2011/11/20 05:45:07
JinxGenius
three chipset?
 
can you list them out for me so that I can google the info? 

I'd say in order to make a "new" Super Record, please give us a chipset with quad-socket and put in four new 8-core 16-Thread CPUs
 
then 32 slot of ram should probably right...  
4GB each already makes it 128GB of ram 
 
32 Core 64 Thread 128GB here comes the Super Record 
2011/11/20 11:11:07
thegreatga
you would setting a record to power it as well as to fitting it into one single case
2011/11/20 21:57:02
ZachA
thegreatga

you would setting a record to power it as well as to fitting it into one single case


actyally Mountain mods has two or three cases that will support Quad socket motherboards like the AMD ones you see around the net.
2011/11/22 22:11:14
robhall86
INFRNL

I think the ram is all shared among the 12 slots but I have no idea. It was also mentioned that they did it this way so you can use your ram from SR-2 for this board and not have to buy new ram.
It is kind of odd depending on how it works exactly, but its nice that they thought about saving us some money and not have to buy new ram. I personally cannot wait for the release

 jacob said that the reason was to make is easy on current SR-2 users.
 
after all it would suck to have 12 sticks and upgrade only to have to put 4 in storage.
 
Post 63
http://forums.evga.com/tm.aspx?&m=1158148&mpage=3
2011/11/25 12:57:28
C4PPY
Maybe a stupid/obvious question but is the SR-X gonne be HPTX or something els?
2011/11/25 13:09:15
Brocasta
HPTX
2011/11/26 11:53:00
jvaungh
Really, this should be called "SR-EX" or "SR-XXX"
 
 
2011/11/26 17:34:51
shadow001
As an SR-2 owner, I'd think about this board only once Intel releases the ivy-bridge E series of CPU's later next year, as they'll be made at 22nm, use 30% less power because they also use intel's finfet tech( vertically stacked transistors, rather than horizontal), so that for a given overclock given that it uses less power, it's also easier to cool down, as well as the added improvement in performance from the ivy bridge architecture itself, and of course having 8 cores onboard.
 
The Xeon versions of the current sandy bridge E's, with all 8 cores enabled and still using the 32 nm process, even if they make it to 4+ Ghz on the overclocking front, are going to be using so much power to do so, that it'll become a pain to keep it cool unless you're into high end water cooling...We can forget air cooled with high overclocks, as the current list of models that will be released, already lists the highest end version as dissipating 150 watts TDP at 3.1 Ghz, so you can imagine where that TDP might end up once in the 4+ Ghz region(yikes), hence my preference to wait for the 22nm process.
 
http://www.cpu-world.com/news_2011/2011102701_Prices_of_Xeon_E5-2600-series_CPUs.html ...Scroll down a bit.
 
As for the number of memory slots, i couldn't care much for the 12 slots as good DDR 3, using 4 GB modules rated at 2000 Mhz with decent timings already exists, so with 8 slots in total( 4 per CPU), that's already 32 GB of ram onboard, and the best overclocking and overall performance wil be achieved with a single module per memory channel, not 2.....Look no further than EVGA's own X79 classifieds and all of them have only 4 memory slots only and none with 8 slots.....That says plenty right there.
 
 
2011/12/02 13:30:30
Rendermax
Looks tasty ! but it better support all version of ocz revo X3 and X2, because iam planing to get one :)  probably max IOPS one.
it was really disappointing that best mobo on planet (SR-2) do not boot up from fastest HDD ..
btw LOM is still slow dual 1 Gbit? or its dual 10 Gbit now?
 
 
2011/12/03 11:41:23
CodePhoenix
On-board 10gigabit would be a bit of a waste because almost no-one has 10G switches to plug it into, or other 10G machines to communicate with. The few who do can get a 10G NIC. I think we still have a couple of years to go before 10G is widespread enough to be standard on workstations.

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account