EVGA

4k Results Please: FireStrike Ultra & TimeSpy Extreme

Author
EVGANewMember2719
New Member
  • Total Posts : 71
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2015/11/18 01:31:24
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
2020/09/29 01:13:25 (permalink)
Hi all,
 
Just curious how much you could overclock the 3090 FTW Ultra. This is the best I was able to get on air. 
 
Using Afterburner, 9900k CPU @ 5.1ghz
Core Clock+ 145
Mem clock+ 914
 
Firestrike Ultra:
GPU: 13,285
Phys: 24,481
Comb: 7,578
Total: 13,196
 
TimeSpy Extreme:
GPU: 10,720
CPU: 5,287
Overall: 9,288
 
 

Attached Image(s)

#1

15 Replies Related Threads

    houkom
    FTW Member
    • Total Posts : 1283
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2007/09/13 13:49:52
    • Location: 01101000011011110110110101100101
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 4
    Re: 4k Results Please: FireStrike Ultra & TimeSpy Extreme 2020/09/29 06:18:54 (permalink)
    My Rig:
    9900k @ 5.0Ghz
    Core +175
    Mem +325
     
    Firestrike Ultra:
    GPU: 13,546
    Phys: 24,514
    Comb: 7,622
    Total: 13,403
     
    TimeSpy:
    CPU: 10,172
    GPU: 20,175
    Total: 17,581
     
    Edit: I dont have Time Spy Extreme
     
    Edit #2: This was also on NORMAL BIOS. Have not played with the OC bios yet.
    post edited by houkom - 2020/09/29 06:56:47

    Attached Image(s)


    13900k | 64GB Trident Z5 6400mhz | MSI Z790 CARBON WIFI | MSI RTX 4090 SUPRIM X |  2TB Sabrent Rocket | 1TB Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe | Corsair AX1200

     

     
    #2
    wolfe155
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 16
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2016/05/13 16:40:47
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 4k Results Please: FireStrike Ultra & TimeSpy Extreme 2020/09/29 06:39:04 (permalink)
    10900k at 5.3
    3090 FTW3 Ultra
     
    Time Spy
    GPU 21472
    CPU 14839
    Total 20122
     
    Port Royal
    Total: 14101
     
     
    Time Spy Extreme
    GPU 10709
    CPU 6780
    Total: 9852
    (i cant remember if this was OC as much as the previous two benchmarks)
     
    #3
    ehabash1
    iCX Member
    • Total Posts : 463
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2019/01/03 12:02:48
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 4k Results Please: FireStrike Ultra & TimeSpy Extreme 2020/09/29 06:54:05 (permalink)
    wolfe155
    10900k at 5.3
    3090 FTW3 Ultra
     
    Time Spy
    GPU 21472
    CPU 14839
     
    Total 20122
     
    Port Royal
    Total: 14101
     
     
    Time Spy Extreme
    GPU 10709
    CPU 6780
    Total: 9852
    (i cant remember if this was OC as much as the previous two benchmarks)
     


    do you have your gpu temp and/or your ram speed and timings for the port royal run?
    It's a very good run, albeit I'm a little disappointed. I thought the ftw3 could do more. 
     
    I'm looking at Vmanuelgm. He scored just shy of 15,000. I'm trying to get a reference for what to expect out of the kingpin card. His card is shunted so hes able to suck i believe around 550wats? with an average temp for the runs of 43 C because he stuck a waterblock on it.
     
    I want to see specifically what you guys are doing so differently. I was talking to a guy on another forum who is currently #5 in port royal and hes using an EVGA card with a score of 14,785.... average temp is 49 C. His peak clock is 2,115 MHz with an average clock of 2,035 MHz on a 9900k.
     
    This clocks and temps are very doable so i want to figure out the reason for such a large disparity in scores. One common thing i notice is that these top guys are have extremely high memory clocks. Over 4000 minimum. I wonder if this benchmark relies on memory speed for extra performance
    #4
    wolfe155
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 16
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2016/05/13 16:40:47
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 4k Results Please: FireStrike Ultra & TimeSpy Extreme 2020/09/29 08:04:02 (permalink)
    Attached are two screen shots. I'm running two 16gig G.Skill Royals at 4000MHz. I cant remember how high my fans were set but my GPU was at 56C. I'm using a corsair 280x Crystal case which is a small form factor so i had to take the side panel off to keep temps down

    Attached Image(s)

    #5
    EVGANewMember2719
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 71
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2015/11/18 01:31:24
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 4k Results Please: FireStrike Ultra & TimeSpy Extreme 2020/09/29 11:35:14 (permalink)
    I think my ram is holding me back, only at 3200mhz.
    Regarding the GPU I never hit thermal limits. Awesome cooling solution by EVGA. I am constantly hitting power limits though. I need better bios please EVGA.
    post edited by EVGANewMember2719 - 2020/09/29 11:42:00
    #6
    ehabash1
    iCX Member
    • Total Posts : 463
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2019/01/03 12:02:48
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 4k Results Please: FireStrike Ultra & TimeSpy Extreme 2020/09/29 12:37:38 (permalink)
    TBF i was comparing to the top 10 scores in the world. 
    I dont want you to think your underperforming. You have great scores try benchmarking port royal as well
    #7
    wolfe155
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 16
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2016/05/13 16:40:47
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 4k Results Please: FireStrike Ultra & TimeSpy Extreme 2020/09/29 13:20:47 (permalink)
    yea i'm not far off from what gamer nexus was getting in his overclocking video. i think he got up to 14350 on air. So i'm happy. its a big step up from my 1080 HC.
    #8
    chumeniuk
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 176
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2011/04/13 10:06:29
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 4k Results Please: FireStrike Ultra & TimeSpy Extreme 2020/09/29 13:36:33 (permalink)
    A comparison of my old card vs new.
     
