HeavyHemi
Hmm...so that would be a no? I didn't ask you about your perception of people who can afford a hobby, I asked you elaborate on your reply.

Sajin

IchigoSoulReaper
If you can manage to sell your titan for $800 or more then I'd say it's worth it to swap for a 1080 Ti. You're getting a few extra frames and money back so why not?

Pretty sure nobody on this forum will buy a titan xp for $800. If you sell a titan xp on ebay for $800 you only really get $700 + you'll still have to pay for shipping the card & paying for shipping on the new 1080 ti. You're still gonna lose some cash to gain a few fps, and when I say a few I really mean 2-3 fps. Worth it when you have already owned titan xp for 7 months? No. Worth it if you need the few extra frames to beat the other guy in benchmarks, say you have the best card out, & talk smack to titan xp owners for spending $1200? Sure, if you're into that. 

CptSpig

Sajin

IchigoSoulReaper
If you can manage to sell your titan for $800 or more then I'd say it's worth it to swap for a 1080 Ti. You're getting a few extra frames and money back so why not?

Pretty sure nobody on this forum will buy a titan xp for $800. If you sell a titan xp on ebay for $800 you only really get $700 + you'll still have to pay for shipping the card & paying for shipping on the new 1080 ti. You're still gonna lose some cash to gain a few fps, and when I say a few I really mean 2-3 fps. Worth it when you have already owned titan xp for 7 months? No. Worth it if you need the few extra frames to beat the other guy in benchmarks, say you have the best card out, & talk smack to titan xp owners for spending $1200? Sure, if you're into that. 

If beating the Titan XP on future Mark was true? Look at the hall of fame the Titan XP is still King especially on the graphic scores. KingPin is the only one on top with a heavily modified 1080ti. Not something you will see on any of our machines. He could not do these modifications on the Titan XP because the boards are more complex. I think I will keep my Titan XP and maybe snag another for $800.00.

ksgnow2010
I lease my cars...get a new one every 36 months...always runs...always under warranty...don't have to pay maintenance...don't ever have to put on tires or brakes...
 
If only I could lease a GPU!   Hrm...interesting business idea...

panzlock

ksgnow2010
I lease my cars...get a new one every 36 months...always runs...always under warranty...don't have to pay maintenance...don't ever have to put on tires or brakes...
 
If only I could lease a GPU!   Hrm...interesting business idea...

You have great variety and don't have to perform maintenance. Long term you're wasting a lot of money. Great idea for the business. Not so for the consumer.

Sajin

CptSpig

Sajin

CptSpig

Sajin

IchigoSoulReaper
If you can manage to sell your titan for $800 or more then I'd say it's worth it to swap for a 1080 Ti. You're getting a few extra frames and money back so why not?

Pretty sure nobody on this forum will buy a titan xp for $800. If you sell a titan xp on ebay for $800 you only really get $700 + you'll still have to pay for shipping the card & paying for shipping on the new 1080 ti. You're still gonna lose some cash to gain a few fps, and when I say a few I really mean 2-3 fps. Worth it when you have already owned titan xp for 7 months? No. Worth it if you need the few extra frames to beat the other guy in benchmarks, say you have the best card out, & talk smack to titan xp owners for spending $1200? Sure, if you're into that. 

If beating the Titan XP on future Mark was true? Look at the hall of fame the Titan XP is still King especially on the graphic scores. KingPin is the only one on top with a heavily modified 1080ti. Not something you will see on any of our machines. He could not do these modifications on the Titan XP because the boards are more complex. I think I will keep my Titan XP and maybe snag another for $800.00.

All the people in the top 10 on 3dmark time spy could increase their scores if they were to switch to 1080 ti's without losing their current clocks that got them into the top 10. My $800 dollar comment was mostly aimed at users who are running older cards like 1080's and below.

