redleader00
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 906
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/03/26 11:02:11
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 7
|
ComboSlicer
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 286
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2016/07/25 02:51:10
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Skylake-X i9-7900X reviews published at Hexus and bit-tech
2017/06/16 10:28:06
(permalink)
And it does look bad to me - this CPU with lower voltage has much higher temp than 6950x on higher voltage. Why? Because 7900X has toothpaste under IHS and 6950X is soldered. Requires some nerve to delid 1k+ USD. Not to mention the fact that they applied thermal grease simply to keep costs down for CPUs with so expensive price tag. Ryzen costs around 300 bucks and is soldered.. Would love to own HEDT but for me it is really difficult to ignore rather goofy approaches by Intel, seems that Z370 or whatever the chip will be is the way to go.
|
panzlock
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1736
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2016/11/10 17:56:33
- Location: Canada
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Skylake-X i9-7900X reviews published at Hexus and bit-tech
2017/06/16 13:20:24
(permalink)
I skimmed through. What exactly were the temps? Can't watch video at work, etc...
post edited by panzlock - 2017/06/16 13:24:02
|
ComboSlicer
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 286
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2016/07/25 02:51:10
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Skylake-X i9-7900X reviews published at Hexus and bit-tech
2017/06/16 14:51:02
(permalink)
From bit-tech review: However, temperatures were definitely a concern with Cinebench and Terragen pushing 100°C with our 240mm AIO liquid cooler. As a result, while stable and potentially tameable under custom water-cooling, we decided to go for 4.6GHz for benchmarking, which required a super-low 1.22V. Interestingly our Core i7-6950X ran much cooler despite using a significantly higher voltage, albeit at 4.4GHz. This could well be due to thermal paste having been used between the heatspreader and CPU core with the new Skylake-X CPUs, in which case delidding could potentially yield significant benefits given the high heat density.
|
Vlada011
Omnipotent Enthusiast
- Total Posts : 10257
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/03/25 00:14:05
- Location: Belgrade-Serbia
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 11
Re: Skylake-X i9-7900X reviews published at Hexus and bit-tech
2017/06/17 03:10:08
(permalink)
It's nice difference compare to i7-6950X. This is best investment for 2017 for gamers with deeper pocket. People with i7-7820X lose nothing for games, frequency is similar.
|
starsmine
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 890
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/04/21 19:04:09
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Skylake-X i9-7900X reviews published at Hexus and bit-tech
2017/06/17 07:18:10
(permalink)
Vlada011 It's nice difference compare to i7-6950X. This is best investment for 2017 for gamers with deeper pocket. People with i7-7820X lose nothing for games, frequency is similar.
Im not sure I would agree with that, x299 looks to be a very weird platform for no good reason. Especially when threadripper will be giving you more pci-e lanes for less money.
|
Vlada011
Omnipotent Enthusiast
- Total Posts : 10257
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2012/03/25 00:14:05
- Location: Belgrade-Serbia
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 11
Re: Skylake-X i9-7900X reviews published at Hexus and bit-tech
2017/06/18 07:17:35
(permalink)
I think about performance. PCI-E lanes are not so important for everyone because again Intel have total more Gen 3 PCI-E lanes. 44 + 24 vs 60 + 4. For people is important to keep SLI on x16 and enough Gen 3 lanes for installation M.2 SSD, PCI-E SSD and maybe Intel Optane Memory. I hope Intel Optane will work on X299. 32GB cost 80$. Other things worry me, because some memory bandwidth results are not so good as i7-6950X. I must check more memory write, read, copy results on i7-6900K/i7-6950X and i7-7820X/i9-7900X. i7-6950X is great investment for people who have X99 platform, because his price drop seriously and maybe could be bought from people who upgrade. I would not complain to find i7-6950X for reasonable price. Flux solder, 10 cores, work on 4.2GHz motherboard and memory ready for him, don't need 400-450 euro investment in that direction. I would scream like idiot from happines if I success to push him on 4.3GHz as i9-7900X Turbo Boost 2.0. Because they OC lower than Haswell-X. I don't know why platform look weird, Intel try to offer Kaby Lake-X and Skylake-X as soon as possible to prepare completely new stuff. This launch now X299 was finished before Ryzen 7 arrived and they couldn't do nothing except to increase Turbo Boost instead to offer manual OC. Worse of everything in X299, worse dissapointment for me is thermal paste and delidding.
post edited by Vlada011 - 2017/06/18 07:24:03
|
GloR1ouS_
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 897
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/07/06 02:14:09
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 4
Re: Skylake-X i9-7900X reviews published at Hexus and bit-tech
2017/06/19 10:50:13
(permalink)
People need to open their eyes to how bad this launch actually is. Manufacturers of motherboards have to fab boards that support 4 to 18 cores and the 18 core is months away. These motherboards now require keys again as well and as far as I understand don't have native 3.1 USB support. Now they had to force a 20 degree cooler to keep those temps in line and were talking some of the best water cooling money can buy period. Even stock clock cannot be ran on air and the INSANE amount of wattage this cpu is eating basically sums up how badly this thing was rushed. I don't understand why intel panicked so hard. They should be in the lab developing cpus worth our money.
My Setup -ASUS PG259QN, XG248Q -Lian Li 011 Dynamic -MSI Z490 Meg Ace -10900K 5.2GHZ-Artic Freezer II 360MM-16GB Viper 4400MHZ -3080 TI Founders -EVGA 750 P2
|
huf757
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1082
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/08/20 00:29:34
- Location: Illinois
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 1
Re: Skylake-X i9-7900X reviews published at Hexus and bit-tech
2017/06/19 11:02:45
(permalink)
Level 3 cache is much lower also @ 13.75 mb it's a rushed response by Intel is what it is. I love intel but if AMD starts to dominate again I would gladly go that route.
7700k 4.9ghz @ 1.37v De-Lidded Noctua NH-D15 16 gb Gskill 2400 1080 TI SC Gaming Black Edition 2 - 1.5 TB Total NVME HD's 2600 read / 1500 Write Asrock z270 killer sli mobo AOC 34 inch Gsync 100 MHz 3440x1440 Monitor EVGA 600 watt semi-modular PSU Corsair Carbide 300R case w/max fans NZXT 5 fan controller
|
the_Scarlet_one
formerly Scarlet-tech
- Total Posts : 24581
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2013/11/13 02:48:57
- Location: East Coast
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 79
Re: Skylake-X i9-7900X reviews published at Hexus and bit-tech
2017/06/19 11:11:39
(permalink)
Huf, you double posted so I removed one.
Also, L3 cache is lower while L2 is expanded to all cores rather than being split per core, which some reviewers have already shown that it allows the processors to utilize L2 faster.
Basically, it didn't matter.
For those complaining about price... really.. 6950x was $1700... 10 core 20 thread, that was $700 more than the exact same thing you can get on x299. Yes, the TIM choice is bad..
The x299 adopting the 7740k is strange, but like many reviewers have shown, it is the exact same price as the 7700k, meaning the chip and motherboard will be the first change, but if someone decided to grab a 10 or 18 core next year, they dont have to rebuy another motherboard, which is kind of nice.
I personally don't care. My 5960x works perfect for everything. Those on x99 upgrading to show off they have the money to spend, let them. If you don't agree with Intel's choice, don't buy their stuff.. force them to make a change. Fact is, the x299 is going to sell just fine like Intel's stuff has. People that care don't matter to Intel, it's those with money to drop that Intel caters to.
|
starsmine
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 890
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/04/21 19:04:09
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Skylake-X i9-7900X reviews published at Hexus and bit-tech
2017/06/19 11:28:56
(permalink)
The reviews of the Kabylake-X parts show very odd thermals, I cant imagine the thermals of the 18 core parts Shown at 9:10
5.3ghz delided is 16 degrees cooler then a 5.0 ghz with TIM? Thats just mind blowing awful.
|
Cool GTX
EVGA Forum Moderator
- Total Posts : 30996
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/12/12 14:22:25
- Location: Folding for the Greater Good
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 122
Re: Skylake-X i9-7900X reviews published at Hexus and bit-tech
2017/06/19 11:44:15
(permalink)
I'm seeing pre-sales orders for the new Intel chips for end of month delivery; think its best to wait and see more reviews
|
redleader00
SSC Member
- Total Posts : 906
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2009/03/26 11:02:11
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 7
Re: Skylake-X i9-7900X reviews published at Hexus and bit-tech
2017/06/19 14:08:17
(permalink)
Cool GTX I'm seeing pre-sales orders for the new Intel chips for end of month delivery; think its best to wait and see more reviews
Yup. It seems Threadripper will release in August and currently the X299 platform is not 100% stable because it's new, etc ... so waiting 1 more month seems like a good idea to me.
|
panzlock
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1736
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2016/11/10 17:56:33
- Location: Canada
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: Skylake-X i9-7900X reviews published at Hexus and bit-tech
2017/06/19 19:52:03
(permalink)
huf757 Level 3 cache is much lower also @ 13.75 mb it's a rushed response by Intel is what it is. I love intel but if AMD starts to dominate again I would gladly go that route.
AMD doesn't need to dominate to be a desirable product, they just need to be competitive. Which they are. My next build will undoubtedly be Ryzen. Matter of fact, I was planning on a 1700X but further investigating identifies the 1700 to be an excellent choice for my needs. I'm just waiting for Vega to drop, have all the wrinkles ironed out because lets face it, there will be some teething problems, and I will have my all AMD build. What I'm also looking for is good performance at the lowest possible TDP. The 1700 offers that, and I hope Vega has the same quality, at least when compared to Nvidia. At first I didn't want to believe it but now I have to agree with others. Skylake-X is looking more and more rushed, and complicated.
|
FattysGoneWild
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 2660
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2011/04/24 18:45:43
- Location: KFC
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 3
Re: Skylake-X i9-7900X reviews published at Hexus and bit-tech
2017/06/19 20:21:48
(permalink)
panzlock
huf757 Level 3 cache is much lower also @ 13.75 mb it's a rushed response by Intel is what it is. I love intel but if AMD starts to dominate again I would gladly go that route.
AMD doesn't need to dominate to be a desirable product, they just need to be competitive. Which they are. My next build will undoubtedly be Ryzen. Matter of fact, I was planning on a 1700X but further investigating identifies the 1700 to be an excellent choice for my needs. I'm just waiting for Vega to drop, have all the wrinkles ironed out because lets face it, there will be some teething problems, and I will have my all AMD build. What I'm also looking for is good performance at the lowest possible TDP. The 1700 offers that, and I hope Vega has the same quality, at least when compared to Nvidia. At first I didn't want to believe it but now I have to agree with others. Skylake-X is looking more and more rushed, and complicated.
AMD caused this and Intel is flailing around in water like lost pups. Its just making it easier for people to choose AMD with their next build. Its where I am headed. Thank goodness AMD has come through on the cpu front. We now have a good alternative. We no longer have to settle for Intel's shenanigans and only hurting themselves. Will the market react accordingly? Or will Intel continue to dominate keeping their dedicated customers simply because of brand name and recognition. Only time will tell.
HP Omen 880-160se custom ordered OS: Windows 10 64 bit MOBO: HP Tampa2 CPU: Intel i7 8700k @4.8GHz RAM: 32GB DDR4 2400 GPU: PNY XLR8 RTX 3080 PSU: Delta 750w 80 Plus Platinum NVMe M.2 SSD: Samsung 512GB MZVLW512HMJP SSD: 250GB Samsung 860 EVO HDD: 2TB Seagate Barracuda ST2000DM001 Sound: Logitech Z623 THX 2.1 Speakers Monitor: Dell S2716DG 2560x1440 @144Hz G-Sync calibrated with ColorMunki Display Keyboard: HP Omen 1100 Mouse: HP Omen 600
|
Bobmitch
Omnipotent Enthusiast
- Total Posts : 8328
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2007/05/07 09:36:29
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 47
Re: Skylake-X i9-7900X reviews published at Hexus and bit-tech
2017/06/19 21:30:34
(permalink)
Now that I am seeing news on both fronts...AMD Threadripper is becoming more attractive. Intel's prices are still out there. Will wait for comparisons before making my move...but AMD has my attention!
MSI MAG X670-E Tomahawk; Ryzen 7 7800X3D; Asus TUF RTX 4070 TI OC; Seasonic Vertex GX-1000 PSU; 32 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 RGB; Corsair iCue Link H150i RGB 360MM AIO; 2-Western Digital Black 4 TB SN850X NVMe; Creative SoundBlaster Z; Lian Li Lancool III; EVGA Z15 Keyboard; Razer Viper 8K Mouse Heatware: http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=72402 Affiliate code: 1L2RV0BNQ6 Associate Code: UD82LJP3Y1FIQPR
|
XrayMan
Insert Custom Title Here
- Total Posts : 73000
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2006/12/14 22:10:06
- Location: Santa Clarita, Ca.
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 115
Re: Skylake-X i9-7900X reviews published at Hexus and bit-tech
2017/06/21 01:10:50
(permalink)
I don't like the higher temps. Not good.
My Affiliate Code: 8WEQVXMCJL Associate Code: VHKH33QN4W77V6A  
|