EVGA

2 1080Ti's overkill?

Page: << < ..6 Showing page 6 of 6
Author
TRClark911
SSC Member
  • Total Posts : 565
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2017/03/03 21:56:17
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: 2 1080Ti's overkill? 2017/05/03 10:10:07 (permalink)
w0ng3r
lol i like how this thread is still tclark trying to convince everyone that he's right


 
Heh... you still butthurt a week later?  Nobody here's trying to convince anyone of anything.  I'm stating the obvious... and BTW the entire topic is retarded if you ask me.
 
A 7700k with a 1080 Ti @ 4k 60hz isn't the same as a 4770k with a 1080 Ti @4k 60 hz which isn't the same as a 6700k with 2x 1080 Ti @ 1440p 144hz.
 
Everyone has a different machine and plays at different resolutions.  What works for me might not work for you and vice versa.  Doesn't have a damn thing to do with trying to convince people I'm right...  it has to do with the fact I'm ALREADY AT 60 FPS IN 4K, SO WHAT DO I NEED SLI FOR?
 
Make sense now?
 
I'll be singing a different tune when I get the 4k 144hz display.. but as of today May 3rd, 2017, SLI is complete overkill for ME.
 
If you need it... go for it,  I really could give a rats.. just do us all a favor and don't post that 1440p DSR'ed and/or upscaled to 4k is the same thing as 4k like the other 2 guys did.
 
LOL
 
 

post edited by TRClark911 - 2017/05/03 10:25:30
CriticalHit_NL
iCX Member
  • Total Posts : 404
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/09/08 10:23:06
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 17
Re: 2 1080Ti's overkill? 2017/05/03 10:47:52 (permalink)
 
The more FPS you generate the more drawcalls your CPU is required to push to feed the GPU, and this scales lineair, this means a stable 120/144/165/240FPS on 1080p or 1440p needs a far more potent CPU than you would on 1080P/1440P/4K 60FPS.
And with SLI I've read it could add additional CPU driver overhead so your CPU becomes even a more important factor here.
 
Many people argument that SLI has become garbage also because of scaling percentages, but is it really?
 
The videocards have remained to increase performance a lot with every iteration and architectural change, either due to optimisations in saving bandwidth aswell far more efficiënt architectures.
Yet processors on the other hand remained marginal in performance increases with every iteration/architecture since the Nehalem i7 CPU's the past 8 years. (which is a lot of time, though Skylake did a fair bit better than usual)
Comparing an i7 1366 socket CPU at the same clockspeed as a 6700K is going to show a lot less of a difference than a GTX200 series GPU versus a GTX1000 series GPU.
The new GPU series have so much more GPU power versus the old ones that the CPU's cannot keep up where the GPU usage starts dropping, though the GPU is capable of more, the FPS rates they could push out at the same settings have increased enormously.
 
Just because current CPU's lack the potentional of feeding these GPU's the SLI scaling is going to be a lot more disappointing than you would've seen back then, with often 90% or more scaling, however this is more of an issue on lower resolutions/settings and/or games that lean a lot on the CPU power.
 
The only downside is that the support of SLI seems to have declined, lower framerates have annoying framepacing issues (40~ etc), or there are other visual bugs/artefacts happening in games, or require tweaking for optimal usage.
Plus there is the cost, would you throw much more money at having more performance at the same architecture/technology or rather save it up for the next generation GPU's? (this matters on how often you upgrade too)
Let alone noise, power and heat.

i7 3930K 4.4Ghz - EVGA 1080Ti FTW3 - 32GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1866 - Asus Sabertooth X79 - Samsung 840 Pro 256GB - Samsung 860 Pro 2TB - 3x HGST 7K4000 Deskstar 4TB - 3x HGST Ultrastar He10 8TB - Corsair AX1200i - Asus PG279Q + BenQ BL2411 - Razer Viper Mini/SBF98 - Logitech Z906 & G35 - Windows 10 Professional

bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
  • Total Posts : 38977
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
  • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 282
Re: 2 1080Ti's overkill? 2017/05/03 11:01:56 (permalink)
CriticalHit_NL
 
The only downside is that the support of SLI seems to have declined, lower framerates have annoying framepacing issues (40~ etc), or there are other visual bugs/artefacts happening in games, or require tweaking for optimal usage.


GOW4 Added SLI Support Yesterday, and it is Great.

Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


 
vampiresinc
New Member
  • Total Posts : 100
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/06/01 15:57:24
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: 2 1080Ti's overkill? 2017/05/03 16:56:45 (permalink)
thanks bcavnaugh I didn't notice gow4 added sli.
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
  • Total Posts : 38977
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
  • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 282
Re: 2 1080Ti's overkill? 2017/05/03 18:07:14 (permalink)
vampiresinc
thanks bcavnaugh I didn't notice gow4 added sli.


You won't unless you have SLI.

Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


 
vampiresinc
New Member
  • Total Posts : 100
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/06/01 15:57:24
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: 2 1080Ti's overkill? 2017/05/04 09:24:55 (permalink)
I have sli just didn't load the game or pay attention to be honest.
Page: << < ..6 Showing page 6 of 6
Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile