spit051261
Anything????

You're missing the point.  He has nothing to prove to you.  His point is that your computer does not meet the definition of stability which the rest of the people in this thread agree to.  And he is right.
 
He isn't turning this into a speed competition or trying to be jealous.  He's just saying that if you try to conform to our definition of stability, you will see that you fail.
 
Why are you all "come at me bro!" about this?  No one is trying to say that your computer is slow or that their computer is faster.
 
Your computer is not 24/7 stable by our definition.  Fact!

Looks good . Nice rig

Im using hynix and not B die so I don't have much leeway with timings.
That is why I can only run at XMP and even then , asus decides to change voltages and crash so then I have to go in and manually change them back.
You are right about the code , it's not the best mobo for ram
That is why I am fitting a x299 and 9980xe ( have the chip waiting for MOBO to be delivered).
I never said I could run CPU intensive benches at 5.6 , I just said that's what it runs at all the time and it does . I never change it because its fine with the chiller
I am getting rid of the ram and getting trident .
I never meant to come off as a show off and only said what I had and what it could do .
I never lied.
I realised you had an idea when you said the code was not the best for ram .
Sorry I doubted you

Nice OC
Here are the numbers asus decides to change
It drops 1.45 to 1.35
Then the 2 lower voltages from auto to 1.25.
I then have to go in and change them back for it to boot.
Now and again, I have to change the 2 auto voltages to 1.35 , strange eh .
Its like this board doesn't like 4400 ram

Thanks again kevininc313, you have really good insights. I actually have one more day to return the R5 3600 + MSI Tomahawk MB and I think they are going back (they are unopened so I wouldn't feel bad about it). Your analysis was very logical and made me realize that I am also scratching a behavioral itch in that I would enjoy building a new rig. It looks like I could get around $200 for the i7-4770k+MB+RAM .. likely $160-170 after fees/shipping, so the minor upgrade to the R5 3600 would cost $100 in total, but be a lot of work and tinkering for a marginal benefit. It doesn't seem the pragmatic thing to do at this time. I'll keep an eye on the i7-10700k / z470 later in the year.
 
Thanks for the consultation! I'll try to return the favor down the line if there is something I can add to a topic.
 
btw, apologies to all that my questions somewhat hijacked the thread a bit. I've read every post on this thread and am amazed at what you all are doing.

I'm getting 2115-2130Mhz stable at 42-44C with my latest GPU. 

Graphite8five

bp7178
 

 
 

That looks very sleek in all black. 

Nice and clean. 

spit051261
TBH I only use that computer for bench marking so it's no big deal leaving it at that speed.
With all the coolers and chiller as well as room AC I need my own power station to run the thing.
That's why I hardly use it .
I know it's "daily" and I made mistake posting here .If the mods want to delete my posts, it's fine.
My boo boo.
Also, just waiting for my x299 board . I can use my i9 9980xe and forget about the ks.
Taking a long time from USA lol.
Just waiting for old mate to come along and call me liar again.
Some people eh.

I don't think there's a problem, but I can see how it would rub some people the wrong way. Maybe a simple disclaimer that it's a very niche setup that's not stable as a daily workhorse might have helped, especially given the context of what the OP was asking about. 
 
That said, I do think it's useful (and interesting) to see the ceiling of what hardware can do. 

lyndonbrooker
FTW3 Ultra here. I sit on +150 core, +1000 memory, with +15 voltage. Power target at 110% and temp limit linked so 86c.
This leaves me peaking at 2115mhz in games on the core, and usually settling about 2086mhz with temps around 70c, on a quiet-ish fan curve that tops out at about 50%.
Raising the power limit further does nothing to raise clocks, even with higher offsets, so I leave it where it is. Also it keeps temps down a bit. Raising to 124% pegs me in the high 70s whatever settings I use. 
Odd one with my memory though, that +1000mhz leave me at 7800mz, rather than the 8000mhz it did last week. But only most of the time. Sometimes I'll boot and it's at 8000mhz. Very confused. Have just posted to that effect if anyone wants to help me out.  

the memory drop seems to be coming from using Nvidia voice, a few of us have discovered. My turtle beach headset with noise cancelling seems to work better with out me having to sacrifice fps with nvida voice.

Anthony41988
I have 2080 ti xc hybrid that is running a core clock of 2175 mHz at 1093 mv. Memory clock is set to 7500 mHz. In game it will downclock sometimes as low 2095 but most of the time it sits between 2100-2160.

I'm using MSI afterburner with fans, power, voltage and temp maxed out. Its staying below 50-55 degrees celsius.

I'm new to overclocking. Are these good results for this card? Anything else I need to pay attention to besides temperature?

Get yourself a FTW3 or Galax Bios.  Looking good.