HW, Completely agree with you: The Gflops are not meaningless. They vary somewhat but if you run them consistently, they can be a good indicator. Kind of like th SuperPi score which has gotten so much attention.
 
Kitfit1 was on the top of the list for Gflops though... Until this last poster's result gets added to the list beats him.

rbeaumont and Conolly Boy, welcome to the club.

Mutt Slayer you need to list out your specs
 
Forum Name <---- THIS IS IMPORTANT. DO NOT FORGET THIS.
Core i7 (whichever you have)   Batch #: (not required, but would be nice to include)
CPU clocked at:
Voltage:
Idle temps: (please provide this in celsius)
Load temps: (please provide this in celsius)
GFlop peak: (used for any clock speed ties, higher gflops wins)
 
and I can not read the image you posted.

Mutt Slayer I can read your picture now, but you still need to list out your stability specs in your post in this form.
 
Forum Name <---- THIS IS IMPORTANT. DO NOT FORGET THIS.
Core i7 (whichever you have)   Batch #: (not required, but would be nice to include)
CPU clocked at:
Voltage:
Idle temps: (please provide this in celsius)
Load temps: (please provide this in celsius)
GFlop peak: (used for any clock speed ties, higher gflops wins)
 
I copy and paste this info into the club list. Thanks.

Hi Kram.
Was this the correct was for me to attach my screenshot to the post? Is it clear enough for you to read?
Thanks!

Governator
Core i7 920
CPU clocked at: 4.21 GHz
Voltage: 1.418
Idle temps: 39, 38, 40, 35
Load Temps: 88, 86, 84, 79
GFlop peak: 55.3369
 

 
 

Governator, welcome to the club.

steel700, got your stability stats updated. Nice job.

**EDIT**
Odd.... it idnt quote....weird....
so, @ V1ral, you asked: hweed. how can we get higher gflops?does gflops even pertain to any significance in performance, it seems ive reafhed 56.x gflop fap and.that was with my 4.35 trial overclock.anyways what should i keep for a 24/7 overclock?
 
My 2 cents are below
**EDIT**
 
From my recent testing, and a HUGE learning curve, I found memory speed.  I was having trouble stabalizing my OC, i was55.25 peak gflops at 2:8 1600, when I dropped 2:6 and uncore with it to maintain the ratio, I got 51, but much better temps and passes my testing.
 
Im FAR from top of the foodchain in OCing, infact JUUUST getting back into it after a long time, but that was my experience.
 
Sidce note, along the same lines, but a different test.  When I first hit 4, I tried to get my voltages lower, mainly VCore, and I was checkng with Super Pi to see if I had performance differences (reruning LinX as well to ensure stab ility) and I found at a certain pint, that my time went up a fair amount, and I was able to reproduce it.  Going from near 1.4 back down to 1.26625, my SuperPi score went up from 9:49 to 10:38.  That is a noticable change in performance, percentage wise.  Looks like it worked, but didnt have enough fuel to run right.
 
Second edit:
I reran SuperPi, with ram at 2:6 1200 instead of 2:8 1600 and my time wasover 11 seconds now, so memory speed will play a role in these numbers.

anonymousone, your screenshot doesn't show the cpu clock speed being at least 4.2Ghz.

 
Same other info from before
 
Anonymousone
Core i7 930
CPU OC: 4.20 (200BCLK 21 Multi) 12gb RAM
VCore: 4.00625
GFlops: 51.5320
Idle: 35 33 35 34
Max Load: 77 74 75 73

kram36

You're kidding me, right? All you did was paste a new CPU-z and Real Temp picture over your previous screenshot.

Not true. Look at the time, and in the prev he has the textpad in the foreground, and in the last he has RealTemp in the foreground. Besides, when you round 4.1988 you get 4.2. It's only a 0.2MHz difference, way to get picky. I think you should allow it Kram. But that's just my opinion, it's your thread.
 

kram36

Yes it is true. Take another look at his LinX, everything is exactly the same in both screenshots. Open both pics and flip back and forth and you will see. Also another issue I have with his first submision is cpu-z and real temp do not match on clock speeds. CPU-z shows 4198 Mhz while Real Temp shows 3400 Mhz.

We do not round off the numbers for this. We have been through this before. Also the bios is not accurate on your clock speed. What you see with cpu-z is accurate. Picky? No, you must achieve 4.2Ghz in the cpu-z screenshot.

Oh, yeah, it says 200x17, that would mean speedstep. Prob is, CPU-Z should match. Yes, I agree with you now Kram. But for this other reason. And I didn't know about any previous discussions on rounding. OK.

i don't see a single person in that list with an i7 940...  as soon as i hit my 350,000 folding points, i'll take a run at being the first on the list with a 940.

Time for an update. Finally got a chip that isn't a voltage hog.