Ok so I thought I was having temp that were higher then normal So decided to go out and buy the Indigo Xtreme 2011-3 X1 Thermal Interface Kit @ http://www.frys.com/product/8323627?site=sr:SEARCH:MAIN_RSLT_PG
 
Well I got some money off the purchase because it was not a full kit was missing the gloves but they took about $3 off the kit.
 
So I watched the video of how to do this on youtube @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEuuvzfZFSY
The video is not for the 2011-3 but its still the same principals.
 
If you buy this stuff watch that video do not listen to his times for waiting and all that I followed the directions to the letter on times. Except for the reflow where my times took longer then it stated but did make the dip after the reflow and then went back up to the 95C temp at which point I shut it down for 45min cooling off as per the directions.
 
Now for my review. Personally I did not see any difference in this from the other two TIMS that I used. In fact of the 3 that I have I think I should have stayed with the Gelid GC extreme. All 3 TIMS are running very close to the exact same temps. Now I did buy a rather cheep version of a waterblock for the CPU but its just a copper plate with a clear view of the water flowing through the block.
 
I will say though it was rather easy to do. Not at all as I was imagining it to be considering your using a metal that I think is bismuth lead and tin alloy. which in the right mix has a melting point of 95C according google research
 
So would I buy it again? NO probably not. with such a little difference in it it was not worth the investment at all. Fact is I could have bought 2 more cooling fans for this monster case instead and probably had better results.
 
Now that I have it on there I will not be removing it any time soon. Because you just can not get a better connection then metal on metal and this does that. Although I can not see under the hood to actually know how good of a spread it does have. That being said it did have seepage out of the opposite end of the cpu as was to be expected. The cpu should never see the 95C mark under normal use anyways so it will not be remelting on me either.
 

 
*****UPDATE*****
 
Contacted the company that makes this product. Stated that I am not seeing the type of results I felt I should be. The sent me an email telling me to remove the waterblock and send them pictures of the TIM as it sets on the cpu they also stated they would send me out a new TIM to replace the one that is there now. So I have to give them big props for that.
 
I will update this as the process unfolds.

Thanks for sharing your experience with the forum, Rarshaiz
 
+1,
 
Arctic MX-4

So far from what I can tell it would most likely be great. But after pulling the Water Block off the cpu it was clear I did not get full coverage. Because of the way you have to install the stuff I think it is probably going to be a crap shoot as to whether or not you get good coverage. I went out and bought another kit and actually did worse on the second try. So I have no clue how to get it to get good coverage.
 
My plans for when I get the new one from them is I am going to make sure the cpu is level I am also going to take the Water Block to a machine shop to see just where any humps may be on the block its self debating whether or not to have them true the surface. Then most likely I will probably only screw the block down minimally so it can let the stuff flow much easier. I am sure it is as good as they claim the problem is getting it to flow or as they say reflow correctly. 
 
Currently using 6 year old Thermaltake TG-1 with the temps at idle 37c and under stress test 67c. 

Scarlet-Tech
Do not have them "true" the surface.

What block are you using? Most waterblocks have a very slight convex surface to the face of the Block, and this is done on purpose. This allows greater coverage for an ever so slightly convex cpu lid. If you "true" the block, you will only be hitting the edges of the cpu and possibly cresting an air gap above the cpu lid. I am not sure I would need to explain how negative those impact would be.

If you think the cpu block is warped, send it back to the manufacturer to be replaced. Why waste more money on an item you are only going to possibly destroy and have to repay to purchase.

I have polished the surface of an EK cpu waterblock, and I can comfortably say that you will be wasting your time, 100%. While it did not hurt my Temps, it did not help at all. The blocks are manufactured with jet plate to provide the proper flex that matched the cpu.

HEATKILLER® IV BASIC (INTEL processor) - Acryl Clean

Model: WC-18006

I tried Indigo Extreme on my old i7-3930K build with Kraken X60 water cooler.   The first pad did not re-flow at all, I forgot to unplug the pump, & apparently, just the water circulation inside the loop was enough to keep the pad from reaching re-flow temp.  Second pad reached re-flow temp, but had very poor re-flow results, only about 1/2 the pad had proper flow (which I only found out about when I sold the CPU), but it still managed a 6C drop over 2 hour Prime95 burn-in run Vs Arctic Silver 5 with CPU at a modest overclock of 4.2GHz.     
 
I definitely want to give Indigo Extreme another shot on my next build which will either be a Skylake 6700K, or Broadwell-E 6930K, but that's probably 6 - 8 months away yet :(

Currently still waiting on the new ETI they sent.
 
Next time I try this I am going to make sure that the computer is level as it may have been off by a very slight fraction. I did not get full coverage as I did miss about 20-30% of the cpu. The only thing I can come up with is must not have been as level as I thought it was. I will also remove the water pipes from the water block to break in the ETI. This way I am sure there is no stress on the water block.
 
Other then that I am still going to say that this is a total crap shoot. I am wondering why they could not make it so that it was already spread across the plastic sheet then when you heat the thing up it could melt in place so you would know you had a high chance that you got full coverage.