Sprinx
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 364
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/03/16 19:05:55
- Location: Tennessee, US
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/09 19:32:02
(permalink)
Sprinx ------------ i5 750 @ 3.66 ---- (1) 680 ---- 1124/1752/1189 ---- 132%/+65/+400 ---- P9338 ---- Air Didn't think my i5 would hamper me that much. I couldn't even break 9000 on stock speeds. Is my 1333 RAM hurting at all? http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3159490
ASUS Prime X570-Pro AM4 | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 32 GB DDR4 3200 Corsair Crystal 570X | Corsair CX-F CX750F PSU Corsair Hydro Series H100i RGB Platinum CPU AIO
|
linuxrouter
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 4605
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/02/28 14:47:45
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 104
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/09 20:58:45
(permalink)
It looks like I had some issues with my setup before. linuxrouter ------ i7 3930K @ 5.0 ---- (1) 680 ----- 1215/3506/2392 ---- 132%/+40/+400 ---- P11190 ---- Air
|
kram36
The Destroyer
- Total Posts : 20362
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/10/27 19:00:58
- Location: United States
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 72
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/09 21:00:23
(permalink)
Nice increase!
|
Khenglish
New Member
- Total Posts : 24
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/12/30 13:58:19
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/09 21:56:33
(permalink)
Sprinx Sprinx ------------ i5 750 @ 3.66 ---- (1) 680 ---- 1124/1752/1189 ---- 132%/+65/+400 ---- P9338 ---- Air Didn't think my i5 would hamper me that much. I couldn't even break 9000 on stock speeds. Is my 1333 RAM hurting at all? http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3159490 Your CPU and RAM aren't holding you back at all. If you look at the graphics score you'll see that you're over 11k just like everyone else. Sure the arbitrary total score would be higher with a faster CPU, but it wouldn't affect your actual graphics performance at all. I personally only care about the graphics score and others feel the same way.
|
Morty
New Member
- Total Posts : 86
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/09/27 02:54:51
- Location: Oslo - Norway
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/10 01:59:57
(permalink)
Morty(Mydog) ------ i7 3960X @ 5.36 ---- (1) 680 ----- 1218/1757/1271 ---- 132%/+212/+510 ---- P11941 ---- Air Morty(Mydog) ------ i7 3960X @ 5.1 ---- (2) 680 ----- 1208/1753/1261 ---- 132%/+202/+500 ---- P19927 ---- Air Morty(Mydog) ------ i7 3960X @ 5.36 ---- (4) 680 ----- 1163/1728/1216 ---- 132%/+150/+455 ---- P28495 ---- Air Will ad the FM links on the SLI and quad SLI score later as 3dmark.com seem to have trouble atm. Edit: fixed FM links
post edited by Morty - 2012/04/10 05:03:41
|
grechie
New Member
- Total Posts : 54
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/04/05 01:33:20
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/10 02:18:43
(permalink)
farout nearly 12k on single 680 you sir are god!
|
Macros
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 701
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/05/20 01:24:59
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/10 03:23:08
(permalink)
Holy crap! What temps are you getting at that clock speed on the CPU on Air cooling?!?
Ship EVGA Products Locally in Australia! EVGA X79 FTW - i7 3930K @ 4.0GHz - 4x4GB Corsair Dominator GT 2133MHz C9 - EVGA GTX 1080 FTW - Corsair AX850 PSU - Corsair Performance Pro 128GB SSD - 2x 2TB Samsung Barracuda 7200rpm - Noctua DH-14 SE2011 - CoolerMaster HAF 932 Advanced
|
Morty
New Member
- Total Posts : 86
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/09/27 02:54:51
- Location: Oslo - Norway
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/10 03:34:51
(permalink)
grechie farout nearly 12k on single 680 you sir are god! Thank you sir Out of the four cards one is good(+212/+510 mhz offsett) two average(+186/+502 mhz offsett) and one I would say is bad(+150/+452 mhz offsett) Macros Holy crap! What temps are you getting at that clock speed on the CPU on Air cooling?!? CPU is watercooled with 3x360 rad and a Hailea waterchiller in the loop, CPU can only do 5363 MHz but it does so on water. At 5363 MHz temps hit high 60C to low 70C, GPU's are alle on stock cooler. Pic of the setup
post edited by Morty - 2012/04/10 03:37:39
|
Max Silencio
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 573
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/12/09 14:35:58
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 3
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/10 03:35:46
(permalink)
linuxrouter It looks like I had some issues with my setup before. linuxrouter ------ i7 3930K @ 5.0 ---- (1) 680 ----- 1215/3506/2392 ---- 132%/+40/+400 ---- P11190 ---- Air Great score. Congratulation. Could you be so kind and post your UEFI settings? How much is VCORE max, I thought it's 1.4? Did you set vcore manually or is it on auto? And did you just take multiplier 50, adjust ram timings, disable EIST and EPU power saving? Or what else. As you have an ASUS board as well as a C2, isn't the UEFI is basically the same? I restricted VCORE to 1.3 for safety and did not dare to go further. http://www.overclockers.c...owthread.php?t=695410# Ai Overclock Tuner – Manual BCLK Frequency – 100 CPU Clock Gen Filter – Enabled Memory Frequency – DDR3-2000 to DDR3-2133 EPU Power Saving Mode – Disabled DRAM Timing Control – 11-11-11-30 DIGI+ Power Control CPU Load-Line Calibration – High CPU Performance Settings CPU Ratio – 47 Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology – Disabled CPU Vcore Voltage – 1.3-1.4v CPU VCCSA – Auto DRAM Voltage (CHA, CHB) – 1.6v DRAM Voltage (CHC, CHD) – 1.6v CPU PLL Voltage – Auto VTTCPU Voltage – 1.3-1.4v @morty Your vcore is 1.584. Is your 3930X that solid? How do you cool it down with merely air?. Really a monster score. @all Let's get ready to rumble! Though I hope this will not emerge to a funeral feast including the incineration of our beloved toys.
|
Sprinx
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 364
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/03/16 19:05:55
- Location: Tennessee, US
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/10 10:27:08
(permalink)
Khenglish Sprinx Sprinx ------------ i5 750 @ 3.66 ---- (1) 680 ---- 1124/1752/1189 ---- 132%/+65/+400 ---- P9338 ---- Air Didn't think my i5 would hamper me that much. I couldn't even break 9000 on stock speeds. Is my 1333 RAM hurting at all? http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3159490 Your CPU and RAM aren't holding you back at all. If you look at the graphics score you'll see that you're over 11k just like everyone else. Sure the arbitrary total score would be higher with a faster CPU, but it wouldn't affect your actual graphics performance at all. I personally only care about the graphics score and others feel the same way. Good point - I didn't take a look at the "Graphics" score in particular. In that case, I'm about the same as the others. I think my P55 / i5 750 setup will last me another couple of years. I can even add a second 680 when these folks start selling them off for the next nVidia series
ASUS Prime X570-Pro AM4 | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 32 GB DDR4 3200 Corsair Crystal 570X | Corsair CX-F CX750F PSU Corsair Hydro Series H100i RGB Platinum CPU AIO
|
KW-Sparhawk
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 592
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/03/25 20:26:45
- Location: San Antonio TX
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/10 10:33:22
(permalink)
*EDIT - New score and screenshot below. Just saw that a screenshot is needed as well. But I had already closed 3DMark11 so I will run again later and get a screenshot for ya.
post edited by KW-Sparhawk - 2012/04/11 06:51:11
|
Max Silencio
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 573
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/12/09 14:35:58
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 3
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/10 13:36:47
(permalink)
|
Morty
New Member
- Total Posts : 86
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/09/27 02:54:51
- Location: Oslo - Norway
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/10 14:22:02
(permalink)
I would try if I could do this mod but it's too crazy for me
|
elganja
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 185
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/02/11 06:26:03
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/10 18:18:53
(permalink)
1. Elganja---- 990x @ 4.5 ---- (3) 680SC ---- 1250/3523/2160(clocks) ---- 132/+75/+425 (offset) ---- P18997 ---- Water it's just a small OC on the cards. Probably shows that my CPU is holding me back a little bit (which is very hard to believe) GPU's are running at 16x/8x/16x (this can be hurting the scores a little bit too) I see a bunch of people running much higher shader clocks... how? I'm still trying to understand this oc'ing and stuff last note... nvidia needs to work on their scaling a little bit!
post edited by elganja - 2012/04/10 18:34:47
|
linuxrouter
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 4605
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/02/28 14:47:45
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 104
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/10 18:27:01
(permalink)
Max Silencio linuxrouter It looks like I had some issues with my setup before. linuxrouter ------ i7 3930K @ 5.0 ---- (1) 680 ----- 1215/3506/2392 ---- 132%/+40/+400 ---- P11190 ---- Air Great score. Congratulation. Could you be so kind and post your UEFI settings? How much is VCORE max, I thought it's 1.4? Did you set vcore manually or is it on auto? And did you just take multiplier 50, adjust ram timings, disable EIST and EPU power saving? Or what else. As you have an ASUS board as well as a C2, isn't the UEFI is basically the same? I restricted VCORE to 1.3 for safety and did not dare to go further. http://www.overclockers.c...owthread.php?t=695410# Thanks. Here are the settings that I am running in UEFI: Base Clock / CPU Strap: 100 Turbo Multiplier: 50x Memory Frequency: 1600 VCore: 1.5v ( ~ 1.47 under full load) CPU PLL: 1.8v DRAM V: 1.5v EPU Power Savings: Disabled EIST: Disabled CPU ClockGen Filter: 20UF I leave pretty much everything else at Auto. This board is very good at automatically setting configuration where needed. I also set base memory timings since I am running tighter base timings than what my memory kit is rated for. The only reason I set PLL and DRAM voltage is because both were higher than needed and I have better stability at these voltages. I sometimes also run a bit higher base clock around 104-105 which the board handles fine and sometimes allows for setting core voltage a bit lower than overclocking by multiplier alone.
post edited by linuxrouter - 2012/04/10 18:29:27
|
elganja
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 185
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/02/11 06:26:03
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/10 18:39:26
(permalink)
was just comparing my graphics scores to kram's since his is the highest the general breakdown: MINE: Graphics Score 26712 Physics Score 10428 Combined Score 9827 GraphicsTest1 126.77 FPS GraphicsTest2 142.82 FPS GraphicsTest3 171.44 FPS GraphicsTest4 72.9 FPS PhysicsTest 33.11 FPS CombinedTest 45.71 FPS KRAMS: Graphics Score 22279 Physics Score 15885 Combined Score 11915 GraphicsTest1 107.31 FPS GraphicsTest2 105.53 FPS GraphicsTest3 136.82 FPS GraphicsTest4 65.84 FPS PhysicsTest 50.43 FPS CombinedTest 55.42 FPS so i'm probably close to where I should be all things considered
|
Max Silencio
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 573
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/12/09 14:35:58
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 3
|
KW-Sparhawk
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 592
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/03/25 20:26:45
- Location: San Antonio TX
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/11 06:39:31
(permalink)
OK, got a new score and a screenshot to go with. Actually got my 680 to do a little OC. I had noticed a few of the higher scores posted had low GPU offsets so instead of starting at 100, which crashed real quick, I started a lot lower at 20. I'm actually very pleased with the results and the temps were all awesome too so I'm just gonna leave it right here. KW-Sparhawk ---- i7-3820 @ 4.3 ---- (1) 680 SC+ ---- 1201/3601/2402 ---- 132%/+25/+500 ----- P10508 ------ Air http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3169688
post edited by KW-Sparhawk - 2012/04/12 20:30:10
|
Max Silencio
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 573
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/12/09 14:35:58
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 3
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/11 16:20:15
(permalink)
|
linuxrouter
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 4605
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/02/28 14:47:45
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 104
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/11 18:29:13
(permalink)
Max Silencio Thanks for your detailed answer. As I quoted already the only thing which withdraws me from occing higher is this tutorial which is very well described and helpful for overclocking newbies like me: The VCORE. Every increase over 1.4 could be harmful. So what do you think about this? Aren't you afraid of grilling your lovely i7 3930K C2? And how do you cool it. Mine is Corsair H80. ***Sandy Bridge E Overclocking Guide*** Walk through, Explanations, and Support for all X79... http://www.overclock.net/...r-all-x79-overclockers I only run these voltages for benching. For 24/7, I run 4.5 GHz at around 1.34v under load mainly because I keep the CPU loaded 24/7. I don't think there is an issue for short term benching at least not that I have seen yet. If anything, I am more concerned about IMC failure than core CPU failure. Out of all the i7s I have pushed to higher frequencies and high voltages while keeping them loaded long-term, I have only ever had one failure and that was with the IMC. Because of that, I keep the memory frequencies and associated voltages at conservative levels. I am running a H100 which works surprisingly well with this processor at high frequencies provided the fans are turned up enough.
|
JediNachos
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 138
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2005/12/19 17:59:58
- Location: Lenexa, KS
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/11 19:37:10
(permalink)
JediNachos ------ i7 [link=mailto:950@4.0]950@4.0[/link] ------- (2) 680 Stock speeds ---- 100%/0/0-------- P13957 ------Air http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3129943 I don't have screen shots like you were listing, but those are my scores at stock EVGA GTX 680 cards, in SLI.
EVGA GTX 680 EVGA E767 SLI3 x58 w/ Intel i7 950 @4.0 Corsair H70 Cooler, Corsair HX1000 PSU 24 Gb Corsair (6 x 4Gb) 3x500 WD Blk Raid 0 OS, 150 WD Raptor storage Window 7 x64 Pro, Samsung 27" 1ms 1920x1080 Thermaletake Eureka Tower
|
techsoldier
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 631
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/07/05 22:05:32
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/12 07:25:40
(permalink)
Some awesome scores posted!
I updated the leaderboard however there were a few people who I haven't added due to not providing the required information outlined in the OP. If you posted results but don't see your scores please check to make sure that you have posted everything. Also, if you guys can, please DO NOT post in bold. I cannot unbold it so I have to type manually which isn't all that fun :) Thanks again and I'll checkup on the thread later today to see if anyone else fixes their score postings.
|
elganja
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 185
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/02/11 06:26:03
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/12 07:33:09
(permalink)
...will need to do some more testing
post edited by elganja - 2012/04/13 04:32:32
|
Max Silencio
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 573
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/12/09 14:35:58
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 3
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/12 15:17:43
(permalink)
Max Silencio----i7 3930K@4.70----(1) 680----1194/3505/2389----132%/+175/+500---- P11065*----Air And here we are: My HWBOT rankings worldwide and GTX680 related though there only 29 submissions in that department. They have a nice appealing design, feels good to find oneself in that board. http://hwbot.org/submissi...marks?recalculate=true Did a little occing, could not withstand. I wonder what will it will be like @4.80. Is there a cure against this addiction...
post edited by Max Silencio - 2012/04/12 17:11:11
|
Max Silencio
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 573
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/12/09 14:35:58
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 3
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/12 15:42:05
(permalink)
linuxrouter I only run these voltages for benching. For 24/7, I run 4.5 GHz at around 1.34v under load mainly because I keep the CPU loaded 24/7. I don't think there is an issue for short term benching at least not that I have seen yet. If anything, I am more concerned about IMC failure than core CPU failure. Out of all the i7s I have pushed to higher frequencies and high voltages while keeping them loaded long-term, I have only ever had one failure and that was with the IMC. Because of that, I keep the memory frequencies and associated voltages at conservative levels. I am running a H100 which works surprisingly well with this processor at high frequencies provided the fans are turned up enough. Thank you for your advice. I've done a bit of research and used nearly the same UEFI settings. My vcore was 1.35 @4700. Max CPU temp was about 60°C. How much is yours? Increasing gpu mem voltage did not help. Contrarily I lowered it and got better results. Next step will be @4800. But I can tell you that I'm still feel a bit apprehensive... Hope there will not be longterm disadvantages, but - who wonders - I'm not used to this stuff. What the DDR Voltage concerns I just stick to 1.5V which is default. Unfortunately I've purchased only DDR3 1600 as I could not imagine to come into benching.
|
andressergio
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 272
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2007/08/20 10:13:12
- Location: Uruguay
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/12 16:48:54
(permalink)
Intel Core i9-7980XE 4.8GHz 18C/18TH DDCASRock X299 OC FormulaXPG D60G (4x8GB) DDR4-3800C16 B-Die 1x Intel Optane SSD 905P 480GB U23x Sabrent ROCKET NVME 4TB SSD3x HP EX950 2TB NVME 2TB SSDEVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 ULTRA Gaming PCB rev 1.0 Alphacool Custom Water Cooling PartsSilverStone ST1500-TI TITANIUM Fully Modular PSUAcer Predator X38 3840x1600 175Hz NVIDIA G-SYNCBenchtable Windows 10 64 Bit Pro Version 21H1 Build 19043.1288EVGA PX1 v1.2.6 & NVIDIA Drivers 496.49
|
SirMaster
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1610
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/07/01 23:58:20
- Location: Sussex, WI
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 21
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/12 17:05:17
(permalink)
SirMaster ------- i7 930 @ 4.3 --------- (1) 680 ---- 1250/3506/2500 ---- 132%/+126/+500 ---- P10648 ---- Air
|
KW-Sparhawk
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 592
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/03/25 20:26:45
- Location: San Antonio TX
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/12 20:10:56
(permalink)
KW-Sparhawk --- i7-3820 @ 4.3 ---- (1) 680sc --- 1227/3601/2455 ---- 132%/+50/+500 ----- P10791 ----- Air http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3181721
post edited by KW-Sparhawk - 2012/04/12 20:30:43
|
elganja
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 185
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/02/11 06:26:03
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/13 03:31:02
(permalink)
why is there such a huge variance on people's shader clocks? you can't even touch those through precision right?
|
OneEyedBob
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 206
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2007/04/27 11:17:58
- Location: London, UK
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re:*** Official GTX 600 Series 3DMark11 Scores ***
2012/04/13 03:39:58
(permalink)
elganja
why is there such a huge variance on people's shader clocks? you can't even touch those through precision right?
The Shader clock is now tied to the GPU clock and runs at twice GPU clock speed, so it is adjusted by adjusting GPU Clock offset.
GA-X58A-UD3R/i7 920 D0 @ 3.8/Corsair H50 EVGA GTX680 GSkill DDR3 1600Mhz 6Gb @ 6-8-6-20 CoolerMaster 830 Stacker/Enermax Galaxy 1000DXX Corsair F60/Raptors Raid 0/Windows 7 64Bit
|