darli328
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 104
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2018/12/10 22:30:23
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/24 12:55:41
(permalink)
kelkel1
darli328
kevinc313
Hey i darli328
I just ran UserBenchmark with these results. Stock CPU clocks, Stock GPU clocks, Rapid mode activated on the Samsung 850 Evo
UserBenchmarks: Game 113%, Desk 154%, Work 139%
CPU: Intel Core i9-9900K - 102.2%
GPU: Nvidia RTX 2070 - 107.8%
SSD: Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB - 286.4%
SSD: Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB - 341.5%
SSD: Samsung 850 Evo 500GB - 1,007.8%
SSD: Intel 510 Series 120GB - 54.3%
RAM: Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB - 103.4%
MBD: EVGA Z390 FTW
I know this might not mean much but I can run the other tests, just let me know which specifically to run.
Hey looks good, I just ran the same and got cpu 104%, though I have potato 2666CL16 memory that scores only 83.8%, I don't know how ram dependent their cpu test is.
Just ran the Passmark CPU Mark test, got 20910 overall, 3015 single thread. Peak of 134w and 65C from a cold start. Download and global results below:
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i9-9900K+%40+3.60GHz&id=3334
https://www.passmark.com/...mancetest/download.php
If you have 3DMark the stock 9900K with mid range memory should do about 11,000 in the normal Timespy CPU test.
Ran PassMark PreformnceTest 9.0 Overall score 21750, CPU single threaded 2870, 132.84w power package, CPU hottest core 72C (lowest 66C), CPU package 70C.
Ran my fans at 100% for the test. When I ran the test the first time my fans only went to 85% and I saw a CPU temp of 75C.
Right now it seems my scores are pretty comparable, but my temps are a good margin hotter which doesn't seem normal... What did you say you're using as your CPU cooler?
I am still using HWmonitor
What about PassMark BurnInTest? Is that not worth running?
I'll download OCCT, Cinebench, RealBench if anyone wants to compare temperatures and cooling
While I do not have an AIO, I am always interesting in seeing what systems with the same CPU will do.
Would it be possible to see some screenshots? Preferably with monitoring software running alongside the benchmark. I personally would use HWiNFO, as it provides the most information.
Thanks
I took a few pictures with my phone while testing previously to make it easier to post the results. While not actual screenshots I can post those at some point for comparison if it's worth it. As anyone seen these videos from Hardware Unboxed regarding 9900K heat and TDP? How does the EVGA Z390 FTW handle TDP? Seems to be unlocked to me... Could this be the source of why some 9900ks are super hot and others aren't? Thoughts? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGHiRrQ2AAo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmAWqyHdebI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_I--zROoRws
post edited by darli328 - 2019/12/24 13:27:03
|
kevinc313
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 5004
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/02/28 09:27:55
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 22
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/24 14:46:02
(permalink)
darli328
kevinc313
Hey i darli328
I just ran UserBenchmark with these results. Stock CPU clocks, Stock GPU clocks, Rapid mode activated on the Samsung 850 Evo
UserBenchmarks: Game 113%, Desk 154%, Work 139%
CPU: Intel Core i9-9900K - 102.2%
GPU: Nvidia RTX 2070 - 107.8%
SSD: Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB - 286.4%
SSD: Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB - 341.5%
SSD: Samsung 850 Evo 500GB - 1,007.8%
SSD: Intel 510 Series 120GB - 54.3%
RAM: Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB - 103.4%
MBD: EVGA Z390 FTW
I know this might not mean much but I can run the other tests, just let me know which specifically to run.
Hey looks good, I just ran the same and got cpu 104%, though I have potato 2666CL16 memory that scores only 83.8%, I don't know how ram dependent their cpu test is.
Just ran the Passmark CPU Mark test, got 20910 overall, 3015 single thread. Peak of 134w and 65C from a cold start. Download and global results below:
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i9-9900K+%40+3.60GHz&id=3334
https://www.passmark.com/...mancetest/download.php
If you have 3DMark the stock 9900K with mid range memory should do about 11,000 in the normal Timespy CPU test.
Ran PassMark PreformnceTest 9.0 Overall score 21750, CPU single threaded 2870, 132.84w power package, CPU hottest core 72C (lowest 66C), CPU package 70C.
Ran my fans at 100% for the test. When I ran the test the first time my fans only went to 85% and I saw a CPU temp of 75C.
Right now it seems my scores are pretty comparable, but my temps are a good margin hotter which doesn't seem normal... What did you say you're using as your CPU cooler?
