rottenmutt
Please post a link to the block diagram.

massdestructor
Is expected any xeon with more than 8 cores for the socket 2011?, it seems that Intel does not have in his roadmap any 10 core or more for this socket.

1. The upper end Xeon for enterprise systems in 4-way boards have always had more cores than regular server, let alone desktop.  Intel's first 6-core was a 45nm Penryn part known a Xeon 7400-- before Nehalem.  Intel's first 8-core was a Nehalem-EX known as Xeon 7500 Nehalem part in LGA1567 socket while no such variant arrived in mainstream server, while that same socket saw the Westmere-EX bring 10-core models known as Xeon E7 and the highest-end desktops only saw the 6-core Gulftown.  Intel reserves the highest cores for Xeon multi-processor and i7's won't have it.
2. When Intel created the LGA1567 socket for their upper end Xeons 7500 series, it was on the assumption AMD would stick to monolithic dies like ther first dual-core, quad-core, 6-core and eventually the Bulldozer 8-core.  Intel wasn't counting on AMD finally invoking it a few years back and suddenly made a 12-core and Bulldozer brought a 16-core.  While any one of us can say Intel's parts still beat AMD, Intel doesn't tolerate any advantage AMD can grasp, it is a threat even if we don't think so.  AMD has the potential of selling more cores per dollar in their drop-in compatible LGA1944 while LGA1567 was limited to 10-cores based on the previous idea Intel wouldn't need more to compete.  So to beat AMD, Intel created LGA2011; it is designed for more than ten cores.  How much more is unknown.
3. Just so you know, there is a LGA1356 socket and those parts are known as Xeon E5-2400 series include 8-core models arriving after SR-X and E5-2600's.  Simplified math (ignoring IMC and IPC) comes to 170 pins per core and therefore 11.8 cores can fit in 2011.  I'm sure you can see if the controller and system agent related pins were constant, a 12-core would easily fit.

n v o

This isn't a board that will benefit gaming - single-processor Sandy Bridge E based boards have more than enough I/O to satisfy quad GPU solutions, so the presence of extra lanes on the SR-X won't really help.  The point of the SR-X is to enable a CPU monster - Sand Bridge EP processors can have a full 8 cores enabled, and overclocked with two sockets would offer fantastically high performance in a single system image.

Striderstone
will the SR-X board be better for gaming then the x79 classified? I am not sure if server processors offer something that gamers need over the normal processors except for possible more l3 cache? Would anyone be able to elaborate?

1. Server is a use and not a function, meaning there is no such thing as a "server" processor versus a "normal" processor.  They're all the same in terms of the micro-architecture except the difference in the die design that set them apart.  Most of them are still following the x86 instruction set; thus install a Windows/Mac OS and any program that can be installed.  An example non-x86 CPUs would be Intel's Itanium series and the IBM CPU in an Xbox360, neither of which are DIY-user friendly.
2. As for gaming alone, understand that developers don't code games openly to take as many cores as available, there is a limit and right now that varies between 2-4 cores mainly because that's what most people own-- I'm talking about everyone.  That won't change until the very cheapest CPUs becomes quads, but their still dual-cores.  As you can see, unless you get a Core i7-3820 for X79 or a pair of Xeon dual-cores for either SR-2 or SR-X, have more uses.

We have literally created a new form factor to fit all the amazing things on one board. Whether you are an extreme gamer, overclocker, power user, workstation user, server admin, folder/cruncher, or just a PC enthusiast; this is the ultimate motherboard. This board will encode your movies, render your images, or even load your games faster than you ever thought possible

badass1982
Has there been any educated estimates as to pricing

lehpron

Striderstone
will the SR-X board be better for gaming then the x79 classified? I am not sure if server processors offer something that gamers need over the normal processors except for possible more l3 cache? Would anyone be able to elaborate?

1. Server is a use and not a function, meaning there is no such thing as a "server" processor versus a "normal" processor.  They're all the same in terms of the micro-architecture except the difference in the die design that set them apart.  Most of them are still following the x86 instruction set; thus install a Windows/Mac OS and any program that can be installed.  An example non-x86 CPUs would be Intel's Itanium series and the IBM CPU in an Xbox360, neither of which are DIY-user friendly.
2. As for gaming alone, understand that developers don't code games openly to take as many cores as available, there is a limit and right now that varies between 2-4 cores mainly because that's what most people own-- I'm talking about everyone.  That won't change until the very cheapest CPUs becomes quads, but their still dual-cores.  As you can see, unless you get a Core i7-3820 for X79 or a pair of Xeon dual-cores for either SR-2 or SR-X, have more uses.

Consider for SR-2:

We have literally created a new form factor to fit all the amazing things on one board. Whether you are an extreme gamer, overclocker, power user, workstation user, server admin, folder/cruncher, or just a PC enthusiast; this is the ultimate motherboard. This board will encode your movies, render your images, or even load your games faster than you ever thought possible

Gaming isn't the only aspect of appeal.

rottenmutt
Some of these boards end up as Cuda crunching monsters with as many graphics cards as possible.  I/O does help with the overhead required to manage the processes running.
Please eliminate the bridge chip which will also help with heat and cost.  And as mentioned by others that platform is meant to be a processor monster; therefore, nobody should be running it single socket and if so I'm sure they wont miss the other half of the pci-e slots.