EVGA

Really Bad Physics Scores

Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Author
Post
Essentials Only Full Version
jeter9209
New Member
  • Total Posts : 21
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/04/08 00:49:37
  • Location: Apple Valley, Minnesota
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Really Bad Physics Scores 2018/01/31 20:18:26 (permalink)
I have been playing with this a lot looking for results in the physics section even after finding out my original bottleneck. So far keys for me have been in memory and the mesh frequency. Going from 30 to 32 mesh yielded nice gains for me with memory at 4000 and a very small overvoltage. I know this setup is capable of more yet but I am hitting a cap with heat @ 4.8ghz on the CPU and the limits of my particular cooling loop and case. I am not delidded though which will be my next step and I am hoping to attain a bench frequency of 5.0ghz. That is where I expect to see the largest gains as the difference in 4.6 to 4.7 to 4.8 were giant jumps. Overall I have not seen a score yet that makes me think I have the wrong board and am extremely happy with it's performance so far! 
#31
geninfo
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 191
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2017/12/18 11:22:15
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 2
Re: Really Bad Physics Scores 2018/01/31 20:35:56 (permalink)
jeter9209
I have been playing with this a lot looking for results in the physics section even after finding out my original bottleneck. So far keys for me have been in memory and the mesh frequency. Going from 30 to 32 mesh yielded nice gains for me with memory at 4000 and a very small overvoltage. I know this setup is capable of more yet but I am hitting a cap with heat @ 4.8ghz on the CPU and the limits of my particular cooling loop and case. I am not delidded though which will be my next step and I am hoping to attain a bench frequency of 5.0ghz. That is where I expect to see the largest gains as the difference in 4.6 to 4.7 to 4.8 were giant jumps. Overall I have not seen a score yet that makes me think I have the wrong board and am extremely happy with it's performance so far! 




Did you have to increase other voltages than VCore for 30 to 32 mesh?
 
Did you have to increase VCCIO for memory overclock?
#32
jeter9209
New Member
  • Total Posts : 21
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/04/08 00:49:37
  • Location: Apple Valley, Minnesota
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Really Bad Physics Scores 2018/01/31 20:52:14 (permalink)

 
Did you have to increase other voltages than VCore for 30 to 32 mesh?
 
Did you have to increase VCCIO for memory overclock?




When i first went to 32 i started with:
CPU VIN @ 2.00
Vcore Adaptive @ 1.25
Vmesh Adaptive @ 1.20
VCCIO @ 1.1
Uncore @ 250
 
I have been bringing things back down now and am at
CPU VIN @ 1.95
Vmesh @ 1.15
 
I will try to lower the VIN a bit more as well as the VCCIO but the core and mesh are as low as they are going to stay stable i think. 
#33
geninfo
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 191
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2017/12/18 11:22:15
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 2
Re: Really Bad Physics Scores 2018/02/01 10:10:06 (permalink)
jeter9209
Going from 30 to 32 mesh yielded nice gains for me



How did you determine moving from 30 to 32 mesh ratio yielded nice gains?  A particular benchmark?
#34
jeter9209
New Member
  • Total Posts : 21
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/04/08 00:49:37
  • Location: Apple Valley, Minnesota
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Really Bad Physics Scores 2018/02/01 17:42:24 (permalink)
geninfo
jeter9209
Going from 30 to 32 mesh yielded nice gains for me



How did you determine moving from 30 to 32 mesh ratio yielded nice gains?  A particular benchmark?


i haven't run all my bench marks yet but time spy yielded consistent gains of 650-700 total score with the gains being in the physics and combined areas specifically. I will run cinebench tonight and see what it does. The idea to try it came from this write up (link Below) on the dark m/b from Vince and the KPC Team that was released back in October on xDevs. I guess "nice" is subjective to the amount one hopes to gain.
 
https://xdevs.com/guide/e299ocg/
 
#35
geninfo
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 191
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2017/12/18 11:22:15
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 2
Re: Really Bad Physics Scores 2018/02/04 07:54:56 (permalink)
jeter9209
 
...time spy yielded consistent gains of 650-700 total score with the gains being in the physics and combined areas specifically ...I guess "nice" is subjective to the amount one hopes to gain.
 
https://xdevs.com/guide/e299ocg/



Any gain is nice.  Just quantifying for replication.
#36
Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile