SmookinJoe
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1345
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/11/15 15:59:33
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 4
I have no idea why but my output today is lower than usual. No stalled sends, on either computer, today when I got home. Basement nice and toasty..lol Even the last threat disappeared  BUT I only produced...  Don't know why, were WU's longer and harder today?
Attached Image(s)
|
ipkha
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 2308
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/02/10 21:01:40
- Location: Indiana
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 6
Re: PPD seems low
2020/04/27 21:01:40
(permalink)
Yes, long WUs with a new Core22 version.
Better utilization of the GPU cores.
|
SmookinJoe
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1345
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/11/15 15:59:33
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 4
Re: PPD seems low
2020/04/27 21:29:59
(permalink)
ipkha
Yes, long WUs with a new Core22 version.
Better utilization of the GPU cores.
So I wasn't imagining it and it isn't just me then.. 
|
Jayrock
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 165
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2008/06/20 03:06:06
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 5
Re: PPD seems low
2020/04/28 03:01:06
(permalink)
My estimated in the client has gone down with these new 22's. However, I'm getting more consistent work.
|
GP300
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 165
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2013/01/09 18:12:44
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: PPD seems low
2020/04/28 08:26:52
(permalink)
I noticed my new setup is using Core 22 version 0.0.5 whereas the systems I already had setup are using 0.0.2
Should I reinstall on the other systems to utilize 0.0.5 ?
  Please register your products with my code and don't forget to upload your invoice, Thanks! VUUI8XCYCI 
|
Cool GTX
EVGA Forum Moderator
- Total Posts : 31001
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2010/12/12 14:22:25
- Location: Folding for the Greater Good
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 122
Re: PPD seems low
2020/04/28 08:32:56
(permalink)
All WU are different ... it is the sandbox we play in Yes my PPD has dropped the last several days. Though from time to time I see a Slot, stuck - upload attempt 14 ... it does not explain the current drop in Rewards I have Not tried this; however, bcavnaugh - wrote a very nice how to : Client Monitoring Application for the Folding@Home with HFM.NET  I'm not sure it is compatible with the newest Client that has recently launched ---> It was a good tracker
|
GP300
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 165
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2013/01/09 18:12:44
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: PPD seems low
2020/04/28 11:10:44
(permalink)
Just set HFM.net up on my laptop to monitor my 4 rigs and it was super easy since I'm only concerned with LAN connection. Works with 7.6.11 & 7.6.12 clients, not sure about earlier ones Downloaded newest version released on March 23rd, 2020 from https://github.com/harlam357/hfm-net
Please register your products with my code and don't forget to upload your invoice, Thanks! VUUI8XCYCI
|
ipkha
CLASSIFIED Member
- Total Posts : 2308
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2015/02/10 21:01:40
- Location: Indiana
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 6
Re: PPD seems low
2020/04/28 14:22:43
(permalink)
Hfm.net has minor issues with the latest client, but still reports the basics just fine. There is a planned update to hfm.net to adjust.
|
ProDigit
iCX Member
- Total Posts : 465
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/02/20 14:04:37
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 4
Re: PPD seems low
2020/04/29 15:37:03
(permalink)
If it's the case you're running mentioned in the pm, it's probably due to the pcie x1 limitation,
Which is why I would never go with a mining board for folding.
|
SmookinJoe
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1345
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/11/15 15:59:33
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 4
Re: PPD seems low
2020/04/29 17:28:52
(permalink)
I explained that the board is 16X at the moment and when I start using all 4 slots it will be 8X
|
STR1D3R_2
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1431
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2017/09/15 16:13:53
- Location: Hudson Valley NY
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 13
Re: PPD seems low
2020/04/29 17:50:27
(permalink)
SmookinJoe
I explained that the board is 16X at the moment and when I start using all 4 slots it will be 8X
Are your cards plugged directly into the pci slots on the mobo currently ? or are you using extensions? risers?
  Affiliate code E1HEL4HYPS
|
SmookinJoe
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1345
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/11/15 15:59:33
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 4
Re: PPD seems low
2020/04/29 18:37:05
(permalink)
Everything is direct... I haven't gotten the Rosewill's yet. (they are sitting south of the border, I ordered flat 90 degree 30cm risers and I will need to extend them) It is the same setup I had before. Two gpu's on two different mobo's I just think the WU's themselves are larger and take allot of time to do ... Some seemed to credit less as well Just whining...lol The estimates of PPD have been less than 2mill for 2 gpu's and just lately they have been creeping back up to 2.4 ish ppd.
post edited by SmookinJoe - 2020/04/29 19:20:23
|
GP300
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 165
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2013/01/09 18:12:44
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: PPD seems low
2020/04/29 19:10:32
(permalink)
Having issues with 16435 on 2060KO, only showing 577K PPD whereas it's normally 1.1-1.3M PPD.
I took a look at the system and it's running all out for 5 sec and then GPU goes way down for 5 sec.
Also, it's running on Core 22 0.0.5
Please register your products with my code and don't forget to upload your invoice, Thanks! VUUI8XCYCI
|
SmookinJoe
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1345
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/11/15 15:59:33
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 4
Re: PPD seems low
2020/04/29 20:22:39
(permalink)
GP300
Having issues with 16435 on 2060KO, only showing 577K PPD whereas it's normally 1.1-1.3M PPD.
I took a look at the system and it's running all out for 5 sec and then GPU goes way down for 5 sec.
Also, it's running on Core 22 0.0.5
Is the beta flag on? I actually had one of my gpu's running at less than 50% on one of the test WU's.. Today I came home and couple of gpu's were READY... Each gpu is NOW beta flagged and the global setting is NOW Advanced.. We will see how things improve...or not..lol
|
GP300
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 165
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2013/01/09 18:12:44
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: PPD seems low
2020/04/30 04:32:01
(permalink)
SmookinJoe
GP300
Having issues with 16435 on 2060KO, only showing 577K PPD whereas it's normally 1.1-1.3M PPD.
I took a look at the system and it's running all out for 5 sec and then GPU goes way down for 5 sec.
Also, it's running on Core 22 0.0.5
Is the beta flag on?
I actually had one of my gpu's running at less than 50% on one of the test WU's..
Today I came home and couple of gpu's were READY...
Each gpu is NOW beta flagged and the global setting is NOW Advanced..
We will see how things improve...or not..lol
Not on beta or advanced flag. Only system that is running on 0.0.5 Core 22 though. It is the older Phenom X6 system though, too.
Please register your products with my code and don't forget to upload your invoice, Thanks! VUUI8XCYCI
|
GP300
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 165
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2013/01/09 18:12:44
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: PPD seems low
2020/04/30 10:19:26
(permalink)
Having issue with another WU on same computer. WU is 14438 and it will be at 92-93% utilization for 2min30sec then go to 0% for 30sec. Any ideas what it might be? Having issues with yet another WU 16435 Here's what GPU-Z & Afterburner are showing when this happens...any ideas? It's killing PPD 
post edited by GP300 - 2020/04/30 14:27:33
Attached Image(s)
Please register your products with my code and don't forget to upload your invoice, Thanks! VUUI8XCYCI
|
SmookinJoe
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1345
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/11/15 15:59:33
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 4
Re: PPD seems low
2020/05/01 19:15:38
(permalink)
Out in left field here...
Have you exempted the Fahclient and all it's sub directories from your antivirus?
|
GP300
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 165
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2013/01/09 18:12:44
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: PPD seems low
2020/05/02 05:44:19
(permalink)
Not running any additional antivirus other than Win10 built-in
Please register your products with my code and don't forget to upload your invoice, Thanks! VUUI8XCYCI
|
SmookinJoe
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1345
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2019/11/15 15:59:33
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 4
Re: PPD seems low
2020/05/02 10:09:13
(permalink)
|
GP300
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 165
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2013/01/09 18:12:44
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
|
STR1D3R_2
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1431
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2017/09/15 16:13:53
- Location: Hudson Valley NY
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 13
Re: PPD seems low
2020/05/02 14:09:00
(permalink)
Was just about to suggest you dual boot with Linux. Be cautious of dual boot if you are running a raid array. Not sure if it is still an issue But I have had issues where I had windows on my C drive which was a striped set of ssd's and dual booted with Linux on another drive. Linux ended up needing a bit of room and borrowed a portion of one of the C disks. It took a bit of work to get windows to open again. That was 2 years ago or more.
I am (still) currently undergoing a major relocation process of my Linux rigs and tossed my best gpu's into my 2 windows rigs, the PPD difference is almost sickening.
Affiliate code E1HEL4HYPS
|
GP300
Superclocked Member
- Total Posts : 165
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2013/01/09 18:12:44
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 0
Re: PPD seems low
2020/05/02 14:25:57
(permalink)
STR1D3R_2
Was just about to suggest you dual boot with Linux. Be cautious of dual boot if you are running a raid array. Not sure if it is still an issue But I have had issues where I had windows on my C drive which was a striped set of ssd's and dual booted with Linux on another drive. Linux ended up needing a bit of room and borrowed a portion of one of the C disks. It took a bit of work to get windows to open again. That was 2 years ago or more.
I am (still) currently undergoing a major relocation process of my Linux rigs and tossed my best gpu's into my 2 windows rigs, the PPD difference is almost sickening.
What kind of difference in ppd are you seeing? I was only getting about 800K ppd on Win10 and I've seen 1.1-1.2M ppd on the 1st couple WUs on Linux!
Please register your products with my code and don't forget to upload your invoice, Thanks! VUUI8XCYCI
|
STR1D3R_2
FTW Member
- Total Posts : 1431
- Reward points : 0
- Joined: 2017/09/15 16:13:53
- Location: Hudson Valley NY
- Status: offline
- Ribbons : 13
Re: PPD seems low
2020/05/02 14:38:45
(permalink)
Let me make sure I state this correctly, by sickening I do mean I nearly want to vomit. l o l 2 1070's on my mint rig were averaging 1.6 to 1.9 million ppd (combined) occasionally over 2mil on Win7 they are getting (best I've seen) 1 to 1.1 million ppd (combined) occasionally much less I do have a 3rd 1070sc currently not installed My 1080ti was 1.2 to 1.9 on Linux (have seen 2.2 mil) It's now in a Win10 rig getting between 800k to 1.4 mil depending on wu 1080sc was at 800k to 1.6 on Linux now in win 10 rig running 580 to 790k Looking forward to getting my open air Linux rigs mounted to the wall and tossing those back in. Also have a 2060ko ultra in route but delayed due to "conditions beyond our control" (UPS). My 5 1060's are cleaned up and ready, may part with them or toss them at some crunching, undecided. They ave 450k in Linux and 325k to 400k in win7
post edited by STR1D3R_2 - 2020/05/02 14:52:27
Affiliate code E1HEL4HYPS
|