hondaboy20

your 920 should handle ok and for the gpu if you can i would get the 670 4gb cards possibly two of them if you cant
the 2gb card will still handle in surround just on lower settings   before i got my second 680 i was only using one for surround 5760x1080 and it was nice but just couldnt  turn up all the eye candy i wanted and im still limited by vram so 2gb is playable and nice but 4gb is more future prove proof 

The 4GB -- Realistically there was not one game that we tested that could benefit from the two extra GB's of graphics memory. Even at 2560x1600 (which is a massive 4 Mpixels resolution) there was just no measurable difference.
Now the setup could benefit from triple monitor setups at 5760x1080 (which is a 6 Mpixels resolution), but even there I doubt if 4 GB is really something you'd need to spend money on. It might make a difference at 16xAA and the most stringent games, or if you game in 3D Stereo and triple monitor gaming -- I mean sure -- at any point graphics memory can and will run out. There's one exception to the rule, and that's Skyrim all beefed, tweaked and modded upwards. But the universal question remains, is it worth it investing in that extra memor? This card is 90 EUR more expensive. Well that answer depends on pricing versus your demands and requriements really, the extra memory certainly won't hurt that's for sure, but sure -- the benefits remains small.

• I get 55-100fps in Battlefield 3, with SSAO and 2X MSAA and FXAA.  That's multiplayer, I mostly hang out in Canals and similar smaller maps.
• Maxed out - Dirt 2 is so high as to never be an issue (60+ fps 'garaunteed' - enough for reliable vsync).
• Maxed out - GRID is so high as to never be an issue.
• Maxed out - Just Cause 2 is high enough to almost never be an issue (I can get some dips into the 50s).  Just Cause 2 is INSANE good in surround.
• Maxed out w/ DX11 extras - Crysis 2 has issues - 35-50fps with everything cranked.  Most times it's 45+ but you have to turn down AA a bit to get rock solid
• I have both Crysis and Crysis Warhead but haven't played them yet. 
• TF2 is so high as to not be an issue. (max)
• Portal 2 is so high as to not be an issue. (max)
• Indie games can be problematic depending on the game.  Trine 2 for example can have odd looking rendering toward the edges because it wasn't 'really' designed for surround.  2D games don't magically do anything, they stretch or zoom in. 
• Sonic Generations is so high as to not be an issue.  Needs a Widescreen Fixer program.
• Skyrim (with 18 mods) runs pretty high but I need a widescreen fixer.  It's not 'meant' to run over 1080p.  But it looks great when you do!
• Tribes: Ascend - broke as heck. 
• Borderlands 2 - WOW, looks great, plays great, is great.
• Diablo 3 - some parts of screen don't render or "pop in", it's the fault of the game - needs a widescreen fix, or to run in windowed mode.  Not really cool in super widescreen.  Acceptable framerate maxed out, haven't measured it.
• Geometry Wars - busted in super widescreen.  Looks terrible.
• Rayman Origins - broken rendering but framerate is fine.  We'll see if it gets a fix, but I play that in 1080p.
• Batman: Arkham City - OK framerate, but haven't measured.  Above the city with quick panning I can get some framerate chugs, but I think that's the engine.  Everything maxed out looks acceptable.
• Maxed out -Saints Row The Third - EDIT--  Had an issue, but I know what it is:  If you run PrecisionX with this game, it either runs terribly or won't start.  Either way, if I don't run PrecisionX, I can run Ultra just fine.

dustinr26

are those the samsung S27A350H monitor by chance? i have that model yours look just like it. you can see here..

buggyruth

dustinr26

are those the samsung S27A350H monitor by chance? i have that model yours look just like it. you can see here..

Almost, S27B550V.
You have a nice setup!!