Zibri
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 338
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/09/30 09:33:17
- Location: Italy
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Let's see your scores! This program is also good as a stability test. Watch out, Heavy can take a few hours on two gtx 580 in SLI. "Normal" takes 6 minutes on my system. Have fun! Note: this program will use all available cards no matter if SLI is enabled or not. If you like a new feature, write it in the comments. Leaderboard
post edited by Zibri - 2011/10/31 19:09:05
Running on Core i7 950 @ 4.2 ghz 2x EVGA GTX 580 in SLI @ 920 / 2250 / 1.150v 24/7 on 335.23 whql
|
MajestacaL
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1313
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/06/22 19:55:11
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 6
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/29 17:48:44
(permalink)
Here is mine. Nice work on the benchmark thanks! 
|
shaneduce
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 2017
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/10/21 10:19:14
- Location: Portland ,Or.
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 3
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/29 17:57:54
(permalink)
Ty will dl and bench tonight when I get home.
|
Little Sister 
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 6072
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/06/06 08:01:11
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 10
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/29 18:29:56
(permalink)
INTEL I7 2600K - CORSAIR H100 - EVGA Z68 FTW - CORSAIR DOMINATOR GT 2000MHZ 16GB - EVGA GTX 580 3GB SLI X3 WESTERN DIGITAL BLACK 1TB X2 - CORSAIR FORCE GT 120GB X2 - PLEXTOR BLU-RAY BURNER - CORSAIR AX1200 ENERMAX FULMO GT - WINDOWS 7 ULTIMATE X64
|
5mall5nail5
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 409
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2007/08/28 21:31:50
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/29 18:33:18
(permalink)
 While watching the Flyers game on Windows 7 Media Center, so its probably hurt a bit. Ran in like 2 minutes.
Asus Crosshair VIII Hero -- 5950X Stock EVGA 3090 FTW3 Ultra
|
5mall5nail5
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 409
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2007/08/28 21:31:50
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/29 18:35:17
(permalink)
 Media center closed
Asus Crosshair VIII Hero -- 5950X Stock EVGA 3090 FTW3 Ultra
|
owentheomen
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 181
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/05/01 19:58:42
- Location: Reno, Nevada
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/29 19:24:55
(permalink)
|
Phillsta
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 326
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/09/21 01:18:35
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 01:22:17
(permalink)
3x Gtx570,s @ 860/1720/2075 they get 55 @stock
Attached Image(s)
<<-- Asus Maximus IV Extreme Z --><--Intel Core i7 2700K--><--3xAsus 7970--><--8g Corsair Dominator GT @2000 9-9-9-24--><--Silverstone ST1500 Psu--><--Xigmatek Elisium--><--Mobo Block By EK--><--Cpu block EK Supreme HF--><--Gpu Blocks by EK--><--Black Ice 360+240 rads--><--2x Koolance 450-S Pumps--><--Koolance Twin Res/Pump Enclosure--><--3Dmark11 http://hwbot.org/submission/2266705_ 3Dmark Vantage http://hwbot.org/submission/2266708_
|
HeavyHemi
Insert Custom Title Here
- Total Posts : 15665
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/11/28 20:31:42
- Location: Western Washington
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 135
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 01:52:59
(permalink)
Doesn't seem to recognize SLI 
Attached Image(s)
EVGA X99 FTWK / i7 6850K @ 4.5ghz / RTX 3080Ti FTW Ultra / 32GB Corsair LPX 3600mhz / Samsung 850Pro 256GB / Be Quiet BN516 Straight Power 12-1000w 80 Plus Platinum / Window 10 Pro
|
Phillsta
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 326
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/09/21 01:18:35
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 02:02:44
(permalink)
<<-- Asus Maximus IV Extreme Z --><--Intel Core i7 2700K--><--3xAsus 7970--><--8g Corsair Dominator GT @2000 9-9-9-24--><--Silverstone ST1500 Psu--><--Xigmatek Elisium--><--Mobo Block By EK--><--Cpu block EK Supreme HF--><--Gpu Blocks by EK--><--Black Ice 360+240 rads--><--2x Koolance 450-S Pumps--><--Koolance Twin Res/Pump Enclosure--><--3Dmark11 http://hwbot.org/submission/2266705_ 3Dmark Vantage http://hwbot.org/submission/2266708_
|
Zibri
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 338
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/09/30 09:33:17
- Location: Italy
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 05:48:52
(permalink)
@HeavyHemi: yes it does and it uses it. Even with SLI disabled, this will use ALL available cards.
@Phillsta: please re-run and post the link to the result not the image. Valid scores are the ones online only.
Running on Core i7 950 @ 4.2 ghz 2x EVGA GTX 580 in SLI @ 920 / 2250 / 1.150v 24/7 on 335.23 whql
|
Krony
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1173
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/11/10 22:42:31
- Location: England
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 6
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 06:44:44
(permalink)
Sli 3Gb 580's @ 954/2025  Link
post edited by Krony - 2011/10/30 07:02:20
|
CraptacularOne
Omnipotent Enthusiast
- Total Posts : 14533
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/06/12 17:20:44
- Location: Florida
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 222
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 07:00:12
(permalink)
 What exactly is this measuring? I have 2 GTX480s @ 800/1600/4000 and a GTX460 SE @ 850/1700/1800. A load was placed on all of them during the test. How is this app using 2 different GPUs?
Intel i9 14900K ...............................Ryzen 9 7950X3D MSI RTX 4090 Gaming Trio................ASRock Phantom RX 7900 XTX Samsung Odyssey G9.......................PiMax 5K Super/Meta Quest 3 ASUS ROG Strix Z690-F Gaming........ASUS TUF Gaming X670E Plus WiFi 64GB G.Skill Trident Z5 6800Mhz.......64GB Kingston Fury RGB 6000Mhz MSI MPG A1000G 1000w..................EVGA G3 SuperNova 1000w
|
Krony
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1173
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/11/10 22:42:31
- Location: England
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 6
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 07:04:47
(permalink)
It must use all gpu's somehow as ur score is the same as mine and sli 480's @ 800/2000 would normally score alot less than sli 580's @ 954/2025 so that 460 is really helping in this bench, might have to dig out my 9800GTX+ :)
|
CraptacularOne
Omnipotent Enthusiast
- Total Posts : 14533
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/06/12 17:20:44
- Location: Florida
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 222
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 07:09:02
(permalink)
Disabling Surround brings up the score a few points:  Not really sold on this being an accurate benchmark yet. I would really like to know what it is measuring.
Intel i9 14900K ...............................Ryzen 9 7950X3D MSI RTX 4090 Gaming Trio................ASRock Phantom RX 7900 XTX Samsung Odyssey G9.......................PiMax 5K Super/Meta Quest 3 ASUS ROG Strix Z690-F Gaming........ASUS TUF Gaming X670E Plus WiFi 64GB G.Skill Trident Z5 6800Mhz.......64GB Kingston Fury RGB 6000Mhz MSI MPG A1000G 1000w..................EVGA G3 SuperNova 1000w
|
CraptacularOne
Omnipotent Enthusiast
- Total Posts : 14533
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/06/12 17:20:44
- Location: Florida
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 222
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 07:16:22
(permalink)
Krony
It must use all gpu's somehow as ur score is the same as mine and sli 480's @ 800/2000 would normally score alot less than sli 580's @ 954/2025 so that 460 is really helping in this bench, might have to dig out my 9800GTX+ :)
If it was using all 3 cards, then my score should be higher than yours. Between your 2 cards you have 1024 cores running at 954Mhz while I have collectively 1248 cores between my 3 cards running at 800-850Mhz. If this was a CUDA benchmark or a collective performance of 3 cards combined then my score should be higher by a good margin.
post edited by CraptacularOne - 2011/10/30 07:18:53
Intel i9 14900K ...............................Ryzen 9 7950X3D MSI RTX 4090 Gaming Trio................ASRock Phantom RX 7900 XTX Samsung Odyssey G9.......................PiMax 5K Super/Meta Quest 3 ASUS ROG Strix Z690-F Gaming........ASUS TUF Gaming X670E Plus WiFi 64GB G.Skill Trident Z5 6800Mhz.......64GB Kingston Fury RGB 6000Mhz MSI MPG A1000G 1000w..................EVGA G3 SuperNova 1000w
|
Krony
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1173
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/11/10 22:42:31
- Location: England
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 6
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 07:18:41
(permalink)
Yea it's strange really how it works.
Edit: Don't think i can get my 9800GTX+ in as the fitting and tubing on the bottom card is gonna be in the way, bottom card will be running @ 4x anyway.
|
Zibri
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 338
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/09/30 09:33:17
- Location: Italy
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 07:24:33
(permalink)
I'm thinking of giving you another digit just for accuracy. For example: my cards get 50 @ 925 and 52 @ 980... Maybe that would read better as 50.3 and 52.8 or 503 and 528. What do you think? I used 2 digits only because the third can fluctuate on the same system. Edit: nevermind, I changed it. 3 digits score now. V1.0 was this score divided by ten and rounded.
post edited by Zibri - 2011/10/30 08:07:35
Running on Core i7 950 @ 4.2 ghz 2x EVGA GTX 580 in SLI @ 920 / 2250 / 1.150v 24/7 on 335.23 whql
|
Zibri
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 338
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/09/30 09:33:17
- Location: Italy
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 07:28:54
(permalink)
☄ Helpful
CraptacularOne
Disabling Surround brings up the score a few points:
Not really sold on this being an accurate benchmark yet. I would really like to know what it is measuring.
This benchmark measures the pure computing power of the cards and as such, everything else is just a matter of settings and optimizations in games, control panel, etc. I always thought it's useless to measure FPS in a benchmark because FPS can be easily upped or lowered by changing the graphic settings.
Running on Core i7 950 @ 4.2 ghz 2x EVGA GTX 580 in SLI @ 920 / 2250 / 1.150v 24/7 on 335.23 whql
|
CraptacularOne
Omnipotent Enthusiast
- Total Posts : 14533
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/06/12 17:20:44
- Location: Florida
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 222
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 07:29:38
(permalink)
Zibri
I'm thinking of giving you another digit just for accuracy.
For example: my cards get 50 @ 925 and 52 @ 980...
Maybe that would read better as 50.3 and 52.8 or 503 and 528.
What do you think?
I used 2 digits only because the third can fluctuate on the same system.
What is the benchmark measuring? Is it just measuring the raw compute power of any GPUs on a system? Also how is it placing a load on 2 different types of GPUs in the same system like mine for example? EDIT: just saw your post above. If it is a collective measurement of GPUs in a system, then I would think it needs some tweaking of the code becasue it doesn't seem to be representing accurate measurement of said GPUs. For instance take my system with it's available 1248 cores of compute power, it should score quite a bit better than a system with only 1024 cores available to it. But if you look at the above results, you'll see that this is not the case.
post edited by CraptacularOne - 2011/10/30 07:32:27
Intel i9 14900K ...............................Ryzen 9 7950X3D MSI RTX 4090 Gaming Trio................ASRock Phantom RX 7900 XTX Samsung Odyssey G9.......................PiMax 5K Super/Meta Quest 3 ASUS ROG Strix Z690-F Gaming........ASUS TUF Gaming X670E Plus WiFi 64GB G.Skill Trident Z5 6800Mhz.......64GB Kingston Fury RGB 6000Mhz MSI MPG A1000G 1000w..................EVGA G3 SuperNova 1000w
|
maniacvvv
Omnipotent Enthusiast
- Total Posts : 10053
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/09/10 20:29:17
- Location: Miami Beach FL
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 165
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 07:46:29
(permalink)
As the "author" of this program, please explain how it functions.
Please detail what API's are used to place GPU loading across multi GPU setups?
Please explain in detail the shader algorithm used and what loading levels it is designed produce?
What software steps have you taken to ensure that Nvidia hadware OCP is not bypassed?
Please explain in detail, what are the max possible volatge levels when using your program and how far your program will push over the max possible PCIE slot voltage limit.
As the person who wrote the program, these are very easy questions to answer, I ask you to do so.
|
Zibri
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 338
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/09/30 09:33:17
- Location: Italy
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 07:59:50
(permalink)
☄ Helpful
I updated the program.
Please re-run it and update the images in your posts.
@Maniacvvv: yes they are very easy to answer and I could, but I don't like your attitude and the way you talk to me and to others, so please leave this thread or just post a result.
@Everyone else:
This program uses CUDA. No tricks used. So it's perfectly safe as long as cuda implementation is safe :)
Running on Core i7 950 @ 4.2 ghz 2x EVGA GTX 580 in SLI @ 920 / 2250 / 1.150v 24/7 on 335.23 whql
|
maniacvvv
Omnipotent Enthusiast
- Total Posts : 10053
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/09/10 20:29:17
- Location: Miami Beach FL
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 165
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 08:11:51
(permalink)
Zibri
@Maniacvvv: yes they are very easy to answer and I could, but I don't like your attitude and the way you talk to me and to others, so please leave this thread or just post a result.
Given the above statement... I suggest that users not download or use the program. There is no reason for a programs author, not to answer honest valid questions about it. Given Zibri's previous postings showing a lack of basic Nvidia driver understanding and his repeated novice "mistakes" when making posts concerning Nvidia drivers and settings, and the fact that he has only been using a SLI setup for a few days. I must conclude that if he is unwilling to answer questions about his NVBench program, it is because he is NOT able to do so. He is welcome to answer the questions I asked, or he should remove the program as using it could be dangerous to users systems and videocards. Answer the questions, or remove the post.
|
Zibri
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 338
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/09/30 09:33:17
- Location: Italy
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 08:13:13
(permalink)
CraptacularOne
What exactly is this measuring? I have 2 GTX480s @ 800/1600/4000 and a GTX460 SE @ 850/1700/1800. A load was placed on all of them during the test. How is this app using 2 different GPUs?
This app will use any GPU present roughly at 99%. And the score will be the same as the SUM of three single card scores (with the same cards). So if (for example) a stock clocked reference GTX 580 gives about 208 (or 20 in v1.0), two of them will give you about 417 (or 41 in V1.0) and three of them will give you about 625 (or 62 in V1.0)...
Running on Core i7 950 @ 4.2 ghz 2x EVGA GTX 580 in SLI @ 920 / 2250 / 1.150v 24/7 on 335.23 whql
|
maniacvvv
Omnipotent Enthusiast
- Total Posts : 10053
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/09/10 20:29:17
- Location: Miami Beach FL
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 165
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 08:17:39
(permalink)
As the "author" of this program, I ask you AGAIN please explain how it functions.
Please detail what API's are used to place GPU loading across multi GPU setups?
Please explain in detail the shader algorithm used and what loading levels it is designed produce?
What software steps have you taken to ensure that Nvidia hadware OCP is not bypassed?
Please explain in detail, what are the max possible volatge levels when using your program and how far your program will push over the max possible PCIE slot voltage limit.
Either answer these questions or I will refer this post to the EVGA Mods
|
Zibri
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 338
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/09/30 09:33:17
- Location: Italy
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 08:18:54
(permalink)
maniacvvv
He is welcome to answer the questions I asked, or he should remove the program as using it could be dangerous to users systems and videocards.
Answer the questions, or remove the post.
1) I don't take orders from anyone. Who the heck are you? 2) As I already (politely) answered, my program uses CUDA and takes no other actions than measuring the calculation speed. *Removed*
post edited by Afterburner - 2011/10/30 08:48:21
Running on Core i7 950 @ 4.2 ghz 2x EVGA GTX 580 in SLI @ 920 / 2250 / 1.150v 24/7 on 335.23 whql
|
Afterburner
EVGA Forum Moderator
- Total Posts : 25794
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2007/09/21 14:41:48
- Location: It's... Classified Yeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaah........
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 110
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 08:26:29
(permalink)
EVGA Mod here.....
If the OP does not want to express or answer a question from a member, that IS NOT a TOS violation.
Please keep it civil. And not everyone has to agree to agree. Many of us like new things like this and are happy to help. Even if in the end we find out it did nothing for us.
Any further repeated request that have already been answered/replied to or asked will be deleted...
|
billythekid2012
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 2030
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/02/08 17:21:31
- Status: offline
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 08:37:14
(permalink)
running two gtx 480 1700/2000 -2600k @ 4.6 but why is evry one only getting like 50 to 65 in the run. 
|
Zibri
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 338
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/09/30 09:33:17
- Location: Italy
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 08:38:13
(permalink)
I coded a program, and I didn't point a gun at anyone to use it. I just wanted this thread to be clean so that people could compare results and settings. This benchmark is intended both as a stability test (the Heavy and Infinite modes) both as a simple speed test that won't be affected by the "usual cheats". I wonder why some people just have the urge to spit on everything.
post edited by Zibri - 2011/11/10 18:02:44
Running on Core i7 950 @ 4.2 ghz 2x EVGA GTX 580 in SLI @ 920 / 2250 / 1.150v 24/7 on 335.23 whql
|
Zibri
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 338
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/09/30 09:33:17
- Location: Italy
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re:New benchmark: NVBench!
2011/10/30 08:41:35
(permalink)
billythekid2012
running two gtx 480 1700/2000 -2600k @ 4.6 but why is evry one only getting like 50 to 65 in the run.
Because they used V1.0... so you must multiply those scores by 10.
Running on Core i7 950 @ 4.2 ghz 2x EVGA GTX 580 in SLI @ 920 / 2250 / 1.150v 24/7 on 335.23 whql
|