EVGA

Intel Core M3 8114Y "Cannon Lake-Y" Processor Surfaces in 3DMark

Author
rjohnson11
EVGA Forum Moderator
  • Total Posts : 102323
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2004/10/05 12:44:35
  • Location: Netherlands
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 84
2018/05/18 09:13:33 (permalink)
https://www.techpowerup.com/244323/intel-core-m3-8114y-cannon-lake-y-processor-surfaces-in-3dmark
 
It's a dual-core processor with four threads that runs at a base clock of 1.5 GHz. The Core M3 8114Y comes with an Intel UHD Graphics iGPU. So slowly but surely we are seeing 10nm CPUs being brought out. I suspect that the problems that Intel is having with 10nm is preventing them with releasing large amounts of different CPUs quickly.
 


AMD Ryzen 9 7950X,  Corsair Mp700 Pro M.2, 64GB Corsair Dominator Titanium DDR5  X670E Steel Legend, MSI RTX 4090 Associate Code: H5U80QBH6BH0AXF. I am NOT an employee of EVGA

#1

1 Reply Related Threads

    Xavier Zepherious
    CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
    • Total Posts : 6746
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/07/04 12:53:39
    • Location: Medicine Hat ,Alberta, Canada
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 16
    Re: Intel Core M3 8114Y "Cannon Lake-Y" Processor Surfaces in 3DMark 2018/05/31 15:39:00 (permalink)
    I would not buy a 10nm Chip right now
     
     
    https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-cpu-10nm-earnings-amd,36967.html
    https://www.extremetech.com/computing/268407-intel-delays-broken-10nm-into-2019-hires-jim-keller-to-fix-it
     
    how busted is it?? well its slower and runs Hotter than the prev gen
     
     

    Is Intel’s upcoming 10nm ‘launch’ real or a PR stunt?

    https://www.semiaccurate.com/2018/05/29/is-intels-upcoming-10nm-launch-real-or-a-pr-stunt/
     
    read charlies story
     
    If you look at the two 8th gen parts that bracket the 8121U, you will see that the i3-8109U and i3-8130U are both 14nm chips from the Coffee and Kaby Lake, respectively, families. Both are 2C/4T parts with a GPU although Intel won’t give out any details about what the GPUs are any more. In any case they are at least a 2+1 configuration. What is interesting is that the 8130U runs at 2.2/3.4GHz (Base clock/Turbo clock) but the 8109U is at 3.0/3.6GHz because of a nominal 28W TDP. This should not be a -U CPU but who am I to question Intel’s sane, logical, and not at all random naming schemes?
    Can You See The Graphics?:
    One thing that is widely known about modern CPUs is that the GPU, where present, can take up a large portion of the TDP. While we won’t get into the nuances of power distribution, cooling, and TDP, lets just assume that half the TDP is for the CPU, the other half for the GPU under normal operation. That means the 10nm 8121U at 2.2/3.2GHz is slower at peak turbo than the 8130U at 2.2/3.4Ghz on an older 14nm process, at the same TDP. Worse yet for the 8121U, the 8130 _HAS_ a GPU. Let us recap, a 14nm CPU with a GPU is faster within a 15W cap than a 10nm CPU without a GPU running at the same 15W.
    To make matters more painful, SemiAccurate’s sources say that the 10nm 2+1 die that the 8121U is based on was meant to be a 9W -Y part. Even if this isn’t true, the 10nm 8121U woefully worse than the 14nm parts, somewhere around half the efficiency of the 14nm competition. Chips with two cores at lower speeds and twice the power but without graphics aren’t likely to sell on merit in the open market.
     
     
     
    IE
    the 10nm part is without GPU and runs slower than the previous node that has a GPU
     


    Primes found     Affiliate Code:YN2AHK39LH



     
    #2
    Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile