EVGA

Sapphire Pure Black X58 LGA1366 Motherboard Review

Author
basicallyevolve
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1233
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 3/25/2008
  • Location: Tujuna California
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 6
Wednesday, March 09, 2011 7:06 AM (permalink)
http://www.hardwarecanuck...otherboard-review.html
 
Strange late release by Sapphire.... Why even bother ?  It isnt that X58 is dead. If you ask me it still has some kicking left before it is down. This board is just garbage in my opinion for the price
post edited by basicallyevolve - Wednesday, March 09, 2011 1:35 PM

i7 8700k @ 5Ghz
16gb Gskill 3200 Mhz trident Z RGB cas Lat 14
ASUS Maximum Hero X Wifi
2TB Samsung 980 Pro
512GB Intel 900P
LG OLED48CXPUB @ 120hz  + 43 inch Samsung 4k
EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 ULTRA
EVGA SuperNOVA 1600 T2
Corsair K95 Platinum

#1

20 Replies Related Threads

    nectari
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 34
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 3/19/2007
    • Location: Surf City
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re:Sapphire Pure Black X58 LGA1366 Motherboard Review Wednesday, March 09, 2011 9:58 AM (permalink)
    On Page 2;
     
    Regrettably, Sapphire have decided not to opt for SLI on the X58 Pure Black...possibly because they couldn't get it certified due to the unusual PCI-E speeds.
     
    No SLI Option=Fail

    post edited by nectari - Wednesday, March 09, 2011 10:00 AM

    Core i7 920 - O.C.: 3.4 - 4.2GHz as needed | Asus P6T X58 Mobo + XSPC RASA H2O CPU Block
    EVGA GTX 580 + DD-GTX580 Full Black Chrome Top/Nickle Base | OCZ Flex EX 12GB DDR3 1600: 7.7.7.16 1T 
    Crucial M4 128GB SSD w/Win7 Pro. 64bit | 2x WD 500GB RE3 in Raid 1 Storage | 2TB Samsung F4 External Backup.
    Corsair HX850W PSU | Soundblaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Champion
    XSPC 750 5.25 Dual Bay Pump/Reservoir | Koolance HX-CU1020V (3x120mm Radiator) + 1 BlackIce GT Stealth 120mm 
    Hannspree 25" HDTV 1080P (1980x1080)


    #2
    kram36
    The Destroyer
    • Total Posts : 20362
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 10/28/2009
    • Location: United States
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 72
    Re:Sapphire Pure Black X58 LGA1366 Motherboard Review Wednesday, March 09, 2011 4:42 PM (permalink)
    Why do they call it Pure Black? There is blue all over that thing.
    #3
    kaninja
    CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
    • Total Posts : 7075
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 10/11/2008
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 25
    Re:Sapphire Pure Black X58 LGA1366 Motherboard Review Wednesday, March 09, 2011 5:21 PM (permalink)
    Why did they even bother?  I can't find a reason I would buy this over any other X58 mobo.

    Corsair 650D   -  i5 3570K @ 4.6GHz  -  Corsair H80i  -  MSI Z77 M-Power  -  16GB DDR3 Corsair Dominator Platinum
    WD 1TB Caviar Black x2  -  OCZ 120GB Vertex2 SSD  -  Corsair HX620  -  GTX285 SSC  -  Samsung T240  -  DIR-655
     


    #4
    lehpron
    Regular Guy
    • Total Posts : 8858
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 5/18/2006
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 191
    Re:Sapphire Pure Black X58 LGA1366 Motherboard Review Thursday, March 10, 2011 0:33 PM (permalink)
    You guys need to try thinking outside the box at least once: This is aimed at Sapphire fans that still have AMD and are looking to switch since not everyone has.   X58 isn't dead to people who actually need more than 8 threads.  Stop acting like because you or anyone that doesn't need more than eight threads doesn't need it, then no one else does.
    post edited by lehpron - Thursday, March 10, 2011 0:37 PM

    For Intel processors, 0.122 x TDP = Continuous Amps at 12v [source].  

    Introduction to Thermoelectric Cooling
    #5
    Brad_Hawthorne
    Insert Custom Title Here
    • Total Posts : 18001
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 6/6/2004
    • Location: Dazed & Confused
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 39
    Re:Sapphire Pure Black X58 LGA1366 Motherboard Review Thursday, March 10, 2011 0:42 PM (permalink)
    lehpron

    You guys need to try thinking outside the box at least once: This is aimed at Sapphire fans that still have AMD and are looking to switch since not everyone has.   X58 isn't dead to people who actually need more than 8 threads.  Stop acting like because you or anyone that doesn't need more than eight threads doesn't need it, then no one else does.

     
    Have you looked at the PCIe lane configuration this board has? I couldn't imagine too many people would want it if they knew how it compared to other X58 mobos. IMHO, SLI comparability is largely irrelevant. The slot speeds are what I see at issue. Why is it even an X58 mobo with this slot config?
    post edited by Brad_Hawthorne - Thursday, March 10, 2011 0:44 PM
    #6
    basicallyevolve
    FTW Member
    • Total Posts : 1233
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 3/25/2008
    • Location: Tujuna California
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 6
    Re:Sapphire Pure Black X58 LGA1366 Motherboard Review Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:38 AM (permalink)
    lehpron

    You guys need to try thinking outside the box at least once: This is aimed at Sapphire fans that still have AMD and are looking to switch since not everyone has.   X58 isn't dead to people who actually need more than 8 threads.  Stop acting like because you or anyone that doesn't need more than eight threads doesn't need it, then no one else does.

     
    Who the hell said X58 was dead? You seem to get into Every Thread and begin to Bash right away. You jump to conclusion without even reading anything. THIS IS A GARBAGE BOARD PERIOD. You could pay less and get another X58 out there that will offer way more than this board. I have an X58 with a 980x and i love it and i will be buying a new motherboard soon and again NO ONE SAID IT WAS DEAD AND NO ONE IS ACTING LIKE ANYTHING.
     
    THIS Board makes no sense... Is late to the game and offers NOTHING to anyone. I think you need to back off and take a chill pill because this is the second thread of mine you have crapped on for false reasons and a lack of knowledge.
     
    Who would buy a sapphire AMD card... and AMD CPU and decide to buy a new  X58 motherboard ...new ram...new CPU just to have a sapphire motherboard because they decided to come out with one late in the game. That is a very odd thing to say and it makes no sense. THis board is poorly designed and again offers nothing for the price.
    post edited by basicallyevolve - Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:59 AM

    i7 8700k @ 5Ghz
    16gb Gskill 3200 Mhz trident Z RGB cas Lat 14
    ASUS Maximum Hero X Wifi
    2TB Samsung 980 Pro
    512GB Intel 900P
    LG OLED48CXPUB @ 120hz  + 43 inch Samsung 4k
    EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 ULTRA
    EVGA SuperNOVA 1600 T2
    Corsair K95 Platinum

    #7
    Brad_Hawthorne
    Insert Custom Title Here
    • Total Posts : 18001
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 6/6/2004
    • Location: Dazed & Confused
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 39
    Re:Sapphire Pure Black X58 LGA1366 Motherboard Review Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:50 AM (permalink)
    I look at the mobo as being an experiment by Sapphire that turned out to be ill thought out. If you're going to experiment in new markets, at least bring something new to the table noone else does. It's like some guy in the Sapphire marketing department said, "Hey, let's make a black and blue mobo. We found a good deal on an excess lot of X58 chips sitting around." To me it makes about that much logical sense.
     
    I have no real beef with Sapphire other than they seem to be a commodity based hardware manufacturer. Heck I own a 5870 E6 card of theirs. I just find the logic to be a bit lacking in the reason for this mobo to exist in it's current specification. There is nothing that really stands out about Sapphire to me.
    post edited by Brad_Hawthorne - Thursday, March 10, 2011 2:05 AM
    #8
    lehpron
    Regular Guy
    • Total Posts : 8858
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 5/18/2006
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 191
    Re:Sapphire Pure Black X58 LGA1366 Motherboard Review Thursday, March 10, 2011 4:46 AM (permalink)
    Brad_Hawthorne
    lehpron
    You guys need to try thinking outside the box at least once: This is aimed at Sapphire fans that still have AMD and are looking to switch since not everyone has.   X58 isn't dead to people who actually need more than 8 threads.  Stop acting like because you or anyone that doesn't need more than eight threads doesn't need it, then no one else does.
    Have you looked at the PCIe lane configuration this board has? I couldn't imagine too many people would want it if they knew how it compared to other X58 mobos. IMHO, SLI comparability is largely irrelevant. The slot speeds are what I see at issue. Why is it even an X58 mobo with this slot config?
    I saw the slot configuration, I maintain that this product simply allows Sapphire not to loose their majority AMD customers when they are tempted to switch to Intel.  Like I said, it really doesn't have to make sense to us why this X58 exists.  
     
    basicallyevolve
    Who the hell said X58 was dead? You seem to get into Every Thread and begin to Bash right away. You jump to conclusion without even reading anything. THIS IS A GARBAGE BOARD PERIOD. You could pay less and get another X58 out there that will offer way more than this board. I have an X58 with a 980x and i love it and i will be buying a new motherboard soon and again NO ONE SAID IT WAS DEAD AND NO ONE IS ACTING LIKE ANYTHING.

    THIS Board makes no sense... Is late to the game and offers NOTHING to anyone. I think you need to back off and take a chill pill because this is the second thread of mine you have crapped on for false reasons and a lack of knowledge.

    I don't know what your deal is and I don't care.  I'm not responsible for your assumptions about me or my posts when by your own admission we've only had one other interaction like this.  I'm not the one using all-caps to re-emphasize a point made just 5 replies earlier while asking someone else to back off and take a chill pill.  We're all pretty decent here on the EVGA forums, there is no reason to use this language with anyone.
    post edited by lehpron - Thursday, March 10, 2011 4:53 AM

    For Intel processors, 0.122 x TDP = Continuous Amps at 12v [source].  

    Introduction to Thermoelectric Cooling
    #9
    Alucard666
    CLASSIFIED Member
    • Total Posts : 4402
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 12/22/2007
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 12
    Re:Sapphire Pure Black X58 LGA1366 Motherboard Review Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:14 AM (permalink)
    fail...

    AMD Ryzen 7 3700x | 32GB Crucial Ballistix PRO RGB 3600mhz| ASUS RTX 3080 TUF OC | ASUS X570i STRIX | 2TB Sabrent Rockit M.2 SSD| NZXT H1 w Ghost Sheets Mesh Front | Noctua 140mm & 2 40mm | Samsung Odyssey G7 32" | Logitech G Pro Wireless | Logitech G915 | SteelSeries Arctis Pro Wireless | Logitech G560 RGB Speakers |
    #10
    SirWaWa
    FTW Member
    • Total Posts : 1398
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 8/4/2010
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re:Sapphire Pure Black X58 LGA1366 Motherboard Review Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:26 AM (permalink)
    hahaha
    in the review they have two evga gtx 280's for illustration purposes
    yes, yes i know, no sli on this board

    Intel i7 960 @ 3.2GHz with Intel EE Heatsink/Fan Delta DBX-A
    Asus P6T6 WS Revolution X58 LGA 1366
    Asus BW-12B1ST CD-RW/DVD-RW/BD-R (x2)
    Corsair Obsidian 800D
    Corsair HX850W Professional Series
    Corsair Dominator GT DDR3 1600 6GB 7-7-7-20
    eVGA Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti SC 3.0GB DDR5 ACX
    WD VelociRaptor 300GB 10,000 RPM SATAII
    WD Caviar Black 2TB/1TB/1TB 7,200 RPM SATAII
    Razer Megalodon 7.1 Headset
    Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum
    Razer Onza Tournament Edition Xbox 360/PC Controller
    Logitech G810 Orion Spectrum
    Logitech X-540 5.1 Speaker System
    LG M2362D 1920 x 1080 23" 60Hz (x2)
    Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
    #11
    kram36
    The Destroyer
    • Total Posts : 20362
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 10/28/2009
    • Location: United States
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 72
    Re:Sapphire Pure Black X58 LGA1366 Motherboard Review Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:28 AM (permalink)
    SirWaWa

    hahaha
    in the review they have two evga gtx 280's for illustration purposes
    yes, yes i know, no sli on this board

    Nice catch lololol
    #12
    ziou.wang
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 155
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2/2/2011
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re:Sapphire Pure Black X58 LGA1366 Motherboard Review Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:33 AM (permalink)
    Looks like MSI...
    #13
    ty_ger07
    Insert Custom Title Here
    • Total Posts : 16602
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 4/11/2008
    • Location: traveler
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 271
    Re:Sapphire Pure Black X58 LGA1366 Motherboard Review Thursday, March 10, 2011 6:12 AM (permalink)
    SirWaWa

    hahaha
    in the review they have two evga gtx 280's for illustration purposes
    yes, yes i know, no sli on this board


    I noticed that too.
     
    But, you don't need SLI to use two or more GPUs.  Remember?  That's why NVIDIA is supposedly better than AMD -- because of their superior GPGPU abilities with CUDA technology.
    #14
    basicallyevolve
    FTW Member
    • Total Posts : 1233
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 3/25/2008
    • Location: Tujuna California
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 6
    Re:Sapphire Pure Black X58 LGA1366 Motherboard Review Thursday, March 10, 2011 6:41 AM (permalink)
    lehpron

    You guys need to try thinking outside the box at least once: This is aimed at Sapphire fans that still have AMD and are looking to switch since not everyone has.   X58 isn't dead to people who actually need more than 8 threads.  Stop acting like because you or anyone that doesn't need more than eight threads doesn't need it, then no one else does.

     
    Alright lets start again to show where you jump to conclusions and shat on this thread for no reason and with no data to prove anything except your jiberish and rambling just like the LSI thread.
     
     
    # 1  You say X58 isnt dead... NO one here said it was. You jumped to a conclusion and basically typed useless information.
     
    #2 you say someone who has an AMD CPU who has waited this long is going to finally drop ship to get this Sapphire board just because sapphire came out with one and that they are die hard sapphire fans... Where is your proof? can you show me ONE person who dropped their AMD platform for this board ?   Then you go on to say that people need more than 8 threads so again... SHow me one person who went from an AMD board  ( people usually go AMD because they think it makes more sense because they dont wanna spend more on intel equipment)  to an X58 Who has an i7 970 or 980/990x .  They in turn are going to buy a sapphire board that is 260 bucks to get nothing for their monies worth and to get a 1 year limited warranty from sapphire? They love sapphire that much that they would rather overpay for a product that offers nothing and to get a 1 year warranty with it? That makes sense..
     
    #3 you sit there and say just cause we dont doesnt mean other dont either. I Said i have a 980x and i utilize my 6 cores and 12 threads time to time when i am video editing or using photo Chop.
     
    You jumped to conclusion and talk about us acting like something when no one said anything remotely similar to what you claimed or concluded in your delirious post.
     
     
    Then you go on to say that it doesnt really need to make sense to us why it even exists in the first place but you immediately jumped to conclusions without facts for why it exists and defended the product by thrashing Mr. X ( who apparently said X58 is dead and no one need more than 8 threads ) . By the way ... When you find him in this thread let us know because i cant seem to find him or her.
     
     
    Then you go on to say you dont know what my deal is???
     
    What is your deal? you came into this thread with pistols shooting making assumption and then turn and say you are not responsible for my assumptions? You are the one who assumed from the get co here.
     
    Then you turn and say we are all pretty decent here and there no reason to use this language with anyone...
     
    What language are you talking about ? What was offensive about anything i said? I merely stated facts as i am doing again now which you dont seem to comprehend because your initial post was inadequate to this thread just as your other post in the LSI 9265-8i threads was.
     
    Everyone here is on the same page except you for some reason. You pulled out information from god knows where and attacked someone who doesnt even exist on this thread and brought your facts with you without showing proof of it.
     
    Kinda like when the 9265 thread right? where you responded when you dont even own a raid card? I own a 9260-8i and 8 solid state drives and i know how it performs.... computurd has owned 20 different raid cards and every single SSD on the market and talks about facts and knows that the 9260-8i is a thing of beauty along with others who own it and you are talking about SSD review advertising for them...
     
    IM sorry? do you own a 9260-8i ? Do you know what another core on the 9260-8i + 512 more ram going from 512mb DDRII to 1GB DDRIII will do for a raid card? Can you show me another raid card on the market that will do 460 k IOPS? Can you show me a raid card with a dual core processor with 1gb DDRIII Ram to back up your claim of TheSSDreview advertising false information for LSI? Have you tested 20 different raid cards like computurd and every single ssd on the market ? Does LSI or SSD companies send you 8 cards for free to test on raid cards so you can give the public information on their SSD's? He isnt a one sided man. He gets products he tests them and he gives you the information.
     
    http://www.xtremesystems....howthread.php?t=267602
     
    When the Kingpin talks about EVGA and uses an EVGA board to smash records and turns around and says go with EVGA does he have every right to? If EVGA came out saying they designed a 6way SLI board  for the SR-2 and the kingpin turned and said hell yeah that product is going to rock... are you going to turn around and tell the Kingpin he is jumping to conclusions and is giving false information? HEll no. It is his given right from  his experience. He has tested every board out there and he knows what he is doing.

    I consider Computurd  the Kingpin of Raid cards. He has done his homework and knows what he is doing.
     
    I will wait for your proof and reasons for you to justify the things you typed because i know you'll have something to say.
    post edited by basicallyevolve - Thursday, March 10, 2011 6:45 AM

    i7 8700k @ 5Ghz
    16gb Gskill 3200 Mhz trident Z RGB cas Lat 14
    ASUS Maximum Hero X Wifi
    2TB Samsung 980 Pro
    512GB Intel 900P
    LG OLED48CXPUB @ 120hz  + 43 inch Samsung 4k
    EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 ULTRA
    EVGA SuperNOVA 1600 T2
    Corsair K95 Platinum

    #15
    Brad_Hawthorne
    Insert Custom Title Here
    • Total Posts : 18001
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 6/6/2004
    • Location: Dazed & Confused
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 39
    Re:Sapphire Pure Black X58 LGA1366 Motherboard Review Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:53 PM (permalink)
    You don't buy a sports car engine and put it into a minivan.
    #16
    kaninja
    CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
    • Total Posts : 7075
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 10/11/2008
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 25
    Re:Sapphire Pure Black X58 LGA1366 Motherboard Review Thursday, March 10, 2011 3:00 PM (permalink)
    Would Sapphire fans be so patriotic that they would buy this stupid board over much better boards from another vendor??  If that's the market Sapphire is going after they sure don't put much faith in the inteligence of their "fans".  No SLI on an enthusiast X58 board is nothing short of ghey....as is the stupid slot configuration.
     
    I could care less that this is a late offering X58 board because IMO X58 isn't dead yet.  However if you are going to offer a board this late, then I would think you might want to offer features that at least match existing boards if not add some design improvements of your own....that's just me though.  GO SAPPHIRE!

    Corsair 650D   -  i5 3570K @ 4.6GHz  -  Corsair H80i  -  MSI Z77 M-Power  -  16GB DDR3 Corsair Dominator Platinum
    WD 1TB Caviar Black x2  -  OCZ 120GB Vertex2 SSD  -  Corsair HX620  -  GTX285 SSC  -  Samsung T240  -  DIR-655
     


    #17
    Bkatt
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 10590
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2/22/2009
    • Location: The Deserts of Arizona, US
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 39
    Re:Sapphire Pure Black X58 LGA1366 Motherboard Review Thursday, March 10, 2011 3:26 PM (permalink)
    A lot of X58 boards did not come with SLI when they were first released. Tis board is not aimed for Nvidia fans obviously. So to count this board as a failure than you have to cound every other board that came before it as a failure also.
     
    Hint hint there is a modified driver/Reg Edit that can enable SLI on any X58 board thats running around on the intewebs.
     
    The real fail on this board to me is the LOCKED PCI-E lanes. why they did this i can not see a good reason other than to save cash on their end. That might be way they didnt pay nvidia for SLI. I think its like 5.00 per board thay pay to nvidia.
     
    Seeing how this board has a IDE cable port kinda a fail IMO. Its a old port that people looking at this board should not be using anymore. I understand some people still use IDE DVD drives but come on.

    Professional Cat
    #18
    Brad_Hawthorne
    Insert Custom Title Here
    • Total Posts : 18001
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 6/6/2004
    • Location: Dazed & Confused
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 39
    Re:Sapphire Pure Black X58 LGA1366 Motherboard Review Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:05 PM (permalink)
    burning_kittins

    I understand some people still use IDE DVD drives but come on.

     
    Seriously, there is no reasoning that makes sense to me to still be using IDE anything. A DVD drive costs all of $15. It's dead weight infrastructure on a modern mobo.
    #19
    ZEROclocked
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 44
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2/17/2010
    • Location: Louisiana
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re:Sapphire Pure Black X58 LGA1366 Motherboard Review Thursday, March 10, 2011 10:25 PM (permalink)
    I think it's funny they felt the need to add the "pure" to black in the product name, when there is all kinds of blue all over the board. Not to mention the horrid slot placement and the lack of SLI. 

    RED QUEEN (Upgrades shown)
    2600K | EVGA P67 FTW | H70 | 2x EVGA SC 580s in SLI | 16GB Corsair Vengeance | 2x Intel x25-m 80G | 1 TB Caviar Black | AX1200 | G19 | G9x | Razer Naga Epic | G930 | HAF932 
     
    #20
    lehpron
    Regular Guy
    • Total Posts : 8858
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 5/18/2006
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 191
    Re:Sapphire Pure Black X58 LGA1366 Motherboard Review Friday, March 11, 2011 9:23 PM (permalink)
    Sapphire's "Pure" is like EVGA's "Classfied", it is just a name and doesn't have to make sense, it just has to catch on.  They gave the word "Black" for their most recent offerings of an Intel P67 and X58.   Go to their website and see the product page for yourself.
     
    burning_kittins
    The real fail on this board to me is the LOCKED PCI-E lanes. why they did this i can not see a good reason other than to save cash on their end.
    Locking lanes is a no hassle configuration, why not?  I'm sure they would know (of their customers that would likely switch) which were demanded lanes and slot positions, most will have AMD graphics, most will be Sapphire.
     
    burning_kittins
    Seeing how this board has a IDE cable port kinda a fail IMO. Its a old port that people looking at this board should not be using anymore.
    Hindsight: The first EVGA X58 (E758) had an IDE port.  Except for the new miniITX, all of their older and current AMD boards have IDE ports (their Pure Black P67 does not because the Intel chipset doesn't support IDE), so it would ease the transition if they (or people like them) were the target market.
     
    Note: target market doesn't mean they'll purchase in droves like early-adopters and brag about it.  It just means meeting a specific demand.
    post edited by lehpron - Friday, March 11, 2011 9:41 PM

    For Intel processors, 0.122 x TDP = Continuous Amps at 12v [source].  

    Introduction to Thermoelectric Cooling
    #21
    Jump to: