.

That’s warm for sure. What size radiator do you run? Is your ambient temp high?

It’s weird that +125 is only getting you 2160mhz. I get that clock speeds with these cards is second to actual performance, I’d just expect a higher clock for +125. Does it start off higher and down clock to 2160mhz?

2080 Ti FTW3 Hybrid with Noctua NF-A12x25 PWM in push/pull. 
 
+125Mhz yields 2175Mhz, with my max stable bench around +145Mhz for 2205Mhz peak. 
 
+125Mhz drops to 2130Mhz eventually due to temps reaching 50C. If I had a 240mm AIO or block I'm certain I could easily achieve far better results simply due to temps.  
 
My Samsung memory goes +1400Mhz for bench, but I typically set it at +800Mhz for daily/gaming.  Very very happy with my FTW3 card. 

2160/7000 MHz 24/7 all games
2205/7000 MHz all games and benchmarks except BFV....
Asus RTX 2080Ti Strix OC flashed with a RTX 2080Ti FTW3 HC bios.
Watercooled using a slightly modified EK block

2080 ti FTW3 Ultra with an EK block in a full custom loop with 3x360 rads. 

In my testing, I was able to get a stable +130 core and +1000 memory with no issues. Peak temps maxed around 42c. I probably could have pushed it a bit further but didn't see the point.

For daily use, I pulled back to +120 core and +800 memory as I find this configuration gives the same gaming performance (2085MHz - 2100MHz consistent) and keeps max temps below 39c, with fan speed nearly silent at 1200rpm, no matter how long I push gaming on ultra level settings with a 3440x1440 monitor.  

I posted earlier today and it is not showing up. This is a test post.

courante
Arrgh. Back to the drawing board!
 
Hello all. I just picked up a 2080 TI XC2 Ultra. This is a huge upgrade from my GTX 750 TI.  I wanted to run my benchmark/GPU-Z results past everyone to see if it is within the expected range of performance. I have a rather old CPU () so I am assuming my lower 3Dmark results are due to that.
 
I recently got an R5 3600 + MSI Tomahawk that are still in their boxes for a future weekend project. My understanding is that a 3600 will have similar -gaming- performance as a 3700X or 3900X, though the latter would have significant increases in productivity tasks, correct?  And any of them would have a substantial increase in performance to the i7-4770k.  I always thought that at high-res (3440x1440) and high refresh rate (120Hz) and ultra graphics quality you end up being limited by GPU rather than CPU .. but I have read some articles that suggest otherwise. I am getting 11,500-11,700 in 3DMark and 2040MHz GPU / 2074 MHz Memory on the 2080 TI with maximum GPU temp of 75 degrees centigrade. Does this sound about right?  I tried MSI afterburner and EVGA Precision X1 on separate runs with sliders all the way up (power/temp/voltage) I set my memory to +1200 and GPU to +128 .. didn't seem to make a different compared to memory +900 and GPU +100.
 
Thanks! and good to be here.
 

Pay attention to your GPU score, the 15,775 is really good for an air cooled reference card at those kind of clocks.  You've got a strong card, even if you can't overclock it much more than that.
 
Boost 4.0 will down clock the card as temps rise, so you may be hitting similar clocks during the run with +128 vs. +100 settings.
 
Memory speed vs. performance isn't linear, yes faster is better usually but certain speeds are optimal.
 
The core clock speeds go in 15mhz increments, so it's 90/105/120/135/150 etc.  Thus your settings are really 90 (100) vs. 120 (128).
 
That res is about 60% of 4K and the 120hz could be a bit demanding.  The card will hit 120fps most of the time but I would expect frequent drops to 100fps, depending on settings.  I would run vsync or a framerate cap to let the card come off max power when it hits the cap, it will keep temps and heat soak down. 
 
As far as the 3600, it's OK but a fair bit behind higher end options in most cases.  Could bottleneck in some games with poor multi core optimization or lack the outright processing power to sustain over 100fps in high cpu demand games.  It just doesn't have the grunt of a 9900K or a 3900X.  You can get better performance in some games by disabling SMT/Hyperthreading, if you can detect that game is heavily loading 4 threads or less.  But overall I doubt it will be a problem, just cool it well if you're loading it up. 
 
You might find that setting screen refresh to 100hz with vsync gives you better overall results with some games due to sustained frame rates and reasonable temps, if you don't have freesync/gsync.  Going to have to tweak game settings, not just all max all the time.

courante
I posted earlier today and it is not showing up. This is a test post.

Fixed

Recovered your post from Spam filter. 
 
I'll report the error to EVGA

spit051261
2295 and 8684
1675 on memory and 210 on clock .

How did you get that kind of OC? Chiller + full block?