Nereus
Captain Goodvibes
- Total Posts : 18192
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 4/10/2009
- Location: Brooklyn, NYC.
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 58

Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Thursday, November 17, 2016 6:51 AM
(permalink)
Wow Z97 doesn't even have it's own forum anymore? :(
|
XrayMan
Insert Custom Title Here
- Total Posts : 63846
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 12/15/2006
- Location: Santa Clarita, Ca.
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 115

Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Friday, November 18, 2016 3:08 AM
(permalink)
Nereus Wow Z97 doesn't even have it's own forum anymore? :(
It's been put into this section to save space.
My Affiliate Code: 8WEQVXMCJL Associate Code: VHKH33QN4W77V6A  
|
cdc-951
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 520
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 4/27/2012
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Sunday, January 29, 2017 10:17 PM
(permalink)
STILL waiting for the FIRMWARE update EVGA!!!! Some EVGA admin please give us an answer
|
NickNasc
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 113
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 1/13/2010
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Monday, January 30, 2017 4:50 PM
(permalink)
The SPACE SAVING is the reason for this? You do know that people who buy premium gear may not be the ones who you want to think don't know better. I remember this thread very well and the promises that they would get RIGHT BACK to us with a fix... Was that a YEAR AGO? Now my top of the line board has been clumped in with the oldies like it is an old POS. Well Now I have sound problems and I have lost all faith in the support from this company. I see others that still support their gear that is OLDER than the Z97 Classified but here I have to sift through thousands of posts to see any new info for mine. I came here to look for Info on sound problems and I see now that it will take a day to do it. My next high dollar build will NOT be through this company again. You don't expect this type of treatment when buying a Premium product. FYI you can look up 10 year old PC information at Dell , HP, Lenovo almost EVERYONE If your webmasters need to learn how to manage a site better ask them ... Claiming we have been tossed in the Old Parts bin to save space is an insult.
Case: Lian Li 011 Dynamic XL BlackDisplays: 2X 4K Samsung UE510 28" Ultra HD 1X 2K 32" 144hz Gaming X1 Samsung 55" 4K CPU:AMD 2700X 4.05 GHZMOBO: ASUS Crossfire 8 Hero WIFI X570VGA: EVGA RTX 2060 XC ULTRA Ram: 32 GB Trident Z NEO 3600 Mem DDR4 Primary Drives: Sabrent M.2 Gen 4 1tb Samsung M2 950 Pro 512gb, Samsung 850 Pro 512 SSD x 4, 1x 4tb Performance WD HDD 1x 6TB WD HDDBlack PSU: Thermaltake Tough power Grand 850psuCooling: EVGA CLC 280OS: Win 11 64 Pro
|
NickNasc
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 113
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 1/13/2010
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Monday, January 30, 2017 4:51 PM
(permalink)
cdc-951 STILL waiting for the FIRMWARE update EVGA!!!! Some EVGA admin please give us an answer
They gave us an answer a year ago... "You are now on IGNORE!"
Case: Lian Li 011 Dynamic XL BlackDisplays: 2X 4K Samsung UE510 28" Ultra HD 1X 2K 32" 144hz Gaming X1 Samsung 55" 4K CPU:AMD 2700X 4.05 GHZMOBO: ASUS Crossfire 8 Hero WIFI X570VGA: EVGA RTX 2060 XC ULTRA Ram: 32 GB Trident Z NEO 3600 Mem DDR4 Primary Drives: Sabrent M.2 Gen 4 1tb Samsung M2 950 Pro 512gb, Samsung 850 Pro 512 SSD x 4, 1x 4tb Performance WD HDD 1x 6TB WD HDDBlack PSU: Thermaltake Tough power Grand 850psuCooling: EVGA CLC 280OS: Win 11 64 Pro
|
Nereus
Captain Goodvibes
- Total Posts : 18192
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 4/10/2009
- Location: Brooklyn, NYC.
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 58

Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Tuesday, January 31, 2017 5:52 AM
(permalink)
NickNasc The SPACE SAVING is the reason for this?
Yeah I thought that was pretty strange - Z97 is still a widely used platform. I guess someone got OCD with control and decided to make the forum smaller and tidier like it would make it better somehow, or at least easier to moderate. Certainly it's reduced the amount of members frequenting the forums. Too late now unfortunately, and EVGA don't seem to give a flying fruitloop, so not much we can do about it.
|
TECH_DaveB
EVGA Alumni
- Total Posts : 4661
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 9/27/2008
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 46
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Friday, February 10, 2017 1:38 AM
(permalink)
Hello all, I have just posted a PLX update that should resolve the problem, and it is available in http://www.evga.com/support/download/ Motherboard tab - "Intel Z97" - "152-HR-E979 - EVGA Z97 Classified" - "Firmware" Unfortunately for several reasons it was not possible to integrate this into a BIOS update, and due to other limitations it is recommended to do the update from within DOS. Please remember for all who read this, this is ONLY for the Classified, as it is the only board in this line with a PLX chip. The update can be downloaded here. Below are the steps also found on the download page: It is recommended to use a USB bootable drive running DOS. If you do not have one, we can recommend: http://www.softpedia.com/get/System/Hard-Disk-Utils/HP-USB-Disk-Storage-Format-Tool.shtml1. Run HPUSB (from above link) on a USB thumb drive to build it as a DOS startup disk. Previous data on the USB drive will be lost. 2. Extract contents of E979_PLX_Update.RAR 3. Copy FW tools into USB disk A. Be sure the following files are on the USB disk (PlxCm.exe, PlxEep.exe, 151207.BIN, and update.bat) 4. Ensure a PCIE device is plugged into a PCIE 16 slot 2/3/4/6 to ensure PLX is initialized prior to the update. 5. Boot into USB disk and run update.bat file. 6. Reboot when done This should get the PLX running non-graphics cards at the speed they should be, I apologize for the issues.
|
Taint3dbulge
New Member
- Total Posts : 72
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 1/2/2014
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Tuesday, February 14, 2017 2:35 AM
(permalink)
Correct me if im wrong but i thought for best sli performance you were supposed to use Slot 2 and 4... This was covered on a Jayztwocents video.
Asus Maximus X Apex 13 Intel 11900K @ 5.2Ghz G.Skill Trident Z 4000Mhz CL14 32GB Gear1 Evga 3080Ti HC Evga P6 1000w EK watercooling Rosewill Blackhawk Ultra
|
NickNasc
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 113
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 1/13/2010
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Wednesday, February 15, 2017 4:33 AM
(permalink)
Sorry to be snippy but WHAT TOOK YOU GUYS SO LONG?? That said HUGE Difference, Now I don't feel so horrible about spending so much on this Drive. Interesting thing is as you see below It was running in Pcie Gen 1x4 The New run is Pcie Gen 3 x4 I am not sure if that is because of the adapter limiting it or if there is a x16 adapter ( have not seen one ) anyway you see the Jump in speeds.. Sure it isn't close to the Max but MUCH MUCH better. I knew it as soon as I booted. Read Write SEQ Read Write RANDOM 832 586 203,598 77,405 AFTER 2460 1452 316,528 79,904
post edited by NickNasc - Wednesday, February 15, 2017 4:38 AM
Case: Lian Li 011 Dynamic XL BlackDisplays: 2X 4K Samsung UE510 28" Ultra HD 1X 2K 32" 144hz Gaming X1 Samsung 55" 4K CPU:AMD 2700X 4.05 GHZMOBO: ASUS Crossfire 8 Hero WIFI X570VGA: EVGA RTX 2060 XC ULTRA Ram: 32 GB Trident Z NEO 3600 Mem DDR4 Primary Drives: Sabrent M.2 Gen 4 1tb Samsung M2 950 Pro 512gb, Samsung 850 Pro 512 SSD x 4, 1x 4tb Performance WD HDD 1x 6TB WD HDDBlack PSU: Thermaltake Tough power Grand 850psuCooling: EVGA CLC 280OS: Win 11 64 Pro
|
TECH_DaveB
EVGA Alumni
- Total Posts : 4661
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 9/27/2008
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 46
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Friday, February 17, 2017 0:15 PM
(permalink)
Well, there is honestly nothing that can be said without coming off as an excuse, so I will not attempt to justify the delays. I apologize for the delays, and I will attempt to improve on these things in the future (hopefully there won't be anymore like this....). As for the improvement, I am glad to hear it is working better. Being that these slots are going through a PLX chip, and there is definite latency associated with lane replication, I do not think it would be possible to reach the NVME's potential peak speed. However, the speeds you have there are quite respectable, and overall im sure perform VERY well for whatever apps you use it for, bootup alone should be REALLY fast. Taint3dbulge Correct me if im wrong but i thought for best sli performance you were supposed to use Slot 2 and 4... This was covered on a Jayztwocents video.
