EVGA

Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome...

Author
GTXJackBauer
Omnipotent Enthusiast
  • Total Posts : 10323
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2010/04/19 22:23:25
  • Location: (EVGA Discount) Associate Code : LMD3DNZM9LGK8GJ
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons : 48
2018/06/18 02:34:43 (permalink)
Just a while ago the first 4K 144 Hz monitors became available with the ASUS PG27UQ and Acer X27. These $2,000 monitors no longer force gamers to pick between high-refresh rate or high resolution, since they support 3840x2160 and refresh rates up to 144 Hz. However, reviews of early-adopters report a noticeable degradation in image quality when these monitors are running at 144 Hz. Surprisingly refresh rates of 120 Hz and below look perfectly sharp.
 
The underlying reason for that is the DisplayPort 1.4 interface, which provides 26 Gbits/s of bandwidth, just enough for full 4K at 120 Hz. So monitor vendors had to get creative to achieve the magic 144 Hz that they were shooting for. The solution comes from old television technology in form of chroma subsampling (YCbCr), which, in the case of these monitors, transmits the grayscale portion of the image at full resolution (3840x2160) and the color information at half the horizontal resolution (1920x2160). - Techpowerup


Source

 Use this Associate Code at your checkouts or follow these instructions for Up to 10% OFF on all your EVGA purchases:
LMD3DNZM9LGK8GJ
#1

25 Replies Related Threads

    bdary
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 10337
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/04/25 14:08:16
    • Location: Florida
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 116
    Re: Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/18 06:45:01 (permalink)
    Interesting info here.  A bit underhanded if it really wasn't disclosed to consumers up front.


     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    #2
    the_Scarlet_one
    formerly Scarlet-tech
    • Total Posts : 24581
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2013/11/13 02:48:57
    • Location: East Coast
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 79
    Re: Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/18 06:52:27 (permalink)
    Early adopters get the early problems.

    120hz versus 144hz really isnt that bog of a jump anyway. May as well stick to 120hz for the perfect resolution to refresh rate mix.
    #3
    Cool GTX
    EVGA Forum Moderator
    • Total Posts : 31001
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/12/12 14:22:25
    • Location: Folding for the Greater Good
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 122
    Re: Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/18 07:11:49 (permalink)
    another case of Marketing not clearly defining/ understanding the engineering when making the sales pitch

    Learn your way around the EVGA Forums, Rules & limits on new accounts Ultimate Self-Starter Thread For New Members

    I am a Volunteer Moderator - not an EVGA employee

    https://foldingathome.org -->become a citizen scientist and contribute your compute power to help fight global health threats

    RTX Project EVGA X99 FTWK Nibbler EVGA X99 Classified EVGA 3080Ti FTW3 Ultra


    #4
    bdary
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 10337
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/04/25 14:08:16
    • Location: Florida
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 116
    Re: Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/18 07:44:04 (permalink)
    the_Scarlet_one
    Early adopters get the early problems.

    120hz versus 144hz really isnt that bog of a jump anyway. May as well stick to 120hz for the perfect resolution to refresh rate mix.

    Personally, I wouldn't care if the specs for these displays were for 120Hz max if that's what I thought I was buying.  But the specs should be accurate so consumers don't feel cheated.
     
    Reminds me of the Nvidia 970 debacle.
     


     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    #5
    the_Scarlet_one
    formerly Scarlet-tech
    • Total Posts : 24581
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2013/11/13 02:48:57
    • Location: East Coast
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 79
    Re: Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/18 08:05:46 (permalink)
    Oh yeah, they should be accuracte, i dont disagree there at all. But this, again, is an early adopter issue. People shouldnt jump on every single piece of new tech right away.
    #6
    GTXJackBauer
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 10323
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/04/19 22:23:25
    • Location: (EVGA Discount) Associate Code : LMD3DNZM9LGK8GJ
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 48
    Re: Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/18 09:53:23 (permalink)
    Maybe they wanted the $2000 price tag because if they had stepped back and were truthful, they'd feel they can't have that rip off price tag anymore.  Who knows....This is ridiculous nonetheless.

     Use this Associate Code at your checkouts or follow these instructions for Up to 10% OFF on all your EVGA purchases:
    LMD3DNZM9LGK8GJ
    #7
    rjohnson11
    EVGA Forum Moderator
    • Total Posts : 102300
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2004/10/05 12:44:35
    • Location: Netherlands
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 84
    Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/18 10:23:18 (permalink)
    https://www.techpowerup.c...rry-chroma-subsampling
     
    It looks like the 4K 144hertz monitor manufacturers had to become creative at refresh rates above 120hertz. Display port 1.4 supports 120 hertz. That is the max. The solution comes from old television technology in form of chroma subsampling (YCbCr), which, in the case of these monitors, transmits the grayscale portion of the image at full resolution (3840x2160) and the color information at half the horizontal resolution (1920x2160). This is why the image might be slightly blurry at frequencies above 120 hertz. Personally I feel the manufacturers should have just stuck to 120hertz refresh rate.
     

    post edited by Sajin - 2018/06/18 19:06:55

    AMD Ryzen 9 7950X,  Corsair Mp700 Pro M.2, 64GB Corsair Dominator Titanium DDR5  X670E Steel Legend, MSI RTX 4090 Associate Code: H5U80QBH6BH0AXF. I am NOT an employee of EVGA

    #8
    bdary
    Omnipotent Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 10337
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/04/25 14:08:16
    • Location: Florida
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 116
    Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/18 10:29:47 (permalink)
    Already a thread on this >
     
    https://forums.evga.com/Looks-like-these-shiny-new-4K-144-Hz-monitors-arent-all-that-awesome-m2830154.aspx
     
    post edited by Sajin - 2018/06/18 19:07:08


     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    #9
    Sajin
    EVGA Forum Moderator
    • Total Posts : 49168
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
    • Location: Texas, USA.
    • Status: online
    • Ribbons : 199
    Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/18 13:24:39 (permalink)
    I own a predator x27. Blacks don't get crushed in HDR games when using 4:2:2 10-bit color to achieve 144Hz. For SDR games 120Hz 8-bit color is best unless you want to run 98Hz to achieve 10-bit color. HDR also works with 8-bit color, so you could leave it at 120Hz RGB FULL 8-bit for both SDR & HDR games.
    post edited by Sajin - 2018/06/18 19:07:18
    #10
    the_Scarlet_one
    formerly Scarlet-tech
    • Total Posts : 24581
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2013/11/13 02:48:57
    • Location: East Coast
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 79
    Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/18 15:18:43 (permalink)
    bdary
    Already a thread on this >
     
    https://forums.evga.com/Looks-like-these-shiny-new-4K-144-Hz-monitors-arent-all-that-awesome-m2830154.aspx
     


    I reported your post to show the thread is a duplicate since Mod posts are not able to be reported. Hopefully they combine thw two threads, or lock this one since the other was already established.
    post edited by Sajin - 2018/06/18 19:07:29
    #11
    fergusonll
    FTW Member
    • Total Posts : 1686
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2013/02/21 09:49:10
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 3
    Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/18 18:27:15 (permalink)
    Glad I'm a big believer that 27" is too small for 4k otherwise I might've shelled out the 2k, NOT
    post edited by Sajin - 2018/06/18 19:07:48
    #12
    Sajin
    EVGA Forum Moderator
    • Total Posts : 49168
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
    • Location: Texas, USA.
    • Status: online
    • Ribbons : 199
    Re: Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/18 19:08:08 (permalink)
    Threads have been merged.
    #13
    z999z3mystorys
    CLASSIFIED Member
    • Total Posts : 4480
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/11/29 06:46:22
    • Location: at my current location
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 23
    Re: Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/18 19:34:30 (permalink)
    reminds me of the early 4k monitors, where you had to use either MST to pretend it was two different monitors, then fuse it together, or downgrade the color information to get it to run at 60 hz.
     
    that said, I don't see a problem myself with running at 120hz over 144hz, I'm still using a 60hz UHD monitor and it's quite doable for my uses (not playing any twitch/fast reaction time games)
     
    that said, they could have advertised "120-144 hz*" with the asertisk there, then mention the color downgrade at 144hz.
    #14
    veganfanatic
    CLASSIFIED Member
    • Total Posts : 2119
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2015/06/20 18:08:41
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re: Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/18 20:19:29 (permalink)
    my IPS 1920x1080 is a lot easier on the pesos to play games on

      


    Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition + Corsair AX1600i PSU
    My desktop uses the ThinkVision 31.5 inch P32p-20 Monitor.
    My sound system is the Edifier B1700BT
    #15
    09973
    iCX Member
    • Total Posts : 474
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/01/10 11:05:19
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 2
    Re: Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/18 22:33:40 (permalink)
    I was wondering where the compromise would be to "overclock" to 144Hz since DP1.4 would not be up to the task. 120Hz to 144Hz, we can all do that math.... its a few more frames but does not matter too much like everyone here says. If this is the only "issue" which is a questionable bit of marketing, then I consider the new monitors a success.

    As long as your popular enough, you can get away with anything.
    #16
    Hoggle
    EVGA Forum Moderator
    • Total Posts : 10102
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2003/10/13 22:10:45
    • Location: Eugene, OR
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 4
    Re: Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/18 22:37:24 (permalink)
    I feel 120hz is pretty good for gaming and kind of am not auprised to hear about an issue. The good news is it gets better from here on out as the first generation issues are worked out.

    Use an Associates Code & SAVE 5% - 10% on your purchase. Just click on the associates banner to save, or enter the associates code at checkout on your next purchase. If you choose to use my code I want to personally say "Thank You" for using it. 
     
     
    #17
    rjohnson11
    EVGA Forum Moderator
    • Total Posts : 102300
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2004/10/05 12:44:35
    • Location: Netherlands
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 84
    Re: Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/18 22:55:36 (permalink)
    Sajin
    Threads have been merged.


    Thanks for the merge

    AMD Ryzen 9 7950X,  Corsair Mp700 Pro M.2, 64GB Corsair Dominator Titanium DDR5  X670E Steel Legend, MSI RTX 4090 Associate Code: H5U80QBH6BH0AXF. I am NOT an employee of EVGA

    #18
    Sajin
    EVGA Forum Moderator
    • Total Posts : 49168
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
    • Location: Texas, USA.
    • Status: online
    • Ribbons : 199
    Re: Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/18 22:58:41 (permalink)
    No problem.
    #19
    boylerya
    FTW Member
    • Total Posts : 1910
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/11/23 19:18:00
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/19 01:46:04 (permalink)
    GTXJackBauer
    Just a while ago the first 4K 144 Hz monitors became available with the ASUS PG27UQ and Acer X27. These $2,000 monitors no longer force gamers to pick between high-refresh rate or high resolution, since they support 3840x2160 and refresh rates up to 144 Hz. However, reviews of early-adopters report a noticeable degradation in image quality when these monitors are running at 144 Hz. Surprisingly refresh rates of 120 Hz and below look perfectly sharp.
     
    The underlying reason for that is the DisplayPort 1.4 interface, which provides 26 Gbits/s of bandwidth, just enough for full 4K at 120 Hz. So monitor vendors had to get creative to achieve the magic 144 Hz that they were shooting for. The solution comes from old television technology in form of chroma subsampling (YCbCr), which, in the case of these monitors, transmits the grayscale portion of the image at full resolution (3840x2160) and the color information at half the horizontal resolution (1920x2160). - Techpowerup


    Source


    I inputted the bandwidth of the display at 120Hz with 10 bit color depth at 3840x2160 and the calculated result is 35.83Gbps according to http://k.kramerav.com/support/bwcalculator.asp
    If the max bandwidth of DP1.4 is 26 Gbits/s then these settings are above the limits of DP1.4 despite what is being stated, but I clearly see the settings at 4K over DP1.4 being 120Hz from various sources although the color depth isnt specified....  The display would need to have a maximum refresh rate limit of 87Hz to stay within the max bandwidth of DP1.4 if it is 26Gbps/s.  Anyone want to point out where the error is in all this?
    post edited by boylerya - 2018/06/19 01:56:11

    United We Stand...Six Feet Apart.
    Beware Vitamin A Palmitate found in products such as 2%, 1% or Skim Milk: government research
    Garlic is the Antichrist.
    #20
    Sajin
    EVGA Forum Moderator
    • Total Posts : 49168
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
    • Location: Texas, USA.
    • Status: online
    • Ribbons : 199
    Re: Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/19 10:43:55 (permalink)
    boylerya
    GTXJackBauer
    Just a while ago the first 4K 144 Hz monitors became available with the ASUS PG27UQ and Acer X27. These $2,000 monitors no longer force gamers to pick between high-refresh rate or high resolution, since they support 3840x2160 and refresh rates up to 144 Hz. However, reviews of early-adopters report a noticeable degradation in image quality when these monitors are running at 144 Hz. Surprisingly refresh rates of 120 Hz and below look perfectly sharp.
     
    The underlying reason for that is the DisplayPort 1.4 interface, which provides 26 Gbits/s of bandwidth, just enough for full 4K at 120 Hz. So monitor vendors had to get creative to achieve the magic 144 Hz that they were shooting for. The solution comes from old television technology in form of chroma subsampling (YCbCr), which, in the case of these monitors, transmits the grayscale portion of the image at full resolution (3840x2160) and the color information at half the horizontal resolution (1920x2160). - Techpowerup


    Source


    I inputted the bandwidth of the display at 120Hz with 10 bit color depth at 3840x2160 and the calculated result is 35.83Gbps according to http://k.kramerav.com/support/bwcalculator.asp
    If the max bandwidth of DP1.4 is 26 Gbits/s then these settings are above the limits of DP1.4 despite what is being stated, but I clearly see the settings at 4K over DP1.4 being 120Hz from various sources although the color depth isnt specified....  The display would need to have a maximum refresh rate limit of 87Hz to stay within the max bandwidth of DP1.4 if it is 26Gbps/s.  Anyone want to point out where the error is in all this?


