EVGA

Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal]

Page: << < ..6789 Showing page 9 of 9
Author
zero5891
New Member
  • Total Posts : 2
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2016/07/03 07:16:58
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 06:33:45 (permalink)
'HYBRID Water Cooler (All in One) for GTX 1080 and 1070' Use possible?
CoercionShaman
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1788
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2015/04/21 17:20:44
  • Location: Augusta, Georgia
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 3
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 06:43:19 (permalink)
zero5891
'HYBRID Water Cooler (All in One) for GTX 1080 and 1070' Use possible?




As stated in other threads, Jacob announced that they are working on an AIO for the Titan X.

What use is knowledge if there is no understanding?~Stobaeus
Crimson AL
iCX Member
  • Total Posts : 434
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2014/02/26 10:32:06
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 09:29:14 (permalink)
If anyone bought a Titan X and has the Acer x34 predator I'd be interested in how it does to hit 100 fps at 3440x1440 in most game with mostly maxed settings.


richurd
New Member
  • Total Posts : 89
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2014/01/12 00:36:39
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 12:32:37 (permalink)
Crimson AL
If anyone bought a Titan X and has the Acer x34 predator I'd be interested in how it does to hit 100 fps at 3440x1440 in most game with mostly maxed settings.


I got the Asus PG348Q with 1 Titan X running about high 80 FPS in ultra setting for Division.  It is OCed to about 2k right now.  It won't hit 100 FPS unless I put it to medium.  This is tempting me to open my other Titan X and go for the 100 FPS.
 
Edit:  Added clockspeed.
Crimson AL
iCX Member
  • Total Posts : 434
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2014/02/26 10:32:06
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 12:36:01 (permalink)
did you try lowering the shadows to high, all 20 different settings that game has for shadows?
 
that's the thing if this could replace my 2x980ti's i would probably grab it and go one card but that 3440x1440@100hz is tough with one card.  But I know myself and I'd grab a second card which would go against the whole reason for getting it, lol.  The Division is a tough game on the fps too though.
 
Thanks for the info!  Any more games that you have tried?


richurd
New Member
  • Total Posts : 89
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2014/01/12 00:36:39
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 12:40:07 (permalink)
I haven't tried anything else really yet.  Just been trying to keep it stable OC right now.  Here is the Firestrike Ultra score, http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9624756.  I will probably try Rise of Tomb Raider later.
I got rid of my 1080s so I can run one card but I ordered 2 Titan X and I'm trying really hard not to install the other one.
Crimson AL
iCX Member
  • Total Posts : 434
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2014/02/26 10:32:06
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 12:41:13 (permalink)
Awesome.
 
You know if that second card is sitting there, it will be opened.  :)


pat39576
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 203
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2016/03/14 02:12:59
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 12:55:50 (permalink)
To me, Titan X isn't worth it at the price point. It is still a beastly card and looks awesome, but $1200 awesome... no. I am waiting to see a 1080ti and the mobile ones as I need a laptop and and honestly, the 1080ti is more likely to be worth it's price point than a Titan.
richurd
New Member
  • Total Posts : 89
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2014/01/12 00:36:39
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 13:20:28 (permalink)
Scarlet-Tech
Yes, and people will, because it is the Titan X and that is what they want. 95% of people buying it have no reason to, but I bet you will see the following sentence: "I bought a Titan x(p), and I am not getting the performance I expected with a (insert old Intel or any AMD cpu) . Please help!"

First.
I bought a Titan x(p), and I am not getting the performance I expected with a 2770k . Please help!
Viper453
SSC Member
  • Total Posts : 630
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/03/13 17:52:50
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 13:21:49 (permalink)
I ordered 2 but has not shipped yet I picked the cheap shipping option :(. has anyone try to sli them on a 16 lane cpu? just not sure how they would perform in 8x8 vs 16x16 could but a big bottleneck.
post edited by Viper453 - 2016/08/03 13:27:55

MIS 4090 Trio 
i9 10900K
EVGA 1600 P+
G.SKILL TridentZ Series 3200 mhz cas 14 32gb
OS drive 960 pro 2 tb
2x EVO 860 4TB 
Monitor ROG PQ32UQX / LG C2 "65
 
 
 
richurd
New Member
  • Total Posts : 89
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2014/01/12 00:36:39
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 13:24:47 (permalink)
Viper453
I ordered 2 but has not shipped yet I picked the cheap shipping option :(


I mean you're paying 2400 already, what's another 40 bucks?
 
Viper453
SSC Member
  • Total Posts : 630
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/03/13 17:52:50
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 1
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 13:31:38 (permalink)
richurd
Viper453
I ordered 2 but has not shipped yet I picked the cheap shipping option :(


I mean you're paying 2400 already, what's another 40 bucks?
 


Yeah that was not smart of me, I called but they can't change the shipment method either :(

MIS 4090 Trio 
i9 10900K
EVGA 1600 P+
G.SKILL TridentZ Series 3200 mhz cas 14 32gb
OS drive 960 pro 2 tb
2x EVO 860 4TB 
Monitor ROG PQ32UQX / LG C2 "65
 
 
 
jeppouza
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 227
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2014/09/30 13:53:18
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 13:32:46 (permalink)
richurd
Scarlet-Tech
Yes, and people will, because it is the Titan X and that is what they want. 95% of people buying it have no reason to, but I bet you will see the following sentence: "I bought a Titan x(p), and I am not getting the performance I expected with a (insert old Intel or any AMD cpu) . Please help!"

First.
I bought a Titan x(p), and I am not getting the performance I expected with a 2770k . Please help!


LOL, seriously?
 
And I was thinking in change my 5930k @ 4.8GHz to a gold sample 6950x @ 4.7GHz for a little fortune. 
jeppouza
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 227
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2014/09/30 13:53:18
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 13:37:02 (permalink)
Crimson AL
If anyone bought a Titan X and has the Acer x34 predator I'd be interested in how it does to hit 100 fps at 3440x1440 in most game with mostly maxed settings.


+1
You have taken the words from my mouth.
 
Also, with a Titan Xp single GPU solution it's possible to use Gsync+FastSync and say goodbye to that freakin' Gsync old style locking max fps to the screen refresh rate. 
nvidia could implement FastSync with SLI enabled 
ksgnow2010
iCX Member
  • Total Posts : 466
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2015/09/21 17:56:35
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 13:39:09 (permalink)
Viper453
I ordered 2 but has not shipped yet I picked the cheap shipping option :(.



Hahahahahaha - that's funny!
stalinx20
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 4977
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/01/03 08:56:23
  • Location: U.S., Michigan
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 14:31:23 (permalink)
AWK16
Do you have a Titan XP also? How do you know it's true?

 
Because I own titans since their very first launch which is the original, this is my 3rd generation I still own 3 org.Titans,  3x Titan Black currently in use and 1x Titan X in my sons rig and they all have one thing in common,  they are much more expensive compare to the  step down card  but only marginally faster e.g. Titan Black vs. 780Ti,  Titan X  vs. 980Ti. and now I'm sure will be the same thing Titan XP vs. 1080 I mean comparing the price value.
 
Considering the price different not worth at all, unless you use DP, other than that you stock with underperforming card........Period
 
When the org. Titan came out it had full DP FP64 function so I could see why the price was substantially higher and so was the Titan black, you could use the cards in different environments but ever since Titan X and now Titan XP, people don't see to grasp the fact that the very feature that made the card so special and more expensive is gone, adding extra ram (big deal) and milk you for every dollar, its plain.....  I won't even say.
 
Do you know what companies spend lots  of their money this days....yes advertising campaigns and  to make a big hype among people and it works in most cases but the reality is, after while, lots of users shooting themselves in a foot and deep in their minds they know it's a  scam and have some regrets.
 
One thing is to  have no problem on spending good amount of $ on  toys and another to to have  some common sense, I'm sorry if that sounds offensive I'm sure many people will find this rude and selfish but its the reality


I will agree with you that Titans are not necessary for consumers, at all; there's no need. Only those that are running a business for complex photography or video rendering. Those are the only 2 things I can think of. Those 2, and then bragging rights. Nevertheless, as you heard already, they're out of stock. For it being $1,200, obviously people don't care, but you can blame your idiot kids who flamed up on the 970s back in early 2015, and started that lawsuit for it being that price, plus the prices of the 1080s/1070s. LMAO, they're making Nvidia pay now for it, but consumers are paying for their damages by increasing the prices on Pascal. People in general suck.

EVGA X79 Dark
2080 Black edition
980
EVGA 1000 gold PSU (Gold)
4820K CPU
16x G-skill
Oliver2kx
New Member
  • Total Posts : 62
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2012/09/14 13:20:36
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 15:15:58 (permalink)
Hi everyone! Just finished the new titan x install and my final overclock is 1974mhz. It peak at 2000 then when I reach 75 degresit drop to 1974. Im very surprise with the power limit +120% and even at maximum overclock with +500 on memory the maximum is 117%.
 
It is crazy fast. Minimum 50% faster than my (old) Titan x.  But it does gets really hot. To maintain the overclock steady and not throtling I need to keep the fan at 90%. And it is REALY LOUD!! Like a hair dryer at 1 feet from me...
 
Im really looking for the All in One Hybrid kit from EVGA. I think it is a must for this monster!!  >:)
 
 
post edited by Oliver2kx - 2016/08/03 15:28:58
Piers123
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 204
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2016/07/23 21:31:20
  • Location: Surrey | Salzburg | Tel Aviv
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 15:36:14 (permalink)
I play games in 3840x2160 and find the 1080 to be more than suitable. My monitor (details in signature) is 60 Hz native, so I have no desire for higher frame rates. This seems like a money-grab from Big Green. And for that sort of money, I expect 16GB GDDR5X or HBM. I'd rather buy another 1080 and SLI them, but I've not seen any of the games I play use more than ~7.5 GB.
 
Too soon, Nvidia.

CPU: AMD R9 5900X
Cooling: 360mm Corsair H150i RGB Pro XT AIO
Motherboard: Asus ROG Strix B550-E
RAM: Corsair 32GB Vengeance LPX @ 3600 MHz CL18
GPU: EVGA RTX 3080 XC3 Hybrid 10GB w/ 240mm radiator 
SSD/HDD: 1 * 1TB WD Blue M.2 PCIe 3.0 NVMe | 2 * 1TB WD Blue SATA | 2 * 8TB Toshiba N300 HDD SATA 
NAS: 280TB on a 4U server
sam nelson
iCX Member
  • Total Posts : 365
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2014/01/06 21:07:07
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 9
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 16:01:37 (permalink)
not buying anything till they unlock 4/way sli and thin i don't care how much i probably got 4 of them even if 2k each lol not much more than the blacks at 1500 each were?
richurd
New Member
  • Total Posts : 89
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2014/01/12 00:36:39
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 16:08:45 (permalink)
Crimson AL
Awesome.
 
You know if that second card is sitting there, it will be opened.  :)


Okay. I gave in. Opening it and seeing how much can it OC. Wait for SLI fire strike in a bit.
20219348762341
FTW Member
  • Total Posts : 1289
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2013/12/21 21:26:25
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 2
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 16:15:37 (permalink)
Just when I though..smart thinking....finally someone with common sense 
not buying anything till they unlock 4/way sli

than you go with this
 and thin i don't care how much i probably got 4 of them even if 2k each lol not much more than the blacks at 1500 each were?
 
post edited by AWK16 - 2016/08/03 16:18:57
Crimson AL
iCX Member
  • Total Posts : 434
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2014/02/26 10:32:06
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 17:32:05 (permalink)
richurd
Crimson AL
Awesome.
 
You know if that second card is sitting there, it will be opened.  :)


Okay. I gave in. Opening it and seeing how much can it OC. Wait for SLI fire strike in a bit.



Woo Hoo!  Post some scores and your impressions.


richurd
New Member
  • Total Posts : 89
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2014/01/12 00:36:39
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/03 19:07:59 (permalink)
The score for the few benches are here.
 
http://forums.evga.com/Ti...930k-44G-m2525879.aspx
post edited by richurd - 2016/08/03 19:33:05
Iluv2raceit
SSC Member
  • Total Posts : 518
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2007/02/07 10:20:35
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 3
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/08 08:49:14 (permalink)
gridironcpj
I've made my decision: I'm just going to wait for Volta in 2017.  $1200 for only 60% over big Maxwell isn't worth it to me.


Why would you need to upgrade?  According to your sig, you mainly run UQHD (3440 x 1440) and WQHD (2560 x 1440) resolutions when gaming.  You just won't get playable frame rates with a single card @ UWQHD with some games when the settings are turned up, so SLI will be needed for those specific games (e.g. The Division, GTA V, etc).  Yes, wait for Volta - Fall 2017 earliest ;-)
Iluv2raceit
SSC Member
  • Total Posts : 518
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2007/02/07 10:20:35
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 3
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/08 09:06:21 (permalink)
You are wrong in your assessment and have missed the entire point of the Titan X.  There are in fact extreme PC gaming enthusiasts that want to be able to attain playable frame rates without having to use SLI due several side affects that come with using that technology -- namely frame rendering lag and micro stutter.  Additionally, over 50% of games scale less than favorable and a 200% gain in frame rates is extremely rare (only a couple of games).  Actual scaling when using SLI is between 10-90% depending on the specific game.  Yes, this may be an issue more with drivers or game developers (sloppy game coding = non-optimization).  Needless, even to this day SLI is not the answer to end all problems with attaining playable frame rates with demanding games at high resolutions.  Thus, enters the Titan X Pascal card.  This card out of the box is able to attain average frame rates that make even the most demanding games playable at high resolutions.  If you use a G-Sync monitor, the point is even more important to bring home here as the Titan X maintains of a minimum 30FPS frame in every single game that I have seen in every hardware review.  No, the 1080 is not even close to that mark (albeit, it is a $600-750 card - dependent upon the model variation).
 
To bring the point home, I currently own two EVGA GTX980Ti SC+ 6B cards (watercooled) in my main rig right now.  I have a Titan X Pascal in my secondary gaming rig which happens to be a mini-ITX system with room for only one graphics card.  I routinely game at UQHD and 4K resolutions on my main rig, which of course requires SLI to be enabled most of the time for those most demanding games when I turn up the settings - and still don't always attain playable frame rates @ 4K.  But until the Titan X was released, I had no way to game at those same resolutions on my mini-ITX rig.  Now I can.  In fact, in comparison to the GTX980Ti cards in SLI, the Titan X is able to maintain nearly identical frame rates at UQHD and WQHD resolutions and also maintain a noticeably higher minimum frame rate vs. GTX980Ti SLI - INCREDIBLE!  I had never imagined that the performance would be that close, but it is.  And the game play is actually smoother on my mini-ITX gaming system and NO MICRO STUTTER!  And no, the 1080 is not able to achieve playable frame rates in the vast majority of games with maxed settings at 4K.  All the hardware reviews of the 1080 vs. Titan X Pascal have proven this.
 
So even if one person finds reason to own a Titan X Pascal card, your assessment that Titan cards are not necessary is wrong - in fact there is a reason to have one (or more...lol).  Just because you don't like the price, or think that there should be some huge difference in performance increase compared to a 1080, doesn't justify your invalid opinion.  If there was no need for a card like this, then they would not have sold out of the first two batches on NVidia.com.  Clearly, Nvidia has found a larger customer pool than they had thought - or you for that matter ;-)   
post edited by Iluv2raceit - 2016/08/08 09:14:43
Iluv2raceit
SSC Member
  • Total Posts : 518
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2007/02/07 10:20:35
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 3
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/08 09:15:01 (permalink)
Piers123
I play games in 3840x2160 and find the 1080 to be more than suitable. My monitor (details in signature) is 60 Hz native, so I have no desire for higher frame rates. This seems like a money-grab from Big Green. And for that sort of money, I expect 16GB GDDR5X or HBM. I'd rather buy another 1080 and SLI them, but I've not seen any of the games I play use more than ~7.5 GB.
 
Too soon, Nvidia.


No, the 1080 is not able to achieve playable frame rates in the vast majority of games with maxed settings at 4K.  All the hardware reviews of the 1080 vs. Titan X Pascal have proven this.
Piers123
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 204
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2016/07/23 21:31:20
  • Location: Surrey | Salzburg | Tel Aviv
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/09 11:07:37 (permalink)
Iluv2raceit
Piers123
I play games in 3840x2160 and find the 1080 to be more than suitable. My monitor (details in signature) is 60 Hz native, so I have no desire for higher frame rates. This seems like a money-grab from Big Green. And for that sort of money, I expect 16GB GDDR5X or HBM. I'd rather buy another 1080 and SLI them, but I've not seen any of the games I play use more than ~7.5 GB.
 
Too soon, Nvidia.


No, the 1080 is not able to achieve playable frame rates in the vast majority of games with maxed settings at 4K.  All the hardware reviews of the 1080 vs. Titan X Pascal have proven this.




In the games I play, I've found the 1080 to manage 55-60 FPS in nearly every scene with a mixture of high and ultra settings at 3840x2160. It's actually quite impressive!

CPU: AMD R9 5900X
Cooling: 360mm Corsair H150i RGB Pro XT AIO
Motherboard: Asus ROG Strix B550-E
RAM: Corsair 32GB Vengeance LPX @ 3600 MHz CL18
GPU: EVGA RTX 3080 XC3 Hybrid 10GB w/ 240mm radiator 
SSD/HDD: 1 * 1TB WD Blue M.2 PCIe 3.0 NVMe | 2 * 1TB WD Blue SATA | 2 * 8TB Toshiba N300 HDD SATA 
NAS: 280TB on a 4U server
stalinx20
CLASSIFIED Member
  • Total Posts : 4977
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/01/03 08:56:23
  • Location: U.S., Michigan
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/09 17:54:02 (permalink)
Piers123
Iluv2raceit
Piers123
I play games in 3840x2160 and find the 1080 to be more than suitable. My monitor (details in signature) is 60 Hz native, so I have no desire for higher frame rates. This seems like a money-grab from Big Green. And for that sort of money, I expect 16GB GDDR5X or HBM. I'd rather buy another 1080 and SLI them, but I've not seen any of the games I play use more than ~7.5 GB.
 
Too soon, Nvidia.


No, the 1080 is not able to achieve playable frame rates in the vast majority of games with maxed settings at 4K.  All the hardware reviews of the 1080 vs. Titan X Pascal have proven this.




In the games I play, I've found the 1080 to manage 55-60 FPS in nearly every scene with a mixture of high and ultra settings at 3840x2160. It's actually quite impressive!


Iluv2racit's point was you cannot max out most games on 4K and achieve "playable" frame rates, with maxed settings. That includes maxing out AA. You won't even get 50FPS using a single 1080.
 
Edit: However, you don't need max AA to have a nice image at 4K. Totally useless and redundant. So, a single 1080 should be fine at 4K to achieve 60fps. Some settings will, though, need to be adjusted to get 60fps.
post edited by stalinx20 - 2016/08/09 18:09:07

EVGA X79 Dark
2080 Black edition
980
EVGA 1000 gold PSU (Gold)
4820K CPU
16x G-skill
Piers123
Superclocked Member
  • Total Posts : 204
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2016/07/23 21:31:20
  • Location: Surrey | Salzburg | Tel Aviv
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 0
Re: Jen-Hsun introduces the new NVIDIA TITANX [Pascal] 2016/08/09 19:43:23 (permalink)
stalinx20
Piers123
Iluv2raceit
Piers123
I play games in 3840x2160 and find the 1080 to be more than suitable. My monitor (details in signature) is 60 Hz native, so I have no desire for higher frame rates. This seems like a money-grab from Big Green. And for that sort of money, I expect 16GB GDDR5X or HBM. I'd rather buy another 1080 and SLI them, but I've not seen any of the games I play use more than ~7.5 GB.
 
Too soon, Nvidia.


No, the 1080 is not able to achieve playable frame rates in the vast majority of games with maxed settings at 4K.  All the hardware reviews of the 1080 vs. Titan X Pascal have proven this.




In the games I play, I've found the 1080 to manage 55-60 FPS in nearly every scene with a mixture of high and ultra settings at 3840x2160. It's actually quite impressive!


Iluv2racit's point was you cannot max out most games on 4K and achieve "playable" frame rates, with maxed settings. That includes maxing out AA. You won't even get 50FPS using a single 1080.
 
Edit: However, you don't need max AA to have a nice image at 4K. Totally useless and redundant. So, a single 1080 should be fine at 4K to achieve 60fps. Some settings will, though, need to be adjusted to get 60fps.




That's my entire point.
 
I use a mixture of high and ultra settings for games. I disable AA as there's very little point using it at a resolution of 3840x2160. With that combination, and no AA, I find the 1080 (with an overclock up to ~2120 core) to be suitable to achieve a stable frame rate in the games I play. That doesn't mean SLI isn't needed for games other people play, but most of those appear to involve dragons, magic, big swords, and other such fantasy content I'm not a fan of. I also dislike Game of Thrones for the same reason.
 
Edit: Here are my result for a few benchmarks and Fallout 4 results.
post edited by Piers123 - 2016/08/09 19:57:04

CPU: AMD R9 5900X
Cooling: 360mm Corsair H150i RGB Pro XT AIO
Motherboard: Asus ROG Strix B550-E
RAM: Corsair 32GB Vengeance LPX @ 3600 MHz CL18
GPU: EVGA RTX 3080 XC3 Hybrid 10GB w/ 240mm radiator 
SSD/HDD: 1 * 1TB WD Blue M.2 PCIe 3.0 NVMe | 2 * 1TB WD Blue SATA | 2 * 8TB Toshiba N300 HDD SATA 
NAS: 280TB on a 4U server
Page: << < ..6789 Showing page 9 of 9
Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile