Baratak
New Member
- Total Posts : 72
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2018/12/05 09:04:27
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
My best run has been 15032, though it didn't upload, my best official graphics score is now 14996, 70th highest score on timespy extreme x2 cards, about 95th overall: If there is no link above, I am still too new and EVGA won't let me. 3dmark/spy/6126330 Seeing if anyone out there has pushed bast the 15k mark with any consistency without dry ice, LN2, or anything else crazy. My current setup is a 9900k, running at 5.2, memory is 3600C15 currently clocked at 4000C17, and 2 FTW3s with hydro copper. PSU is the 1600T2, all watercooled. Oh, I have 1x 420 rad and 1x 360 rad. . To help anyone with my travels so far. With everything stock my graphics score was in the 13000s, playing with PX1 I was able to get +150ish and +1000ish (don't remember exactly) and that got me into the low-mid 14000s. What was interesting is when I started upping my RAM speed and lowering timings, it actually made as much of a difference again. My current runs are actually clocked lower on the GPU +130/+1050 to get the 15000 score than when I was hitting 14400ish, but speeding up the RAM, and to a degree the CPU added the rest I am hoping some sub timing adjustments will get me solid in the 15000s. So far the most extreme cooling attempts I've done were to aim my AC vent at the computer, there is nothing crazy, right now, sitting in a 75 degree room (I live in FL) I can hit high 14000s all day with the computer being barely audible.
post edited by Baratak - 2019/02/11 13:15:35
|
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
- Total Posts : 38977
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
- Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 282
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 13:18:08
(permalink)
|
ehabash1
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 463
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/01/03 12:02:48
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 13:43:36
(permalink)
timespy hates the 9900k and loves XE processors. unfortunately it effects the gpu score as well nevertheless i managed a score of 15,205 http://www.3dmark.com/spy/6127491
|
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
- Total Posts : 38977
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
- Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 282
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 13:46:21
(permalink)
|
ehabash1
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 463
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/01/03 12:02:48
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 13:47:02
(permalink)
for reference, i think i have somewhere around top 10 score in firestrike extreme and ive literally only ran that benchmark twice. Just to show the wide bias between the 2 benchmarks as it relates to cpu. Anything graphics related i refer to firestrike ultra as king. Thats the best representation of graphics and likely gaming performance relatively. I love the look of your setup it reminds me of mine as i run inverted as well. good job Just because youve been looking to compare i have a very similar setup. I was running 3600 cl15 and swapped to new ram running 4100 cl16. cant push memory anymore or it wont boot I think the score was with the 9900k at 5.3 but i dont keep that for 24/7 as it crashes in gta v. sometimes i leave it at 5.2 though I also have the ftw3 hydrocopper sli but since i have a big case im running more rads. i have 2 separate loops but the gpus get a 420 and 120.
post edited by ehabash1 - 2019/02/11 13:55:12
|
Baratak
New Member
- Total Posts : 72
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2018/12/05 09:04:27
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 13:50:42
(permalink)
bcavnaugh
ehabash1 timespy hates the 9900k and loves XE processors. unfortunately it effects the gpu score as well nevertheless i managed a score of 15,205
Nice
But I really think this proves that running X16 on both cards also makes a big difference with RTX Cards.
You state that, but your graphics score on 16/16 is lower than either of us running 8/8 :)
|
Sajin
EVGA Forum Moderator
- Total Posts : 49131
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
- Location: Texas, USA.
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 199
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 13:52:12
(permalink)
3dmark is fun, but game benchmarks are better for judging real world performance. Shadow of the tomb raider is a good one to use.
|
Baratak
New Member
- Total Posts : 72
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2018/12/05 09:04:27
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 13:52:15
(permalink)
ehabash1 timespy hates the 9900k and loves XE processors. unfortunately it effects the gpu score as well nevertheless i managed a score of 15,205
Your GPU/Memory clocks are really high! Did you win the lottery twice, or are you running with a chiller or something to cool it off?
|
Sajin
EVGA Forum Moderator
- Total Posts : 49131
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
- Location: Texas, USA.
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 199
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 13:55:39
(permalink)
Baratak Seeing if anyone out there has pushed bast the 15k mark with any consistency without dry ice, LN2, or anything else crazy.
Easy... https://www.3dmark.com/spy/5484688
|
ehabash1
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 463
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/01/03 12:02:48
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 14:02:32
(permalink)
Baratak
ehabash1 timespy hates the 9900k and loves XE processors. unfortunately it effects the gpu score as well nevertheless i managed a score of 15,205
Your GPU/Memory clocks are really high! Did you win the lottery twice, or are you running with a chiller or something to cool it off?
my memory settings are 24/7 i used this memory https://www.amazon.com/G-Skill-TridentZ-4400Mhz-PC4-35200-Channel/dp/B07GPK2P8DI down-clocked to 4100 but improved the timings. Using a maximus hero xi mobo I did use better cooling for this run but it wasnt too crazy.. it was sub ambient by about 12c but def way above freezing. My cpu can run 5.3 with high voltage normally but the colder temps help me lower voltage to be reasonable. My daily clock speed is 5.1GHz for gaming but i am fully stable at 5.2
|
ehabash1
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 463
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/01/03 12:02:48
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 14:04:36
(permalink)
Sajin
Baratak Seeing if anyone out there has pushed bast the 15k mark with any consistency without dry ice, LN2, or anything else crazy.
Easy... https://www.3dmark.com/spy/5484688
how did you get that galax bios? Im jealous for sure O.O
|
Sajin
EVGA Forum Moderator
- Total Posts : 49131
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
- Location: Texas, USA.
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 199
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 14:06:26
(permalink)
|
ehabash1
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 463
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/01/03 12:02:48
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 14:17:50
(permalink)
^^ thank you^^ this is the one im most proud of since i guess 35k graphics is like a gold mark for this bench. When i was running it i just wanted to beat jays 2 cent score since he kept flooding youtube with videos but didnt think it was possible since he was gifted a private bios + was using ln2 cpu/ice bucket for radiator cheat... I actually beat it by a large margin o.O I dont do nearly as well in the timespys :/
post edited by ehabash1 - 2019/02/11 14:22:52
|
Baratak
New Member
- Total Posts : 72
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2018/12/05 09:04:27
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 14:24:46
(permalink)
You are running about the same as me, I meant your graphics memory/clocks are way higher than mine. Though if you were running sub ambient to your 2080s, that would help.
|
Baratak
New Member
- Total Posts : 72
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2018/12/05 09:04:27
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 14:26:31
(permalink)
Didn't think the Galax bios was a big power limit jump. Worth it?
|
Sajin
EVGA Forum Moderator
- Total Posts : 49131
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
- Location: Texas, USA.
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 199
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 14:28:03
(permalink)
Baratak Didn't think the Galax bios was a big power limit jump. Worth it?
For you it most likely isn't worth it, and the vbios might not work correctly on your card since it's made for reference cards.
|
ehabash1
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 463
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/01/03 12:02:48
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 14:42:47
(permalink)
Baratak You are running about the same as me, I meant your graphics memory/clocks are way higher than mine. Though if you were running sub ambient to your 2080s, that would help.
I think without cooling my core clocks are the same at 2115, but my memory clocks are higher. My cpu runs those clocks with or without cooling as i do direct die and actually prefer not to go cold as it messes with the liquid metal expansion/contraction do you run firestrike ultra? i dont have many timespy results for me to compare but i can show u a standard run for firestrike ultra if u want to compare clocks and scores. i think your doing very well regardless. Also dont just look at peak clocks...you have to make sure you can maintain those clocks as the stupid temperature step down is extreme with these cards. You might peak at 2115 but actually run at 2085 for the majority for instance if your temps are hitting 45-50+ More radiator/fans with help maintain the 2115
|
Cool GTX
EVGA Forum Moderator
- Total Posts : 30908
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/12/12 14:22:25
- Location: Folding for the Greater Good
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 122
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 15:18:52
(permalink)
|
Baratak
New Member
- Total Posts : 72
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2018/12/05 09:04:27
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 16:37:27
(permalink)
ehabash1
Baratak You are running about the same as me, I meant your graphics memory/clocks are way higher than mine. Though if you were running sub ambient to your 2080s, that would help.
I think without cooling my core clocks are the same at 2115, but my memory clocks are higher. My cpu runs those clocks with or without cooling as i do direct die and actually prefer not to go cold as it messes with the liquid metal expansion/contraction do you run firestrike ultra? i dont have many timespy results for me to compare but i can show u a standard run for firestrike ultra if u want to compare clocks and scores. i think your doing very well regardless. Also dont just look at peak clocks...you have to make sure you can maintain those clocks as the stupid temperature step down is extreme with these cards. You might peak at 2115 but actually run at 2085 for the majority for instance if your temps are hitting 45-50+
More radiator/fans with help maintain the 2115
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/33457128? 3dmark/3dm/33457128 1st run, house is 80 right now, so gpu hit almost 60C, sure that didn't help as the actual clock was only 2012 Score 16 474 with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti(2x) and Intel Core i9-9900K Processor Graphics Score16 931 Physics Score26 095 Combined Score9 386 I'll try again later with the house cooler.
|
SprayingMango
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 273
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/03/10 21:45:38
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 17:47:20
(permalink)
I do not understand people using Z390 systems with SLI...the 9900K does not have enough PCIe lanes to fully feed both cards. It's such a waste.
Affiliate Code = I6E6SHELAX12900KASUS Z690 Strix E32GB DDR5 Corsair Dominator 5600Samsung 970 Evo Plus 2TBWD Black 2TB PCIe 4 NVMEEVGA 3090Ti FTW3 UltraCorsair AX1600i PSUCorsair 1000D Corsair QL120 fans x 15Corsair H150i Pro XTAsus PG27UQ w/ PG279Q x2
|
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
- Total Posts : 38977
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
- Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 282
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 17:51:15
(permalink)
SprayingMango I do not understand people using Z390 systems with SLI...the 9900K does not have enough PCIe lanes to fully feed both cards. It's such a waste.
Same here.
|
bcavnaugh
The Crunchinator
- Total Posts : 38977
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/09/18 17:31:18
- Location: USA Affiliate E5L3CTGE12 Associate 9E88QK5L7811G3H
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 282
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 17:54:03
(permalink)
Baratak
bcavnaugh
ehabash1 timespy hates the 9900k and loves XE processors. unfortunately it effects the gpu score as well nevertheless i managed a score of 15,205
Nice But I really think this proves that running X16 on both cards also makes a big difference with RTX Cards.
You state that, but your graphics score on 16/16 is lower than either of us running 8/8 :)
I go by Overall Score, not one part of it.
|
Baratak
New Member
- Total Posts : 72
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2018/12/05 09:04:27
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 18:28:24
(permalink)
bcavnaugh
Baratak
bcavnaugh
ehabash1 timespy hates the 9900k and loves XE processors. unfortunately it effects the gpu score as well nevertheless i managed a score of 15,205
Nice But I really think this proves that running X16 on both cards also makes a big difference with RTX Cards.
You state that, but your graphics score on 16/16 is lower than either of us running 8/8 :)
I go by Overall Score, not one part of it.
But that isn't showing that the 16/16 is helping, that is because Timespy is good at multithreading in the CPU section of the benchmark with a AVX load. Your graphics score is lower, but your CPU is WAAYYY higher (and more $$) :D
|
Baratak
New Member
- Total Posts : 72
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2018/12/05 09:04:27
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 18:29:40
(permalink)
|
Baratak
New Member
- Total Posts : 72
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2018/12/05 09:04:27
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 18:56:25
(permalink)
SprayingMango I do not understand people using Z390 systems with SLI...the 9900K does not have enough PCIe lanes to fully feed both cards. It's such a waste.
Though there may be a couple percent slowdown, the NVLink bridge is doing most of the heavy lifting. Gamer's Nexus did a test of it, and as long as you were using the nvlink, 16x/16x and 8x/8x were within the margin of error. In many games, the 9900k with a pair of 2080tis will outperform the 9980xe with a pair of 2080tis due to the higher single threaded clock speeds. 9980 is only faster if the application is doing a lot of multithreading.
|
jfw06013
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 586
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2017/02/14 10:26:10
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 4
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 22:03:47
(permalink)
Sajin, what up with the Galax bios and is it for the video card or motherboard? Does it really matter?
|
Sajin
EVGA Forum Moderator
- Total Posts : 49131
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
- Location: Texas, USA.
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 199
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/11 23:46:18
(permalink)
jfw06013 Sajin, what up with the Galax bios and is it for the video card or motherboard? Does it really matter?
It's for the video cards. It will increase the power limit of reference cards to 380w.
|
jfw06013
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 586
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2017/02/14 10:26:10
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 4
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/12 00:46:41
(permalink)
|
Sajin
EVGA Forum Moderator
- Total Posts : 49131
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
- Location: Texas, USA.
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 199
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/12 00:56:15
(permalink)
jfw06013 How to install?
You can use nvflash to flash the vbios to your card.
|
ehabash1
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 463
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/01/03 12:02:48
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Timespy Extreme, crossing the 15000 graphics mark (2x 2080TI)
2019/02/12 08:54:10
(permalink)
if you guys want to talk about x8 vs x16 well, i have the #19 overall score in firestrike ultra so how do u explain that? And if my gpus were starved from the lanes then how do i have a top 10 graphics score in firestrike extreme? especially with all the ppl running around with galax cards/ ln2 / private bios how is the number 1 overall score using a 9900k with sli 2080tis? if its such a limiting factor why not swap cpus? https://www.3dmark.com/fs/18150307 time spy uses a stupid avx workload and 3dmark in general isnt a good representation of cpu performance in actually gaming. There are tons of benchmarks out there that show the 9900k outperform the rest in modern games They are nice if you can actually use the cores and threads but if your strictly building a gaming rig buying the 7980/9980xe is foolish as its arguably slower than the $500 9900k for gaming as for x8 vs x16.. this was tested and it only matters in ashes of singularity where u cant utilize nvlink. Since every other game can, the limited bandwidth via the pcie bus is irrelevant and x8/x8 performs essentially equally to x16
post edited by ehabash1 - 2019/02/12 09:06:30
|