LM is quite simple, and safe if you’re comfortable with it.. Conformal coating on the components around the die, mount the card in the pcie slot, never vertically on a riser, and you’re fine.

Using VF curve in Afterburner, 2280@1.1mv, also using Classy Tool. My chip doesn’t require much tho.. giving it 1.16875 nvdd (LL 7), 1.0875 msvdd (LL 6), and 1.36250 for the mem.

magillaman
LM is quite simple, and safe if you’re comfortable with it.. Conformal coating on the components around the die, mount the card in the pcie slot, never vertically on a riser, and you’re fine.

Using VF curve in Afterburner, 2280@1.1mv, also using Classy Tool. My chip doesn’t require much tho.. giving it 1.16875 nvdd (LL 7), 1.0875 msvdd (LL 6), and 1.36250 for the mem.

Ah. I haven't even went past 1.14375V yet on NVVDD, that explains how you're hitting a higher speed than I can so far.  Next time I'm doing an OC session I'll give'er a bump on that & see how it goes.

That, and temps.. all about the temps

Anyone know how much power you can push through the 3080 ftw3 hc? Wanted to know how it compares to the 3090 in power usage since kp can push 520-550
Edit-Oops asked wrong thread 😬

Dabadger84

howe10888
Finally broke 15.5K...
https://www.3dmark.com/pr/998018
 

 
 

:-D coincidence?
 
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/61495604 
 
 
Edit: we be postin' up up up
 
https://www.3dmark.com/pr/1028885 

@Dabadger84  Thanks for the advice and I broke 15.6K last night...
Port Royal 15640 - https://www.3dmark.com/pr/1037914
Time Spy Extreme 11753 - https://www.3dmark.com/spy/16692392
 

howe10888
@Dabadger84  Thanks for the advice and I broke 15.6K last night...
Port Royal 15640 - https://www.3dmark.com/pr/1037914
Time Spy Extreme 11753 - https://www.3dmark.com/spy/16692392

Are you running any form of special benchmark-only Windows or just normal with background processes closed?  That is crazy that you got that good of a score with an architecture that is that old.  Was there a 3DMark update recently that fixed the scoring issues people were experiencing where almost everyone's system was suddenly scoring 500-700 points less than previous at the same clocks/same drivers?

Just noticed on steam 3dmark forum. 
 
Developer is aware of Porte royal points loss issue, it only seems to effect some people, and only the PR benchmark.
 
They hope to know more by monday.

Dabadger84

howe10888
@Dabadger84  Thanks for the advice and I broke 15.6K last night...
Port Royal 15640 - https://www.3dmark.com/pr/1037914
Time Spy Extreme 11753 - https://www.3dmark.com/spy/16692392

Are you running any form of special benchmark-only Windows or just normal with background processes closed?  That is crazy that you got that good of a score with an architecture that is that old.  Was there a 3DMark update recently that fixed the scoring issues people were experiencing where almost everyone's system was suddenly scoring 500-700 points less than previous at the same clocks/same drivers?

Just normal windows 10 20H1, ultimate power plan, core +165, memory +1200, 100% fan, max slider on voltage, power level and temp.  LN2 Bios with rebar enabled.  Back plate heat sink and fan.  NVVOD 1.15, FBVOD 1.3875, MSVOD 1.10, Both LL1 and OCP Disabled.  Nothing special and that showed the Intel system(I built it in 2017) is still pretty good even compared to the current systems.

emmett
Just noticed on steam 3dmark forum. 
 
Developer is aware of Porte royal points loss issue, it only seems to effect some people, and only the PR benchmark.
 
They hope to know more by monday.

Thanks for pointing this out. I recently lost 450-500pts, last update must've destroyed something... nice to see there's an actual issue because I was pulling my hair out trying to figure out what the hell happened to my scores.

howe10888

Dabadger84

howe10888
@Dabadger84  Thanks for the advice and I broke 15.6K last night...
Port Royal 15640 - https://www.3dmark.com/pr/1037914
Time Spy Extreme 11753 - https://www.3dmark.com/spy/16692392

Are you running any form of special benchmark-only Windows or just normal with background processes closed?  That is crazy that you got that good of a score with an architecture that is that old.  Was there a 3DMark update recently that fixed the scoring issues people were experiencing where almost everyone's system was suddenly scoring 500-700 points less than previous at the same clocks/same drivers?

Just normal windows 10 20H1, ultimate power plan, core +165, memory +1200, 100% fan, max slider on voltage, power level and temp.  LN2 Bios with rebar enabled.  Back plate heat sink and fan.  NVVOD 1.15, FBVOD 1.3875, MSVOD 1.10, Both LL1 and OCP Disabled.  Nothing special and that showed the Intel system(I built it in 2017) is still pretty good even compared to the current systems.

Yeah that's a really good score for an architecture that most people would consider antiquated.  I approve