    HBR3 mode allows 32.4 Gbits/s.
    #21
    transdogmifier
    CLASSIFIED ULTRA Member
    • Total Posts : 6116
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2003/09/05 14:26:21
    • Location: Orlando, Fl
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 17
    Re: Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/19 10:50:53 (permalink)
    Well, I'm not paying 2k for it then...Will wait until a true 144Hz monitor comes out..which is...when? ;)
     

    AMD Ryzen 7900x3d
    Deepcool LT720
    Gigabyte Aorus Elite AX X670 (Might change..don't like this board)
    eVGA GeForce RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra Gaming (Hybrid kit on it)
    Asus ROG Swift PG43UQ 4k Monitor
    eVGA 1600W Supernova T2 PSU
    32GB Kingston 6000 DDR5 (2x16GB) Fury
    Corsair MP600 Pro 2TB (Boot)
    Corsair MP600 2TB (Games/Data)
    Phanteks P500A Case
     
    #22
    Viper453
    SSC Member
    • Total Posts : 630
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2012/03/13 17:52:50
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 1
    Re: Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/19 14:49:05 (permalink)
    GTX 1180 16gb 2x + P27x = 5k :(

    MIS 4090 Trio 
    i9 10900K
    EVGA 1600 P+
    G.SKILL TridentZ Series 3200 mhz cas 14 32gb
    OS drive 960 pro 2 tb
    2x EVO 860 4TB 
    Monitor ROG PQ32UQX / LG C2 "65
     
     
     
    #23
    Sajin
    EVGA Forum Moderator
    • Total Posts : 49168
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
    • Location: Texas, USA.
    • Status: online
    • Ribbons : 199
    Re: Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/19 14:50:10 (permalink)
    The 1180 better not cost $1500.
    #24
    boylerya
    FTW Member
    • Total Posts : 1910
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2008/11/23 19:18:00
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons : 0
    Re: Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/19 15:12:16 (permalink)
    Sajin
    boylerya
    GTXJackBauer
    Just a while ago the first 4K 144 Hz monitors became available with the ASUS PG27UQ and Acer X27. These $2,000 monitors no longer force gamers to pick between high-refresh rate or high resolution, since they support 3840x2160 and refresh rates up to 144 Hz. However, reviews of early-adopters report a noticeable degradation in image quality when these monitors are running at 144 Hz. Surprisingly refresh rates of 120 Hz and below look perfectly sharp.
     
    The underlying reason for that is the DisplayPort 1.4 interface, which provides 26 Gbits/s of bandwidth, just enough for full 4K at 120 Hz. So monitor vendors had to get creative to achieve the magic 144 Hz that they were shooting for. The solution comes from old television technology in form of chroma subsampling (YCbCr), which, in the case of these monitors, transmits the grayscale portion of the image at full resolution (3840x2160) and the color information at half the horizontal resolution (1920x2160). - Techpowerup


    Source


    I inputted the bandwidth of the display at 120Hz with 10 bit color depth at 3840x2160 and the calculated result is 35.83Gbps according to http://k.kramerav.com/support/bwcalculator.asp
    If the max bandwidth of DP1.4 is 26 Gbits/s then these settings are above the limits of DP1.4 despite what is being stated, but I clearly see the settings at 4K over DP1.4 being 120Hz from various sources although the color depth isnt specified....  The display would need to have a maximum refresh rate limit of 87Hz to stay within the max bandwidth of DP1.4 if it is 26Gbps/s.  Anyone want to point out where the error is in all this?


    HBR3 mode allows 32.4 Gbits/s.


    Ah well then the article for this thread must be stating 8bit color depth for 3840x2160 at 120Hz, because 10 bit color depth goes above 32.4Gbits/s.  I guess when using 10bit color depth for the upcoming 3840x1440 200Hz HDR-Gsync displays, I will have to limit the refresh rate to 160Hz over DP1.4.

    United We Stand...Six Feet Apart.
    Beware Vitamin A Palmitate found in products such as 2%, 1% or Skim Milk: government research
    Garlic is the Antichrist.
    #25
    Sajin
    EVGA Forum Moderator
    • Total Posts : 49168
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2010/06/07 21:11:51
    • Location: Texas, USA.
    • Status: online
    • Ribbons : 199
    Re: Looks like these shiny new 4K 144 Hz monitors aren't all that awesome... 2018/06/19 23:12:55 (permalink)
    Just ordered some new HBR3 cables... https://forums.evga.com/FindPost/2830579
    #26
    Jump to:
  • Back to Mobile