I am still using HWmonitor
What about PassMark BurnInTest? Is that not worth running?
I'll download OCCT, Cinebench, RealBench if anyone wants to compare temperatures and cooling
Hey it sounds like you're right on the money. I think you're running a bit hotter than than me for the following reasons: - Single sided fans on the radiator, I've got push pull which can be as much as 6-8C cooler - Exhaust air, I've got intake air flow which is a few degrees cooler than any air passing through a case and over a MB VRM, etc - Hot 25C ambient, I've got 19-20C ambient here This all adds up to the difference you're seeing. I've got a CLC120 with push pull A12 fans.
|
darli328
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 104
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2018/12/10 22:30:23
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/24 14:48:30
(permalink)
|
kevinc313
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 5004
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/02/28 09:27:55
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 22
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/24 17:01:10
(permalink)
|
darli328
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 104
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2018/12/10 22:30:23
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/24 17:27:26
(permalink)
|
kevinc313
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 5004
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/02/28 09:27:55
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 22
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/24 19:08:47
(permalink)
|
darli328
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 104
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2018/12/10 22:30:23
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/25 22:36:17
(permalink)
Ran CineBench R15 and got a score of 2019, max temperature for the core and the package was 74C, package power 143.13W, vocre 1.206, cpu vcore 1.192 Does this seem in line?
post edited by darli328 - 2019/12/25 22:54:47
|
kelkel1
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 601
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/05/18 09:52:47
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/26 05:28:13
(permalink)
darli328
Ran CineBench R15 and got a score of 2019, max temperature for the core and the package was 74C, package power 143.13W, vocre 1.206, cpu vcore 1.192
Does this seem in line?
This is where screenshots of the monitoring software, e.g. HWiNFO, are invaluable. I did a run of Cinebench R15 with HWiNFO running and took a screenshot: https://ibb.co/jM0MQnk
post edited by kelkel1 - 2019/12/26 05:32:10
|
wmmills
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 4688
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/01/04 20:47:29
- Location: New Jersey
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 40
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/26 05:56:53
(permalink)
kevinc313
darli328
kevinc313
Hey i darli328
I just ran UserBenchmark with these results. Stock CPU clocks, Stock GPU clocks, Rapid mode activated on the Samsung 850 Evo
UserBenchmarks: Game 113%, Desk 154%, Work 139%
CPU: Intel Core i9-9900K - 102.2%
GPU: Nvidia RTX 2070 - 107.8%
SSD: Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB - 286.4%
SSD: Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB - 341.5%
SSD: Samsung 850 Evo 500GB - 1,007.8%
SSD: Intel 510 Series 120GB - 54.3%
RAM: Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB - 103.4%
MBD: EVGA Z390 FTW
I know this might not mean much but I can run the other tests, just let me know which specifically to run.
Hey looks good, I just ran the same and got cpu 104%, though I have potato 2666CL16 memory that scores only 83.8%, I don't know how ram dependent their cpu test is.
Just ran the Passmark CPU Mark test, got 20910 overall, 3015 single thread. Peak of 134w and 65C from a cold start. Download and global results below:
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i9-9900K+%40+3.60GHz&id=3334
https://www.passmark.com/...mancetest/download.php
If you have 3DMark the stock 9900K with mid range memory should do about 11,000 in the normal Timespy CPU test.
Ran PassMark PreformnceTest 9.0 Overall score 21750, CPU single threaded 2870, 132.84w power package, CPU hottest core 72C (lowest 66C), CPU package 70C.
Ran my fans at 100% for the test. When I ran the test the first time my fans only went to 85% and I saw a CPU temp of 75C.
Right now it seems my scores are pretty comparable, but my temps are a good margin hotter which doesn't seem normal... What did you say you're using as your CPU cooler?
I am still using HWmonitor
What about PassMark BurnInTest? Is that not worth running?
I'll download OCCT, Cinebench, RealBench if anyone wants to compare temperatures and cooling
Hey it sounds like you're right on the money. I think you're running a bit hotter than than me for the following reasons:
- Single sided fans on the radiator, I've got push pull which can be as much as 6-8C cooler
- Exhaust air, I've got intake air flow which is a few degrees cooler than any air passing through a case and over a MB VRM, etc
- Hot 25C ambient, I've got 19-20C ambient here
This all adds up to the difference you're seeing. I've got a CLC120 with push pull A12 fans.
+1.... i think you nailed it kevin. When you start out with ambient temps that high you pretty much NEED push/pull setups on whatever your using to move that air as fast as possible. It WILL make a difference and its easy fix.
MOBO: EVGA x299 Dark, CPU: I9 10900X, RAM: Patriot Viper RGB 3600 32gb, SSD: Samsung 860 EVO 1TB, M2: Samsung 970 EVO+ 1TB, PSU: CoolerMaster M2 1500, CPU HSF: EVGA 240 CLC HSF~ P/P EK Furious Vardar, G-CARD:EVGA RTX3090 FTW3 Ultra Gaming w/Hybrid kit and Noctua IPPC 3000 P/P, CASE: LIAN-LI PC-V2010B w/ Window mod, OS: Windows 10 Pro 64bit, MON: Alienware AW3821DW  New EVGA product? Register it NOW with this link: http://www.evga.com/register/default.asp?affiliatecode=4QFQRAMOII Help Our Vets From K-2! [link=https://strongholdfreedom
|
kevinc313
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 5004
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/02/28 09:27:55
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 22
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/26 14:08:02
(permalink)
darli328
Ran CineBench R15 and got a score of 2019, max temperature for the core and the package was 74C, package power 143.13W, vocre 1.206, cpu vcore 1.192
Does this seem in line?
R15 score 2030 with nothing running, 2004 with HWiNFO64 2nd pass, 62C, 133w, Vcore 1.280. Only other thing I can think of at this point is that your FTW3 board has better current delivery that is allowing the chip to draw a bit more power. Additionally, as of two days ago I've upgraded to 4000CL19 2x16 memory running at XMP.
post edited by kevinc313 - 2019/12/26 14:31:33
|
Nereus
Captain Goodvibes
- Total Posts : 18169
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/04/09 20:05:53
- Location: Brooklyn, NYC.
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 58
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/26 17:23:34
(permalink)
Cinebench R15 was released in 2013.. they are up to R20 now, just wondering why everyone is using 6-7 year old version?
|
kevinc313
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 5004
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/02/28 09:27:55
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 22
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/26 18:32:34
(permalink)
Nereus
Cinebench R15 was released in 2013.. they are up to R20 now, just wondering why everyone is using 6-7 year old version?
Just for comparison. I get about 4950 in R20, 148w power and 70C temp.
|
DEJ915
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 544
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2013/11/03 21:58:26
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 11
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/26 22:39:54
(permalink)
wmmills
+1.... i think you nailed it kevin. When you start out with ambient temps that high you pretty much NEED push/pull setups on whatever your using to move that air as fast as possible. It WILL make a difference and its easy fix.
They also said they have the AIO mounted to the top exhaust which is probably getting some heat dump off the GPU as well as the other components. If they switched it to front mounted it'd decrease the temps a few degrees as well from cool air intake.
|
wmmills
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 4688
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/01/04 20:47:29
- Location: New Jersey
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 40
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/26 23:40:10
(permalink)
DEJ915
wmmills
+1.... i think you nailed it kevin. When you start out with ambient temps that high you pretty much NEED push/pull setups on whatever your using to move that air as fast as possible. It WILL make a difference and its easy fix.
They also said they have the AIO mounted to the top exhaust which is probably getting some heat dump off the GPU as well as the other components. If they switched it to front mounted it'd decrease the temps a few degrees as well from cool air intake.
I dont usually recommend that cause then your dumping the hot air into the case to circulate which is really not beneficial. The only way id see that needing to be done is if the case has no other options and even then id still look to a outside mount maybe etc... myself.
MOBO: EVGA x299 Dark, CPU: I9 10900X, RAM: Patriot Viper RGB 3600 32gb, SSD: Samsung 860 EVO 1TB, M2: Samsung 970 EVO+ 1TB, PSU: CoolerMaster M2 1500, CPU HSF: EVGA 240 CLC HSF~ P/P EK Furious Vardar, G-CARD:EVGA RTX3090 FTW3 Ultra Gaming w/Hybrid kit and Noctua IPPC 3000 P/P, CASE: LIAN-LI PC-V2010B w/ Window mod, OS: Windows 10 Pro 64bit, MON: Alienware AW3821DW New EVGA product? Register it NOW with this link: http://www.evga.com/register/default.asp?affiliatecode=4QFQRAMOII Help Our Vets From K-2! [link=https://strongholdfreedom
|
kelkel1
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 601
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/05/18 09:52:47
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/27 04:21:23
(permalink)
wmmills
DEJ915
wmmills
+1.... i think you nailed it kevin. When you start out with ambient temps that high you pretty much NEED push/pull setups on whatever your using to move that air as fast as possible. It WILL make a difference and its easy fix.
They also said they have the AIO mounted to the top exhaust which is probably getting some heat dump off the GPU as well as the other components. If they switched it to front mounted it'd decrease the temps a few degrees as well from cool air intake.
I dont usually recommend that cause then your dumping the hot air into the case to circulate which is really not beneficial. The only way id see that needing to be done is if the case has no other options and even then id still look to a outside mount maybe etc... myself.
+1.
|
darli328
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 104
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2018/12/10 22:30:23
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/27 16:39:00
(permalink)
kelkel1
darli328
Ran CineBench R15 and got a score of 2019, max temperature for the core and the package was 74C, package power 143.13W, vocre 1.206, cpu vcore 1.192
Does this seem in line?
This is where screenshots of the monitoring software, e.g. HWiNFO, are invaluable.
I did a run of Cinebench R15 with HWiNFO running and took a screenshot:
https://ibb.co/jM0MQnk
I think you mentioned you have an AIO. Which one and where is it mounted? If yours is a 240 and top mounted like mine seems like you're getting better temps then me. Maybe I missed in the the screen shop, what was the ambient temp? Mine is a little warmer (24.5C) so I know that's where some of my extra heat is coming from.
|
darli328
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 104
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2018/12/10 22:30:23
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/27 16:41:37
(permalink)
kevinc313
Nereus
Cinebench R15 was released in 2013.. they are up to R20 now, just wondering why everyone is using 6-7 year old version?
Just for comparison. I get about 4950 in R20, 148w power and 70C temp.
I'll work on getting cinebench R20 for comparison and post the results when I can. I'll also try getting 3D Mark off steam as well.
|
kelkel1
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 601
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/05/18 09:52:47
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/27 17:04:06
(permalink)
darli328
kelkel1
darli328
Ran CineBench R15 and got a score of 2019, max temperature for the core and the package was 74C, package power 143.13W, vocre 1.206, cpu vcore 1.192
Does this seem in line?
This is where screenshots of the monitoring software, e.g. HWiNFO, are invaluable.
I did a run of Cinebench R15 with HWiNFO running and took a screenshot:
https://ibb.co/jM0MQnk
I think you mentioned you have an AIO. Which one and where is it mounted? If yours is a 240 and top mounted like mine seems like you're getting better temps then me. Maybe I missed in the the screen shop, what was the ambient temp? Mine is a little warmer (24.5C) so I know that's where some of my extra heat is coming from.
I said I do not have an AIO. I have a custom loop. Sorry. But I would like to see shot screenshots of your testing. Not for temperatures, but I am interested in seeing what clocks you get at what voltages.
|
darli328
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 104
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2018/12/10 22:30:23
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/27 17:47:08
(permalink)
Ran 3DMark Time Spy.
CPU score 11607
Max CPU Temperature 71 package and core
Package Power 121.55W
CPU vcore 1.192
Vcore 1.206
Fans/pump 100%
|
darli328
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 104
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2018/12/10 22:30:23
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/27 19:00:35
(permalink)
kelkel1
darli328
kelkel1
darli328
Ran CineBench R15 and got a score of 2019, max temperature for the core and the package was 74C, package power 143.13W, vocre 1.206, cpu vcore 1.192
Does this seem in line?
This is where screenshots of the monitoring software, e.g. HWiNFO, are invaluable.
I did a run of Cinebench R15 with HWiNFO running and took a screenshot:
https://ibb.co/jM0MQnk
I think you mentioned you have an AIO. Which one and where is it mounted? If yours is a 240 and top mounted like mine seems like you're getting better temps then me. Maybe I missed in the the screen shop, what was the ambient temp? Mine is a little warmer (24.5C) so I know that's where some of my extra heat is coming from.
I said I do not have an AIO. I have a custom loop. Sorry.
But I would like to see shot screenshots of your testing. Not for temperatures, but I am interested in seeing what clocks you get at what voltages.
I’ll work on trying to get some screen shots over the weekend. I’ll have to re-run a few tests to get all the shots, no big deal. I’ll just need a little more time.
|
darli328
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 104
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2018/12/10 22:30:23
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/27 20:13:27
(permalink)
kevinc313
Nereus
Cinebench R15 was released in 2013.. they are up to R20 now, just wondering why everyone is using 6-7 year old version?
Just for comparison. I get about 4950 in R20, 148w power and 70C temp.
My Cinebench R20 score 4846 Max CPU Temperature core and package 78C 151.85W Power Fans 100% CPU vcore 1.200 Vcore 1.208 Stock clocks
|
darli328
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 104
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2018/12/10 22:30:23
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/29 09:06:12
(permalink)
I’ve been trying to do some testing with my fans to figured out if that could be a cause or contributor to my higher temperatures. I have a Meshify C dark tempered glass case. My two front intake fans are Fractal Venturi HF-14s. https://www.fractal-desig...i/venturi-hf-14/black/They are high flow, low static pressure fans. Anyone think the front mesh on the Meshify C is too restrictive for these and should I get some static pressure fans instead? Maybe two Fractal Dynamic X2 GP-14 PWMs? https://www.fractal-desig...ic-x2-gp-14-pwm/black/ Since I have a fractal case and cooler (Celsius S24 AIO top mounted as exhaust) I’d like to only use Fractal fans for aesthetic reasons. For the rear exhaust I used one of the fans that came with the case. Fractal Dynamic X2 GP-12. Might not be the best on airflow and pressure but it is quiet. https://www.fractal-desig...ynamic-x2-gp-12/black/
post edited by darli328 - 2019/12/29 10:08:56
|
kevinc313
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 5004
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/02/28 09:27:55
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 22
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/29 12:30:55
(permalink)
darli328
I’ve been trying to do some testing with my fans to figured out if that could be a cause or contributor to my higher temperatures. I have a Meshify C dark tempered glass case. My two front intake fans are Fractal Venturi HF-14s.
https://www.fractal-desig...i/venturi-hf-14/black/
They are high flow, low static pressure fans. Anyone think the front mesh on the Meshify C is too restrictive for these and should I get some static pressure fans instead? Maybe two Fractal Dynamic X2 GP-14 PWMs?
https://www.fractal-desig...ic-x2-gp-14-pwm/black/
Since I have a fractal case and cooler (Celsius S24 AIO top mounted as exhaust) I’d like to only use Fractal fans for aesthetic reasons.
For the rear exhaust I used one of the fans that came with the case. Fractal Dynamic X2 GP-12. Might not be the best on airflow and pressure but it is quiet.
https://www.fractal-desig...ynamic-x2-gp-12/black/
Maybe those front fans would help but what you really need is push pull on the radiator, if you can fit it.
|
darli328
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 104
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2018/12/10 22:30:23
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/29 14:43:56
(permalink)
kevinc313
darli328
I’ve been trying to do some testing with my fans to figured out if that could be a cause or contributor to my higher temperatures. I have a Meshify C dark tempered glass case. My two front intake fans are Fractal Venturi HF-14s.
https://www.fractal-desig...i/venturi-hf-14/black/
They are high flow, low static pressure fans. Anyone think the front mesh on the Meshify C is too restrictive for these and should I get some static pressure fans instead? Maybe two Fractal Dynamic X2 GP-14 PWMs?
https://www.fractal-desig...ic-x2-gp-14-pwm/black/
Since I have a fractal case and cooler (Celsius S24 AIO top mounted as exhaust) I’d like to only use Fractal fans for aesthetic reasons.
For the rear exhaust I used one of the fans that came with the case. Fractal Dynamic X2 GP-12. Might not be the best on airflow and pressure but it is quiet.
https://www.fractal-desig...ynamic-x2-gp-12/black/
Maybe those front fans would help but what you really need is push pull on the radiator, if you can fit it.
Regarding a push pull setup from just looking at it, it might barely fit if it does. But, I’d like to consider that after adjusting the rest of my case fan set if there’s anything to be gained there. I take it you think the front mesh on my case is to restrictive for high flow fans?
|
kevinc313
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 5004
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/02/28 09:27:55
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 22
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/29 16:32:21
(permalink)
darli328
kevinc313
darli328
I’ve been trying to do some testing with my fans to figured out if that could be a cause or contributor to my higher temperatures. I have a Meshify C dark tempered glass case. My two front intake fans are Fractal Venturi HF-14s.
https://www.fractal-desig...i/venturi-hf-14/black/
They are high flow, low static pressure fans. Anyone think the front mesh on the Meshify C is too restrictive for these and should I get some static pressure fans instead? Maybe two Fractal Dynamic X2 GP-14 PWMs?
https://www.fractal-desig...ic-x2-gp-14-pwm/black/
Since I have a fractal case and cooler (Celsius S24 AIO top mounted as exhaust) I’d like to only use Fractal fans for aesthetic reasons.
For the rear exhaust I used one of the fans that came with the case. Fractal Dynamic X2 GP-12. Might not be the best on airflow and pressure but it is quiet.
https://www.fractal-desig...ynamic-x2-gp-12/black/
Maybe those front fans would help but what you really need is push pull on the radiator, if you can fit it.
Regarding a push pull setup from just looking at it, it might barely fit if it does. But, I’d like to consider that after adjusting the rest of my case fan set if there’s anything to be gained there.
I take it you think the front mesh on my case is to restrictive for high flow fans?
No, I don't think the mesh is restrictive. Maybe you'll get a slight improvement with those GP-14, but I doubt it. Radiators are VERY restrictive, hence the need for good radiator fans and push pull. If you want some serious front fans, get a pair of the Noctua 140mm 3K industrial. They will be quiet at moderate speeds but you can crank them up when needed. You can remove the brown parts so they are just black. https://www.newegg.com/no...48?Item=9SIAADY4B02860 Here's some good testing of push pull: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJmE13sG9PI
post edited by kevinc313 - 2019/12/29 16:50:53
|
wmmills
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 4688
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/01/04 20:47:29
- Location: New Jersey
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 40
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/29 20:38:29
(permalink)
kevinc313
darli328
kevinc313
darli328
I’ve been trying to do some testing with my fans to figured out if that could be a cause or contributor to my higher temperatures. I have a Meshify C dark tempered glass case. My two front intake fans are Fractal Venturi HF-14s.
https://www.fractal-desig...i/venturi-hf-14/black/
They are high flow, low static pressure fans. Anyone think the front mesh on the Meshify C is too restrictive for these and should I get some static pressure fans instead? Maybe two Fractal Dynamic X2 GP-14 PWMs?
https://www.fractal-desig...ic-x2-gp-14-pwm/black/
Since I have a fractal case and cooler (Celsius S24 AIO top mounted as exhaust) I’d like to only use Fractal fans for aesthetic reasons.
For the rear exhaust I used one of the fans that came with the case. Fractal Dynamic X2 GP-12. Might not be the best on airflow and pressure but it is quiet.
https://www.fractal-desig...ynamic-x2-gp-12/black/
Maybe those front fans would help but what you really need is push pull on the radiator, if you can fit it.
Regarding a push pull setup from just looking at it, it might barely fit if it does. But, I’d like to consider that after adjusting the rest of my case fan set if there’s anything to be gained there.
I take it you think the front mesh on my case is to restrictive for high flow fans?
No, I don't think the mesh is restrictive. Maybe you'll get a slight improvement with those GP-14, but I doubt it.
Radiators are VERY restrictive, hence the need for good radiator fans and push pull.
If you want some serious front fans, get a pair of the Noctua 140mm 3K industrial. They will be quiet at moderate speeds but you can crank them up when needed. You can remove the brown parts so they are just black.
https://www.newegg.com/no...48?Item=9SIAADY4B02860
Here's some good testing of push pull:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJmE13sG9PI
If your going to spend that kinda money just go to the beasts.... 120 cfm Delta's!  They have higher cfm versions yet but they get much more expensive. https://www.newegg.com/delta-afb1212hhe-pwm-case-fan/p/N82E16835213015?Description=delta%20120%20case%20fans&cm_re=delta_120_case_fans-_-35-213-015-_-Product
MOBO: EVGA x299 Dark, CPU: I9 10900X, RAM: Patriot Viper RGB 3600 32gb, SSD: Samsung 860 EVO 1TB, M2: Samsung 970 EVO+ 1TB, PSU: CoolerMaster M2 1500, CPU HSF: EVGA 240 CLC HSF~ P/P EK Furious Vardar, G-CARD:EVGA RTX3090 FTW3 Ultra Gaming w/Hybrid kit and Noctua IPPC 3000 P/P, CASE: LIAN-LI PC-V2010B w/ Window mod, OS: Windows 10 Pro 64bit, MON: Alienware AW3821DW New EVGA product? Register it NOW with this link: http://www.evga.com/register/default.asp?affiliatecode=4QFQRAMOII Help Our Vets From K-2! [link=https://strongholdfreedom
|
kevinc313
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 5004
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/02/28 09:27:55
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 22
Re: 9900k tempatures stock 240 AIO
2019/12/29 20:50:36
(permalink)
Push pull 250cfm Deltas ftw!!!!
|