Not true, if you look at the graphic scores the 1080ti's do not clock as high unless you modify the board or are on LN2. The 1080ti cards seem to hit a wall at about 2060 even on water. My Titan XP's core clock on water is 2152 with 675 on memory. I see some guys on Overclock.net go up to 900 MHz on memory with the Titan XP on water with reduced core clocks. The 1080ti OC very well on memory but not on the core unless on LN2. Sorry misunderstood your $800.00 comment.

It's true. http://www.3dmark.com/com../fs/11963509/fs/9908829

CptSpig

Sajin

CptSpig
 
That's a pour example to many variables with 4-cards. Look at my example in the last post much better. The video you posted at the beginning of this thread is with stock coolers and the Titan XP had a better Fire Strike score. Put both cards on water and you will see different results throughout all his bench marks. Look at this result. http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/11963509/fs/11826725

Good example, but wintermagic's system is clocked 200MHz faster on the CPU which is making all the difference.

But that's my point the Titan XP will clock higher than the 1080ti in most cases.

CptSpig

Sajin
Your system is also overclocked 400MHz faster than st.strecker's rig.
 
http://www.3dmark.com/com...s/11486413/fs/12043726

Yes but he has a 6950x compared to my 5930K and his Physics score is better. You know 6th gen processors will not over clock as high as 5th gen. I thought we were looking at the graphic scores.
The processor has no impact in Fire Strike on graphics scores unlike Time Spy.

Sajin

CptSpig

Sajin
Your system is also overclocked 400MHz faster than st.strecker's rig.
 
http://www.3dmark.com/com...s/11486413/fs/12043726

Yes but he has a 6950x compared to my 5930K and his Physics score is better. You know 6th gen processors will not over clock as high as 5th gen. I thought we were looking at the graphic scores.
The processor has no impact in Fire Strike on graphics scores unlike Time Spy.

I am looking at the graphics score. I'm telling you why you're winning. CPU & GPU clock speeds are king when it comes to 3dmark fire strike.

Sajin

CptSpig

Sajin

CptSpig

Sajin
Your system is also overclocked 400MHz faster than st.strecker's rig.
 
http://www.3dmark.com/com...s/11486413/fs/12043726

Yes but he has a 6950x compared to my 5930K and his Physics score is better. You know 6th gen processors will not over clock as high as 5th gen. I thought we were looking at the graphic scores.
The processor has no impact in Fire Strike on graphics scores unlike Time Spy.

I am looking at the graphics score. I'm telling you why you're winning. CPU & GPU clock speeds are king when it comes to 3dmark fire strike.

I am not winning you just can't admit when your wrong. No worries it's been fun, time to move on to another topic.

You're clearly winning when comparing graphics scores only. Maybe I am wrong, but I don't think I am. If I owned a 1080 ti I would post the results between 1080 ti and titan xp. Have a good one. 

CptSpig

Sajin

CptSpig

Sajin

CptSpig

Sajin
Your system is also overclocked 400MHz faster than st.strecker's rig.
 
http://www.3dmark.com/com...s/11486413/fs/12043726

Yes but he has a 6950x compared to my 5930K and his Physics score is better. You know 6th gen processors will not over clock as high as 5th gen. I thought we were looking at the graphic scores.
The processor has no impact in Fire Strike on graphics scores unlike Time Spy.

I am looking at the graphics score. I'm telling you why you're winning. CPU & GPU clock speeds are king when it comes to 3dmark fire strike.

I am not winning you just can't admit when your wrong. No worries it's been fun, time to move on to another topic.

You're clearly winning when comparing graphics scores only. Maybe I am wrong, but I don't think I am. If I owned a 1080 ti I would post the results between 1080 ti and titan xp. Have a good one. 

Last post....maybe.  If you are comparing the same hardware. you my friend are trying to compare a 6950x to a 5930k the 6050x will always kill my 5930k. Even though my processor is clocked higher his physics scores still beat mine. You can't compare 6 cores to 10 cores when bench marking. Like I said Fire Strike is one bench mark that the processor does not impact the graphics. You are still my favorite Moderator!

CptSpig

Sajin

CptSpig
 
Last post....maybe.  If you are comparing the same hardware. you my friend are trying to compare a 6950x to a 5930k the 6050x will always kill my 5930k. Even though my processor is clocked higher his physics scores still beat mine. You can't compare 6 cores to 10 cores when bench marking. Like I said Fire Strike is one bench mark that the processor does not impact the graphics. You are still my favorite Moderator! 

Last post? I doubt it. 
 
You're right again. When it comes to 3dmark physics score the 6950x will always kill the 5930k. CPU does play a role in your gpu score. Don't believe me? Go run 3dmark fire strike with your cpu @ stock speeds. 

I have to ask this question if you truly think the 1080ti is a superior card. Why don't you sell your Titan XP's and buy four 1080ti's? Or could it possibly be that Titan X Pascal just sounds better and it's all black.

Sajin

CptSpig

Sajin

CptSpig
 
Last post....maybe.  If you are comparing the same hardware. you my friend are trying to compare a 6950x to a 5930k the 6050x will always kill my 5930k. Even though my processor is clocked higher his physics scores still beat mine. You can't compare 6 cores to 10 cores when bench marking. Like I said Fire Strike is one bench mark that the processor does not impact the graphics. You are still my favorite Moderator! 

Last post? I doubt it. 
 
You're right again. When it comes to 3dmark physics score the 6950x will always kill the 5930k. CPU does play a role in your gpu score. Don't believe me? Go run 3dmark fire strike with your cpu @ stock speeds. 

I have to ask this question if you truly think the 1080ti is a superior card. Why don't you sell your Titan XP's and buy four 1080ti's? Or could it possibly be that Titan X Pascal just sounds better and it's all black.

Simple... the 2-3 fps difference over titan xp isn't worth it. I've owned my titan xp's for 7 months already. I also got both my titan xp's for $600 a piece. I'm not going to sell them just to get a 2-3 fps difference.

HeavyHemi

CptSpig

HeavyHemi

CptSpig

Sajin

CptSpig

Sajin

CptSpig

Sajin
Your system is also overclocked 400MHz faster than st.strecker's rig.
 
http://www.3dmark.com/com...s/11486413/fs/12043726

Yes but he has a 6950x compared to my 5930K and his Physics score is better. You know 6th gen processors will not over clock as high as 5th gen. I thought we were looking at the graphic scores.
The processor has no impact in Fire Strike on graphics scores unlike Time Spy.

I am looking at the graphics score. I'm telling you why you're winning. CPU & GPU clock speeds are king when it comes to 3dmark fire strike.

I am not winning you just can't admit when your wrong. No worries it's been fun, time to move on to another topic.

You're clearly winning when comparing graphics scores only. Maybe I am wrong, but I don't think I am. If I owned a 1080 ti I would post the results between 1080 ti and titan xp. Have a good one. 

Last post....maybe.  If you are comparing the same hardware. you my friend are trying to compare a 6950x to a 5930k the 6050x will always kill my 5930k. Even though my processor is clocked higher his physics scores still beat mine. You can't compare 6 cores to 10 cores when bench marking. Like I said Fire Strike is one bench mark that the processor does not impact the graphics. You are still my favorite Moderator!

That isn't strictly true. The CPU and your CPU clocks will affect your GPU scores. Not as dramatically as the raw physics score but it can be substantial none the less.
 
http://www.3dmark.com/com...s/11940791/fs/10112114

You just made my point you have again compared different CPU's. A lot of things can impact the score like the Nvidia drivers in your example one old one new. I have had scores go up 500 points with newer drivers. But thanks for the input.

Uh no...you claimed the CPU made no difference in the GPU score. You were wrong. That is my system with the comparison. So, I think I would know exactly what I am comparing and seeing. It is okay to admit to a mistake. It is not okay to deflect and then claim 'your point' (to whom and whomever is unknown) was made. That does not seem like an accurate rendition of the events....if you catch my drift.