    Time Spy Extreme
    3970X
    3090 FT3 Ultra
    GPU 10211
    CPU 15237
    Total 10211
    http://www.3dmark.com/spy/14215834
     
    3970X
    2080 Ti
    GPU 7064
    CPU 15294
    Total 7684
    http://www.3dmark.com/spy/14021735


    #9
    wolfe155
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 16
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2016/05/13 16:40:47
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 4k Results Please: FireStrike Ultra & TimeSpy Extreme 2020/09/30 08:47:43 (permalink)
    Chumeniuk, wow your threadripper really kicks my 10900k's ass in that benchmark. I get about 10,000 less on my CPU score. I knew theres a big difference between them but i didnt know it was that big. 
     
    At least it only amounts to about a 500 difference in overall score so i hope it wont matter much for gaming which is all i do
    #10
    arestavo
    CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
    • Total Posts : 6916
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/02/06 06:58:57
    • Location: Through the Scary Door
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 76
    Re: 4k Results Please: FireStrike Ultra & TimeSpy Extreme 2020/09/30 08:59:06 (permalink)
    chumeniuk
    A comparison of my old card vs new.
     
    Time Spy Extreme
    3970X
    3090 FT3 Ultra
    GPU 10211
    CPU 15237
    Total 10211
    http://www.3dmark.com/spy/14215834
     
    3970X
    2080 Ti
    GPU 7064
    CPU 15294
    Total 7684
    http://www.3dmark.com/spy/14021735


    Your threadripper spanks my 10940X, but my 3090 FTW3 Ultra is spanking yours! https://www.3dmark.com/co.../14215834/spy/14254119
    #11
    glocked89
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 187
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2019/01/16 23:48:00
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 4k Results Please: FireStrike Ultra & TimeSpy Extreme 2020/09/30 09:00:31 (permalink)
    Time Spy Extreme
    10980xe
    3090 FTW3 Ultra
    GPU 10932
    CPU 8583
    Total 10500
    https://www.3dmark.com/spy/14245132
    #12
    chumeniuk
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 176
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2011/04/13 10:06:29
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 4k Results Please: FireStrike Ultra & TimeSpy Extreme 2020/09/30 10:19:25 (permalink)
    arestavo
    chumeniuk
    A comparison of my old card vs new.
     
    Time Spy Extreme
    3970X
    3090 FT3 Ultra
    GPU 10211
    CPU 15237
    Total 10211
    http://www.3dmark.com/spy/14215834
     
    3970X
    2080 Ti
    GPU 7064
    CPU 15294
    Total 7684
    http://www.3dmark.com/spy/14021735


    Your threadripper spanks my 10940X, but my 3090 FTW3 Ultra is spanking yours! https://www.3dmark.com/co.../14215834/spy/14254119



    Here's a slightly better one.  I'm going to try mounting my card differently.  It replaced a vertically mounted water cooled card and it's very close to the motherboard.  I noticed your temps are much better than mine and I wonder if the cool are is just being pushed past the card.  I have an Enthoo 719 so the motherboard is pretty far back in the case to start.  The riser cable is PCIE 4.0 and shows that in GPU-Z but that may also be causing some issues.
     
    Also not really a fan of the CPU score being included.  Even the 3970x can barely render the scene above 20 FPS so it's a pointless test.  GPU scores in general will be lower if the CPU can't keep up anyways and a faster core clock will be more beneficial than 32 cores at 3.8-4.1Ghz.
     
    3970X
    3090 FT3 Ultra
    GPU 10058
    CPU 15538
    Total 10619
     
    post edited by chumeniuk - 2020/09/30 10:22:22


    #13
    woone
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 1
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2020/10/22 09:29:59
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 4k Results Please: FireStrike Ultra & TimeSpy Extreme 2020/10/22 09:32:38 (permalink)
    Hey chunemiuk !
     
    I was wondering what kind of set up did you have,
    I have 3970x + gigyabite 3090 and when i run the defaut Time Spy ( the free one ) in game mode, I only get around 17k...
     
    I tried basically everything, can't get better than that.
    What's your secret? :)
    Do you OC your cpu/gpu?
     
    Thank you !
     
    Romain
    chumeniuk
    A comparison of my old card vs new.
     
    Time Spy Extreme
    3970X
    3090 FT3 Ultra
    GPU 10211
    CPU 15237
    Total 10211

     
    3970X
    2080 Ti
    GPU 7064
    CPU 15294
    Total 7684





    #14
    telehog
    iCX Member
    • Total Posts : 413
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2018/12/05 13:48:52
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re: 4k Results Please: FireStrike Ultra & TimeSpy Extreme 2020/10/22 11:06:16 (permalink)
    Time Spy Extreme I9 10980xe , 3090 FTW3 ULTRA, Total: 11548,   http://www.3dmark.com/spy/14741358   Fire Strike Ultra ,    http://www.3dmark.com/fs/23833863   13764.
    post edited by telehog - 2020/10/25 08:19:28
    #15
    vexorian87
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 13
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2020/09/24 06:04:41
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: 4k Results Please: FireStrike Ultra & TimeSpy Extreme 2020/10/22 11:40:43 (permalink)
    9900k @5ghz
    3090 FTW3 Ultra with: +160 clock, +1000 mem.
    32GB 3600
     
    Time Spy Extreme: 11057
    #16
    Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile