Well I was looking at graphic cards recently and picked up a EVGA 1080 Ti sc2 and coming from 1060 6gb im getting the same fps it feels like on csgo and fortnite. MY gpu runs at 20-22% Usage And cpu 10-12% usage and only getting 120 to 170 fps sometimes with everything set to low. Just seems a little off. I downloaded and did a clean install for the driver. My setup is a Ryzen 2700x 16gb ram 3000hz and the 1080 ti.

Sorry about that well it’s 1080p 144 hz and my expectations just thought they would be a little bit higher FPS that from a 1060 6gb. I have max settings and see it go to 30% usage. Just feels weird that’s all.

Download 3DMark here:
 
https://benchmarks.ul.com/downloads/3dmark.zip
 
Run Timespy and share your result link.
 
It will help get a better view of your computer performance. CSGO is not a good benchmark.

Well here is the score   (9729) and said I had a invalid score.    And it wont let me post the link...   www .3dmark.com/   7200610      Also after testing csgo with multicore rendering on my fps goes  220-almost 300 40% Gpu usage but when its turned off im at 90-140 max with gpu usage 29%( Also tells me dedicated gpu memory 1.7/11.0GB)

ItsWolfee
Well here is the score   (9729) and said I had a invalid score.    And it wont let me post the link...   www .3dmark.com/   7200610      Also after testing csgo with multicore rendering on my fps goes  220-almost 300 40% Gpu usage but when its turned off im at 90-140 max with gpu usage 29%( Also tells me dedicated gpu memory 1.7/11.0GB)

I got a 404 error when checking that Link --->   https://www.3dmark.com/7200610
 
What OS ?---  if Win 10 Which Version & Build number
Which Nvidia Driver ?
What have you changed in Nvidia Control Panel ?
Have you set Windows to Performance Mode ?

HeavyHemi
Here's the link kids
 
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/7200610
 

thanks Gramps

Your tests are similar to my 1080tis results at this point for CS:GO and 3DMark Timespy. http://www.3dmark.com/spy/2700882

HeavyHemi
Well, don't take this wrong...but an intel processor of BW-E or newer would gain you another 15% or so.  But the main thing is you're under utilizing the GPU.  You could also use DSR, effectively doubling the resolution. That would reduce jaggies and load the GPU more. What scores do you get for 3DMark? I was just playing Mass Effect 3, with ALOT HD texture mods, 4K resolution, and 2X SGSSAA or effectively 8K and I was hardly over 40% utilization and easily over 60 FPS.

I say the fault is indeed running 1080p with this GPU, the OP is basically holding the GPU back.
Even if they had a Intel the results would be similar.
Plus its not worth switching platforms for a mere 15% for 1080p but i get it 15% is like 999% to intel fanboys wearing beer goggles.
Sure makes spending that extra $100 hurt more when the results are that small.

Have a similar setup and it seems you're getting similar results as mine now. I don't know, I think it's pretty good performance.
 
For me it just wansn't worth the absurd cost of the 20xx generation this time around. Very happy I got a 1080ti at launch for msrp and it's served me well. Don't have any games I play yet that I can't enjoy 1080p on a 144hz gsync monitor.

A 1080Ti has no problem running all games at 1080P high quality from 144fps or more

I do notice a little screen tearing on fortnite and pubg on the omen 144 monitor when I cap my fps to 144 it tears super bad.

ItsWolfee
I do notice a little screen tearing on fortnite and pubg on the omen 144 monitor when I cap my fps to 144 it tears super bad.

Turn Vsync on. Capping framerate doesn't prevent tearing. The only way to prevent tearing is for the image output buffer to be synced with the monitor. Capping the framerate doesn't sync the output buffer with the monitor.

MadmanRB

HeavyHemi
Well, don't take this wrong...but an intel processor of BW-E or newer would gain you another 15% or so.  But the main thing is you're under utilizing the GPU.  You could also use DSR, effectively doubling the resolution. That would reduce jaggies and load the GPU more. What scores do you get for 3DMark? I was just playing Mass Effect 3, with ALOT HD texture mods, 4K resolution, and 2X SGSSAA or effectively 8K and I was hardly over 40% utilization and easily over 60 FPS.

I say the fault is indeed running 1080p with this GPU, the OP is basically holding the GPU back.
Even if they had a Intel the results would be similar.
Plus its not worth switching platforms for a mere 15% for 1080p but i get it 15% is like 999% to intel fanboys wearing beer goggles.
Sure makes spending that extra $100 hurt more when the results are that small.

Actually it's more like bouncing around 55 FPS and always being over 60 FPS. That's what the extra 15% or so gets you. The same reason for overclocking both the CPU and GPU. In aggregate, I gain at least another 20-25% in FPS. Secondarily, nobody was saying he 'should switch platforms' that would be silly. If he WERE BUYING NEW, would you suggest AMD or intel for gaming?
I don't appreciate being called a fanboy or that drinking affects my ability to offer sane reliable advice. Meh, not impressed with your opinions.

Without knowing your full system specs it's hard to tell if 600W is "enough", but I'd venture to say that it's cutting it close to the max on an overclocked system. A good rated/efficient 700+W with again only knowing your cpu/gpu would be better in my opinion.
 
You can use tools such as https://www.evga.com/power-meter/ to get an idea of what's recommended.