I envy you your CPU temps. My 5820K @4.4GHz (1.326V) tops out at ~85C under heavy stress testing with a Corsair H115i with expensive (and very quiet) aftermarket fans running at 100% along with the pump running at 100%.
 
As long as it is stable, I'd say you got a great chip!
 
Edit: I've got a H115i, not a H110i. The stock fans were SO LOUD - I had to replace them with near silent fans to maintain my sanity.

I also have a 5820K that is in another machine in stock configuration. It's a Windows 7 Ultimate PC used for older legacy games, music and media, and other programs.  Both CPUs are cooled by the Corsair H115i using their new magnetic levitation (MAGLEV?) fans.  I don't know if that makes any difference though.  I've been PCing and Master Racing for nearly a decade, but some of the more intricate and intimate aspects, like my question above, I admit, I'm somewhat of a novice.  Never too old to learn though!
 
EDIT: MORE TYPOS!!! ARRRGH! I NEED TO STOP DRINKING. :/

1.36v is too high. Max voltage you want to use on a 5960x is 1.3v. Currently running my 5960x at 4.4GHz @ 1.3v. My cpu can do 4.5 @ 1.3v too but I lowered it to 4.4GHz for added stability.

I think you might have a good chip in your hands as I would take Sajin's advise and not go over 1.3v.  As already stated, you don't want to use auto voltage since it always pumps too much voltage.  
 
Use adaptive when OCing.  
 
I'm sitting with adaptive at 4.4 Ghz around 1.28v on a 5930K.

vanity59
On a related side note, is 1.36v really damaging to the CPU?

Here is what Raja@ASUS has to say...
 
https://hardforum.com/thr...age-19#post-1041586993

vanity59
I'm currently testing adaptive voltage as I write.  I think I'm doing this adaptive voltage thing correctly, if not please advise as I continue experimenting.
 
Should I aim for the lowest possible "CPU voltage target" to make it into the desktop, while setting the "CPU offset voltage" to the adjust into the absolute, bare minimum stress test passing overall voltage provided by CPU-Z?   I hope this last sentence made sense.

 
Don't touch anything but the offset.  So you want to set it at adaptive and change the offset.  You want to add increments of +10 in the beginning till you get loaded to windows and once there, you can start adding +5 and or +1s once you're stable in benching and gaming to find your sweet spot.  

For example, I use an offset of +180 to get me stable @ 4.4 Ghz.  It used to be a higher offset in the +210 range in previous BIOS versions but in the latest version, this is where it stabilizes.  

Sometimes the BIOS updates change the values and so in some cases you'll have to redo your OC but as long as you're in the latest BIOS version, you should be good to go.

Quick question. In the BIOS, I have set CPU Voltage target @ 1.000 (I did not change the default value set by "adaptive") and the offset is manually set at +250.  Which, if my math is correct is 1.250v.  However, while in Windows using CPU-Z, I am showing a 1.312v.  So, who am I to believe? The BIOS or CPU-Z?  Where did this random .050v+ come from? Anyone have any ideas?

Sajin
I don't do all that offset stuff. I run my cpu at 4.4GHz @ 1.3v all the time. 

I have tested my OC in every possible configuration and found there to be no difference in stability. I personally like to run adaptive voltage set 1.24-1.25v

On my 5930k on the x99 classy i just change the multiplier to my target (my case 44 or 45) and select adaptive. Then i change voltage manually to as low as i can get it and remain stable at that particular multiplier.
 
im stable at 4.5 at 1.21 and 4.4 stable and 1.19. and under full synthetic load on customer water i have never seen it exceed 60c 
 
I dont know if this is right or wrong but it works for me. 
 
Edit: i never use the auto overclock on the MOBO's as every time i have seen the voltage go to high for my comfort and these arent specific to the chip you have. 

GTXJackBauer
You got one amazing "Golden" chip if this is stable.  

me?
 

Nice i guess i have a golden chip then. 
 
no matter how high i set the voltage though I cant it stable passed 4.5. 
 
So you win some you lose some. 
 
I have had the same chip in the MSI sli krait edition board also and in that board no matter what i did i couldnt get it passed 4.2. 
 

It's been a few days. I've settled at 4.450 @ 1.228v.  I could just leave it at 4.5gHz @ 1.317 (the lowest stable voltage), but decided to drop the speed for some further stability. After days of trying to find that "perfect" ratio, I basically said, "<insert irratated expletive rant here>" and just hit a few options.  My RAM is is 2800mHz from Corsair so applying the XMP1 profile gave me the ideal timings and speed from the box.  It of course changed the BLCK, but all my days of failing (semi-stable, the ratio is around 70/30 = P/F) the stability test under 1.3v at my intended speed, I just upped the core multiplier to as close as possible to 4.5 gHz. Under load I haven't broke 60°C either.  However, I expect that to change when summer officially hits.  Highest core temp reached at my settled OC was 58°C.  All is well.  Appreciate the help!!  Thanks everyone!
 

GTXJackBauer
When you start heading into the 4.5+ and 4.8+ range, sometimes it takes a big jump in voltage to get it stable which involves a lot of testing and sometimes the chip just doesn't jive well with it all.  I also can get to 4.5 but not completely stable as well.  I think I need more testing to get there but I'm happy so far with 4.4 Ghz @ 1.28v.

Usually chips that can OC in the 4.4+ range at less than 1.2 or around that mark are usually labeled as "golden" because of their efficiency of running higher clocks with much less voltage than the average chip.  

I was noticing this as well. I was suggested to run my CPU at 4.7/4.8.  At 1.36v I was semi-stable @ 4.7, but I don't have some fancy, schmancy water loop to even attempt those "grey zone" voltages.  4.6 was stable @ 1.349v and from there on out I wasn't gonna touch it.  The CPU gets wonky after 4.5 gHz.  The jump in voltage is mind boggling to say the least.  I'll settle for what I have it running at now. 

Actually, no I haven't ran the sticks higher than 2800 mHz.  I have ran them at various other speeds like 2667 with a CPU BCLK of 100 to get 4.5 with a just slightly over 1.3v stability.  I just sorta gave up on the extreme fine tuning of the overclock and left it as for the time being.  My ram voltage is just over 1.2v in the BIOS.  I could say, go back and fine tune some more, but everything is running pretty peachy, albeit with a slight increase in fan noise, but not so much where it is noticeable.  The new Corsair MAGLEV fans are pretty quiet and the In Win 509 is a pretty quiet case.  I'm happy with the overclock and the help from the people here.

well been running mine at 4.653 for just over a year almost 24/7 gaming benchmark every thing I do. I have not changed my bios setting, adaptive .350 and voltage at 1.050 and bloc at 102.40. it's all in the cooling system . on air can't get near this. and even on water I only boot hear. from in window I have push it up to 4.8 stable for times but will not boot there for me even 4.7 is very stable and will boot sometimes hard on reg so for everything I do I lev it at 4,65 lol and whin friend over and we are playing and overclocking I will go up to 4.7. wont take it to 4.8 anymore . don't want to take it apart to replace it if I burn it lol.
 P.S. all 8 cores set at 46 .

 Have an 5960X CPU, X99 Classified and 1080 EVGAs.....  Though i have reached 98Centigrade i run at 44 Celsius or centigrade when modestly OCing!!!!! Usually even cooler. Temp is a fine gauge and should be monitored for all improvement, Fluid for cooling should move as fast as can and not too much pressure... Voltage on X99 Classified EVGA is not to exceed average 1.234 Volts... That is Ram voltage! May this help?