In strict technicality yes. That is the only way to get x16/x16 for SLI, however x8/x16's difference in speed is really not noticeable in 99% of all applications, some benches may see a slightly higher score, but not much. In games you most likely will never see a difference. However this thread is specifically for low speeds on NVME drives via PCIE adapter caused by detection and resource issues on PLX chips.
|
Tunnel_Rat
New Member
- Total Posts : 2
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 8/19/2014
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Friday, February 17, 2017 1:40 AM
(permalink)
bschimp Hello EVGA Fans, I have looked for this specific question and have not found an answer. I have the EVGA Z97 Classified and beginning a new build and I will be SLI'ing two GTX 980ti's. In doing Forum research, I understand that the best install procedure is to use Slot 1 at x8 (CPU) and Slot 4 at x16 (PLX). I would like to add a Samsung 950 Pro M.2 with an M.2 PCIe SSD - PCIe 3.0 4-Lane Adapter - not to be used as a boot drive but as a separate standalone drive to be loaded with games. My specific question is with the above Slots used - what PCIe slot should I utilize (if able) to get x4 bandwidth to ensure I get the full speed from the 950? As I understand it - Slot 1 is Native x16 tied to the CPU - if SLI is used, dropping it down to x8 - what other PCIe Slot is tied to the CPU as x8? The diagram below annotates the remaining 4 PCIe Slots as PLX so I am thinking that any add-in card will drop the x8 (Slot 1) - x16 (Slot 4) SLI setup to x8 (Slot 1) - x8 (Slot 4) and x8 (x4 for the 950) in any remaining PCIe Slots. Therefore - since there is not another PCIe Slot tied to the CPU - I will simply not be able to use the remaining x8 bandwidth. Thank you in advance.
I also have looked deep into this as I run a 4790k in an ASUS Maximus VII Hero and I had two 770SC before I upgraded to my 1080 Classified. Since the CPU has 16 Lanes and the Chipset has another 4, that gives you 1 card at 16x or two at 8x, HOWEVER........ The 980 Ti's only require x16 PCIe GEN 2 to utilize it's max potential, so yes... you can put one 980 Ti in the CPU slot, the second 980 Ti in another CPU slot. The 4 PCIe Gen 3.0 Lanes are from the PCH which were meant to compensate for other devices such as sound cards, network cards and even your M.2 you'd like to run. Make sure your Motherboard has the latest BIOS update as the Z97 came out before M.2 was mainstream and most companies have further improved their compatibility with this tech. :) -TunnelRat
|
cdc-951
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 520
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 4/27/2012
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Friday, February 17, 2017 3:30 PM
(permalink)
So is there a combination that allows us to use the full M.2 speeds on a PCIE slot and have 16x sli on both of my 980 TIs with little to no latency?
|
quadlatte
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 5427
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 9/14/2006
- Location: Greensboro, NC
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 56

Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Friday, February 17, 2017 10:29 PM
(permalink)
cdc-951 So is there a combination that allows us to use the full M.2 speeds on a PCIE slot and have 16x sli on both of my 980 TIs with little to no latency?
