kraade
Kev , you only run your ignorance flag up the pole with statements like this, just let it go bud, 
I have the Numbers and 3d mark valid results behind me, when you want to compare numbers , lets do it.
All cards are different and every single one has a happy spot weather you overclock or undervolt, and a proper undervolt is actually an overclock, Its getting the same performance with less power draw. Cards are produced to work within a tolerance and if you can tune that to work at it's upper most efficiently, why not try it.   I am here to provide advise to those who wish to listen.

Nice, so you're on the 3DMark Port Royal Single card Hall of Fame with your undervolted 3090 Ti?  That's extremely impressive.  Which is yours?
 
https://www.3dmark.com/hall-of-fame-2/port+royal+3dmark+score+performance+preset/version+1.0/1+gpu
 
Here's my 'undervolted' (by your definition) 3080 FTW3 Hybrid running currently top 40 in the world for 3080's in Timespy GPU score, from 18 months ago:
 
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/16605955
 
'Undervolting' is an unreliable overclocking and power capping method with a bunch of reddit tier handwaving and elitist cultism surrounding it.  There are better ways to achieve the stated goals, in fact, Nvidia makes those tools readily accessible in the form of a power slider, clock slider and Nvidia-SMI!  If proponents of undervolting truly cared about performance, they would go to the minimal incremental cost and effort to improve their cooling so they can properly use the power capabilities of their GPU and get the most out of overclocking it.
 
 

kevinc313

kraade
Kev , you only run your ignorance flag up the pole with statements like this, just let it go bud, 
I have the Numbers and 3d mark valid results behind me, when you want to compare numbers , lets do it.
All cards are different and every single one has a happy spot weather you overclock or undervolt, and a proper undervolt is actually an overclock, Its getting the same performance with less power draw. Cards are produced to work within a tolerance and if you can tune that to work at it's upper most efficiently, why not try it.   I am here to provide advise to those who wish to listen.

Nice, so you're on the 3DMark Port Royal Single card Hall of Fame with your undervolted 3090 Ti?  That's extremely impressive.  Which is yours?
 
https://www.3dmark.com/hall-of-fame-2/port+royal+3dmark+score+performance+preset/version+1.0/1+gpu
 
Here's my 'undervolted' (by your definition) 3080 running currently top 40 in the world in Timespy GPU score, from 18 months ago:
 
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/16605955
 
'Undervolting' is an unreliable overclocking and power capping method with a bunch of reddit tier handwaving and elitist cultism surrounding it.  There are better ways to achieve the stated goals, in fact, Nvidia makes those tools readily accessible in the form of a power slider, clock slider and Nvidia-SMI!
 
 

Your repetitive and ignorant trolling is not needed in yet another thread. They also make the voltage curve available (you know, another tool) for those more competent than you, in fact.
Grow up.

kraade

kevinc313

kraade
Kev , you only run your ignorance flag up the pole with statements like this, just let it go bud, 
I have the Numbers and 3d mark valid results behind me, when you want to compare numbers , lets do it.
All cards are different and every single one has a happy spot weather you overclock or undervolt, and a proper undervolt is actually an overclock, Its getting the same performance with less power draw. Cards are produced to work within a tolerance and if you can tune that to work at it's upper most efficiently, why not try it.   I am here to provide advise to those who wish to listen.

Nice, so you're on the 3DMark Port Royal Single card Hall of Fame with your undervolted 3090 Ti?  That's extremely impressive.  Which is yours?
 
https://www.3dmark.com/hall-of-fame-2/port+royal+3dmark+score+performance+preset/version+1.0/1+gpu
 
Here's my 'undervolted' (by your definition) 3080 running currently top 40 in the world in Timespy GPU score, from 18 months ago:
 
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/16605955
 
'Undervolting' is an unreliable overclocking and power capping method with a bunch of reddit tier handwaving and elitist cultism surrounding it.  There are better ways to achieve the stated goals, in fact, Nvidia makes those tools readily accessible in the form of a power slider, clock slider and Nvidia-SMI!
 
 

 

what eva boi . lolz
I never said I had a TOP 100 card. where did you find he ability to miss understand so much in such a short period of time.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti video card benchmark result - Intel Core i9-12900K Processor,Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MAG Z690 TOMAHAWK WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D32) (3dmark.com)
here's quick run I did just now
 

Hey you beat me by 12.7% using a GPU costing $1500 more, 18 months later.  Good job.

HeavyHemi They also make the voltage curve available (you know, another tool) for those more competent than you, in fact.
 

I literally just posted a Timespy run where I used the PX1 curve editor to lock 1.1v at an actual 2,265mhz and sustained 2,250mhz.
 
(Then put the PC outside in the middle of the night in the middle of winter)
 
Sigh.
 
Just because I know how to do it doesn't mean I think it's a reasonable choice for daily driver use.

kraade

kevinc313
 
 
Hey you beat me by 12.7% using a GPU costing $1500 more, 18 months later.  Good job.

looking like a looser , and a sore looser, go troll someone else on somewhere else please, we do not need this obtw.

I haven't bothered to bench my 3090 Kingpin and haven't been able to justify the costs of going 3090 SLI.

This Kevin guy must be great at parties. 

UPDATE: I undervolted a TI that can outperform a stock 3090 Kingpin at just 309 watts 

kraade
UPDATE: I undervolted a TI that can outperform a stock 3090 Kingpin at just 309 watts 

👍😎

kevinc313

HeavyHemi They also make the voltage curve available (you know, another tool) for those more competent than you, in fact.
 

I literally just posted a Timespy run where I used the PX1 curve editor to lock 1.1v at an actual 2,265mhz and sustained 2,250mhz.
 
(Then put the PC outside in the middle of the night in the middle of winter)
 
Sigh.
 
Just because I know how to do it doesn't mean I think it's a reasonable choice for daily driver use.

Locking the voltage at max is not using the curve nor address what we're doing. In fact, it is just about the opposite. What a boring repetitive troll.  Because you don't know what you're doing, is the reason for not using that choice for daily use. Stick to the 'click the button' for noob options you prefer.

HeavyHemi

kevinc313

HeavyHemi They also make the voltage curve available (you know, another tool) for those more competent than you, in fact.
 

I literally just posted a Timespy run where I used the PX1 curve editor to lock 1.1v at an actual 2,265mhz and sustained 2,250mhz.
 
(Then put the PC outside in the middle of the night in the middle of winter)
 
Sigh.
 
Just because I know how to do it doesn't mean I think it's a reasonable choice for daily driver use.

Locking the voltage at max is not using the curve nor address what we're doing. In fact, it is just about the opposite. What a boring repetitive troll.  Because you don't know what you're doing, is the reason for not using that choice for daily use. Stick to the 'click the button' for noob options you prefer.

Sigh, more handwaving.  I feel like you might be overly confident in your skill and experience level here.