EVGA

Intel Comet Lake-S 10-Core CPU Benchmarks Surface

Author
rjohnson11
EVGA Forum Moderator
  • Total Posts : 74829
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2004/10/05 12:44:35
  • Location: Europe
  • Status: online
  • Ribbons : 68
2019/11/19 23:00:08 (permalink)
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-comet-lake-s-10th-gen-geekbench-benchmark
 
Fresh benchmarks for Intel's 10th-Generation Comet Lake-S (CML-S) processors have started to appeared in the Geekbench 4 database. The results reveal the chips' core counts, L2 and L3 cache, as well as the preliminary base and boost clocks. But as always, it's wise to take these with a some grains of salt, since they are submissions of unreleased hardware. As a quick refresher, Comet Lake-S will replace Intel's current Coffee Lake Refresh lineup. The upcoming Comet Lake-S chips continue to hail from Intel's 14nm process node. However, they're likely to be based on an improved 14nm+++ process. Comet Lake-S is also expected to bring higher core counts and more cache.
 
Well I personally am not impressed with Intel's continued use of the 14nm die. 
 



Specs: AMD 2920X Threadripper, Corsair MP510 M.2, 64GB Corsair RGB Dominator,  ASRock X399 Taichi, Corsair 1000D, EVGA RTX 2080ti Black

Associate Code: H5U80QBH6BH0AXF



#1

1 Reply Related Threads

    vegajf51
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 219
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2018/01/07 12:53:12
    • Status: online
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: Intel Comet Lake-S 10-Core CPU Benchmarks Surface 2019/11/19 23:31:24 (permalink)
    I am very curious how high Intel can get the clocks for the 10 core Comet lake-S, it would be incredible if they could get 5.2-5.3 ghz out of the box, I wouldn't be surprised. That would help hold of Ryzen 4th gen which I doubt clocks much higher than current but will increase ipc again. I willing to bet Intel will still edge out in pure gaming but could be wrong. Of course being Intel will need a new board for new socket LGA1200, still pci-e gen 3.0 also which will suck in year 2020.
     
    #2
    Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile