Phoenix864
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 198
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2016/07/22 12:36:00
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a121/3a1216a8921fa6b2e0fa23710ebe46e2118fe611" alt=""
Re: Voltage Curve vs Normal OC
2016/10/12 14:33:37
(permalink)
Thanks, I am really satisfied with the result.
Gigabyte X99 SLI, GTX 1080 Hybrid, Corsair Vengeance 3000Mhz RAM, Intel 6800k, Corsair 750D Airflow Edition, Dell S2716DG 144Hz G-sync, Deepcool Captain 360, EVGA 850GQ.
|
Sean1976
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 222
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2016/07/03 07:44:58
- Location: Does it matter?
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Voltage Curve vs Normal OC
2016/10/13 05:31:03
(permalink)
I wouldn't alter the voltage curve, it seems fine at stock honestly. I see 120% power target in benchmarks, voltage reaches 1.063, till the temp goes above 60C then the down-clock occurs, which if you ask me, s way too early, it shouldn't down-clock till 70C to be honest, this is when the 600 series down-clocked. These cards run so damn cool, their is no reason to have them down clock the core at 60C. It seems every series of card the downclock comes earlier, and earlier on the temp profile.
post edited by Sean1976 - 2016/10/13 08:40:11
Intel i5 8600k @5.3ghz with 1.450 Vcore Asus ROG Strix-E GamingZ370 deck Hyper 212 Evo Air After-Cooler Evga 1080 GTX Founder's Edition@ 1987mhz core/5400mhz memory G-Skill TridentX 3600mhz XMP4000mhz (2x8GB RGB) 1x Intel 540 series SSD 480GB 2x Intel 520 series SSD 240GB each(480GB) 2x Intel 535 series SSD 240GB each(480GB) Corsair HX850 Watt Gold Psu Antec Eleven Hundred v2 Carbon Fiber case w/ 9x 120mm fans BenQ XL2420TE 144hz 1ms Lightboost/MotionBlur/ Gaming panel(1080p)TN G15/G9 Logitech gear [URL=http://s1273.photobucket.com/user/SeanJ76/media/8600k%20new%20pics_zps2k125brl.jpg.html] [/URL]
|
Phoenix864
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 198
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2016/07/22 12:36:00
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a121/3a1216a8921fa6b2e0fa23710ebe46e2118fe611" alt=""
Re: Voltage Curve vs Normal OC
2016/10/13 06:41:26
(permalink)
Voltage curves are just another way to OC. Instead of adding one offset to the entire card, you control the offset added at each voltage. It lets you get a higher stable OC at load, but gives you higher efficiency when idle. I have a hybrid kit on my card. It never gets over 43c.
Gigabyte X99 SLI, GTX 1080 Hybrid, Corsair Vengeance 3000Mhz RAM, Intel 6800k, Corsair 750D Airflow Edition, Dell S2716DG 144Hz G-sync, Deepcool Captain 360, EVGA 850GQ.
|
Sean1976
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 222
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2016/07/03 07:44:58
- Location: Does it matter?
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Voltage Curve vs Normal OC
2016/10/13 08:34:40
(permalink)
I'm using stock voltage settings on a Evga Founders Edition 1080 GTX, it has never surpassed 64C to date. All I did was alter my fan curve to 50C=60%, 55C=70%, 60C=80%, 65C=85%, 70C=100% My question is can I add voltage to the Vcurve at certain temps and it will keep higher core clocks? 43C is damn cool but that's due to the add on hybrid kit.
post edited by Sean1976 - 2016/10/13 08:41:22
Intel i5 8600k @5.3ghz with 1.450 Vcore Asus ROG Strix-E GamingZ370 deck Hyper 212 Evo Air After-Cooler Evga 1080 GTX Founder's Edition@ 1987mhz core/5400mhz memory G-Skill TridentX 3600mhz XMP4000mhz (2x8GB RGB) 1x Intel 540 series SSD 480GB 2x Intel 520 series SSD 240GB each(480GB) 2x Intel 535 series SSD 240GB each(480GB) Corsair HX850 Watt Gold Psu Antec Eleven Hundred v2 Carbon Fiber case w/ 9x 120mm fans BenQ XL2420TE 144hz 1ms Lightboost/MotionBlur/ Gaming panel(1080p)TN G15/G9 Logitech gear [URL=http://s1273.photobucket.com/user/SeanJ76/media/8600k%20new%20pics_zps2k125brl.jpg.html] [/URL]
|
Phoenix864
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 198
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2016/07/22 12:36:00
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a121/3a1216a8921fa6b2e0fa23710ebe46e2118fe611" alt=""
Re: Voltage Curve vs Normal OC
2016/10/13 08:39:56
(permalink)
Sean1976 I'm using stock voltage settings on a Evga Founders Edition 1080 GTX, it has never surpassed 64C to date. All I did was alter my fan curve to 50C=60%, 55C=70%, 60C=80%, 65C=85%, 70C=100% 43C is damn cool but that's due to the add on hybrid kit right?
Yes. the hybrid kit helps quite a bit in the way of cooling. It decreases temps while increasing OC potential.
Gigabyte X99 SLI, GTX 1080 Hybrid, Corsair Vengeance 3000Mhz RAM, Intel 6800k, Corsair 750D Airflow Edition, Dell S2716DG 144Hz G-sync, Deepcool Captain 360, EVGA 850GQ.
|
Sean1976
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 222
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2016/07/03 07:44:58
- Location: Does it matter?
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Voltage Curve vs Normal OC
2016/10/13 08:41:39
(permalink)
Will adding voltage at certain temp curves keep the core clock higher/more stable? I've tried K-boost it does not lock the core clock nor the voltage, so its useless as far as Im concerned. The downclock still occurs @ certain temps with K-boost enabled.
post edited by Sean1976 - 2016/10/13 08:50:05
Intel i5 8600k @5.3ghz with 1.450 Vcore Asus ROG Strix-E GamingZ370 deck Hyper 212 Evo Air After-Cooler Evga 1080 GTX Founder's Edition@ 1987mhz core/5400mhz memory G-Skill TridentX 3600mhz XMP4000mhz (2x8GB RGB) 1x Intel 540 series SSD 480GB 2x Intel 520 series SSD 240GB each(480GB) 2x Intel 535 series SSD 240GB each(480GB) Corsair HX850 Watt Gold Psu Antec Eleven Hundred v2 Carbon Fiber case w/ 9x 120mm fans BenQ XL2420TE 144hz 1ms Lightboost/MotionBlur/ Gaming panel(1080p)TN G15/G9 Logitech gear [URL=http://s1273.photobucket.com/user/SeanJ76/media/8600k%20new%20pics_zps2k125brl.jpg.html] [/URL]
|
Phoenix864
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 198
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2016/07/22 12:36:00
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a121/3a1216a8921fa6b2e0fa23710ebe46e2118fe611" alt=""
Re: Voltage Curve vs Normal OC
2016/10/13 08:50:34
(permalink)
You are not really adding voltage, just increasing offset at higher volts. I maxed the voltage slider for my card, as it give the card access to %100 of the possible volts drawn. When I added a 200Mhz offset using the slider method, it would crash because it was trying to push too high clocks on too low volts. By creating the curve, I did not add any volts, I just told the card to add x amount of offset at x amount of voltage. This means if the card is idle and volts are low, I can tell it not to use an offset and increase power savings. When the card is under load and volts are high, I can tell it to use a high offset which is stable only at high volts. This is what make the voltage curve much more effective then stranded slider overclocking.
Gigabyte X99 SLI, GTX 1080 Hybrid, Corsair Vengeance 3000Mhz RAM, Intel 6800k, Corsair 750D Airflow Edition, Dell S2716DG 144Hz G-sync, Deepcool Captain 360, EVGA 850GQ.
|
AHowes
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 6502
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2005/09/20 15:38:10
- Location: Macomb MI
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 27
Re: Voltage Curve vs Normal OC
2016/10/13 09:03:22
(permalink)
Yeah using the normal core offset it won't use enough voltage on load so it will insta lockup. The manual curve is how I roll. Just one setting is all I use at the clock I want it to run at load. So a block at +175 @ 1.050v and hit enter and all set at 2190mhz on water cooling of course. Can run at +200 at 2115mhz but at 1.093v but feel it's not worth the difference. Let me add that my cards won't drop clocks during use and stay happy at 34-36c under load. If your card will start dropping clocks and it drops and uses a much lower voltage then it may cause it to lock up.. so a full curve may be the better way to go.
post edited by AHowes - 2016/10/13 09:08:14
Intel i9 9900K @ 5.2Ghz Single HUGE Custom Water Loop. Asus Z390 ROG Extreme XI MB G.Skill Trident Z 32GB (4x8GB) 4266MHz DDR4 EVGA 2080ti K|NGP|N w/ Hydro Copper block. 34" Dell Alienware AW3418DW 1440 Ultra Wide GSync Monitor Thermaltake Core P7 Modded w/ 2x EK Dual D5 pump top,2 x EK XE 480 2X 360 rads.1 Corsair 520 Rad.
|
nautics889
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 137
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2016/09/05 15:14:39
- Location: California
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a121/3a1216a8921fa6b2e0fa23710ebe46e2118fe611" alt=""
Re: Voltage Curve vs Normal OC
2016/10/13 11:07:41
(permalink)
AHowes Yeah using the normal core offset it won't use enough voltage on load so it will insta lockup. The manual curve is how I roll. Just one setting is all I use at the clock I want it to run at load. So a block at +175 @ 1.050v and hit enter and all set at 2190mhz on water cooling of course. Can run at +200 at 2115mhz but at 1.093v but feel it's not worth the difference.
Let me add that my cards won't drop clocks during use and stay happy at 34-36c under load. If your card will start dropping clocks and it drops and uses a much lower voltage then it may cause it to lock up.. so a full curve may be the better way to go.
yup i love using the custom curve to max out points where the card hits at from 1.062v and 1.050v i get really good stable clock under load playing games and benchmarking software.
|
Keidj
New Member
- Total Posts : 83
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2016/05/18 15:46:22
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Voltage Curve vs Normal OC
2016/10/16 15:16:26
(permalink)
Using fixed offset on my 1080 Classified I can get max stable clocks for benchmarking at 2164MHz, starts at 2177MHz but drops down to 2164MHz when temperature has leveled out. Using a fixed curve of +125MHz and then "adjusting" only the higher voltage points , I can benchmark at 2202MHz stable and +500 on memory...still testing though :D But ONLY adjusting the higher voltage points and leaving "the rest" at stock gives substantially lower results. GL
|
Phoenix864
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 198
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2016/07/22 12:36:00
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a121/3a1216a8921fa6b2e0fa23710ebe46e2118fe611" alt=""
Re: Voltage Curve vs Normal OC
2016/10/16 15:55:04
(permalink)
Keidj Using fixed offset on my 1080 Classified I can get max stable clocks for benchmarking at 2164MHz, starts at 2177MHz but drops down to 2164MHz when temperature has leveled out. Using a fixed curve of +125MHz and then "adjusting" only the higher voltage points , I can benchmark at 2202MHz stable and +500 on memory...still testing though :D But ONLY adjusting the higher voltage points and leaving "the rest" at stock gives substantially lower results. GL
How much are you adjusting your top clocks?
Gigabyte X99 SLI, GTX 1080 Hybrid, Corsair Vengeance 3000Mhz RAM, Intel 6800k, Corsair 750D Airflow Edition, Dell S2716DG 144Hz G-sync, Deepcool Captain 360, EVGA 850GQ.
|
Keidj
New Member
- Total Posts : 83
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2016/05/18 15:46:22
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Voltage Curve vs Normal OC
2016/10/16 16:35:20
(permalink)
Phoenix864
Keidj Using fixed offset on my 1080 Classified I can get max stable clocks for benchmarking at 2164MHz, starts at 2177MHz but drops down to 2164MHz when temperature has leveled out. Using a fixed curve of +125MHz and then "adjusting" only the higher voltage points , I can benchmark at 2202MHz stable and +500 on memory...still testing though :D But ONLY adjusting the higher voltage points and leaving "the rest" at stock gives substantially lower results. GL
How much are you adjusting your top clocks?
1.050mV = +126MHz 1.062mV = +131Mhz 1.075mV = +155MHz 1.081mV = +173MHz 1.093mv = +189MHz
post edited by Keidj - 2016/10/16 17:29:20
Attached Image(s)data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfa03/cfa03870a7b676fd23a946fb0bbc80489fc0a0c4" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bf43/5bf436dc0c956a8f8d9909ceedbf5b4987b887b7" alt=""
|