doodlez123
New Member
- Total Posts : 9
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/01/24 13:57:50
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Hello i dont know if all 970 gtx cards have that Problem but i bought a 970 gtx sc acx 2.0 and i now have lower Fps in Cs:Go as with my old 660 Gtx, so there is my Question, is there any Fix out for that? with 660Gtx i had around 260- 300 fps and with the 970 i only got 160 with some frame drops, new driver is installed. My System i5 3570k 8 GB Ram a SSD 970 GTX Seasonic S2 520 Watts Dont say i dont need more Fps because i got a 144hz Monitor and its anoying when it starts lagging thanks for help
|
Sajin
EVGA Forum Moderator
- Total Posts : 49181
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
- Location: Texas, USA.
- Status: online
- Ribbons : 199
Re: a bit disapointed
2015/01/24 14:09:55
(permalink)
This is probably why it's running lower FPS.
|
the_Scarlet_one
formerly Scarlet-tech
- Total Posts : 24581
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2013/11/13 02:48:57
- Location: East Coast
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 79
Re: a bit disapointed
2015/01/24 15:51:24
(permalink)
CSGO doesn't use much vram at all.
Doodle, what is your setting in game for video? I found with mine, the lower the setting the worse the performance. Do you have everything set to max?
|
doodlez123
New Member
- Total Posts : 9
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/01/24 13:57:50
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: a bit disapointed
2015/01/24 16:03:35
(permalink)
well all is max only aa is set to 2 , was my old setting, seen the card throttle up full ingame but still lower fps, well in this thread there a lot ppls with prob, but i dont know if they got that prob with lower vram usage
post edited by doodlez123 - 2015/01/24 16:06:49
|
the_Scarlet_one
formerly Scarlet-tech
- Total Posts : 24581
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2013/11/13 02:48:57
- Location: East Coast
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 79
Re: a bit disapointed
2015/01/24 16:48:10
(permalink)
Monitor your game play with gpuz running in the background. After a full round, check gpuz and set the vram to Max and see what max reported is.
|
doodlez123
New Member
- Total Posts : 9
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/01/24 13:57:50
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: a bit disapointed
2015/01/24 16:50:09
(permalink)
how i could limit the vram?
|
the_Scarlet_one
formerly Scarlet-tech
- Total Posts : 24581
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2013/11/13 02:48:57
- Location: East Coast
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 79
Re: a bit disapointed
2015/01/24 17:01:56
(permalink)
You aren't limiting it, just checking to make sure it isn't the issue linked by Sajin above.
This will also allow to to check boost clocks and all other functionality of the card to make sure your card is working well.
|
doodlez123
New Member
- Total Posts : 9
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/01/24 13:57:50
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: a bit disapointed
2015/01/24 17:04:19
(permalink)
well gpu boots full up to 1417 mhz 75°C ram load 770 mb but still low fps, seen this benchmark and i did that and the mbit broke down at chunk 24 so i think i got the same problem
post edited by doodlez123 - 2015/01/24 17:06:49
|
the_Scarlet_one
formerly Scarlet-tech
- Total Posts : 24581
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2013/11/13 02:48:57
- Location: East Coast
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 79
Re: a bit disapointed
2015/01/24 18:56:11
(permalink)
you should redo your drivers. First, completely remove them using control panel, then update them to 347.25 at least. Once you are setting the drivers select Custom, uncheck 3d, audio GFE or anything you don't need. Do not do the standard install. I think it may just be a driver issue. Does your card stay boosted to 144hz for the refresh rate at all times, or does it downclock at idle on the desktop? Running my cards at max everything, on a 20 man map with explosions constantly, I never once used over 1027mb of memory, so it isn't a memory issue at all.
|
Sajin
EVGA Forum Moderator
- Total Posts : 49181
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
- Location: Texas, USA.
- Status: online
- Ribbons : 199
Re: a bit disapointed
2015/01/24 19:21:32
(permalink)
|
doodlez123
New Member
- Total Posts : 9
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/01/24 13:57:50
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: a bit disapointed
2015/01/24 19:41:00
(permalink)
is there any info about, that only got this the newer version of the 970´s?
|
Sajin
EVGA Forum Moderator
- Total Posts : 49181
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
- Location: Texas, USA.
- Status: online
- Ribbons : 199
Re: a bit disapointed
2015/01/24 20:10:17
(permalink)
☼ Best Answerby doodlez123 2015/01/24 20:26:04
doodlez123, Does your FPS improve when you downclock the card as far as it can go on both the core & memory? Use msi afterburner to downclock the card.
|
doodlez123
New Member
- Total Posts : 9
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/01/24 13:57:50
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: a bit disapointed
2015/01/24 20:27:22
(permalink)
i changed the gpu clock to the lowest setting and i would say it doesnt changed anything stillt around 160 - 200 fps
|
doodlez123
New Member
- Total Posts : 9
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/01/24 13:57:50
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: a bit disapointed
2015/01/25 07:13:56
(permalink)
ok now i tested in Grid Autosport the Benchmark, i dunno if the very high preset the highest is what i could get but i got there a 110 fps avg
|
the_real_maverick
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1773
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/11/06 19:00:13
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 3
Re: a bit disapointed
2015/01/25 09:17:24
(permalink)
The gtx970 is significantly faster than the gtx660. As others have mentioned, its either a driver or related software issue. Sometimes the games are better optimized for older hardware. Still, you're at 160fps.......you won't notice any difference until you get down around ~60fps. If you really want to see how much better the 970 is, download Heaven benchmark and run both. That way you can check to see if your particular GPU is faulty in some way.
post edited by the_real_maverick - 2015/01/25 09:20:53
Intel i7 6700K 4.0Ghz/ EVGA 980TI Classified / 16GB G.Skill DDR4 2400 / Gigabyte G1 gaming mobo / Western Digital Black 1 TB HDD/ Mushkin 1TB SSD / Corsair 750W PSU / 27" Asus ROG PG279Q IPS 1440 G-sync 165hz / Razer Deathadder / Logitech G810 Spectrum / Windows 10 64bit / K70 RGB http://www.heatware.com/u/70338
|
GoldenShadow
New Member
- Total Posts : 18
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/10/27 19:32:46
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: a bit disapointed
2015/01/25 18:58:47
(permalink)
The heaven benchmark I ran on my gtx 970 sc got twice as many fps as the gtx 660 ti sc I used to have.
SettingsRender:Direct3D11 Mode:1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen PresetCustom QualityUltra Tessellation:Extreme 660 Score: 699 970 Score: 1424
|
doodlez123
New Member
- Total Posts : 9
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/01/24 13:57:50
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: a bit disapointed
2015/01/25 19:41:27
(permalink)
Unigine Heaven Benchmark 4.0FPS:52.7 Score:1327 Min FPS:22.8 Max FPS:108.5
SystemPlatform:Windows NT 6.2 (build 9200) 64bit CPU model:Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz (3400MHz) x4 GPU model:NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 9.18.13.4725/Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000 10.18.10.3958 (4095MB) x1
SettingsRender:Direct3D11 Mode:1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen PresetCustom QualityUltra Tessellation:Extreme
|
Squall_Rinoa86
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1735
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/07/26 14:09:48
- Location: The Empire State -> Hyde Park
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 5
Re: a bit disapointed
2015/01/25 22:26:49
(permalink)
doodlez123
Unigine Heaven Benchmark 4.0FPS:52.7 Score:1327 Min FPS:22.8 Max FPS:108.5
SystemPlatform:Windows NT 6.2 (build 9200) 64bit CPU model:Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz (3400MHz) x4 GPU model:NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 9.18.13.4725/Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000 10.18.10.3958 (4095MB) x1
SettingsRender:Direct3D11 Mode:1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen PresetCustom QualityUltra Tessellation:Extreme
Run Valley and see what you get as well in terms of scores.
PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA 1300 G2 My Affiliate Code: AN1FW0VMG6
|
doodlez123
New Member
- Total Posts : 9
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/01/24 13:57:50
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: a bit disapointed
2015/01/26 12:40:53
(permalink)
Unigine Valley Benchmark 1.0FPS:54.6 Score:2283 Min FPS:21.8 Max FPS:110.1
SystemPlatform:Windows 8 (build 9200) 64bit CPU model:Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz (3399MHz) x4 GPU model:NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 9.18.13.4725/Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000 10.18.10.3958 (4095MB) x1
SettingsRender:Direct3D11 Mode:1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen PresetExtreme HD
|
Sajin
EVGA Forum Moderator
- Total Posts : 49181
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
- Location: Texas, USA.
- Status: online
- Ribbons : 199
Re: a bit disapointed
2015/01/26 12:48:38
(permalink)
|
Squall_Rinoa86
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1735
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/07/26 14:09:48
- Location: The Empire State -> Hyde Park
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 5
Re: a bit disapointed
2015/01/26 13:01:34
(permalink)
Sajin Scores look normal.
It's close yes. SC its about right so over-all the card isn't the issue but perhaps the games in question are. Uploading my results with a FTW model for comparison. Also.. try repairing whatever game is having issues.
post edited by Squall_Rinoa86 - 2015/01/26 21:41:34
Attached Image(s)
PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA 1300 G2 My Affiliate Code: AN1FW0VMG6
|