Capt_Caveman
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 132
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2005/12/09 14:41:35
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Finally got my card and installed it with a Ryzen 1700(oc'd to 3700), 16gb DDR4 3000mhz with a clean Windows install. Windows set to high performance and Nvidia drivers set for max performance and vsync off. Two issues so far discovered. Fire Strike - I expected a higher score. Precision shows that the card reached 1995.5 before settling down to 1987 gpu clock. The bigger issue is Battlefield 1 where in 1440p with Ultra settings, I'm only averaging in the 90 to 100s fps sometimes dipping into the 60-70s when I should be averaging over 140 fps. Resolution scale is set to 100% with frame delimiter set to 200. When I switch to video auto mode, it only selectes medium settings. Should I be doing better than this with my card?
AMD 5900XEVGA 3080 FTW3AsRock X570 Taichi / Noctua NH-U14SG.Skill TridentZ Neo 32gb(16x2) 3600mhz CL16Seagate Firecuda 520 2TB NVMe / Samsung 960 EVO 1TB NVMeCorsair Crystal 570X CaseEVGA G3 850wSoundblaster AE-5Alienware AW3418DW and LG 27GP850-B
|
HeavyHemi
Omnipotent Enthusiast
- Total Posts : 13885
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/11/28 20:31:42
- Location: Western Washington
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 135
Re: 1080 Ti FTW3 Poor Performance
2017/05/13 22:20:49
(permalink)
Capt_Caveman Finally got my card and installed it with a Ryzen 1700(oc'd to 3700), 16gb DDR4 3000mhz with a clean Windows install. Windows set to high performance and Nvidia drivers set for max performance and vsync off. Two issues so far discovered. Fire Strike - I expected a higher score. Precision shows that the card reached 1995.5 before settling down to 1987 gpu clock.
The bigger issue is Battlefield 1 where in 1440p with Ultra settings, I'm only averaging in the 90 to 100s fps sometimes dipping into the 60-70s when I should be averaging over 140 fps. Resolution scale is set to 100% with frame delimiter set to 200. When I switch to video auto mode, it only selectes medium settings. Should I be doing better than this with my card?
It would be easier to tell with a link to the actual bench run... 23 784 with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti(1x) and Intel Core i7-6850K Graphics Score 31 388 Physics Score 19 841 Combined Score 9 443 http://www.3dmark.com/fs/12578065 There's mine for comparison. You're about where you should be considering your hardware and clocks.
EVGA X99 FTWK / i7 6850K @ 4.5ghz / RTX 3080Ti FTW Ultra / 32GB Corsair LPX 3600mhz / Samsung 850Pro 256GB / Be Quiet BN516 Straight Power 12-1000w 80 Plus Platinum / Window 10 Pro
|
Capt_Caveman
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 132
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2005/12/09 14:41:35
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: 1080 Ti FTW3 Poor Performance
2017/05/13 23:19:33
(permalink)
HeavyHemi It would be easier to tell with a link to the actual bench run... 23 784 with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti(1x) and Intel Core i7-6850K Graphics Score 31 388
Physics Score 19 841
Combined Score 9 443
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/12578065 There's mine for comparison. You're about where you should be considering your hardware and clocks.
Thanks! I had to reboot and lost the link. Ran it again and only got 19312 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/19926716 Though this time, I turned on KBoost. I need to figure out BF1 b/c the purpose of getting the card was to get over 140fps in Ultra.
AMD 5900XEVGA 3080 FTW3AsRock X570 Taichi / Noctua NH-U14SG.Skill TridentZ Neo 32gb(16x2) 3600mhz CL16Seagate Firecuda 520 2TB NVMe / Samsung 960 EVO 1TB NVMeCorsair Crystal 570X CaseEVGA G3 850wSoundblaster AE-5Alienware AW3418DW and LG 27GP850-B
|
arestavo
CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
- Total Posts : 6801
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/02/06 06:58:57
- Location: Through the Scary Door
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 77
Re: 1080 Ti FTW3 Poor Performance
2017/05/13 23:44:29
(permalink)
Capt_Caveman
HeavyHemi It would be easier to tell with a link to the actual bench run... 23 784 with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti(1x) and Intel Core i7-6850K Graphics Score 31 388
Physics Score 19 841
Combined Score 9 443
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/12578065 There's mine for comparison. You're about where you should be considering your hardware and clocks.
Thanks! I had to reboot and lost the link. Ran it again and only got 19312 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/19926716 Though this time, I turned on KBoost. I need to figure out BF1 b/c the purpose of getting the card was to get over 140fps in Ultra.
Your GPU FPS tests (1 and 2) are spot on. Your physics test looks about right for a Ryzen 1700. However, your combined score looks quite low for some reason - I don't know for sure, but that might have something to do with Ryzen's (relatively) weaker single core performance? Here's your test compared with mine: http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/12628210/fs/12363922
post edited by arestavo - 2017/05/13 23:47:26
|
Capt_Caveman
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 132
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2005/12/09 14:41:35
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: 1080 Ti FTW3 Poor Performance
2017/05/14 00:36:26
(permalink)
arestavo Your GPU FPS tests (1 and 2) are spot on. Your physics test looks about right for a Ryzen 1700. However, your combined score looks quite low for some reason - I don't know for sure, but that might have something to do with Ryzen's (relatively) weaker single core performance? Here's your test compared with mine: http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/12628210/fs/12363922
Maybe, need to find someone with the same setup to compare. Raised the overclock to 3.9mhz on my Ryzen 1700 - still not as good as my first run http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/19927521
AMD 5900XEVGA 3080 FTW3AsRock X570 Taichi / Noctua NH-U14SG.Skill TridentZ Neo 32gb(16x2) 3600mhz CL16Seagate Firecuda 520 2TB NVMe / Samsung 960 EVO 1TB NVMeCorsair Crystal 570X CaseEVGA G3 850wSoundblaster AE-5Alienware AW3418DW and LG 27GP850-B
|
scott@bjorn3d
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 693
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/11/20 04:37:19
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 2
Re: 1080 Ti FTW3 Poor Performance
2017/05/14 09:02:18
(permalink)
Capt_Caveman Finally got my card and installed it with a Ryzen 1700(oc'd to 3700), 16gb DDR4 3000mhz with a clean Windows install. Windows set to high performance and Nvidia drivers set for max performance and vsync off. Two issues so far discovered. Fire Strike - I expected a higher score. Precision shows that the card reached 1995.5 before settling down to 1987 gpu clock.
The bigger issue is Battlefield 1 where in 1440p with Ultra settings, I'm only averaging in the 90 to 100s fps sometimes dipping into the 60-70s when I should be averaging over 140 fps. Resolution scale is set to 100% with frame delimiter set to 200. When I switch to video auto mode, it only selectes medium settings. Should I be doing better than this with my card?
On my 1080 TI FE I am getting 90-140FPS in BF1 on Ultra with the same 1440P on my Dell G-Sync Monitor. My CPU is a 3960X at 3.8GHz. Now I do have a 1070 FTW doing Folding while I am playing the game so that eats up some of my CPU.
|
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
- Total Posts : 38516
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
- Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 282
Re: 1080 Ti FTW3 Poor Performance
2017/05/14 09:09:25
(permalink)
|
chrism101
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 549
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/05/21 06:47:05
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: 1080 Ti FTW3 Poor Performance
2017/05/14 15:42:36
(permalink)
Have you went into Nvidia control panel and set it to max performance and made sure things like vsynch aren't slowing performance?
|
Capt_Caveman
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 132
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2005/12/09 14:41:35
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: 1080 Ti FTW3 Poor Performance
2017/05/14 16:08:07
(permalink)
bcavnaugh Your AMD Ryzen 7 1700 -v- My AMD Ryzen 7 1800X http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/12628210/fs/12440241 3,700 MHz -v- 4,075 MHz http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/12628210/fs/12440241/fs/12628618 3,700 MHz -v- 4,075 MHz and -v- 3,900 MHz I would say with that CPU + GPU your Scores are fine.
Thanks! Looks like I'm fine Fire Strike wise. Reran at 3.9mhz and got a 20694 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/19937907 Now, just need to figure out how to get it working fast in games. chrism101 Have you went into Nvidia control panel and set it to max performance and made sure things like vsynch aren't slowing performance?
Yes, I have. So, my Fire Strike score is ok but even after deleting my BF1 profile and resetting the video. I'm still in the 90s fps and when it dips into the 70s fps, it becomes laggy.
post edited by Capt_Caveman - 2017/05/14 16:10:38
AMD 5900XEVGA 3080 FTW3AsRock X570 Taichi / Noctua NH-U14SG.Skill TridentZ Neo 32gb(16x2) 3600mhz CL16Seagate Firecuda 520 2TB NVMe / Samsung 960 EVO 1TB NVMeCorsair Crystal 570X CaseEVGA G3 850wSoundblaster AE-5Alienware AW3418DW and LG 27GP850-B
|
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
- Total Posts : 38516
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
- Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 282
Re: 1080 Ti FTW3 Poor Performance
2017/05/14 19:36:00
(permalink)
I have never gammed at the same Settings that I use when I Benchmark. On my Intel I run +190 for Benchmarking and down to +150 for Gaming. +230 or 2138MHz for Folding and Crunching. On my AMD I run +180 for Benchmarking and down to +140 for Gaming. I run +190 or 2100MHz for Folding and Crunching.
|
Sajin
EVGA Forum Moderator
- Total Posts : 49129
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
- Location: Texas, USA.
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 199
Re: 1080 Ti FTW3 Poor Performance
2017/05/15 18:59:06
(permalink)
Capt_Caveman Finally got my card and installed it with a Ryzen 1700(oc'd to 3700), 16gb DDR4 3000mhz with a clean Windows install. Windows set to high performance and Nvidia drivers set for max performance and vsync off. Two issues so far discovered. Fire Strike - I expected a higher score. Precision shows that the card reached 1995.5 before settling down to 1987 gpu clock.
The bigger issue is Battlefield 1 where in 1440p with Ultra settings, I'm only averaging in the 90 to 100s fps sometimes dipping into the 60-70s when I should be averaging over 140 fps. Resolution scale is set to 100% with frame delimiter set to 200. When I switch to video auto mode, it only selectes medium settings. Should I be doing better than this with my card?
Graphics score looks good. I've watched a few videos on youtube that show ryzen holding 1080 ti's performance back.
|