EVGA

Helpful Replyx299 Dark AVX Offset PSA

Author
wert158
New Member
  • Total Posts : 5
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2014/01/08 20:04:36
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
2018/03/18 01:58:51 (permalink)
Just got my x299 Dark system up and running and started playing around with overclocking my i9 7900x.
 
I noticed I was hitting thermal limits pretty quick even with a custom loop when exceeding 4.3Ghz (haven't delidded).
Because my primary workload is gaming, I decided to set a per-core multiplier on my two strongest cores to be significantly higher than the other 8.
 
Per-Core Multipliers (100 BCLK):
Core 0: 42
Core 1: 50
Core 2: 42
Core 3: 42
Core 4: 42
Core 5: 42
Core 6: 50
Core 7: 42
Core 8: 42
Core 9: 42

 
While doing stability testing in Prime95 I noticed something really interesting - all of my cores were hitting up to 4.7 GHz (even though most of them were set to a max multiplier of 42 (4.2 GHz).
 
After digging around a little bit (and realizing that Prime95 utilizes AVX by default) I noticed my AVX workload multiplier offset was -3. This explains the 4.7 GHz on Cores 1 & 6, but not all the others.
 
For testing, I set my AVX offset to -10 and rebooted. Running Prime95 again yielded some interesting results - all my cores held at 4.0 GHz. From this I can gather that when setting per-core multipliers, the AVX offset applies to the highest multiplier. Interestingly enough this allows cores with multipliers below the highest to exceed their set multiplier (assuming the max core multiplier - offset > core set multiplier).
 
TLDR: The AVX workload multiplier offset is applied to the highest core multiplier and then set for all cores.
#1
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
  • Total Posts : 38977
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
  • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 282
Re: x299 Dark AVX Offset PSA 2018/03/18 13:12:53 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby wert158 2018/03/18 13:20:57
I ended up using 3 & 3 @4700MHz with vCore set to Auto and the VID set to 1.750.
post edited by bcavnaugh - 2018/03/18 13:15:01

Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


 
#2
wert158
New Member
  • Total Posts : 5
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2014/01/08 20:04:36
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: x299 Dark AVX Offset PSA 2018/03/18 13:37:50 (permalink)
I assume you delidded your i9 7940X?
 
Do you happen to have an idea of what your temps would be like running an AVX workload without delid?
With Small FFT torture test I'm seeing some thermal throttling even at 4.0 GHz on all cores.
 
That also seems like a really high VID. Did you mean VCCIN?
I did the same thing and left my Vcore set to auto, but I'm not seeing higher than 1.176 Vcore.
 
I see the max VID on the two cores running at 5.0 GHz at about 1.430 V.
#3
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
  • Total Posts : 38977
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
  • Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 282
Re: x299 Dark AVX Offset PSA 2018/03/18 13:49:00 (permalink)
wert158
I assume you delidded your i9 7940X?
 
Do you happen to have an idea of what your temps would be like running an AVX workload without delid?
With Small FFT torture test I'm seeing some thermal throttling even at 4.0 GHz on all cores.
 
That also seems like a really high VID. Did you mean VCCIN?
I did the same thing and left my Vcore set to auto, but I'm not seeing higher than 1.176 Vcore.
 
I see the max VID on the two cores running at 5.0 GHz at about 1.430 V.


No Delid, nor on my i9-7900X
The Default VID was like 1.890 and I that was to high IMO, My Rig View System
I run  24 Hours a Day ATM, it is like running Prime95
But I do run Prime95 but for finding Prime Numbers as well after testing out.
Current running Project

post edited by bcavnaugh - 2018/03/18 13:57:51

Associate Code: 9E88QK5L7811G3H


 
#4
Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile