2020/10/23 17:45:45
aeunexcore
I don't understand what's happening.  So I tried downloading and flashing the two bios(Normal and OC) into this new one for the 450W.  I tried overclocking my 3080 FTW3 Ultra to +125 clock and +630 mem and was having issue trying to run port royal.  When I was able to get it run, the maximum power draw that's being recorded in GPU-Z is 418W.  Can someone explain what is going on here?  Am I missing something?  I have 3 single PCIe cables connected to the graphics card and I have a 1000W EVGA G5 PSU.
2020/10/24 00:04:20
Dabadger84
aeunexcore
I don't understand what's happening.  So I tried downloading and flashing the two bios(Normal and OC) into this new one for the 450W.  I tried overclocking my 3080 FTW3 Ultra to +125 clock and +630 mem and was having issue trying to run port royal.  When I was able to get it run, the maximum power draw that's being recorded in GPU-Z is 418W.  Can someone explain what is going on here?  Am I missing something?  I have 3 single PCIe cables connected to the graphics card and I have a 1000W EVGA G5 PSU.




Are you maxing out the voltage slider?  Is that overclock actually stable?  What "PerfCap" reason are you seeing in Port Royal?  For my run, it's mostly VRel/VOp which is voltage-related, not power limit... but I did also hit the suposed "power limit as well" a few times:
 

 
That's at +150/+800... so it's entirely possible your OC is simply not hitting power limit on the card yet.  I know when I was running +130/+800 I didn't get power limit PerfCap hardly at all the whole test, and max draw was around 433W.
2020/10/24 09:25:39
PhoenixA7Z
Hi All!
 
Where can I find the stock 3080 FTW3 Ultra BIOS?
2020/10/24 10:12:43
aeunexcore
Dabadger84
Are you maxing out the voltage slider?  Is that overclock actually stable?  What "PerfCap" reason are you seeing in Port Royal?  For my run, it's mostly VRel/VOp which is voltage-related, not power limit... but I did also hit the suposed "power limit as well" a few times:
 

 
That's at +150/+800... so it's entirely possible your OC is simply not hitting power limit on the card yet.  I know when I was running +130/+800 I didn't get power limit PerfCap hardly at all the whole test, and max draw was around 433W.




I tried maxing out the voltage to 100% in PX1.  Someone also mentioned leaving it at 0 so now I'm confused about what to believe.  For some reason, I'm able to run benchmarks(timespy & port royal) 100% of time when the voltage is at 0, though.  PerCap reason I only see is "Idle".  So if you're +130/+800 wasn't hitting power limit, does that mean my +125/+630 is a very conservative OC and there's more I can squeeze out of this card before it shows instability?
2020/10/24 14:19:59
SoldierRBT
Hi, 
I installed the 450W beta BIOS on my 3080 FTW3 Ultra and it's able to maintain 2205MHz in Port Royal. Video card is on a open bench at 100% fans speed (21C ambient). My highest score is: 13 205

Here's a video of my settings:

 
EDIT: For some reason links are not showing. Any idea?
 
2020/10/24 20:31:00
Dabadger84
aeunexcore
Dabadger84
Are you maxing out the voltage slider?  Is that overclock actually stable?  What "PerfCap" reason are you seeing in Port Royal?  For my run, it's mostly VRel/VOp which is voltage-related, not power limit... but I did also hit the suposed "power limit as well" a few times:
 

 
That's at +150/+800... so it's entirely possible your OC is simply not hitting power limit on the card yet.  I know when I was running +130/+800 I didn't get power limit PerfCap hardly at all the whole test, and max draw was around 433W.




I tried maxing out the voltage to 100% in PX1.  Someone also mentioned leaving it at 0 so now I'm confused about what to believe.  For some reason, I'm able to run benchmarks(timespy & port royal) 100% of time when the voltage is at 0, though.  PerCap reason I only see is "Idle".  So if you're +130/+800 wasn't hitting power limit, does that mean my +125/+630 is a very conservative OC and there's more I can squeeze out of this card before it shows instability?




It's really a silicon lottery question I think.  Some people are having issues getting over +100 "stable".  And I'm not even 100% sure my +130 (which I think actually boosts to +135) is stable, I haven't run it for extended periods in actual usage, the most I've run for gaming is +100, and I actually ended up using mostly "stock" with a -10% Power Target modifier, which resulted in cooler temps, while still boosting to around 1980MHz most of the time, due to the lower temperature.
If you're not seeing any PerfCap reason other than Idle, you definitely have more headroom.
The Voltage Silder thing I think is glitchy, and as a result, some people are seeing better results with 0, some people are seeing better results with it maxed out.  I would try both and see which gives you better results, but it sounds like your card prefers 0.
+130/+800 on my card tickles the power limit on occasion but doesn't constantly hit it, in most tests it's giving VRel/VOp most of the test, with little sprinkles of Pwr popping up from time to time, and in some less-stressful tests, no PerfCap reason comes up because the GPU isn't being pushed fully.
If you want to really stress test an OC and insure it's actually fully stable for gaming usage, I would recommend running a mixture of Port Royal on a loop, Superposition on a loop, and one or two others, maybe TimeSpy regular & something else.  Wouldn't use Furmark or a power-virus type workload as there's no real point in doing that, since the newer cards have safety features that prevent full boost clocks in Furmark unless that's changed this generation, and it thereby isn't a good stability test.
Anything you're running as a "stress test" should be ran for at least an hour imo, some people go pretty extreme & run stress/stability testing for a full day still.
2020/10/25 12:14:37
nolaes619
PhoenixA7Z
Hi All!
 
Where can I find the stock 3080 FTW3 Ultra BIOS?


Would like to know too, the orignal post file NORMAL is not working 
2020/10/25 21:54:30
Mandalorian1977
I did a lot of testing with the 3080 FTW3 Ultra in Time Spy and Port Royal. For me, i got better scores upping the memory clock a bit, at the expense of some core speed. 
 
I'd try +120 core, 0 memory, which amounts to 2100mhz on the core clock. 
Then i'd do +115 core, +200 memory and get a better score. 
 
I my actual highest score was from +110 core, 500 memory, but... i thought maybe in real games and video editing i might be better off just going with a higher core, slightly slower memory. 
 
I'd get crashes if i tried to sneak much more than that. It was like a give and take between core and memory. 
 
I'm a total noob to all this, honestly. But these are my findings after running those benchmarks over and over with slight adjustments. 
 
I think i'll stick with +115 core and +200 memory. 
Which amounts to 2085mhz and 10002mhz
2020/10/26 02:03:58
streamroller
To anyone wonder if your chip is golden sample or not ( easy way to guarentee 2100+ )
 
Just undervolt it with .900mV and go as high as you can. I would say if your chip able to do 2000+ on .900mV, pretty much u got good chip and u should now start overclock benchmarks.
2020/10/26 08:53:35
JTBerkman
I'm probably being blind but .... is there a link to the original BIOS anywhere if we wish to go back?

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account