Hey all, I was hoping to get a sense for what a normal OC is for the Titan X Pascal? Using MSA Afterburner my chip maxes out at +210 or +215 core(If i try to go to +250 it will crash) - I have it now at +200 and my memory is at +300. Is this a normal range? on the lower side? I am using a EVGA Hybrid cooler so temps are below 50C. 
 
Thanks!

^ offset is so hard to judge as with all the pre overclocked stuff sometimes +75 equals 2000mhz. 300 sounds on the lower end for memory though is this the Titan XP or Xp ? Unless it's the Xp as then you have +300 on top of allready 12000 MHz memory

If you can run at 2090 or even 2000 that is a decent oc. And ya there's a point in most memory moduals where going higher ends up even giving less performance as ecc will kick in

Mathieas
Hey all, I was hoping to get a sense for what a normal OC is for the Titan X Pascal? Using MSA Afterburner my chip maxes out at +210 or +215 core(If i try to go to +250 it will crash) - I have it now at +200 and my memory is at +300. Is this a normal range? on the lower side? I am using a EVGA Hybrid cooler so temps are below 50C. 
 
Thanks!

Instead of telling us a number you increased the core by, what are the actual clocks it is reaching under boost? That is the most important to know. Also, you will notice you cannot change the clock speeds in less than ~13mhz steps. In other words,  running at 2088mhz for example, your next clock bin will be 2100mhz, the next, 2112mhz, then 2125mhz and so on. So, when you're adjusting the offsets (which of course you can adjust in 1mhz steps), pay attention at what offset you set in the core clocks results in what boost clock. It will also vary a bin or more in boost clocks depending upon the game/application.

hey all,

Thank you very much for the replies. I apologize for not giving you enough info upfront- this is my first GPU with boost. I did some more tests last night and watched the freqs while running 3dmark Time Spy. 
 
Here is what i found
 
GFX test 1: At +200 on the core i hit 2088mhz max, this was not constant though as it dipped and rose through out the run. It dipped to 2050 and maybe one step lower a couple times.I would say it spent most of the time around 2065.
 
GFX test 2: This one dipped quite a bit more down to 1985(or 1984) it didnt stay that lwo for too long. It did seem to spend the most time around 2012 or 2024. I can do this again but log the freq with GPUZ if it would make any difference.
 
Thanks for your time,
 
Jonathan