EVGA

High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV

Author
_Nite_
Omnipotent Enthusiast
  • Total Posts : 14962
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2007/04/18 15:35:04
  • Location: Sumner, Washington
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 46
2013/05/02 21:05:07 (permalink)
http://www.pcper.com/revi...hmarked-4K-Resolutions
 
imagine running 3 of these in Surround.
 
3840x2160 x 3 = 11520x2160
 

post edited by _Nite_ - 2013/05/03 15:15:02

Gaming Rig: AMD Ryzen 7 2700x @ 4.25Ghz - Asrock B450 Pro 4 - 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4 3000 - 240GB SSD (OS), 1TB ADATA SU800 SSD and 2TB ADATA SX8200 Pro M2 NVME (Games) - 8GB RTX 3070 XC3 Ultra - Sound Blaster Audigy 5 RX - EVGA Supernova 750w G2 - Antec 302 - 24" Asus VG248QE
 
#1

21 Replies Related Threads

    loveha
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 10302
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/09/26 01:51:22
    • Location: Beulah Michigan
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 65
    Re:High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV 2013/05/02 21:47:35 (permalink)
    Still decent FPS even for a 690/SLI680. 4K is out of my budget for a while though till it becomes more standard.

    Case - Phanteks Enthoo Evolv X
    Mobo - EVGA X570 FTW
    CPU - AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
    RAM - 32GB Trident Z Royal 3600MHz 14-14-14-34
    GPU - EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Gaming
    PSU - Seasonic Prime TX-1000
    Heatkiller IV CPU Waterblock / Heatkiller V GPU Waterblock
    Heatkiller V EBC Active Backplate / Two Heatkiller Rad 360 L
    Six Noctua NF-A12x25 / Heatkiller D5 Pump
    #2
    _Nite_
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 14962
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2007/04/18 15:35:04
    • Location: Sumner, Washington
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 46
    Re:High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV 2013/05/03 14:50:07 (permalink)
    if it does become standard that will hopely drop the price of 2560x1600 screens and I can afford one.
     
    with me getting a GTX 770 later, I'm sure it will be way overkill for my 1920x1080
    post edited by _Nite_ - 2013/05/03 14:51:54

    Gaming Rig: AMD Ryzen 7 2700x @ 4.25Ghz - Asrock B450 Pro 4 - 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4 3000 - 240GB SSD (OS), 1TB ADATA SU800 SSD and 2TB ADATA SX8200 Pro M2 NVME (Games) - 8GB RTX 3070 XC3 Ultra - Sound Blaster Audigy 5 RX - EVGA Supernova 750w G2 - Antec 302 - 24" Asus VG248QE
     
    #3
    megalolman
    iCX Member
    • Total Posts : 403
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2006/06/15 07:38:41
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 4
    Re:High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV 2013/05/08 10:48:47 (permalink)
    I don't know why they are claiming "4k resolution" in all the games tested...
    Some of the games shown much small resolution in the configuration screenshots:
    Battlefield 3 : 1920 x 1200 @ 59.86 Hz
    Crysis 3: No configuration screenshot posted.
    Dirt 3 :  1920 x 1200 @ 60 Hz
    Farcry 3 : 2560 x 1440
    Skyrim : 1920 x 1200 (Shows a GTX560 Ti as graphics adapter...) 
    Sleeping Dogs: No configuration screenshot posted.
     
    For me, this "review" has a lot of typos or it is fake...
    post edited by megalolman - 2013/05/08 10:50:06

    Succubi-Lair(Main Rig, dual-system) :
         Processor: AMD Ryzen 3900x @ NZXT Kraken x62 Motherboard: Gigabyte Elite X570, Memory: 32GB GSkill TridentZ 3200Mhz C14, Storage: Samsung EVO 960 M.2 NVME 250GB (Windows10 PRO), 2 x Samsung EVO 970 plus M.2 NVME 1TB (2TB Raid 0 array - Games), Graphics: MSI GTX1080 Ti X @ NZXT Kraken x42, Audio: ASUS Xonar DX, PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower Grand RGB 850W, Case: Phanteks Enthoo Evolv X, Second-System (Envy, Ruoting/WIFI AP): Gigabyte GA-J1900N_D3V, 8GB SO_DIMM 1600MHZ DDR3, 120x2 SSD Raid 0, 150W picoPSU @ Phanteks Enthoo Evolv X ITX tray

    #4
    Brad_Hawthorne
    Insert Custom Title Here
    • Total Posts : 18001
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2004/06/06 16:13:06
    • Location: Dazed & Confused
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 39
    Re:High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV 2013/05/08 11:33:15 (permalink)
    _Nite_
    imagine running 3 of these in Surround.
    3840x2160 x 3 = 11520x2160

    Better yet, 3x1P. Too bad about the 30hz limitation though. That would make me want to claw my eyes out after constant use. Vertical FOV is just as important to suspension of disbelief in a large screen set as horizontal FOV. At that size 3x1P is preferable.
    post edited by Brad_Hawthorne - 2013/05/08 11:34:35
    #5
    Shockjockey
    CLASSIFIED Member
    • Total Posts : 2256
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2006/11/29 14:24:02
    • Location: OHIO
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 18
    Re:High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV 2013/05/08 11:45:42 (permalink)
    The 30hz would give me some serious headaches. I can only stand 60hz for an hour or 2 at the most.

    Asus Sabertooth x99
    5930k (4.5ghz)
    16gb Corsair DDR4 (3000)
    EVGA 1000w psu
    Zotac 980ti x 2
    Samsung 850 pro 500 SSD
    HPLP3065 30in Monitor 2560x1600
    #6
    _Nite_
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 14962
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2007/04/18 15:35:04
    • Location: Sumner, Washington
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 46
    Re:High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV 2013/05/08 12:13:43 (permalink)
    well the 30hz @ 3840x2160 could be cause current video cards can only handle 2560x1600 @ 60hz, basicly the TV technology is ahead of what current video cards can support. The picture I posted above, they had to disable vsync to get that 43fps on fraps.
     
    AMD and Nvidia will have to figure out how to get that new resolution to run more efficently
    post edited by _Nite_ - 2013/05/08 12:29:00

    Gaming Rig: AMD Ryzen 7 2700x @ 4.25Ghz - Asrock B450 Pro 4 - 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4 3000 - 240GB SSD (OS), 1TB ADATA SU800 SSD and 2TB ADATA SX8200 Pro M2 NVME (Games) - 8GB RTX 3070 XC3 Ultra - Sound Blaster Audigy 5 RX - EVGA Supernova 750w G2 - Antec 302 - 24" Asus VG248QE
     
    #7
    Brad_Hawthorne
    Insert Custom Title Here
    • Total Posts : 18001
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2004/06/06 16:13:06
    • Location: Dazed & Confused
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 39
    Re:High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV 2013/05/08 12:32:30 (permalink)
    _Nite_

    well the 30hz @ 3840x2160 could be cause current video cards can only handle 2560x1600 @ 60hz, basicly the TV technology is ahead of what current video cards can support. The picture I posted above, they had to disable vsync to get that 43fps on fraps.

    AMD and Nvidia will have to figure out how to get that new resolution to run more efficently

    Incorrect. Current GPUs can process 16k x 16k resolution if you understand how to interprit dxcaps.exe data on current generation Nvidia and AMD cards. DisplayPort 1.2 is perfectly capable of pushing UHD at 60hz+ and there is zero limitation on the GPU for that type of pixel processing. The issue is the HDMI 1.4a port that TV uses, not the video card. HDMI 1.4a is deficient in many ways compared to DisplayPort 1.2 -- primarily in bandwidth limitations. It's limited to 30hz because HDMI 1.4a at UHD only has the maximum bandwidth of 30hz. It's a whole different story with DisplayPort 1.2.
    post edited by Brad_Hawthorne - 2013/05/08 12:39:00
    #8
    knightsilver
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 9189
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/11/21 13:42:06
    • Location: Nebraska
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 14
    Re:High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV 2013/05/08 19:46:47 (permalink)
    What hz do the current 3D films run at? I just saw my first 3D film (since the 80" red & blue) was Iron Man 3.

    Are current form films in theatres 120hz/4K? I swear, I could see Iron Man 3 10x better, but i do have a astigmatism.
    #9
    Brad_Hawthorne
    Insert Custom Title Here
    • Total Posts : 18001
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2004/06/06 16:13:06
    • Location: Dazed & Confused
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 39
    Re:High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV 2013/05/08 20:07:13 (permalink)
    Digital S3D movies in theaters are often 144hz and/or use two projectors -- 1 per eye with a polarized filter on the lens.
    post edited by Brad_Hawthorne - 2013/05/08 20:29:57
    #10
    knightsilver
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 9189
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/11/21 13:42:06
    • Location: Nebraska
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 14
    Re:High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV 2013/05/08 21:06:35 (permalink)
    Thanks Brad.

    My eyes never bothered me, when I had my 24's Trinitrons, I dont remember, but I had m Jack over 120hz, I think, never had problems with the eyes,I swear I see higher than the what 24fps, or what ever it is.
    #11
    SirMaster
    FTW Member
    • Total Posts : 1610
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2006/07/01 23:58:20
    • Location: Sussex, WI
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 21
    Re:High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV 2013/05/09 08:09:58 (permalink)
    Though the digital projectors are refreshing at 96Hz or 144Hz, the film content is still just 24FPS. Unless it's the Hobbit which in that case would be 48FPS.
    #12
    knightsilver
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 9189
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/11/21 13:42:06
    • Location: Nebraska
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 14
    Re:High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV 2013/05/09 10:08:31 (permalink)
    So, would the higher resolution have anything with me eyes focusing better/seeing better?
    #13
    SirMaster
    FTW Member
    • Total Posts : 1610
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2006/07/01 23:58:20
    • Location: Sussex, WI
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 21
    Re:High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV 2013/05/09 14:17:34 (permalink)
    I don't think it's necessarily the resolution.  Most theaters, even if they have 4K projectors installed are still just playing 2K DCPs.
     
    Newer theater projectors are just getting better in general.
    #14
    Nephross
    iCX Member
    • Total Posts : 263
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2011/01/11 12:36:18
    • Location: Unable to process- IES stealth engaged
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 3
    Re:High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV 2013/05/13 06:27:04 (permalink)
    knightsilver

    So, would the higher resolution have anything with me eyes focusing better/seeing better?

    Perhaps you just sat at a distance from the screen that suited your eyes?
     
    Iv'e recently had to get glasses because I was having trouble seeing anything clearly at a distance more than 3m. Could be the same, just not as bad? Have you been to an optician to check your eyesight?
     
    Regarding 4K. I doubt we will see that resolution for PC monitors anytime soon. The physical size of the average monitor doesn't really cater for that high a resolution. Well.. that's my theory anyways :)


    #15
    xxbassplayerxx
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 61
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/08/18 12:35:59
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re:High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV 2013/05/13 08:41:33 (permalink)
    I seriously can't wait for this to become mainstream... 32" 4K screen = perfect.

    Main Rig:
    i7 920 / X58A-OC / 6GB Corsair 2000 7-8-7 / 5870 Lightning / AX1200
    GPU Collection:
    Nvidia: 2x EVGA 8800GTS 512 / BFG 8800GTS 320 / Zodac 9800GT / EVGA 9800GTX+ / MSI GT210 / EVGA GTX 275 / Asus GTX 285 Matrix
    ATI/AMD: Diamond 3870 / Asus 4850 / 2x Visiontek 4870X2 / 2x Diamond 4890 / Gigabyte 5450 / Diamond 5870 / MSI 5870 Lightning
    #16
    Brad_Hawthorne
    Insert Custom Title Here
    • Total Posts : 18001
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2004/06/06 16:13:06
    • Location: Dazed & Confused
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 39
    Re:High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV 2013/05/13 10:37:41 (permalink)
    xxbassplayerxx

    I seriously can't wait for this to become mainstream... 32" 4K screen = perfect once the port options are capable of running the panel at reasonable hz settings.

     
    There, I fixed your post. 
    #17
    xxbassplayerxx
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 61
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/08/18 12:35:59
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re:High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV 2013/05/13 10:40:38 (permalink)
    That too 

    Main Rig:
    i7 920 / X58A-OC / 6GB Corsair 2000 7-8-7 / 5870 Lightning / AX1200
    GPU Collection:
    Nvidia: 2x EVGA 8800GTS 512 / BFG 8800GTS 320 / Zodac 9800GT / EVGA 9800GTX+ / MSI GT210 / EVGA GTX 275 / Asus GTX 285 Matrix
    ATI/AMD: Diamond 3870 / Asus 4850 / 2x Visiontek 4870X2 / 2x Diamond 4890 / Gigabyte 5450 / Diamond 5870 / MSI 5870 Lightning
    #18
    Brad_Hawthorne
    Insert Custom Title Here
    • Total Posts : 18001
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2004/06/06 16:13:06
    • Location: Dazed & Confused
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 39
    Re:High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV 2013/05/13 10:45:11 (permalink)
    32" would be awesome though. Would be no real reason to use anti-aliasing then, because the pixel density would be approaching print resolution. The only reason why anti-aliasing exists is to hide pixel density deficiencies in LCD panel design. That means your trading off processing power for anti-aliasing for processing power for real pixel density. Often times pixel density wins out on fps processing speed when post process needs are removed from the processing overhead.
    post edited by Brad_Hawthorne - 2013/05/13 11:06:42
    #19
    lehpron
    Regular Guy
    • Total Posts : 8858
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2006/05/18 15:22:06
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 191
    Re:High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV 2013/05/13 17:01:10 (permalink)
    _Nite_
    with me getting a GTX 770 later, I'm sure it will be way overkill for my 1920x1080 
    There was a time where 3-way 8800GTX was considered overkill for 1920x1200, but the performance equivalency to those graphics cards is a single GTX560-- not overkill anymore as the games themselves have changed.  
     
    Remember, time doesn't stop once you make an upgrade; don't be too concerned about overkill unless you don't plan on getting those upcoming games that will require you to get another GTX770 (or upgrade to the equivalent single-GPU) to maintain your preferences at 1920x1080.

    For Intel processors, 0.122 x TDP = Continuous Amps at 12v [source].  

    Introduction to Thermoelectric Cooling
    #20
    Mystikalrush
    CLASSIFIED Member
    • Total Posts : 2852
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2006/12/03 07:33:21
    • Location: Hou, Tx
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 9
    Re:High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV 2013/05/13 20:57:16 (permalink)
    Im not sure if that grid picture is correct, but 2k to 4k, is so minimal in the size, kinda not worth it no?

    | Intel i9 12900K @5.2GHz | NZXT Kraken X73 | Corsair 4000D | Gigabyte AORUS PRO Z690 | EVGA SuperNova 1000 G6 |  
    | RTX 3090FE @2.1GHz | 980 PRO 2TB | 980 PRO 1 TB x 2 | G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB 32GB 6000MHz | LG 34" UW 1440p 144Hz |      
     

    #21
    Flybye
    FTW Member
    • Total Posts : 1216
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2006/11/17 23:55:10
    • Location: Miami (Cuba v2.1)
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 4
    Re:High End GPU's benchmarked on 4K TV 2013/05/15 07:13:46 (permalink)
    At least we are turning in the right direction.
     
    Soon they will be able to release them with correct connections and be 60-120hz+ capable.
     
    At 30hz, though, this would make a wonderful work monitor I would think. :)

    Gaming thing
    i9-12900KF @ 5.20GHz
    EVGA: Z690 Classified - RTX 3080 FTW3 Ultra - Supernova 1200w P3 - DG-75
    32GBs Corsair Dominator DDR5 @ 6800 - Seagate: .5TB, 1TB M.2s, HD 4TB
    Sony CRT 24" GDM-FW900 16:10 - DangerDen (RIP) Goodies: 2x120mm Rad & D5 + Primochill stuff
    #22
    Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile