rjohnson11
I have a similar article already posted here but because this post contains more info I'll let it stand for now:
https://forums.evga.com/FindPost/3096155
RJ, I would respectfully argue that these are two different posts on the same matter. This is a collaboration of statements from the companies, not a 'investigation' by Igors lab.
The sad part in all of this is, whomever out there seems to be trying to create a name for themselves for clickbait with their speculations during a big launch who happened to paint most with the issue ridden brush? Were they payed by Asus since they were revered for not cutting corners in their power delivery?
See I can speculate too.
How many CPU engineering samples were there while having some features disabled on them when being reviewed? I say this because when did people freak out if engineering samples or preproduction components didn't go as planned before adjustments are made for final releases create this much ruckus? Was this just an issue with ZOTAC?
This has been completely blown out of proporstion for what it is. I think this has run its course and all the folks who don't know better about silicon lottery will think they will have these issues now. What a mess and feel bad for the AIBs, especially EVGA who already has enough on their plate during these launches while upholding it's stellar CS.