EVGA

CLC 360 on Larger IHS platform

Author
Post
Essentials Only Full Version
MattCarrier
New Member
  • Total Posts : 9
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2022/06/01 23:01:44
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
2022/06/07 15:49:31 (permalink)
How well does the CLC 360 perform on a larger IHS socket such as sWRX or SP3 relative to it's performance to the rest of the market for the more frequently seen platforms? 
 
What about in an absolute sense, does not being able to do so severely hamper performance? 
 
Would how many cores the processor have play a big role in this?  IE if it's a 16c processor, those cores are more centralized and therefore the coverage is less important vs 64c where the cores are more spread out and thus coverage is more important.
#1

2 Replies Related Threads
    EVGA_Lee
    Moderator
    • Total Posts : 4247
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2016/11/04 14:43:35
    • Location: Brea, CA
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 14
    Re: CLC 360 on Larger IHS platform 2022/06/08 10:20:22 (permalink)
    The biggest issue is that there is no mounting kit available for SP3 or sWRX.  Asetek worked with AMD to provide mounting kits for TR4 with retail TR4 processors, but these larger sockets do not have mounting kits that will allow them to be compatible with these larger sockets.  As such, they aren't officially supported.
     
    For that reason, you're going to have hard time finding decent reviews with normal AIOs on these sockets.  There do appear to be AIOs here and there that were designed just for those larger sockets, but EVGA does not make one.
    #2
    MattCarrier
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 9
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2022/06/01 23:01:44
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: CLC 360 on Larger IHS platform 2022/06/08 17:20:43 (permalink)
    Isn’t the TR4 socket the same size as the sWRX and SP3 sockets? I am confused, what is different about them?

    I see them all as 75.40 mm × 58.50 mm × 6.26 mm.
    post edited by MattCarrier - 2022/06/08 17:21:52
    #3
    Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile