EVGA

Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects

Page: < 1234 > Showing page 2 of 4
Author
Post
Essentials Only Full Version
the_Scarlet_one
formerly Scarlet-tech
  • Total Posts : 24079
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2013/11/13 02:48:57
  • Location: East Coast
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 79
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/17 19:29:36 (permalink)
bcavnaugh


Can you designate, in advanced settings (sorry, no computer so I can not say exactly which tab) for your projects to prefer folding for Cancer or Alzheimers or something?

Project 9637 Disease Type: Unknown
Project 9629 Disease Type: Unknown
Project 9704 Disease Type: Unspecified

This are your last two files units that I could see. I will keep looking at your other projects.. Let's try to pick units with a purpose, if the unknowns are failing.


Interesting read: Client-type Advanced:

This switch is not intended for machines where stability or usability are the primary concern (e.g. corporate or education environments). Its use may lead to the client running experimental projects, which may be less stable or much more complex. This setting is not recommended for a machine which is not constantly monitored. This setting may require more donor intervention. The availability of this class of WUs is based on the current projects that are running, so there is no guarantee the client will get these WUs. This setting has no affect on PPD. PPD for these WUs are benchmarked and set exactly the same as every other work unit. However, due to an occasional instability, the WU might fail, which results in lost points, so overall PPD might decrease.

Basically, the bold spells out what you are experiencing:

https://folding.stanford....e/configuration-guide/

Remove client-type advanced as well.
post edited by Scarlet-Tech - 2015/11/17 19:40:43


TSgt Matthew Schwartz  SrA Bryan Bell A1C Matthew Seidler SSgt Joseph Fankhauser
#31
un4givn85
SSC Member
  • Total Posts : 903
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/02/01 14:35:34
  • Location: MT
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/17 20:11:36 (permalink)
and the weirdest part of all of this....
i have not had any of these issues since the tzc started and am running the same hardware, granted less of them, as you guys that are getting the fails
 
also, i noticed a drop in ppd when i dropped the advanced flag

Folding equipment - 3080 FTW3, 2070, 1660S, 1060 6G, 1050ti, 980 - All EVGA


#32
the_Scarlet_one
formerly Scarlet-tech
  • Total Posts : 24079
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2013/11/13 02:48:57
  • Location: East Coast
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 79
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/17 20:14:18 (permalink)
un4givn85
and the weirdest part of all of this....
i have not had any of these issues since the tzc started and am running the same hardware, granted less of them, as you guys that are getting the fails
 
also, i noticed a drop in ppd when i dropped the advanced flag


If you aren't experiencing failures, you aren't going to experience the PPD drop. Disabling advanced when you aren't experiencing the failures would cause a drop in ppd.


TSgt Matthew Schwartz  SrA Bryan Bell A1C Matthew Seidler SSgt Joseph Fankhauser
#33
un4givn85
SSC Member
  • Total Posts : 903
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/02/01 14:35:34
  • Location: MT
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/17 20:15:39 (permalink)
The post you just made says otherwise.

Folding equipment - 3080 FTW3, 2070, 1660S, 1060 6G, 1050ti, 980 - All EVGA


#34
the_Scarlet_one
formerly Scarlet-tech
  • Total Posts : 24079
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2013/11/13 02:48:57
  • Location: East Coast
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 79
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/17 20:18:15 (permalink)
un4givn85
The post you just made says otherwise.


Yeah, it says they are balanced.. They are not. Imagine that all failures are user hardware and not Stanford... Same scenario.


TSgt Matthew Schwartz  SrA Bryan Bell A1C Matthew Seidler SSgt Joseph Fankhauser
#35
Gunsvnvmc
SSC Member
  • Total Posts : 616
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/10/28 14:16:00
  • Location: Ardmore OK
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/17 20:23:07 (permalink)
Log files from the last 4 failed WUs Titan X Hydro Coppers CPU and GPUs at stock default.
Hope this helps if you don't want the info form the Titans let me know.
 
23:00:16:WU01:FS01:0x21:Completed 400000 out of 2000000 steps (20%)
23:00:24:WU01:FS01:0x21:Bad State detected... attempting to resume from last good checkpoint
23:00:24:WU01:FS01:0x21:Max number of retries reached. Aborting.
23:00:24:WU01:FS01:0x21:ERROR:Max Retries Reached
23:00:24:WU01:FS01:0x21:Saving result file logfile_01.txt
23:00:24:WU01:FS01:0x21:Saving result file log.txt
23:00:24:WU01:FS01:0x21:Folding@home Core Shutdown: BAD_WORK_UNIT
23:00:25:WARNING:WU01:FS01:FahCore returned: BAD_WORK_UNIT (114 = 0x72)
23:00:25:WU01:FS01:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:9635 run:1 clone:30 gen:62 core:0x21 unit:0x0000004eab436c9b5609bee37a10b542
23:00:25:WU01:FS01:Uploading 10.50KiB to 171.67.108.155
23:00:25:WU01:FS01:Connecting to 171.67.108.155:8080
23:00:25:WU01:FS01:Upload complete
23:00:26:WU01:FS01:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
23:00:26:WU00:FS01:Connecting to 171.67.108.45:80
23:00:26:WU01:FS01:Cleaning up
 
12:00:18:WU01:FS01:0x21:Completed 700000 out of 2000000 steps (35%)
12:00:26:WU01:FS01:0x21:Bad State detected... attempting to resume from last good checkpoint
12:00:26:WU01:FS01:0x21:Max number of retries reached. Aborting.
12:00:26:WU01:FS01:0x21:ERROR:Max Retries Reached
12:00:26:WU01:FS01:0x21:Saving result file logfile_01.txt
12:00:26:WU01:FS01:0x21:Saving result file log.txt
12:00:26:WU01:FS01:0x21:Folding@home Core Shutdown: BAD_WORK_UNIT
12:00:27:WARNING:WU01:FS01:FahCore returned: BAD_WORK_UNIT (114 = 0x72)
12:00:27:WU01:FS01:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:9631 run:0 clone:34 gen:26 core:0x21 unit:0x0000001dab436c9b5609bee267814b45
12:00:27:WU01:FS01:Uploading 11.50KiB to 171.67.108.155
12:00:27:WU01:FS01:Connecting to 171.67.108.155:8080
12:00:27:WU01:FS01:Upload complete
12:00:27:WU01:FS01:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
12:00:27:WU02:FS01:Connecting to 171.67.108.45:80
12:00:27:WU01:FS01:Cleaning up
 
05:43:43:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 200000 out of 2000000 steps (10%)
05:43:52:WU00:FS01:0x21:Bad State detected... attempting to resume from last good checkpoint
05:43:52:WU00:FS01:0x21:Max number of retries reached. Aborting.
05:43:52:WU00:FS01:0x21:ERROR:Max Retries Reached
05:43:52:WU00:FS01:0x21:Saving result file logfile_01.txt
05:43:52:WU00:FS01:0x21:Saving result file log.txt
05:43:52:WU00:FS01:0x21:Folding@home Core Shutdown: BAD_WORK_UNIT
05:43:52:WARNING:WU00:FS01:FahCore returned: BAD_WORK_UNIT (114 = 0x72)
05:43:52:WU00:FS01:Sending unit results: id:00 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:9643 run:1 clone:5 gen:59 core:0x21 unit:0x00000055ab436c9b5609bee48dd9b670
05:43:52:WU00:FS01:Uploading 9.00KiB to 171.67.108.155
05:43:52:WU00:FS01:Connecting to 171.67.108.155:8080
05:43:53:WU01:FS01:Connecting to 171.67.108.45:80
05:43:53:WU00:FS01:Upload complete
05:43:53:WU00:FS01:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
05:43:53:WU00:FS01:Cleaning up
 
11:56:59:WU00:FS02:0x21:Completed 1000000 out of 2000000 steps (50%)
11:57:08:WU00:FS02:0x21:Bad State detected... attempting to resume from last good checkpoint
11:57:08:WU00:FS02:0x21:Max number of retries reached. Aborting.
11:57:08:WU00:FS02:0x21:ERROR:Max Retries Reached
11:57:08:WU00:FS02:0x21:Saving result file logfile_01.txt
11:57:08:WU00:FS02:0x21:Saving result file log.txt
11:57:08:WU00:FS02:0x21:Folding@home Core Shutdown: BAD_WORK_UNIT
11:57:08:WARNING:WU00:FS02:FahCore returned: BAD_WORK_UNIT (114 = 0x72)
11:57:08:WU00:FS02:Sending unit results: id:00 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:9625 run:1 clone:10 gen:23 core:0x21 unit:0x00000028ab436c9b5607d8d12c5ea6c6
11:57:08:WU00:FS02:Uploading 13.00KiB to 171.67.108.155
11:57:08:WU00:FS02:Connecting to 171.67.108.155:8080
11:57:09:WU00:FS02:Upload complete
11:57:09:WU01:FS01:0x21:Completed 725000 out of 2500000 steps (29%)
11:57:09:WU02:FS02:Connecting to 171.67.108.45:80
11:57:09:WU00:FS02:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
11:57:09:WU00:FS02:Cleaning up
 
 
 
 
 
post edited by Gunsvnvmc - 2015/11/17 20:31:19



 
Elite ID: NIRFPZ2AFBYQ56SSJ7EV
 
 A lesson unlearned will be retaught
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
#36
the_Scarlet_one
formerly Scarlet-tech
  • Total Posts : 24079
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2013/11/13 02:48:57
  • Location: East Coast
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 79
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/17 20:43:06 (permalink)
9637 Disease Type Unspecified
9625 Disease Type Unspecified
9635 Disease Type Unspecified
9643 Disease Type Unspecified

Is this all with Client-type Advanced still?


TSgt Matthew Schwartz  SrA Bryan Bell A1C Matthew Seidler SSgt Joseph Fankhauser
#37
z999z3mystorys
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 3910
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/11/29 06:46:22
  • Location: at my current location
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 23
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/17 20:49:49 (permalink)
I don't have advanced type, client is set to whatever default settings for the most part, did disable the CPU client part however.
 
 
also details on failed x21 unit:
 
03:11:46:WU00:FS03:0x21:Completed 1700000 out of 2000000 steps (85%)
03:11:53:WU00:FS03:0x21:Bad State detected... attempting to resume from last good checkpoint
03:11:53:WU00:FS03:0x21:Max number of retries reached. Aborting.
03:11:53:WU00:FS03:0x21:ERROR:Max Retries Reached
03:11:53:WU00:FS03:0x21:Saving result file logfile_01.txt
03:11:53:WU00:FS03:0x21:Saving result file log.txt
03:11:53:WU00:FS03:0x21:Folding@home Core Shutdown: BAD_WORK_UNIT
03:11:54:WARNING:WU00:FS03:FahCore returned: BAD_WORK_UNIT (114 = 0x72)
03:11:54:WU00:FS03:Sending unit results: id:00 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:9625 run:1 clone:8 gen:65 core:0x21 unit:0x0000005aab436c9b5607d8d1329f92cd
03:11:54:WU00:FS03:Uploading 16.50KiB to 171.67.108.155
03:11:54:WU00:FS03:Connecting to 171.67.108.155:8080
03:11:55:WU00:FS03:Upload complete
03:11:55:WU01:FS03:Connecting to 171.67.108.45:80
03:11:55:WU00:FS03:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
03:11:55:WU00:FS03:Cleaning up
post edited by z999z3mystorys - 2015/11/17 20:51:32
#38
the_Scarlet_one
formerly Scarlet-tech
  • Total Posts : 24079
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2013/11/13 02:48:57
  • Location: East Coast
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 79
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/17 20:52:37 (permalink)
z999z3mystorys
I don't have advanced type, client is set to whatever default settings for the most part, did disable the CPU client part however.


Could you try designating a disease in the advanced setting to see if it picks up known projects.


TSgt Matthew Schwartz  SrA Bryan Bell A1C Matthew Seidler SSgt Joseph Fankhauser
#39
z999z3mystorys
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 3910
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2008/11/29 06:46:22
  • Location: at my current location
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 23
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/17 20:55:04 (permalink)
ok, selected a disease, going to see if that has any effect in what projects I get in the future.
 
edit: just got an x21 core  9206 unit, seems it won't only pull for that disease, just raises it to a slightly higher priority.
post edited by z999z3mystorys - 2015/11/17 20:56:32
#40
the_Scarlet_one
formerly Scarlet-tech
  • Total Posts : 24079
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2013/11/13 02:48:57
  • Location: East Coast
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 79
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/17 21:02:15 (permalink)
Yeah, it only gives it higher priority. If there aren't any available units for a specified disease, it gives work just so the computer isn't sitting idle.

9206 Disease Type Unspecified: Cystic Fibrosis.

I don't think Cystic Fibrosis is on the list of diseases that can be specified, so that is probably why is shows as Unspecified. It isn't like the other failed projects that say, "Malfunction of the CLC chloride ion" which is where the failures seem to be occurring.
post edited by Scarlet-Tech - 2015/11/17 21:08:38


TSgt Matthew Schwartz  SrA Bryan Bell A1C Matthew Seidler SSgt Joseph Fankhauser
#41
HK-Steve
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 2251
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2015/04/06 08:46:57
  • Location: Switzerland
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 2
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/18 03:58:10 (permalink)
Just some info for you guy's.
 
I am running 353.06 driver, PhysX set to cpu, with stock setting for the 970's (running 5 of them, 3 in one and 2 in the other computer)
Running Windows7 pro both computers.
 
Had no tasks fail since PhysX setting changed.
 
Now my 770 and 760's, did not help them, still getting tasks fail.

 


#42
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
  • Total Posts : 38516
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
  • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 282
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/18 06:32:56 (permalink)
Scarlet-Tech
bcavnaugh


Can you designate, in advanced settings (sorry, no computer so I can not say exactly which tab) for your projects to prefer folding for Cancer or Alzheimers or something?

Project 9637 Disease Type: Unknown
Project 9629 Disease Type: Unknown
Project 9704 Disease Type: Unspecified

This are your last two files units that I could see. I will keep looking at your other projects.. Let's try to pick units with a purpose, if the unknowns are failing.


Interesting read: Client-type Advanced:

This switch is not intended for machines where stability or usability are the primary concern (e.g. corporate or education environments). Its use may lead to the client running experimental projects, which may be less stable or much more complex. This setting is not recommended for a machine which is not constantly monitored. This setting may require more donor intervention. The availability of this class of WUs is based on the current projects that are running, so there is no guarantee the client will get these WUs. This setting has no affect on PPD. PPD for these WUs are benchmarked and set exactly the same as every other work unit. However, due to an occasional instability, the WU might fail, which results in lost points, so overall PPD might decrease.

Basically, the bold spells out what you are experiencing:

https://folding.stanford....e/configuration-guide/

Remove client-type advanced as well.

Yes I have mine set to Advanced.
But I have also removed it with no change.
 
I will remove the advanced setting.
 
They still show Big Advanced, maybe Stanford needs to update this page and a few others.
post edited by bcavnaugh - 2015/11/18 06:34:19

Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


 
#43
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
  • Total Posts : 38516
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
  • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 282
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/18 06:37:23 (permalink)
Third BAD_WORK_UNIT Core 21 project:9631 GTX 980HC
 
11:51:20:WU01:FS04:0x21:Completed 880000 out of 2000000 steps (44%)
11:52:46:WU01:FS04:0x21:Completed 900000 out of 2000000 steps (45%)
11:52:56:WU01:FS04:0x21:Bad State detected... attempting to resume from last good checkpoint
11:52:56:WU01:FS04:0x21:Max number of retries reached. Aborting.
11:52:56:WU01:FS04:0x21:ERROR:Max Retries Reached
11:52:56:WU01:FS04:0x21:Saving result file logfile_01.txt
11:52:56:WU01:FS04:0x21:Saving result file log.txt
11:52:56:WU01:FS04:0x21:Folding@home Core Shutdown: BAD_WORK_UNIT
11:52:57:WARNING:WU01:FS04:FahCore returned: BAD_WORK_UNIT (114 = 0x72)
11:52:57:WU01:FS04:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:9631 run:1 clone:77 gen:8 core:0x21 unit:0x0000000cab436c9b5609bee204fd8294
11:52:57:WU01:FS04:Uploading 13.00KiB to 171.67.108.155
11:52:57:WU01:FS04:Connecting to 171.67.108.155:8080
11:52:57:WU01:FS04:Upload complete
11:52:57:WU01:FS04:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
11:52:57:WU01:FS04:Cleaning up
 

Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


 
#44
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
  • Total Posts : 38516
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
  • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 282
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/18 06:40:15 (permalink)
Scarlet-Tech
9637 Disease Type Unspecified
9625 Disease Type Unspecified
9635 Disease Type Unspecified
9643 Disease Type Unspecified

Is this all with Client-type Advanced still?

As I said I am now removing this setting and will report back.
 
ZETA_DEV is under Beta but Core 18 Projects are listed as ZETA_DEV.
So does this client type setting even work anymore>?
 
Lets hope that Core 15 Projects do not start popping back up!
post edited by bcavnaugh - 2015/11/18 07:54:12

Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


 
#45
HK-Steve
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 2251
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2015/04/06 08:46:57
  • Location: Switzerland
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 2
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/18 07:10:29 (permalink)
Sorry forgot to add, running no flags at all..

 


#46
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
  • Total Posts : 38516
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
  • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 282
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/18 07:26:20 (permalink)
Project: 9641 getting ready to Fail Failed *OPENMM_21 21 P9641 this is not one of the UNKNOWN_ENUM Core
 
Forth Failed Project 
 
15:30:29:WU02:FS00:0x21:Completed 780000 out of 2000000 steps (39%)
15:31:56:WU02:FS00:0x21:Completed 800000 out of 2000000 steps (40%)
15:32:05:WU02:FS00:0x21:Bad State detected... attempting to resume from last good checkpoint
15:32:05:WU02:FS00:0x21:Max number of retries reached. Aborting.
15:32:05:WU02:FS00:0x21:ERROR:Max Retries Reached
15:32:05:WU02:FS00:0x21:Saving result file logfile_01.txt
15:32:05:WU02:FS00:0x21:Saving result file log.txt
15:32:05:WU02:FS00:0x21:Folding@home Core Shutdown: BAD_WORK_UNIT
15:32:05:WARNING:WU02:FS00:FahCore returned: BAD_WORK_UNIT (114 = 0x72)
15:32:05:WU02:FS00:Sending unit results: id:02 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:9641 run:0 clone:37 gen:31 core:0x21 unit:0x0000002eab436c9b5609bee4be719abe
15:32:05:WU02:FS00:Uploading 12.50KiB to 171.67.108.155
15:32:05:WU02:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.155:8080
15:32:06:WU02:FS00:Upload complete
15:32:06:WU02:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
15:32:06:WU02:FS00:Cleaning up
post edited by bcavnaugh - 2015/11/18 07:44:48

Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


 
#47
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
  • Total Posts : 38516
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
  • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 282
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/18 07:55:19 (permalink)
Scarlet-Tech
9637 Disease Type Unspecified
9625 Disease Type Unspecified
9635 Disease Type Unspecified
9643 Disease Type Unspecified

Is this all with Client-type Advanced still?

Client-type Removed.
Project 9637 Disease Type:  Unknown Project 9629 Disease Type:  Unknown  NO So Far.
 
Project 9704 Disease Type: Unspecified YES
 
Updated:
No Flag and I get Beta Projects ZETA_DEV is under Core 18 And UNKNOWN_ENUM 21 P9704 (R11, C8, G109)
post edited by bcavnaugh - 2015/11/18 08:45:39

Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


 
#48
the_Scarlet_one
formerly Scarlet-tech
  • Total Posts : 24079
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2013/11/13 02:48:57
  • Location: East Coast
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 79
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/18 10:34:54 (permalink)
They must not be running any advanced units if they are still being picked up without the flags set.

Sounds like they need to pull and rethink the CLC Malfunction units.


TSgt Matthew Schwartz  SrA Bryan Bell A1C Matthew Seidler SSgt Joseph Fankhauser
#49
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
  • Total Posts : 38516
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
  • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 282
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/18 13:02:38 (permalink)
Scarlet-Tech
They must not be running any advanced units if they are still being picked up without the flags set.

Sounds like they need to pull and rethink the CLC Malfunction units.

My HFM Site
Well after some time I am now getting ZETA_DEV Core 18 and still have one Core 21 OPENMM_21 P9206
For the most part I have not seen any issues with any Core 21 OPENMM_21 P92xx Projects.
They are for the most part Big Credit Projects compared to ZETA_DEV Core 18 which are Long Running and most are below 94,000 in Credit.
No new Core 21 P97xx or P96xx now so this is good, the Bad News is an lost over 400,000 PPD less then what I was seeing before.
post edited by bcavnaugh - 2015/11/18 13:08:26

Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


 
#50
the_Scarlet_one
formerly Scarlet-tech
  • Total Posts : 24079
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2013/11/13 02:48:57
  • Location: East Coast
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 79
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/18 14:40:23 (permalink)
Strange enough, I got 0 units and points for the 3pm update today. I will be home in a few days, and hope to see what caused the lack of completed units.


TSgt Matthew Schwartz  SrA Bryan Bell A1C Matthew Seidler SSgt Joseph Fankhauser
#51
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
  • Total Posts : 38516
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
  • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 282
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/18 14:46:51 (permalink)
Scarlet-Tech
Strange enough, I got 0 units and points for the 3pm update today. I will be home in a few days, and hope to see what caused the lack of completed units.

I show this as well and out Team shows Zero as well.
Sometimes http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/team_summary.php?s=&t=111065 is way late in updates.

Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


 
#52
un4givn85
SSC Member
  • Total Posts : 903
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/02/01 14:35:34
  • Location: MT
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/18 14:49:36 (permalink)
Might not even show until the 6pm update, I too am at 0 for 3pm.

Folding equipment - 3080 FTW3, 2070, 1660S, 1060 6G, 1050ti, 980 - All EVGA


#53
the_Scarlet_one
formerly Scarlet-tech
  • Total Posts : 24079
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2013/11/13 02:48:57
  • Location: East Coast
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 79
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/18 14:51:36 (permalink)
Well, that makes me feel a little better..

Don't tell anyone, but I am trying to outrun mflanaga. Because of the 9 days of horrible production, I fell behind. 700k points to catch up to him, and I won't before the end of the challenge today.. I was happy being number 1 for Eastern those first 4 days, lol.


TSgt Matthew Schwartz  SrA Bryan Bell A1C Matthew Seidler SSgt Joseph Fankhauser
#54
the_Scarlet_one
formerly Scarlet-tech
  • Total Posts : 24079
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2013/11/13 02:48:57
  • Location: East Coast
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 79
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/18 16:08:24 (permalink)
6pm update shows points for everyone.

Around the 12pm-3pm update tomorrow, we should cross 2 billion for the month.
post edited by Scarlet-Tech - 2015/11/18 16:11:07


TSgt Matthew Schwartz  SrA Bryan Bell A1C Matthew Seidler SSgt Joseph Fankhauser
#55
un4givn85
SSC Member
  • Total Posts : 903
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/02/01 14:35:34
  • Location: MT
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/18 16:11:39 (permalink)
Scarlet-Tech
6pm update shows points for everyone.

Around the 12pm-3pm update tomorrow, we should cross 2 billion for the month.



Folding equipment - 3080 FTW3, 2070, 1660S, 1060 6G, 1050ti, 980 - All EVGA


#56
the_Scarlet_one
formerly Scarlet-tech
  • Total Posts : 24079
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2013/11/13 02:48:57
  • Location: East Coast
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 79
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/18 16:13:41 (permalink)
un4givn85



I should grab a couple 980ti's with my payout from being in Arizona.. And watch my score go to 3mil ppd before selling the 980's.
post edited by Scarlet-Tech - 2015/11/18 16:15:03


TSgt Matthew Schwartz  SrA Bryan Bell A1C Matthew Seidler SSgt Joseph Fankhauser
#57
un4givn85
SSC Member
  • Total Posts : 903
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2011/02/01 14:35:34
  • Location: MT
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/18 16:18:29 (permalink)
Do it.

Folding equipment - 3080 FTW3, 2070, 1660S, 1060 6G, 1050ti, 980 - All EVGA


#58
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
  • Total Posts : 38516
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
  • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 282
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/18 19:02:53 (permalink)
Round 1 Log Files
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kgNbip_LMcBsz28c-cQKTrAMp9NPJ4zpDv4YY--RsVs/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i64d_hw_Khi0ph962gbECYjm0COsxeNAuvgKb-DH8F8/edit?usp=sharing
 
My computers are going back the their default Overclocked Settings and setting the GPU back to 1500 MHz
post edited by bcavnaugh - 2015/11/18 19:17:51

Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


 
#59
Mekhed
iCX Member
  • Total Posts : 415
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2014/04/19 19:14:48
  • Location: Rocky Mountain High
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re: Testing Issues with the GTX 980 Graphics Cards and Core 21 Projects 2015/11/19 09:17:17 (permalink)
ok... this is from my 970 but still failing... no flags set...driver 355.82
 
03:43:57:WU02:FS02:0x21:Completed 2000000 out of 2500000 steps (80%)
03:44:12:WU02:FS02:0x21:Bad State detected... attempting to resume from last good checkpoint
03:44:12:WU02:FS02:0x21:Max number of retries reached. Aborting.
03:44:12:WU02:FS02:0x21:ERROR:Max Retries Reached
03:44:12:WU02:FS02:0x21:Saving result file logfile_01.txt
03:44:12:WU02:FS02:0x21:Saving result file log.txt
03:44:12:WU02:FS02:0x21:Folding@home Core Shutdown: BAD_WORK_UNIT
03:44:12:WARNING:WU02:FS02:FahCore returned: BAD_WORK_UNIT (114 = 0x72)
03:44:12:WU02:FS02:Sending unit results: id:02 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:9205 run:8 clone:67 gen:24 core:0x21 unit:0x00000055664f2dd055d4cc15ce7907cb
03:44:12:WU02:FS02:Uploading 3.14KiB to 171.64.65.104
03:44:12:WU02:FS02:Connecting to 171.64.65.104:8080
03:44:13:WU02:FS02:Upload complete
03:44:13:WU00:FS02:Connecting to 171.67.108.45:80
03:44:13:WU02:FS02:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
03:44:13:WU02:FS02:Cleaning up
post edited by Mekhed - 2015/11/19 12:07:55



 "Kaos"   ASUS RAMPAGE V EXTREME | Intel Core i7-5930K | Corsair H110i GTX | 2x 1080TI Hybrid & 1080 Hybrid | HyperX 32GB 3000 | Supernova 1200 | Corsair 780T
"BigDawg" Asus Maximus VI Formula | i7-4790k | Corsair H100i | 2x RTX 2080 Ti FTW3 Ultra | Mushkin Redline 16GB 2400 | Supernova 1300 | Antec 1200
#60
Page: < 1234 > Showing page 2 of 4
Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile