harley262ive become disenchanted with this 760 classified mb for a couple of issues with the bios, plus the i had forgotten that these 780ti are such flamethrowers and i merely wanted this board to go with those gpus for appearance only.anyways, i moved the adapter and ssd to a p6x58d premium to see how it performs. asus is the top image, similar performance in the first two and last tests, but the third is way different. any ideas why?
ZoranC It seems to me you are comparing apples and oranges, different block sizes, queue depths and number of threads. Take a look at second line for example: sequential 128K queue 32 thread 1 vs. 1MB queue 1 thread 1. Also keep in mind results with one CPU can't be same as ones from different CPU, more powerful per thread CPU can throw bigger load per second which will show up as higher results.
harley262ZoranCIt seems to me you are comparing apples and oranges, different block sizes, queue depths and number of threads. Take a look at second line for example: sequential 128K queue 32 thread 1 vs. 1MB queue 1 thread 1. Also keep in mind results with one CPU can't be same as ones from different CPU, more powerful per thread CPU can throw bigger load per second which will show up as higher results.thanks, i didnt know that there be a difference between those 2 cpu (5675/975), go xeon!
ZoranCIt seems to me you are comparing apples and oranges, different block sizes, queue depths and number of threads. Take a look at second line for example: sequential 128K queue 32 thread 1 vs. 1MB queue 1 thread 1. Also keep in mind results with one CPU can't be same as ones from different CPU, more powerful per thread CPU can throw bigger load per second which will show up as higher results.
glnzglnz I have a related question, and this is definitely the right group of knowledgeable people to help me. A couple of months ago, for my Win 10 Pro 64-bit machine, I got a SAMSUNG 970 EVO Plus SSD 2TB - M.2 NVMe Interface Internal Solid State Drive with V-NAND Technology (MZ-V7S2T0B/AM), to replace a HDD.This Samsung 970 EVO Plus M.2 is supposed to run at up to 3,500 MBps, but I'm getting only 1,700 MBps. (I've been testing the speed using CrystalDiskMark.)I put this NVMe in my Dell Optiplex 7010 Mini-Tower, which has an i3 CPU and 16GB RAM (running Win 10 Pro 64-bit v21H2) and a Q77 chipset, but no one else reports a speed problem in this context.It doesn't seem to get hot. (At least not at that speed.) So:Am I getting only 1,700 MBps (an not 3,500 MBps) because I have only PCIe Gen 2?Would I maybe get PCIe Gen 3 if I changed my i3 to an i5 or i7, and then would I get 3,500 MBps on this NVMe?By the way, there is at least one person out there who is getting 3,500 MBps on the same Optiplex 7010 PC - see but I don't know his other specs. (And that's an interesting article.)And open to other suggestions !!!Thanks.
glnzglnz I have a related question, and this is definitely the right group of knowledgeable people to help me. A couple of months ago, for my Win 10 Pro 64-bit machine, I got a SAMSUNG 970 EVO Plus SSD 2TB - M.2 NVMe Interface Internal Solid State Drive with V-NAND Technology (MZ-V7S2T0B/AM), to replace a HDD.This Samsung 970 EVO Plus M.2 is supposed to run at up to 3,500 MBps, but I'm getting only 1,700 MBps. (I've been testing the speed using CrystalDiskMark.)I put this NVMe in my Dell Optiplex 7010 Mini-Tower, which has an i3 CPU and 16GB RAM (running Win 10 Pro 64-bit v21H2) and a Q77 chipset, but no one else reports a speed problem in this context.It doesn't seem to get hot. (At least not at that speed.) So:Am I getting only 1,700 MBps (an not 3,500 MBps) because I have only PCIe Gen 2?Would I maybe get PCIe Gen 3 if I changed my i3 to an i5 or i7, and then would I get 3,500 MBps on this NVMe?By the way, there is at least one person out there who is getting 3,500 MBps on the same Optiplex 7010 PC - see article described below ** but I don't know his other specs. (And that's an interesting article.)And open to other suggestions !!!Thanks. ** I'm not permitted to post links here, so please google Tachytelic 7010 NVMe. You'll see the article title "Install and boot from an NVMe SSD on a Dell OptiPlex 3010, 7010 or 9010". Interesting article. But please let me know your thoughts on my questions 1, 2 and 3 ,
Hoggleglnzglnz I have a related question, and this is definitely the right group of knowledgeable people to help me. A couple of months ago, for my Win 10 Pro 64-bit machine, I got a SAMSUNG 970 EVO Plus SSD 2TB - M.2 NVMe Interface Internal Solid State Drive with V-NAND Technology (MZ-V7S2T0B/AM), to replace a HDD.This Samsung 970 EVO Plus M.2 is supposed to run at up to 3,500 MBps, but I'm getting only 1,700 MBps. (I've been testing the speed using CrystalDiskMark.)I put this NVMe in my Dell Optiplex 7010 Mini-Tower, which has an i3 CPU and 16GB RAM (running Win 10 Pro 64-bit v21H2) and a Q77 chipset, but no one else reports a speed problem in this context.It doesn't seem to get hot. (At least not at that speed.) So:Am I getting only 1,700 MBps (an not 3,500 MBps) because I have only PCIe Gen 2?Would I maybe get PCIe Gen 3 if I changed my i3 to an i5 or i7, and then would I get 3,500 MBps on this NVMe?By the way, there is at least one person out there who is getting 3,500 MBps on the same Optiplex 7010 PC - see article described below ** but I don't know his other specs. (And that's an interesting article.)And open to other suggestions !!!Thanks. ** I'm not permitted to post links here, so please google Tachytelic 7010 NVMe. You'll see the article title "Install and boot from an NVMe SSD on a Dell OptiPlex 3010, 7010 or 9010". Interesting article. But please let me know your thoughts on my questions 1, 2 and 3 ,The question should be do you really notice the SSD being slow? For some work you would notice the speed being double but a lot of people have trouble telling the difference between a SATA SSD and an M.2 so it's worth asking since doubling the speed from what you feel is instant is still instant.
glnzglnzrjohnson, ZoranC and Hoggle - you are all quite correct and wise that I probably don't need the higher throughput number. But I have a number of these old 7010s to convert, and others are definitely getting 3,500 MBps for them.Given your expertise, may I ask you to take another look at my questions 1, 2 and 3 above and let me have your thoughts?