arestavo

bloodshot45
I'm only seeing GPU temperature when clicking "ICX" in Precision X1 1.1.0.9. Can anyone else confirm they see the same with XOC beta bios? Also, can someone confirm if the VRM temps show up in ICX with normal vbios?
 
Thanks!

Double check with the new .11 version on PX1 as well. It might be required for the beta VBIOS.

robvoip
This is amazing from EVGA, but I'm having a weird issue, nothing major as everything still works fine.

Before the bios my clocks were stable between 2055-2085 and sometimes 2100, anything 2100 and over for a prolonged period crashed.

With this new bios I now have stability between 2100 and 2135 (no crashing), but my frames take a beating after 15 minutes or so of gameplay (2070-2085 zero issues, my floor increased by 20 mhz).

I have zero overclock on the memory and all sliders are set to 100%, my temps are hovering just below 69 degrees.

Anyone else with the same issue?

hayabusa09
How the heck do you guys keep your cards < 70C? Max fan speed? Sorry if noob question..im a noob :-/

TheGuz4L

Dabadger84
I'm not sure what's going on, but I did some independent tests where just my vRAM, then just my core were OCed, to see where I can get on both before combining the two and adjusting as needed... 
I plugged in +130 core +800 vRAM and got a lower score than the Core being LOWER by itself, and nearly the same score as just the vRAM OC, and GPUz is not showing a Reason for Performance Cap, other than VRel/VOp at the very beginning of Port Royal and that goes away after about 10 seconds.  Temperatures are fine, the Core clock is reading where it should be for that OC... but the result is off.  I had all background processes closed, and closed Precision after setting the clocks & setting fans to 80%.  Ran GPUz the second run to see if there was a PerfCap reason, first run was with nothing in the background.
Anyone else got any ideas?
 
vRAM +800 only: 12093 https://www.3dmark.com/pr/405082
Core +100 only: 12271 https://www.3dmark.com/pr/405357
Core +130/ vRAM +800: 12157 https://www.3dmark.com/pr/412550

All of those were done at same system settings other than the GPU OCs, to avoid anything else influencing the score.  And you can see from the FutureMark readout that my average GPU Core clock was 47MHz higher for the +130 vs +100 runs... yet the score is worse? lol  Is it possible with both OCs applied the vRAM is getting warm & ECC is kicking in?  I guess I'll have to leave Precision X1 open & on  HWMonitor to keep an eye on vRAM temps & see if they get warm warm, during the previous +800 only test they only saw about 58C during the test though.

yes e cc is kicking in. I can push my memory to 900 but I get sho **** FPS. Anything higher that 600 I lose score points

arestavo

robvoip
This is amazing from EVGA, but I'm having a weird issue, nothing major as everything still works fine.

Before the bios my clocks were stable between 2055-2085 and sometimes 2100, anything 2100 and over for a prolonged period crashed.

With this new bios I now have stability between 2100 and 2135 (no crashing), but my frames take a beating after 15 minutes or so of gameplay (2070-2085 zero issues, my floor increased by 20 mhz).

I have zero overclock on the memory and all sliders are set to 100%, my temps are hovering just below 69 degrees.

Anyone else with the same issue?

Try reducing the voltage slider to 0. I've always seen my scores drop by setting 100 with my 3090 FTW3 Ultra. Also, start testing out a memory OC after you have that other problem sorted - I bet you can get a conservative +500 on the VRAM (although it's not guaranteed to work, just likely).

compuclinic
C'mon guys,  release something for the 3090!   I want to see what these things can do.  

Seeing some of the power unlocked 3080's hitting 3090s stock numbers is both concerning and exciting if you care enough to make sure the 3090 isn't dwarfed by the 3080ti.  
 

Dabadger84
I'm not sure what's going on, but I did some independent tests where just my vRAM, then just my core were OCed, to see where I can get on both before combining the two and adjusting as needed... 
I plugged in +130 core +800 vRAM and got a lower score than the Core being LOWER by itself, and nearly the same score as just the vRAM OC, and GPUz is not showing a Reason for Performance Cap, other than VRel/VOp at the very beginning of Port Royal and that goes away after about 10 seconds.  Temperatures are fine, the Core clock is reading where it should be for that OC... but the result is off.  I had all background processes closed, and closed Precision after setting the clocks & setting fans to 80%.  Ran GPUz the second run to see if there was a PerfCap reason, first run was with nothing in the background.
Anyone else got any ideas?
 
vRAM +800 only: 12093
Core +100 only: 12271 
Core +130/ vRAM +800: 12157 

All of those were done at same system settings other than the GPU OCs, to avoid anything else influencing the score.  And you can see from the FutureMark readout that my average GPU Core clock was 47MHz higher for the +130 vs +100 runs... yet the score is worse? lol  Is it possible with both OCs applied the vRAM is getting warm & ECC is kicking in?  I guess I'll have to leave Precision X1 open & on  HWMonitor to keep an eye on vRAM temps & see if they get warm warm, during the previous +800 only test they only saw about 58C during the test though.