the short answer is no. the plx chip is what it is, latency is inherent to them. the only sure way to get full x16 sli and full m.2 speed is to use a cpu with more lanes which unfortunately doesnt exist for these boards. the pch lanes are limited to pcie 2.0 so no love there either.
|
TECH_DaveB
EVGA Alumni
- Total Posts : 4661
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 9/27/2008
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 46
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Friday, February 17, 2017 10:51 PM
(permalink)
Agreed, PLX chips give you the extra PCIE lanes at the cost of latency. Currently the only way to get x16 x16 w/o a PLX for a normal platform is an X99. Z97 PCH is Gen2 only unfortunately, that was imho one of the best features about Z170 vs Z97 was the Gen3 PCH, that opened a lot of doors and really was a step forward.
|
quadlatte
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 5427
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 9/14/2006
- Location: Greensboro, NC
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 56

Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Friday, February 17, 2017 10:59 PM
(permalink)
EVGATech_DaveB Agreed, PLX chips give you the extra PCIE lanes at the cost of latency. Currently the only way to get x16 x16 w/o a PLX for a normal platform is an X99. Z97 PCH is Gen2 only unfortunately, that was imho one of the best features about Z170 vs Z97 was the Gen3 PCH, that opened a lot of doors and really was a step forward.
yep. it is cool that you guys do take the time to try and help people with older products use new tech in them, that is a very rare thing that i think some dont appreciate.
|
TECH_DaveB
EVGA Alumni
- Total Posts : 4661
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 9/27/2008
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 46
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Saturday, February 18, 2017 0:02 PM
(permalink)
I do my best, honestly wish I could help more than I do. There are a lot of "old" products out there that are a few gens back that are definitely very serviceable, but this industry moves FAST, faster than me unfortunately. While we can't fix/update everything on older gen boards, we do try to help where we can.
|
Tunnel_Rat
New Member
- Total Posts : 2
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 8/19/2014
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Sunday, February 19, 2017 8:49 AM
(permalink)
CPU: i7-4790k @ 4.6GHz MOBO: ASUS Maximus VII Hero GPU: EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Classified @ 2.18GHz I manage just fine with my "Old" tech. :) The reason why I haven't upgraded yet is because the 4790k is still the best processor to date for single core performance. It can handle x16 PCIe Gen3.0 for my new 1080 Classified, so I just upgrade Storage and Cases and fancy RGB lighting and liquid cooling etc. I won't upgrade Chipsets/CPU/Mobo/DDR4RAM until I'm impressed. So far the Kaby Lake X and Skylake X are looking promising on the LGA 2066 socket.... Crossing my fingers for the X299 Chipset.
|
TECH_DaveB
EVGA Alumni
- Total Posts : 4661
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 9/27/2008
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 46
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Monday, February 20, 2017 8:43 PM
(permalink)
Yeah, "old" is relative, certainly does not mean slower or inferior. Gen to gen, you don't see really large performance gains either, but unfortunately, industry wide, you typically see little to no new support for products 2 gens old, even if they do perform just as well as current gen.
|
cdc-951
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 520
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 4/27/2012
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Monday, February 20, 2017 11:50 PM
(permalink)
So is there no way to get the full NVME speeds with this new Firmware update? Dave?
|
TECH_DaveB
EVGA Alumni
- Total Posts : 4661
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 9/27/2008
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 46
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Tuesday, February 21, 2017 0:08 PM
(permalink)
You will get pretty high speeds as seen in NickNasc's post. Typically you will not see the theoretical max in real world testing, at least not until the technology is at the point where the drives are continuously bottoming out the controller (ie SATA3). On top of that, it is still going through a PLX chip, which is a lane replicator, primarily for video cards, and while helps with bandwidth it causes bus latency, same as the NF200 before it, that is NOT avoidable, and WILL impact speeds. I do not think it will get much better on this. NVMe hit the desktop market right about the time this chipset was released, much like SATA3 towards the end of X58's, it was an improvement but definitely not what the technology turned into later. It might be a bit faster on a FTW, or if you run the drive on PCIE1 and run the GPUs ONLY on the PLX driven slots, it may get a bit faster then.
post edited by EVGATech_DaveB - Tuesday, February 21, 2017 0:29 PM
|
cdc-951
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 520
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 4/27/2012
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Tuesday, February 21, 2017 2:48 AM
(permalink)
well since the gpus will be on the PLX chips how much more latency we talking about
|
TECH_DaveB
EVGA Alumni
- Total Posts : 4661
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 9/27/2008
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 46
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Tuesday, February 21, 2017 8:15 PM
(permalink)
I do not have a specific amount, but it is definitely there. PLX is a means to an end for 16 lane CPU's. Using 2 cards on PLX lanes will not have as high of a video benchmark as 2 cards both on 16 lanes without a PLX. One of the advantages of the X series boards. But it still is faster than having 2 cards on 8 lanes each (benchmark wise). Outside of benchmarking or VERY high end surround systems, the extra bandwidth does not play very much of a roll for 2 way SLI, it was on the Z170 series because 3x and 4x SLI were still a actively supported technology form NVidia at the time, not just through software for the specific companies that want to develop for it.
|
cdc-951
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 520
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 4/27/2012
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 4:29 PM
(permalink)
|
cdc-951
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 520
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 4/27/2012
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 4:47 PM
(permalink)
Taint3dbulge Correct me if im wrong but i thought for best sli performance you were supposed to use Slot 2 and 4... This was covered on a Jayztwocents video.
What is the final answer btw EVGA? what is the best config for the system all around? For any lurkers who come visits this exact forum thread
|
TECH_DaveB
EVGA Alumni
- Total Posts : 4661
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 9/27/2008
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 46
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Thursday, February 23, 2017 5:01 PM
(permalink)
From all of the testing I have seen, the only time, outside of benchmarking, where you can see the difference in performance in video cards between x8 and x16 is when you are running some elaborate setups like 4k surround, otherwise, it really doesn't matter that much. I think you will see slightly better NVMe speeds from PE1, and yes slots 2 and 4 give you the highest theoretical bandwidth, BUT, it is theoretical, and on most setups you will not see a performance difference. If it were my Z97 Classified, I would likely put the NVMe on PE1, then my cards on 2 and 4, I think everything would be easiest to install that way, because when there is very little performance difference I would build it how it would be easiest to build and tube (im typically all water) and how it would be easiest to take apart for maintenance and component upgrade/replacement as limitations from hand size or cases vary person to person, build to build.
|
cdc-951
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 520
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 4/27/2012
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Friday, February 24, 2017 4:50 AM
(permalink)
|
cdc-951
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 520
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 4/27/2012
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Tuesday, February 28, 2017 10:34 PM
(permalink)
I am getting an error 5 on flashing the firmware through dos usb why..... @Dave
|
TECH_DaveB
EVGA Alumni
- Total Posts : 4661
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 9/27/2008
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 46
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Tuesday, February 28, 2017 10:56 PM
(permalink)
I am honestly not sure. If you have a screen shot or pic of any kind of the error you could attach here that would be appreciated. I can pass it onto the engineer who helped with this fix initially.
|
cdc-951
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 520
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 4/27/2012
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Tuesday, February 28, 2017 11:11 PM
(permalink)
.
post edited by cdc-951 - Tuesday, February 28, 2017 11:15 PM
Attached Image(s)
|
TECH_DaveB
EVGA Alumni
- Total Posts : 4661
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 9/27/2008
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 46
Re: Z97 Classified and Samsung 950 Pro M.2
Wednesday, March 01, 2017 4:03 PM
(permalink)
cdc-951, can you email me please at dbiel@evga.comI have a solution that might work.
|