talon951
It's been shown by multiple people now that the card actually does reach 450w or even a bit more. GPUZ/HWINFO underreport the total power draw. This has been covered over and over.
And I've shown multiple times including just a few posts back in this thread that the difference in benchmark scores between the stock bios and the 1kw Galax is very small. 300-400 pts in PR.
i dont think thats true for everybody. my 3080ti ftw3 is showing 400 watt at 100% PL but it will not go above 108% PL in 3dmark.
If you would be right, it would tell me that 108% is 112% in Reality and even with 100% PL im over 400 watt.
But on the other hand i found out that i can pretty easy hit 450 watt with this card showing in Gpu-z if i use OCCT stresstest.
This shows me also that this card is heavy throttling by over 50 watt if it hits 450. So i guess it does reach 450 also in benchmarks but we dont
see it as the intervall is to short.
Some numbers from my occt run default x1 setup with 450 W PL for 25 sec with a intervall of 0.1sec in GPU-Z so i got 250 samples. compaired to a curve optimized setting where i wouldnt stay under 450 W with a PL 112% ( i tried to find a setup with 440 watt average so i would be save below 450 Watt) (std=standard deviation)
PL 450 / 450PL 450/440Max469,1 watt435,7 wattMin396,1 watt392,6 wattAverage446,7 watt427,8 wattStandard Deviation82,5663,31
My theory is, that with this powerhorses its best to stay far away from powerlimit, as best es u can. U see standard deviation is much higher if u hit PL. At least you cut peaks al lot. U see also u can hit 446 watt average readout from gpu-z with some heavy workload. I guess this holds ftw3 card back from hitting 450wat in "real World" benchmarks or games. the second setting is not the best possible you can get closer to 450 PL but its long way to find the right setup for every case ( benchmark game)
Thats what i thought before this test. you wont have a single setup for every usecase with this CUDA heavy cards.