EVGA

PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?!

Page: 1234 > Showing page 1 of 4
Author
callsignvega
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 222
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/08/20 18:58:13
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
2012/04/07 04:18:15 (permalink)
Well, the results of my PCI Express 2.0 versus 3.0 on my 4-way SLI GTX 680 FW900 Surround setup are in. The results are so incredible I had to start the tests over from scratch and run them multiple times for confirmation! :eek:
Test setup: 
3960X @ 5.0 GHz (temp slow speed)Asus Rampage IV Extreme with PCI-E slots running 16x/8x/8x/8x(4) EVGA GTX 680's running 1191MHz core, 3402 MHz MemorynVidia Driver 301.10 with PCI-E 3.0 registry adjustment turned on and off for each applicable tesGPU-Z  0.6.0


After PCI-E settings changed, confirmed with GPU-Z:



All settings in nVidia control panel, in-game and in benchmark, EVGA precision are all UNTOUCHED between benchmark runs. The only setting adjusted is the PCI-E 2.0 to 3.0 and back and forth for confirmation (Reboots obviously for registry edit).



I kid you not, that is how much PCI-E 2.0 running at 16x/8x/8x/8x versus PCI-E 3.0 bottlenecks BF3 and Heaven 2.5 at these resolutions. I attribute this to the massive bandwidth being transferred over the PCI-E bus. We are talking 4-way SLI at up to 10-megapixels in alternate frame rendering. Entire frames at high FPS are being swapped and PCI-E 2.0 falls on it's face. 
The interesting part was that while running PCI-E 2.0, the GPU utilization dropped way down as would be typically seen if you are "CPU" limited. In this instance I am not CPU limited, nor GPU limited. We are really at a point now that you can be PCI-E limited unless you go PCI-E 3.0 8x (16x PCI-E 2.0) or faster on all GPU's in the system.  GPU utilization dropped down into the ~50% range due to PCI-E 2.0 choking them to death. As soon as I enabled PCI-E 3.0, the GPU utilization skyrocketed to 95+% on all cores. I was going to run more benchmarks and games but the results are such blow-outs it seems pretty pointless to do any more. It may interest some of those out there running these new PCI-E 3.0 GPU's in which they think they are CPU limited (below 95% GPU utilization) yet might have PCI-E bandwidth issues. 
Down to the nitty gritty; if you run a single GPU, yes; a single 16x speed PCI-E 2.0 slot will be fine. When you start to run multiple GPU's and/or run these new cards at 8x speed, especially in Surround/Eyefinity, make sure to get PCI-E 3.0. ;)
 
More on my system: http://www.overclock.net/...-computer-edition-2012

GPU: 4-Way SLI GTX Titan's (1202 MHz Core / 3724 MHz Mem) with EK water blocks and back-plates
CPU: 3960X - 5.2 GHz with Koolance 380i water block
MB: ASUS Rampage IV Extreme with EK full board water block 
RAM: 16 GB 2400 MHz Team Group with Bitspower water blocks
DISPLAY: 3x 120Hz Portrait Perfect Motion Clarity 2D Lightboost Surround
SOUND: Asus Xonar Essence -One- USB DAC/AMP
PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA NEX1500
SSD: Raid 0 - Samsung 840 Pro's
BUILD THREAD: http://www.evga.com/forums/tm.aspx?high=&m=1894073&mpage=1#1912314
#1

94 Replies Related Threads

    goldentiger
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 182
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2007/01/30 08:50:32
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 04:44:57 (permalink)
    Wow! I'm starting to wonder if my 2-way SLI is bottlenecked by having x8 2.0 for each card then... it looks possible (2560x1600). My GPU utilization is high (90%+) at almost all times in games though. Regardless, looking like a day-1 buy for Ivy Bridge for me to enable PCI-E 3.0 on my Z68 Gen3 board!
    Is there any chance I could trouble you for a 2-way SLI run at 3600x1920 (PCI-E 2.0 vs 3.0)? Pretty please?  That's most comparable to my resolution... though still far greater (4mp vs 7mp).
    post edited by goldentiger - 2012/04/07 04:49:08
    #2
    sourtimes9
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 37
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/07/14 17:43:53
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 04:56:16 (permalink)
    Is there any ETA from nvidia on fixing their driver issues with PCIE3.0 on X79 yet ?

    I am considering getting a 3rd 680, but after looking at your results, I won't bother until they enable PCIE3.0 on X79.
    #3
    Max Silencio
    SSC Member
    • Total Posts : 573
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/12/09 14:35:58
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 3
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 05:06:34 (permalink)
    callsignvega

    Well, the results of my PCI Express 2.0 versus 3.0 on my 4-way SLI GTX 680 FW900 Surround setup are in. The results are so incredible I had to start the tests over from scratch and run them multiple times for confirmation! :eek:


     
    @EVGA MODS: PETITION! BLUE RIBBON FOR CALLSIGNVEGA PLEASE!
     
    Fantastic work, respect.

     
    Would be nice If You could insert the percentage gains over PCIe 2.0. Roughly I would say 30% to 50% higher.
    I remember quite well some guys here, defending tooth and nail that PCIe 3.0 is not even worth a try. Contrarily I used driver 300.83 from the beginning where PCIe 3.0 is enabled.
     

     
    PCIe 3.0: Enable PCIe 3.0 on GTX680/X79 through Japanese registry hack?
    http://forums.evga.com/tm.aspx?m=1509861
     
    post edited by Max Silencio - 2012/04/07 12:48:18

      


     
    #4
    Raistlin Majere
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 47
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2011/06/10 07:40:59
    • Location: Perth Australia
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 05:13:43 (permalink)
    Firstly I know stuff all about SLI.
     
    Looking at your GPU-Z pics, is it right that the first pic with PCI-E 2.0 shows that the nVidia SLI is disabled?
    #5
    mrcimon
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 187
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2007/12/12 18:57:16
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 3
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 05:17:31 (permalink)
    Raistlin Majere

    Firstly I know stuff all about SLI.

    Looking at your GPU-Z pics, is it right that the first pic with PCI-E 2.0 shows that the nVidia SLI is disabled?

     
    Yes, That doesn't look proper..  Is it possible that SLI wasnt enabled when doing your benchmarks?

    Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z    
    Core i7-2600k @ 4.2GHz       
    16g G.Skill Ripjaw Series @ 2133Mhz
    2-way SLI GTX 680's 
    OCZ Vertex 3 120Gb SSD
    Thermaltake Level 10 GT Case
    Thermaltake Toughpower 1275W Platinum Certified PSU
    Thermaltake Bigwater 760 Plus
     
    #6
    bigmoe
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 40
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/03/12 13:37:46
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 05:27:40 (permalink)
    Nice post on the PCI 3.0
     
     
     
     
     
    MSI Big Bang Xpower
    I7950 @ 4.0GHz
    24g G.Skill Ripjaw
    EVGA GTX 580 SLI @ 850/1700/2004
    OCZ Agility 3 120GB Raid 0
    Raptor 10000K 300GB Raid 0
    Thermaltake Speedo Case
    UltraX 1200W PSU
    H70 Water Cooled Push Pull
    post edited by bigmoe - 2012/04/07 05:45:33

    Bigmoe(EVGA fan!!)
    #7
    way2faded
    CLASSIFIED Member
    • Total Posts : 3077
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2007/01/29 16:37:18
    • Location: Peoria,IL
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 3
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 05:45:16 (permalink)
    How ironic,  just Thursday a buddy of mine sent me all these links on pics of your system and some videos on youtube.  He was going on and on about those CRTs.  
     
    totally awesome man, those speakers that look like crystals are pretty sweet too, i went to look at your specs to findout more about them but they werent listed :(   
     
    on topic tho, thats pretty jawdropping results there, certainly wouldnt have ever guessed that big of gains.   
     
    BR for sure!!!! 
     
     
     

    #8
    bigmoe
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 40
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/03/12 13:37:46
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 05:48:54 (permalink)
    Im still new at this, how you post that pic at the bottom of your message. The Sig.

    Bigmoe(EVGA fan!!)
    #9
    nvidia3
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 152
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/07/17 02:01:04
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 06:37:00 (permalink)
    omg There is so different between pcie 2 vs pcie 3

    #10
    outlawii
    SSC Member
    • Total Posts : 815
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/01/24 17:39:09
    • Location: Minnesota
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 07:00:46 (permalink)
    Very nice ! Good info ,wonder how much difference there is on a single card? 

    Intel 9900K @ 5.0 EK Supremacy Clean Water block
    Gigabyte Aurous Master
    G-skill DDR4 3600 32 gig
    Evga 2080 EK Waterblock
    Evga SuperNova 750
    Lian Li PC 011
     

      
    #11
    Afterburner
    EVGA Forum Moderator
    • Total Posts : 25794
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2007/09/21 14:41:48
    • Location: It's... Classified Yeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaah........
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 110
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 07:23:47 (permalink)
    AB Was Here Per Request... 

     
    #12
    Afterburner
    EVGA Forum Moderator
    • Total Posts : 25794
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2007/09/21 14:41:48
    • Location: It's... Classified Yeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaah........
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 110
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 07:26:06 (permalink)
    @OP... These results are a tad off others I have seen. Would you be kind enough to find the correct CPU-z pic with SLI enabled or run the PCI-E 2.0 again/correctly?

     
    #13
    kram36
    The Destroyer
    • Total Posts : 21477
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/10/27 19:00:58
    • Location: United States
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 72
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 08:45:01 (permalink)
    Max Silencio

    callsignvega

    Well, the results of my PCI Express 2.0 versus 3.0 on my 4-way SLI GTX 680 FW900 Surround setup are in. The results are so incredible I had to start the tests over from scratch and run them multiple times for confirmation! :eek:



    @EVGA MODS: PETITION! BLUE RIBBON FOR CALLSIGNVEGA PLEASE!

    Fantastic work, respect.


    Would be nice If You could insert the percentage gains over PCIe 2.0. Roughly I would say 30% to 50% higher.
    I remember quite well some guys here, defending tooth and nail that PCIe 3.0 is not even worth a try. Contrarily I used driver 300.83 from the beginning where PCIe 3.0 is enabled.

    PCIe 3.0: Enable PCIe 3.0 on GTX680/X79 through Japanese registry hack?
    http://forums.evga.com/tm.aspx?m=1509861


    I did this registry hack, but it only made my first card in SLi run at PCI-e 3.0 and my other card was still running at the PCI-e 2.0 speed. I sure would like to know how the op got all 4 cards to run in PCI-e 3.0 speeds.
    #14
    callsignvega
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 222
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/08/20 18:58:13
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 08:58:49 (permalink)
    Afterburner

    @OP... These results are a tad off others I have seen. Would you be kind enough to find the correct CPU-z pic with SLI enabled or run the PCI-E 2.0 again/correctly?

     
    That particular GPU-Z screenshot was taken when I was re-arranging the monitors. In order to do that, you must disable SLI and then re-enable SLI/Surround mode and it will pick up my CRT monitors again. With three CRT's it is impossible to run these Surround resolutions without being in SLI, and due to each GTX 680 having a maximum 1 analog connection to the RAMDAC of each card, you need a minimum of three GTX 680s.
     
    I can understand some people being skeptical, heck I was at first results! I knew there would be a nice difference, but now THIS much. Remember I am pushing cards and resolutions at FPS's that have never been tested comparing PCI-E 2.0 vs 3.0 before. The only other 2.0 vs 3.0 benchmarks I have seen are either single card and/or single monitor. 

    goldentiger

    Wow! I'm starting to wonder if my 2-way SLI is bottlenecked by having x8 2.0 for each card then... it looks possible (2560x1600). My GPU utilization is high (90%+) at almost all times in games though. Regardless, looking like a day-1 buy for Ivy Bridge for me to enable PCI-E 3.0 on my Z68 Gen3 board!
    Is there any chance I could trouble you for a 2-way SLI run at 3600x1920 (PCI-E 2.0 vs 3.0)? Pretty please?  That's most comparable to my resolution... though still far greater (4mp vs 7mp).

     
    Sorry my Surround setup needs a minimum of three GTX 680's to run 
    sourtimes9

    Is there any ETA from nvidia on fixing their driver issues with PCIE3.0 on X79 yet ?

    I am considering getting a 3rd 680, but after looking at your results, I won't bother until they enable PCIE3.0 on X79.

     
    Please show your support here:
     
    http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=226569&st=0&gopid=1392983&#entry1392983
     
    ManuelG from nVidia is reading the thread. The squeaky wheel gets the oil!

    Max Silencio

    callsignvega

    Well, the results of my PCI Express 2.0 versus 3.0 on my 4-way SLI GTX 680 FW900 Surround setup are in. The results are so incredible I had to start the tests over from scratch and run them multiple times for confirmation! :eek:



    @EVGA MODS: PETITION! BLUE RIBBON FOR CALLSIGNVEGA PLEASE!

    Fantastic work, respect.


    Would be nice If You could insert the percentage gains over PCIe 2.0. Roughly I would say 30% to 50% higher.
    I remember quite well some guys here, defending tooth and nail that PCIe 3.0 is not even worth a try. Contrarily I used driver 300.83 from the beginning where PCIe 3.0 is enabled.

    PCIe 3.0: Enable PCIe 3.0 on GTX680/X79 through Japanese registry hack?
    http://forums.evga.com/tm.aspx?m=1509861


    Yup, that's the registry mod!

    GPU: 4-Way SLI GTX Titan's (1202 MHz Core / 3724 MHz Mem) with EK water blocks and back-plates
    CPU: 3960X - 5.2 GHz with Koolance 380i water block
    MB: ASUS Rampage IV Extreme with EK full board water block 
    RAM: 16 GB 2400 MHz Team Group with Bitspower water blocks
    DISPLAY: 3x 120Hz Portrait Perfect Motion Clarity 2D Lightboost Surround
    SOUND: Asus Xonar Essence -One- USB DAC/AMP
    PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA NEX1500
    SSD: Raid 0 - Samsung 840 Pro's
    BUILD THREAD: http://www.evga.com/forums/tm.aspx?high=&m=1894073&mpage=1#1912314
    #15
    callsignvega
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 222
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/08/20 18:58:13
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 09:01:20 (permalink)

    I did this registry hack, but it only made my first card in SLi run at PCI-e 3.0 and my other card was still running at the PCI-e 2.0 speed. I sure would like to know how the op got all 4 cards to run in PCI-e 3.0 speeds.

     
    I ran into the same problem but I found the solution! When all cards are in non-Surround mode, they each have their own VID ID. You  must apply the registry edit to the 0000 folder of EACH GTX 680 entry. Then once that is done, go into SLI/Surround mode and then apply to the SLI/Surround VID ID 0000 folder. It combines them and treats them as one in SLI! Reboot and now you are good. ;)

    GPU: 4-Way SLI GTX Titan's (1202 MHz Core / 3724 MHz Mem) with EK water blocks and back-plates
    CPU: 3960X - 5.2 GHz with Koolance 380i water block
    MB: ASUS Rampage IV Extreme with EK full board water block 
    RAM: 16 GB 2400 MHz Team Group with Bitspower water blocks
    DISPLAY: 3x 120Hz Portrait Perfect Motion Clarity 2D Lightboost Surround
    SOUND: Asus Xonar Essence -One- USB DAC/AMP
    PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA NEX1500
    SSD: Raid 0 - Samsung 840 Pro's
    BUILD THREAD: http://www.evga.com/forums/tm.aspx?high=&m=1894073&mpage=1#1912314
    #16
    8IronBob
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 206
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2007/11/09 12:08:47
    • Location: Cleveland...The final frontier.
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 09:07:47 (permalink)
    /me wonders why he even bothers sticking with his dreaded Phenom II/790GX setup when results are really this clear. 
     
    Might as well build a whole new rig around the GTX 680 if this is the case.  Seems like just doubling the RAM and the GPU upgrade won't be enough alone it sounds like to me.

    Galacticus Prime - PC Specs:
    Intel i7 4790K
    Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO
    ASUS Z97 Maximus VII Hero
    Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3-2400 32GB (4 x 8GB)
    EVGA GTX 1080 SC2 iCX
    Corsair HX620W PSU
    Cooler Master CM Storm Trooper ATX
    1 TB Samsung 850 EVO - Boot and Gaming
    2 TB Crucial MX300 - Storage/Backup
    Pioneer 16x BDR-2209 BD-RE Drive
    ASUS ROG Front Base Control Panel
    Windows 10 Pro x64
    Dell UltraSharp 27" U2718Q
    Logitech Z-2300 2.1 THX Speakers
    Logitech G710 KB/Logitech G502 Mouse
    #17
    kram36
    The Destroyer
    • Total Posts : 21477
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/10/27 19:00:58
    • Location: United States
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 72
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 09:28:33 (permalink)
    callsignvega


    I did this registry hack, but it only made my first card in SLi run at PCI-e 3.0 and my other card was still running at the PCI-e 2.0 speed. I sure would like to know how the op got all 4 cards to run in PCI-e 3.0 speeds.


    I ran into the same problem but I found the solution! When all cards are in non-Surround mode, they each have their own VID ID. You  must apply the registry edit to the 0000 folder of EACH GTX 680 entry. Then once that is done, go into SLI/Surround mode and then apply to the SLI/Surround VID ID 0000 folder. It combines them and treats them as one in SLI! Reboot and now you are good. ;)

    I'm not following this part as I don't have a SLI/Surround folder in my registry.
     
    "Then once that is done, go into SLI/Surround mode and then apply to the SLI/Surround VID ID 0000 folder. It combines them and treats them as one in SLI! Reboot and now you are good. ;)"
     
    Can you be more specific on this please?
     
    EDIT: Also I did not instal any of the 3d surround drivers since I don't use surround.
    post edited by kram36 - 2012/04/07 09:33:29
    #18
    kram36
    The Destroyer
    • Total Posts : 21477
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/10/27 19:00:58
    • Location: United States
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 72
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 09:53:03 (permalink)
    OK I got it done now. I have to apply the pci-e 3.0 reg hack while the cards are out of SLi mode. This gives me folders to enter the RMPcieLinkSpeed for each card. Once that is done I turn SLi back on and both cards are running at the pci-e 3.0 speed.
     
    Thanks.
    post edited by kram36 - 2012/04/07 14:24:51
    #19
    callsignvega
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 222
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/08/20 18:58:13
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 10:20:49 (permalink)
    kram36

    OK I got it done now. I have to apply the pci-e 3.0 reg hack while the cards are out of SLi mode. This gives me folders to inter the RMPcieLinkSpeed for each card. Once that is done I turn SLi back on and both cards are running at the pci-e 3.0 speed.

    Thanks.

     
    What cards/monitors are you running? Now that you can switch between PCI-E 3.0 and 2.0 at will, maybe do some benchmark comparisons?

    GPU: 4-Way SLI GTX Titan's (1202 MHz Core / 3724 MHz Mem) with EK water blocks and back-plates
    CPU: 3960X - 5.2 GHz with Koolance 380i water block
    MB: ASUS Rampage IV Extreme with EK full board water block 
    RAM: 16 GB 2400 MHz Team Group with Bitspower water blocks
    DISPLAY: 3x 120Hz Portrait Perfect Motion Clarity 2D Lightboost Surround
    SOUND: Asus Xonar Essence -One- USB DAC/AMP
    PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA NEX1500
    SSD: Raid 0 - Samsung 840 Pro's
    BUILD THREAD: http://www.evga.com/forums/tm.aspx?high=&m=1894073&mpage=1#1912314
    #20
    dugless
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 63
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2007/11/19 15:07:17
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 5
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 10:22:27 (permalink)
    CallsignVega,
    I spent my morning looking over your 2012 build 
    http://www.overclock.net/t/1220962/vegas-heavyweight-display-and-computer-edition-2012
    Amazing "outside the box" thinking, sweet computer pron!
    Your willingness to share is second to none, hats off to you my friend. 
    Great work, keep it up, thanks for sharing!!!!
    #21
    kram36
    The Destroyer
    • Total Posts : 21477
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/10/27 19:00:58
    • Location: United States
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 72
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 10:27:09 (permalink)
    callsignvega

    kram36

    OK I got it done now. I have to apply the pci-e 3.0 reg hack while the cards are out of SLi mode. This gives me folders to inter the RMPcieLinkSpeed for each card. Once that is done I turn SLi back on and both cards are running at the pci-e 3.0 speed.

    Thanks.


    What cards/monitors are you running? Now that you can switch between PCI-E 3.0 and 2.0 at will, maybe do some benchmark comparisons?

    I'll give 3DMark 11 a go and see if it improves any there.
     
    EDIT: Looks like I got a bump with this. Exact same system settings, just the pci-e 3.0 hack done.
     
    Before http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3136887 Score 19,206
     

     
    After http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3141931 Score 19,417
     

     
     
    post edited by kram36 - 2012/04/07 10:57:37
    #22
    englehmj
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 168
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/10/27 06:43:22
    • Location: Maryland
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 11:00:45 (permalink)
    Could this disparity be more a result of the other cards running at x8 rather than x16.?  I am just wondering because I wanted to keep my e762 x16/x16/x16/x16 for at least another year or two but I do want to run 3 - 4 GK110's for a 3D Vision surround setup.  I would seriously reconsider upgrading to Ivy if it will be like buying a ferrari to only drive it 20MPH.

    Lian Li PC011D XL | EK-Quantum Reflection D5 D-RGB Front Distribution Plate | EK CoolStream 360 PE and XE Radiators |  EVGA Supernova T2 100W PSU | Custom Cable Mod Cables and Lian Li Strimer Plus | Acer Predator X27 4K 144Hz HDR LCD | EVGA Z490 Dark KINGPIN | Intel i9 10900K | EK Quantum Velocity Nickel+Plexi CPU Block | Corsair Dominator DDR4 32GB | EVGA RTX2080 Super FTW3 | EK-Quantum Velocity D-RGB Nickel+Plexi GPU Block | 2x1GB Samsung NVMe Drives | EK-Nickel Black Torque Fittings and 16mm Hard Tubing | 10xEK-Vardar EVO 120mm D-RGB Fans
    Heatware
    #23
    mwparrish
    CLASSIFIED Member
    • Total Posts : 3278
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/01/08 15:27:28
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 23
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 11:01:01 (permalink)
    LOL... great... more to tinker with. :)
     
    Folks, y'all gotta stop giving me reasons to not write papers and watch the Masters.

    Intel Core i7 3930K - 4.7 GHz  |  ASUS Rampage IV Extreme  |  8x4GB G.Skill Ripjaws Z DDR3-2133
    2x EVGA GTX 780 Ti SC  |  BenQ XL2420TX - 1920x1080 120Hz LCD  |  Logitech G9x  |  Corsair Vengeance 1500
    5x Crucial 128GB SSD  |  LG BD-R Drive  |  Danger Den Torture Rack  |  Enermax Galaxy EVO 1250W
     
     
    #24
    callsignvega
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 222
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/08/20 18:58:13
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 11:14:36 (permalink)
    englehmj

    Could this disparity be more a result of the other cards running at x8 rather than x16.?  I am just wondering because I wanted to keep my e762 x16/x16/x16/x16 for at least another year or two but I do want to run 3 - 4 GK110's for a 3D Vision surround setup.  I would seriously reconsider upgrading to Ivy if it will be like buying a ferrari to only drive it 20MPH.

    Hm, that is debatable. Since that board runs 2x NF200's it should help out with multi-GPU/Surround gaming versus native X58 PCI-E lane allocation. It would be interesting to see if the increased PCI-E bandwidth of 3.0 to the CPU would be a boon over the NF200's communication to the CPU via PCI-E 2.0. I would lean toward PCI-E 3.0 being overall better but NF200 quad 16x being much better than without the NF200's. 

    GPU: 4-Way SLI GTX Titan's (1202 MHz Core / 3724 MHz Mem) with EK water blocks and back-plates
    CPU: 3960X - 5.2 GHz with Koolance 380i water block
    MB: ASUS Rampage IV Extreme with EK full board water block 
    RAM: 16 GB 2400 MHz Team Group with Bitspower water blocks
    DISPLAY: 3x 120Hz Portrait Perfect Motion Clarity 2D Lightboost Surround
    SOUND: Asus Xonar Essence -One- USB DAC/AMP
    PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA NEX1500
    SSD: Raid 0 - Samsung 840 Pro's
    BUILD THREAD: http://www.evga.com/forums/tm.aspx?high=&m=1894073&mpage=1#1912314
    #25
    callsignvega
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 222
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/08/20 18:58:13
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 13:16:25 (permalink)
    Hitting VRAM limit and PCI-E 2.0 vs 3.0 battle video tests. Make sure to watch in 480P instead of lower (I forgot to set the camera back to 720P and I don't feel like recording everything all over again lol). Sorry about the video quality but it is still view-able. 
    http://www.youtube.com/wa...jBhzZ8mtcWAKgkFdz3LBo=
    http://www.youtube.com/wa...LsTk3pZxTxt4tbGt5H9Yk=

    GPU: 4-Way SLI GTX Titan's (1202 MHz Core / 3724 MHz Mem) with EK water blocks and back-plates
    CPU: 3960X - 5.2 GHz with Koolance 380i water block
    MB: ASUS Rampage IV Extreme with EK full board water block 
    RAM: 16 GB 2400 MHz Team Group with Bitspower water blocks
    DISPLAY: 3x 120Hz Portrait Perfect Motion Clarity 2D Lightboost Surround
    SOUND: Asus Xonar Essence -One- USB DAC/AMP
    PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA NEX1500
    SSD: Raid 0 - Samsung 840 Pro's
    BUILD THREAD: http://www.evga.com/forums/tm.aspx?high=&m=1894073&mpage=1#1912314
    #26
    Khenglish
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 24
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2011/12/30 13:58:19
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 14:45:47 (permalink)
    The only reason there is such a large increase is because the resolutions are so high that he ran out of VRAM, so then PCI-E traffic increased dramatically to access textures in the main memory. If you had 4GB cards I guarantee that you'd only see around a 1% improvement like you saw with 3dm11.
    #27
    callsignvega
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 222
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/08/20 18:58:13
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 19:40:29 (permalink)
    Khenglish

    The only reason there is such a large increase is because the resolutions are so high that he ran out of VRAM, so then PCI-E traffic increased dramatically to access textures in the main memory. If you had 4GB cards I guarantee that you'd only see around a 1% improvement like you saw with 3dm11.

     
    Wow, this is wrong on so many levels. Did you even watch the videos?

    GPU: 4-Way SLI GTX Titan's (1202 MHz Core / 3724 MHz Mem) with EK water blocks and back-plates
    CPU: 3960X - 5.2 GHz with Koolance 380i water block
    MB: ASUS Rampage IV Extreme with EK full board water block 
    RAM: 16 GB 2400 MHz Team Group with Bitspower water blocks
    DISPLAY: 3x 120Hz Portrait Perfect Motion Clarity 2D Lightboost Surround
    SOUND: Asus Xonar Essence -One- USB DAC/AMP
    PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA NEX1500
    SSD: Raid 0 - Samsung 840 Pro's
    BUILD THREAD: http://www.evga.com/forums/tm.aspx?high=&m=1894073&mpage=1#1912314
    #28
    kram36
    The Destroyer
    • Total Posts : 21477
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2009/10/27 19:00:58
    • Location: United States
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 72
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/07 19:59:03 (permalink)
    Does it really even matter what the % increase is as long as we get an increase with it?
    #29
    callsignvega
    Superclocked Member
    • Total Posts : 222
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/08/20 18:58:13
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re:PCI-E 2.0 vs PCI-E 3.0 BATTLE ROYAL!!?! 2012/04/08 12:35:28 (permalink)
    kram36

    Does it really even matter what the % increase is as long as we get an increase with it?

     
    Ya, even if on a single GPU with a single monitor if you only get 2-5% performance increase. Isn't that a good thing? Silly people treat PCI-E 3.0 likes it's something bad. PCI-E 3.0 may only provide small gains in the single GPU/single monitor realm but can create phenomenal gains in the multi-GPU/multi-display world. There is basically no reason not to use PCI-E 3.0 whenever possible.   

    GPU: 4-Way SLI GTX Titan's (1202 MHz Core / 3724 MHz Mem) with EK water blocks and back-plates
    CPU: 3960X - 5.2 GHz with Koolance 380i water block
    MB: ASUS Rampage IV Extreme with EK full board water block 
    RAM: 16 GB 2400 MHz Team Group with Bitspower water blocks
    DISPLAY: 3x 120Hz Portrait Perfect Motion Clarity 2D Lightboost Surround
    SOUND: Asus Xonar Essence -One- USB DAC/AMP
    PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA NEX1500
    SSD: Raid 0 - Samsung 840 Pro's
    BUILD THREAD: http://www.evga.com/forums/tm.aspx?high=&m=1894073&mpage=1#1912314
    #30
    Page: 1234 > Showing page 1 of 4
    Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile