Tax breaks for companies exists worldwide and been around for a long time. 
 
However Intel should just suck up the costs themselves in my personal opinion instead of relying on subsidies and tax breaks. 

Takes 2-3 years for these to come online, so no.

Unfortunately, the consumer has no regard for what you are asking.  Is it really governments role to enforce moral standards?  It should be the consumer who does that.  Do not buy products that do add to the climate change problem or companies who use slave or child labor to assemble their products.  Before you know it many will then be asking for government to stay away because they “are to involved in my daily life.”
 
America is the ultimate open market.  Is that not what capitalism is all about?  It is interesting that we have benefited more than any single country through globalization, but some how we now want “even” playing fields.  Jobs evolve and some of the earlier manufacturing jobs are gone, never to return.  Most of it from efficiencies and automation (robots) and not due to export to another country.  How do we help individuals who want to have a job in field that is dying or dead and do not want to be trained in something that will be more in line with the needs of today?  Automation is the single biggest factor in the reduction of manufacturing jobs in the United States.
 
America has always had the field tilted its way, but that is because we have the innovation, market and dollars to sway it.  Protectionism does not work, never has, never will.  If we put tariffs on sub-standard goods, who determines what is “sub-standard?”  Are you really ready to walk into a Walmart and have very little on the shelves, as the once “Made in America” retailer has virtually nothing made in America to sell on its shelves.  Maybe if consumers did not chase the lowest price products without regard for what that does, we would not be here.  Heck we cannot even get people to stop buying from scalpers of GPUs and those are not even necessity item, but I am sure some on this forum think they are.
 
The business may get a tax break, but the $14 Million price tag is a relatively reasonable price, given the overall economic jolt the County and State will get from the 1,000 (or 700) people employed with these high-paying, high-skill jobs.  This is nowhere close to what the fools in Wisconsin did for Foxconn who has now announced they will not even bring manufacturing to Pleasant Prairie, Wisconsin.  The average cost to the Wisconsin taxpayer for the jobs created by Foxconn is about $225,000 per job.  Given the tax breaks announced here, it is $20,000 per job for the 700 and if it gets to 1,000 then it’s $14,000.  That seems like a reasonable amount to bring in high-paying jobs and good economic activity to a region.  There is a return for the State and County in this agreement based on these numbers unlike the Foxconn deal in Wisconsin.

From my understanding, these sorts of subsidies are what everyone should have expected as a result of the tariffs. If the money collected as a result of the tariffs went to no one and didn't get invested into our local manufacturing capabilities, that would be much worse, in my opinion.

Kinda feel like AMD is gonna eat Intel's lunch for the next couple years. It's impressive what Intel has done with the tech, but they just haven't kept up on lower nanometer processes because they just didn't need to in order to stay on top.....till now.

GTXJackBauer

Star_Hunter
Takes 2-3 years for these to come online, so no.

Closer to 5 years.

Technology and building methods should allow for these to be completed quickly. Probably late 2022 or 2023.